New safeguarding children arrangements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Roles and responsibilities of elected members and senior officers in local safeguarding services Cllr Shireen Ritchie Cabinet Member for Family and Childrens.
Advertisements

Representing Central Government in the South East Monday, 27 April 2015 Vivien Lines DCSF Safeguarding Adviser VCS Safeguarding Seminar 17 December 2009.
Safeguarding children in Essex- making a difference together
The role of the NYSCB. a)to coordinate what is done by each person or body represented on the Board for the purposes of safeguarding and promoting the.
Review of CSE Services within Sheffield: November 2014
Disability and special educational needs: local area responsibilities under the Children and Families Act, 2014 Charlie Henry HMI National lead for disability.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
1 Every Child Matters National and Local Perspectives Rolle College 29 th June 2007 Geoff Tew Devon CPD Adviser.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Cambridgeshire Local Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) and Schools in Cambridgeshire Josie Collier – LSCB Business Manager Sally.
LSCB EFFECTIVENESS WORKSHOP
Halton Children’s Trust – Halton Safeguarding Children Board Joint Frontline Event 2014 Select Security Stadium May 1 st 2014.
Inspection of Safeguarding and Looked After Children 23 March 2012.
Children’s Trust Network 19 October 2011 Developments in Safeguarding Anthony May Corporate Director for Children, Families and Cultural Services.
Joint Area Review Overview. What is a JAR? Q. What is a Joint Area Review (JAR)? A. A JAR provides a comprehensive report on the outcomes for children.
L E A R N I N G Draft SEND Legislation Jane Marriott, Psychology and Inclusion Service Manager and Pathfinder Lead Medway Council Vulnerable Children Partnership.
Series 3: Best Practice in Joint Commissioning Implementing the SEND Reforms Produced in collaboration with: Contact a Family Council for Disabled Children.
Sunderland City Council : Support and Aspiration Children and Families Bill Implementing the Reforms for Special Educational Needs and Disability.
Safeguarding peer review 18 th – 22nd January 2010 Northumberland county council.
November 2015 Common weaknesses in local authorities judged inadequate under the single inspection framework – a summary.
Sandwell Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report 2015 Presentation to Council January 12 th 2016 John Harris – Independent Chair.
Birmingham Early Help and Safeguarding Partnership Implementation of Early Help Strategy and Partnership systems.
Buckinghamshire County Council OFSTED – Challenges and Opportunities Chris M Williams Chief Executive Buckinghamshire County Council CCN Conference 16.
… because safeguarding children is everyone’s responsibility Enfield Safeguarding Children Board (ESCB) Annual Report 2014/15 Geraldine Gavin – ESCB Independent.
The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) & Lead Professional (LP)
Preparing for the Safeguarding and looked after children inspection Tony Morrissey Head of Safeguarding Inspection & Audit Directorate for Children & Young.
NHS Milton Keynes CCG Constitution This document is not a legal document and is not to be used as a replacement for the full version of the NHS Milton.
Powered down?. Every Child Matters: Children and young people have told us that 5 outcomes are key to well-being in childhood and later life – Being healthy,
Child safe guarding Child protection in your organisation.
The New Inspection Framework The Multi agency arrangements for protecting children The multi-agency arrangements for the protection of children The multi-agency.
Safeguarding Link Governors Forum
Welcome-Alex Walters-Independent Chair-Swindon LSCB
The role of the NYSCB.
Wirral Safeguarding Children Board
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
Herefordshire Safeguarding Children Board & hvoss – Working Together
Children and Families Bill SEND provision: how we work together
Cardiff Partnership Board
Wirral Safeguarding Children Board
Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning
Secondment & Strategic review of care home sector update Rosamunde Willis-Read CQC/NCC 11 September 2014 Nottinghamshire County Council.
Wirral Safeguarding Children Board
3-MINUTE READ WORKING TOGETHER TO SAFEGUARD CHILDREN.
DSCB Annual Report Children’s version
1 November 2017 Serious Case Reviews
Working Together to Safeguard Children 2018 Summary of Changes
Wirral Safeguarding Children Board
Role & Responsibilities: Surrey Safeguarding Children Board (SSCB)
Information for the JPPB
Developing an integrated approach to identifying and assessing Carer health and wellbeing ADASS Yorkshire and The Humber Carers Leads Officers Group, 7.
Cardiff Partnership Board
Information for the JPPB
Doncaster Safeguarding Children Board Annual Report
Brighton & Hove Safeguarding Children Board (LSCB) Annual Report
Laura Greason Mark Garner Policy & Practice Manager Project Manager
Mission to MARS – taking children’s services to outstanding and beyond
Worcestershire Joint Services Review
Strategy
Centre of Excellence For Disabled Children and Families in York
Children’s MARS Local Arrangements Update
An Integrated Decision Making Process for Children with Complex Needs
Redesigning our safeguarding system
Safeguarding Early Adopters
Wirral Safeguarding Children Partnership New Multi-agency Arrangements
Consent, throughout the Early Help Journey
The Future of Child Safeguarding Arrangements
Thanks to the Wirral LSCB for permission to adapt their PowerPoint
Better Together Forum 9th April 2019
A new partnership to safeguard children. Why were we required to change? Wood review report (2016) findings resulted in the introduction of statutory.
Presentation transcript:

New safeguarding children arrangements Steve Baumber Service Manager Partnerships & Planning Nottinghamshire County Council

Nottinghamshire LSCB Typical LSCB structure 35+ members 5 x NHS Trusts, 2 x NHS England regional teams, 6 x Clinical Commissioning Groups, 1 local authority, 7 x District/Borough Councils, regional NPS, regional CRC, 1 police service, 350 schools, CAFCASS, voluntary sector…. 2700 MASH enquiries per quarter 850 children subject to a child protection plan 800+ Looked after children LSCB graded ‘Good’ at last Ofsted inspection

Options development Safeguarding partners meeting + NSCB Ind. Chair (advisor) 7th November 2017 Safeguarding arrangements options – local authority Child death review options - CCGs Options Draft WT2018 & Children & Social Work Act 2017 Comparison of LSCB functions against new safeguarding arrangements Assessment of LSCB effectiveness – strengths and weaknesses Reference to ‘early adopters’ section on AILC website Four options developed Safeguarding partners meeting + NSCB Ind. Chair (advisor) 5th February 2018 – agreed option in principle Specific meeting of safeguarding partners to consider funding

Assessment of LSCB Strengths Weaknesses Well attended Board with strong commitment from partners Transparent case review process Effective multi-agency audit programme Comprehensive training programme covering wide range of issues and seminar/workshop/e- learning options Shared procedures with Nottingham City NSCB Executive decision making limited due to the level of representation from agencies Coordination of improvement activity Large Board with representation at differing levels which limits discussion and decision making effectiveness Overlap between work of Executive and Board Perception of being skewed towards local authority – in terms of activity and assessment of performance Demand on partner resources to attend meetings (including other Boards, sub groups etc.) Accountability Retain and build on what was working well but take the opportunity to address the weakness with LSCBs highlighted by Wood

Consultation & development of model Consultation with LSCB & sub group members Who’s decision is it? A balancing act.. Describing the model – tendency to try and map existing groups onto new model Perception of difference in status – safeguarding partners/relevant agencies Health providers Safeguarding partners meeting 17th August 2018 – WT 2018 published high level implementation plan agreed Relevant agencies agreed Geographic area agreed – shared groups with Nottingham City Confirmation of lead representatives & delegation of functions Further consultation with LSCB led by safeguarding partners Working group to draft arrangements ‘How can you contribute to the new arrangements’ workshop Communication – never enough

Nottinghamshire Safeguarding Children Partnership

What do we hope to achieve? Vision and values Our vision ‘that children and young people in Nottinghamshire grow up in a safe and stable environment and are supported to lead healthy, happy and fulfilling lives’.   The Nottinghamshire Safeguarding Children Partnership will: Work effectively as a partnership to protect children from harm. Build working relationships between partners which support constructive challenge. Be transparent and self-critical. Learn from local and national safeguarding practice and improve the way children are safeguarded. Listen and respond to children and young people and adult victims and survivors of child abuse to guide how services are delivered. Ensure services for children and families in Nottinghamshire support children and young people to stay healthy and happy. Ensure services for children and families in Nottinghamshire support parents and carers to provide the best possible care for their children. Clear accountability Faster response to serious child safeguarding cases Improved engagement with lead safeguarding practitioners Better coordination of improvement activities Streamlined structure

Implementing the new safeguarding arrangements Funding – retain same formula for 2019/20 and review in summer 2019 Safeguarding partners meeting – 5th Sign off December 2018 New safeguarding arrangements published under the auspices of the Nottinghamshire Safeguarding Children Partnership Implementation period – 1st January – 31st March 2019 One SCR remaining – due to be published imminently Groups meeting and taking on new responsibilities SLG – best place for CDOP to provide assurance to

Early indications of benefits Earlier engagement and greater involvement of lead representatives from safeguarding partners Opportunities to re-think why we do things and whether we can do them any better Much greater involvement with schools Partnership not restricted by the need to manage the size of the Board Scrutiny, Coordination and Development Rapid reviews - OK so far Flexibility – further refinement as we learn from our experience and from other areas