Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages (June 2003)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Msh2 Mismatch Repair Protein Localizes to Recombination Intermediates In Vivo  Elizabeth Evans, Neal Sugawara, James E Haber,
Advertisements

The Mre11 Complex Is Required for Repair of Hairpin-Capped Double-Strand Breaks and Prevention of Chromosome Rearrangements  Kirill S. Lobachev, Dmitry.
Cotranscriptionally Formed DNA:RNA Hybrids Mediate Transcription Elongation Impairment and Transcription-Associated Recombination  Pablo Huertas, Andrés.
Strand Invasion Structures in the Inverted Repeat of Candida albicans Mitochondrial DNA Reveal a Role for Homologous Recombination in Replication  Joachim.
Molecular Biology Restriction enzymes.
Volume 19, Issue 4, Pages (August 2005)
A Physical Assay for Sister Chromatid Cohesion In Vitro
A Postincision-Deficient TFIIH Causes Replication Fork Breakage and Uncovers Alternative Rad51- or Pol32-Mediated Restart Mechanisms  María Moriel-Carretero,
MEC1-Dependent Redistribution of the Sir3 Silencing Protein from Telomeres to DNA Double-Strand Breaks  Kevin D Mills, David A Sinclair, Leonard Guarente 
Brca1 Controls Homology-Directed DNA Repair
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 12, Pages (December 2016)
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Volume 120, Issue 5, Pages (March 2005)
Silencing in Yeast rDNA Chromatin
Austen R.D. Ganley, Satoru Ide, Kimiko Saka, Takehiko Kobayashi 
Volume 117, Issue 4, Pages (May 2004)
Volume 29, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
The Structure of Supercoiled Intermediates in DNA Replication
Volume 17, Issue 1, Pages (January 2005)
Volume 10, Issue 2, Pages (August 2002)
Volume 30, Issue 3, Pages (May 2008)
Ben B. Hopkins, Tanya T. Paull  Cell 
Volume 14, Issue 19, Pages (October 2004)
A Rad51 Presynaptic Filament Is Sufficient to Capture Nucleosomal Homology during Recombinational Repair of a DNA Double-Strand Break  Manisha Sinha,
Volume 39, Issue 3, Pages (August 2010)
TALEN-Induced Double-Strand Break Repair of CTG Trinucleotide Repeats
Hsin-Yen Wu, Hsuan-Chung Ho, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Jung-Ok Han, Sharri B Steen, David B Roth  Molecular Cell 
DNA Transposition by the RAG1 and RAG2 Proteins
Xinyang Zhao, P.Shannon Pendergrast, Nouria Hernandez  Molecular Cell 
Neal Sugawara, Xuan Wang, James E. Haber  Molecular Cell 
CDC5 and CKII Control Adaptation to the Yeast DNA Damage Checkpoint
Single Holliday Junctions Are Intermediates of Meiotic Recombination
Chromatin Remodeling In Vivo
Linear Mitochondrial Plasmids of F
Regulation of Telomere Elongation by the Cyclin-Dependent Kinase CDK1
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages (July 2010)
Branch Migrating Sister Chromatid Junctions Form at Replication Origins through Rad51/Rad52-Independent Mechanisms  Massimo Lopes, Cecilia Cotta-Ramusino,
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Austen R.D. Ganley, Satoru Ide, Kimiko Saka, Takehiko Kobayashi 
Marie Frank-Vaillant, Stéphane Marcand  Molecular Cell 
Induction of Large DNA Palindrome Formation in Yeast: Implications for Gene Amplification and Genome Stability in Eukaryotes  David K Butler, Lauren E.
Pierre-Henri L Gaillard, Eishi Noguchi, Paul Shanahan, Paul Russell 
Volume 137, Issue 2, Pages (April 2009)
Hansen Du, Haruhiko Ishii, Michael J. Pazin, Ranjan Sen  Molecular Cell 
Nucleosomes Unfold Completely at a Transcriptionally Active Promoter
Allyson M Holmes, James E Haber  Cell 
Targeted Stimulation of Meiotic Recombination
Telomere Dysfunction Increases Mutation Rate and Genomic Instability
Crossover Homeostasis in Yeast Meiosis
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages (February 2012)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Cell 
Alessandro Bianchi, Simona Negrini, David Shore  Molecular Cell 
Excision of the Drosophila Mariner Transposon Mos1
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2002)
Volume 1, Issue 2, Pages (January 1998)
Scott J Diede, Daniel E Gottschling  Current Biology 
Identification and Characterization of a Mutation, in the Human UDP-Galactose-4- Epimerase Gene, Associated with Generalized Epimerase-Deficiency Galactosemia 
Hsin-Yen Wu, Sean M. Burgess  Current Biology 
Simon W.-L Chan, Elizabeth H Blackburn  Molecular Cell 
Zhu Zhu, Woo-Hyun Chung, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee, Grzegorz Ira 
Huan Chen, Michael Lisby, Lorraine S. Symington  Molecular Cell 
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (March 2015)
Increased Recombination Intermediates and Homologous Integration Hot Spots at DNA Replication Origins  Mónica Segurado, Marı́a Gómez, Francisco Antequera 
Meiotic DNA Breaks at the S. pombe Recombination Hot Spot M26
Volume 1, Issue 4, Pages (March 1998)
Volume 7, Issue 1, Pages (January 2001)
Xiaorong Wang, Peter Baumann  Molecular Cell 
Presentation transcript:

Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1661-1671 (June 2003) Equal Sister Chromatid Exchange Is a Major Mechanism of Double-Strand Break Repair in Yeast  Sergio González-Barrera, Felipe Cortés-Ledesma, Ralf E Wellinger, Andrés Aguilera  Molecular Cell  Volume 11, Issue 6, Pages 1661-1671 (June 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7

Figure 1 Physical Analysis of HO-Induced DSB Repair (A) Monocopy plasmid pRS316-TINV including the recombination substrate TINV. Fragments generated by HO cleavage and XhoI-SpeI digestion are indicated with their corresponding sizes in kb. (B) Kinetics of HO induction and DSB repair. Yeast DNA was isolated from cells grown on either SC-2% glucose (Glu) or after different times in SC-2% galactose medium (Gal), doubly digested with XhoI and SpeI, separated by gel electrophoresis, and analyzed by Southern blotting. The 32P-labeled probe for detecting the LEU2 gene (0.6 kb ClaI-EcoRV fragment) is depicted in Figure 2. Quantification of bands resulting from HO cleavage (HO-X and HO-S, closed symbols) and recombination intermediates (REC 2.9 and 4.7, open symbols) is relative to the total plasmid DNA. Note that the low signal intensity of the HO-X band might have interfered with the correct quantification of this band. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 2 Scheme of Putative Recombination Events Initiated by a HO-Induced DSB in Plasmid pRS316-TINV Inversions could occur by intrachromatid break-induced replication (BIR; left) or by unequal sister chromatid exchange (SCE; middle). Whether occurring by reciprocal exchange or BIR, unequal SCE would lead to head-to-head dimers (HHDs) and to 2.9 and 4.7 kb fragments when digested with SpeI and XhoI, whereas equal SCE (right) would lead to head-to-tail dimers (HTDs) and to 3.8 kb SpeI-XhoI fragments. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 3 PCR Analyses of TINV Recombination Intermediates and Products (A) Scheme of the TINV inverted repeat region in the parental and inverted configuration and the 2.9 kb SpeI band of the recombination intermediate. Primers (arrows a, b, c, and d) and expected PCR products (gray lines) are shown. (B) PCR analysis of genomic DNA isolated from yeast cells grown for 12 hr in 2% galactose. PCR was performed with different primer combinations (see [A]). Band sizes of marker DNA (GIBCO-BRL, 1 kb-plus ladder) are indicated. The incapacity to detect a PCR product with primers a and c at time 0 indicates that all inversions detected were DSB induced. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 4 Southern Analysis of Undigested pRS316-TINV and pCM189-leu2HOr and In-Gel Digested pRS316-TINV (A) Diagram of the different type of monomers and dimers expected after induction of HO cleavage in pRS316-TINV. Fragments generated by HO cleavage and XhoI digestion are indicated with their corresponding sizes in kb. (B) Kinetics of HO-mediated cleavage and multimer formation in 2% galactose in plasmid pRS316-TINV. Total DNA was digested with BglII (BglII restriction sites are not present in pRS316-TINV) and separated by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel. “X” depicts two bands that are barely distinguishable. Since the upper of the two bands was present before HO-induction, only the lower was considered to consist of multimers (tetramers, see text for explanation). Note that linear dimers migrate together with relaxed monomers. D and X band values were normalized with respect to total plasmid DNA. (C) 2D agarose gel analyses of pRS316-TINV dimer formation. DNA isolated from cells grown for 24 hr in SC-2% glucose (no HO-induction) or SC-2% galactose (HO-induction) was separated by size in a 0.8% agarose gel. After EtBr staining, the gel slice of interest was cut out and incubated without (−XhoI) or with (+XhoI) restriction enzyme. After electrophoresis of the cleavage products in the second dimension gel, Southern blot analysis was performed with a 0.6 kb ClaI-EcoRV LEU2 probe. Black arrows mark the DNA fragments resulting from cleavage of dimers (see [A]). The fraction of plasmids that remained uncut as a consequence of partial in-gel digestion is observed as either relaxed or supercoiled molecules. A star identifies an unspecific signal of the membrane. For technical reasons the nondigested (−XhoI) slow migrating plasmid multimers were cut off the gel prior to Southern blot. (D) Kinetics of HO-mediated DSBs and dimer formation in plasmid pCM189-leu2HOr after HO activation in SC-2% galactose. DNA was digested with HaeI (HaeI restriction sites are not present in pCM189-leu2HOr). Other details as in (B). Relaxed dimers (rD), relaxed monomers (rM), supercoiled dimers (scD), linear monomers (lM), supercoiled monomers (scM), and multimers (X) are indicated. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 5 Physical Analysis of HO-Induced SCE in rad51Δ and rad59Δ Mutants (A) Scheme of plasmid pRS314-TU3 and structure of the expected plasmid dimer generated by unequal SCE. Bands expected by SpeI-XhoI digestion are shown with their corresponding sizes in kb. (B) Kinetics of HO-induced recombination as determined by Southern analysis. Quantification of the HO-induced DSB (HO-S 3.5 kb, closed symbols) and the 4.0 kb recombination product (REC 4.0 kb, open symbols). Asterisks indicate unspecific hybridization. The 2.2 kb band results from cross-hybridization with the endogenous leu2ΔSFA1. For details see Figure 1. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 6 Kinetics of HO Induction and DSB Repair in an mre11Δ Strain Using Plasmid pRS316-TINV Wild-type data are taken from Figure 1. Other details as in Figure 1. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)

Figure 7 Genetic Analysis of Leu+ Inversions (A) Frequency of HO-induced Leu+ recombinants and percentage of inversions in wild-type, rad51Δ, rad59Δ, rad51Δrad59Δ, and rad52Δ cells. HO-induced Leu+ frequency values are the median value obtained from 3–4 independent recombination tests (bottom numbers). The percentage of noncrossovers (dashed) and inversions (white) was determined from 42–84 independent Leu+ recombinants in each strain analyzed. (B) PCR and Southern analyses of 20 independent HO-induced Leu+ recombinants. PCR was performed using a mix of three primers (a, b, and c). The 2.16 and 1.95 kb fragments correspond to the parental and inverted configurations as shown in Figure 3A. For the Southern analysis, total yeast DNA was digested with SspI. The 2.03 and 3.67 kb fragments correspond to the parental configuration, whereas the 1.47 and 4.23 kb bands correspond to the inverted configuration. A 1.2 kb ClaI-SspI LEU2 internal fragment was used as a probe. In all cases the bands obtained coincided with the expected pattern of either inversions or noninversions according to the PCR analysis. In few cases, the presence of both parental and inverted configuration could be detected, indicating the presence of two different plasmids. The 1.6 kb and 2.0 kb marker bands (L) are shown. Molecular Cell 2003 11, 1661-1671DOI: (10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00183-7)