- Measurement of traffic volume -

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FileCatalyst Performance Presentation.
Advertisements

Progress Report from ET-CTS (Expert Team on WIS-GTS Communication Techniques and Structure) Doc. 4.3 (1) Presentation version ICG-WIS-6 (Seoul, February.
Future WMO Information System (FWIS) Hiroyuki Ichijo (Japan Meteorological Agency) WMO/WSIS Session on Reducing Natural Disaster Risk through Technical.
1 1 Japan Meteorological AgencyET-WISC-3, EUMETSAT Germany, Jun.2008 JMA’s Status Report related to WIS Toshikazu NISHIO JMA ET-WISC-III Jun.
Microsoft ® Exchange Server 2010 with Service Pack 1 Infrastructure Planning and Design Published: December 2010 Updated: July 2011.
Wenjing Wu Andrej Filipčič David Cameron Eric Lancon Claire Adam Bourdarios & others.
Status of the Global Telecommunication System connected with RTH Tokyo Sixth Meeting on Asia-Pacific Satellite Data Exchange and Utilization (APSDEU-6)
Configuring SQL Server for a successful SharePoint Server Deployment Haaron Gonzalez Solution Architect & Consultant Microsoft MVP SharePoint Server
1 Towards Full GISC Compliance for IMD in
1 Eiji (aka Eizi) TOYODA Japan Meteorological Agency Cg-XVI May 2011, Geneva WMO Information System at Japan Meteorological Agency.
GISC Brasilia status report Doc25 (AI 2)
Status of GISC Tokyo GISC Tokyo / JMA.
EUMETSAT Perspectives on Inter GISC Communication (ET-CTS 2014 Doc 19)
2nd GEO Data Providers workshop (20-21 April 2017, Florence, Italy)
A proposed Security Incident Management Process for WMO Member States
WIS ET-CTS Components ET-CTS Toulouse ET-CTS Toulouse
TT-GISC – Brasilia – October 2015 Rémy Giraud (Météo-France)
GISC Exeter Status Report
GISC Seoul Status TT-GISC, Melbourne April 2016
Update on the WIS Monitoring project
How to keep WIS performance healthy
Status report of GISC Beijing
GISC Status WIS Portal based on a commercial solution
FileCatalyst Performance
ICG-WIGOS 6 WIS Status Report Agenda Item 6.1 David Thomas
Requirement for Full Global Operation on WIS Survey on the WIS Doc
DCPC Development in the Hong Kong Observatory
AR report to ADC 14 May 2007 Presented by Hiroyuki Ichijo (JMA)
ET-CTS 2016 ASECNA, Dakar. Senegal Date: April 2016
Status Report of GISC Beijing
Progress Report on WIS Implementation, Hong Kong Observatory, Hong Kong, China Submitted by: S.T. CHAN (Hong Kong, China) (Doc 12) Expert team on WIS centres.
Outcome of the ET-CTS Meeting (Toulouse, May 2008)
WIS data-communication structure Outcome of study by ET-CTS (Expert Team on WIS-GTS Communication Techniques and Structure) Please consider our Earth.
ET-CTS 2016 ASECNA, Dakar. Senegal Date: April 2016
Expert Team on WIS Centres Task Team on GISCs
Status Report of GISC Tokyo
Utilization of Azure CDN for the large file distribution
WMO IT Security Incident Process
Status of the WMO WIS Implementation at NOAA/NWS October 2015
Bandwidth Measurements for VMs in Cloud
Expert Team - Cache in and through the cloud
ET-CTS - Cache in and through the cloud Background information
GISC Washington Status Submitted by: Robert BUNGE (USA) (Doc 20)
GISC Moscow status report Submitted by: Sergey BELOV (Russia) (Doc 17)
Information Technology Ms. Abeer Helwa
WIS Strategy – WIS 2.0 Submitted by: Matteo Dell’Acqua(CBS) (Doc 5b)
Future Requirements of WIS Centres
Status Report of RTH Tokyo
Operational Status of GIS Offenbach
ET-CTS - Cache in and through the cloud
Yasutaka Hokase (JMA) TT-GISC 2015, Brasilia
Item 5(2)/1 - WIS 2.0 implementation plan
GISC Tokyo Cloud Pilot Project
Toward WIS2.0 Shigeharu NISHIKAWA Japan Meteorological Agency
Status Reprot GISC SEOUL
JCOMM Submitted by: TT-MOWIS (Doc 03b)
Audit Criteria Mark Francis ET-WISC/TT-DC Agenda item 10
Report from Task Team on GISC (TT-GISC)
Status report of GISC CASABLANCA
GISC Offenbach – Status Report 02/2014 (Doc 19)
GISC Offenbach Kai Wirt Task Team GISC TT-GISC2018
Office 365 Performance Management
Status report of GISC Beijing
WIS Project Office WMO Managing WIS WIS Project Office WMO
Status report of GISC Beijing
GISC New Delhi Status Dr. S. L. Singh
The next step of development
RTH Exeter Status Report – 2014 (Doc 22)
GISC Beijing Status Report
GISC Exeter Status Report
Presentation transcript:

- Measurement of traffic volume - Cache in the cloud - Measurement of traffic volume - Shuichi Ikeda Agenda item 3.1.9 Task Team on Evolution of WIS TT-eWIS2017 21-23 November 2017, Geneva

Cache in the cloud project RMDCN (WIS Core Network) INTERNET Data center (Cloud) Current Full mesh Sync among 15 GISCs One possible solution Centralization using cloud technology * A solution using a cloud based approach was presented at TT-GISC and ET-CTS in 2014. * Then it was agreed to run a pilot to access whether this option was viable or not in 2015.

Cache in the cloud project Cloud SV (Interoute) GISC Tokyo FTP/SFTP client Internet cloud1.teganet.eu 100Mbps Best Effort GISC8 GISC9 GISC10 GISC11 GISC12 GISC13 GISC1 GISC2 GISC3 GISC4 GISC5 GISC6 GISC14 GISC7

Requirement of cache in the cloud Centralization of global distributed data Performance Centralization global data is to be transmitted end to end within two minutes (if priority data is included) Data flow Inputs: Global information Outputs: Cached global information Note Global information is required to be all GISCs within 15 minutes Requirement : See Tech-Spec 3 of Manual on the WIS

Target architecture (initial stage) Condition: SLA: Best Effort Storage: 200 GB Number of users: 15 users (GISCs) CDN Service: May be needed to meet 20 Mb/s or more Throughput: 20 Mb/s (not contractual) between a GISC and the cloud e.g. to get 4 GB (e.g. NWP) within 30 minutes, minimum actual speed must be 20Mb/s or more (see below) If actual speed of each connection is 20Mb/s, the deliver time (end-to-end) will be 120 minutes DCPC-A NWP GISC-A 20Mb/s 4GB/30 min GISC-B DCPC-B NC-B Cache End-to-end : 120 minutes

TEST case of GISC Tokyo Our test server is Uploading JMA’s data (Observation, NWP Products, etc.) and GISC Tokyo’s Area of responsibility’s data as WMO FTP file format by using FTP (LFTP tool). Downloading data one by one from Cloud server (cloud1.teganet.eu) by using SFTP (LFTP tool) and removing data after downloaded it from directory of GISC Tokyo on the cloud. FTP PUT SFTP GET Cloud GISC Tokyo

Uploading data from Tokyo to Cloud Average uploading daily data Number of Bulletin: 43,115 Number of File data: 69 (Satellite) Daily data volume: 219 Mbytes Bulletin WMO FTP format FTP PUT Cloud Tokyo

Downloading data from cloud to Tokyo Average downloading daily data Number of Bulletin: 285,443 Number of File data: 50 (Satellite) Daily data volume: 4.5 GBytes Bulletin File format SFTP GET Cloud Tokyo

Comparing time for parallel download Test case: In case of 1 SFTP session Cloud Tokyo In case of 3 SFTP sessions Cloud Tokyo In case of 6 SFTP sessions Cloud Tokyo Downloading time is total time to download for an hour's data.

Total downloading time per hour Test case   Number of data in an hour Data Volume in an hour Total Download Time Download speeds SFTP 1 session Ave. 15020 213 MB 5 h 13 min 1.25 sec/1 file MIN 11665 70 MB 4 h 0 min 1.22 sec/1 file MAX 22941 1646 MB 8 h 48 min 1.38 sec/1 file SFTP 3 sessions 15029 187 MB 2 h 0 min 0.68 sec/1 file 11386 89 MB 2 h 9 min 0.67 sec/1 file 22477 1642 MB 4 h 48 min 0.77 sec/1 file SFTP 6 sessions 14976 181 MB 2 h 36 min 0.62 sec/1 file 10538 65 MB 1 h 30 min 0.47 sec/1 file 22963 5 h 54 min 0.92 sec/1 file Downloading time is total time to download for an hour's data.

Consideration (1) About parallel sessions SFTP 3 sessions are effectively SFTP 1 session is not effectively If we can reduce number of files, downloading time will be reducing. To use WMO FTP procedure (accumulating message) To pack data (e.g. ZIP, bz7)

Consideration (2) There is a “Round-Trip-Time issue” in the TCP/IP’s world In theory, throughput of the "Round Trip Time (RTT) 222ms” is 2.31 Mbps. In this situation, we might not get a good performance of high speed even though the number of files reduced. And I’ve tried calculating expected downloading time in case of RTT 222ms when we can handle WMO FTP procedures. Cloud Tokyo RTT: 222ms

Summary Exchanging data using cloud will be useful It’s easy to access data, no full mesh sync Concerns Many files on cache in the cloud Throughput (TCP/IP round trip time issue) In preparation for WIS 2.0 How to achieve requirement of WIS 2.0 strategy, seamless access to meteorological information using cloud. How to handle large volume data.

Thank you Merci