Monitoring Status Patriq Fagerstedt

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ERA-LEARN Supporting the ERA-NET Learning Platform by creating a toolbox for the ERA-NET community Roland Brandenburg, FFG.
Advertisements

Technical skills and competences
The EU I2010 benchmarking framework and its implementation GENEVE 29 June 2008.
What is an M and E Plan?. Organizing the Work of M and E An M and E System -- the 12 components as a whole – Sets out broad vision at national level An.
© Grant Thornton UK LLP. All rights reserved. Review of Partnership Working: Follow Up Review Vale of Glamorgan Council Final Report- November 2009.
MODULE 8: PROJECT TRACKING AND EVALUATION
High level expert meeting to develop the Near East Regional Action Plan to Implement the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.
Risk Management Assessment: The Canadian Banking System Nawal K Roy Vice President Risk Management Specialist Nawal K Roy Vice President Risk Management.
RSM McGladrey, Inc. is a member firm of RSM International – an affiliation of separate and independent legal entities. Operational Risk Management Framework.
Operational Risk Management Framework Control Self Assessment
Strategic Environmental Assessment and environmental issues in programme evaluation Ivana Capozza Italian Evaluation Units Open Days Roma, July 5, 2006.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Cultural Heritage and Global Change: a new challenge for Europe Working for strengthening the European Research Area Towards Joint Programming in Research.
LOUGHBOROUGHCOLLEGE Business Support Self Assessment
New Guidelines for the National Strategy for the Development of Statistics (NSDS) Eric Rancourt Statistics Canada (Chair of PARIS21 NSDS Guidelines Review.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
QUICK OVERVIEW - REDUCING REOFFENDING EVALUATION PACK INTRODUCTION TO A 4 STEP EVALUATION APPROACH.
Christiana Noestlinger & Bea Vuylsteke, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium This work is part of the Joint Action on Improving Quality in HIV Prevention.
1 PRODUCTION OF A MANUAL FOR STATISTICS ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION IN HOUSEHOLDS MESH PROJECT 3 rd Working Meeting Vienna, 4 rd October 2012 WP3: Draft Manual.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
The Evaluation of Publicly Funded Research Berlin, 26/27 September 2005 Evaluation for a changing research base Paul Hubbard Head of Research Policy, HEFCE,
Ministry of the Environment and Territory Directorate for Development and Environmental Research Ministry of Economy and Finance Department for Development.
Nutrition Surveillance in the ASEAN: A Workshop-Conference February 2015 Makati City, Philippines Summary of Agreements 1.
Federal Department of Economic Affairs, Education and Research EAER Federal Office for Agriculture FOAG WP5 Impact assessment and evaluation of ERA-NET.
Regional Policy Veronica Gaffey Evaluation Unit DG Regional Policy International Monitoring Conference Budapest 11 th November 2011 Budapest 26 th September2013.
Work Package 6 L2C Kick-off meeting Fontainebleau, March 7th 2006.
Antonio Mocci Mestre, January 17, 2011 Lead partner: Governance of the project monitoring, evaluation and dissemination systems.
REPORT OF THE TASK FORCE ON IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF FELLOWSHIPS IN THE UN SYSTEM AND AGENCIES Dr Alexandre Goubarev, WHO/Impact Assessment Taskforce Chair.
Part-financed by the European Union Investments in projects, strategic projects and extension stage Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Applicant Seminar,
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
Future outlook and next steps for ESPON The ESPON 2013 Programme OPEN DAYS Bruxelles, 10 October 2007.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Bevan Commission: reaffirming the founding principles.
Rannís Erasmus+ Data collection, analysis & impact studies.
4/16/2010 Regional Planning Group Meeting Long-Term Planning Study of the ERCOT Interconnection Warren Lasher Manager, System Assessment.
Proposal for WORK PROGRAMME GA Meeting, Vienna 25 March 2015 National Institute of Health Carlos III – ISCIII 1.
WP6 – Monitoring and Evaluation 17th November 2014 Rome.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation Giovanni Rum, Chao Xing GEO Secretariat GEO Work Programme Symposium Geneva, 2-4 May 2016.
Reporting, Monitoring and Evaluation
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
Focused Midterm Report
Academic Professional Promotion Implementation Team
Funded by the Erasmus+ Programme EPP JO-EPPKA2-CBHE-JP Lina Tsakalou
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
Business Environment
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Call topic identification for 2019 call
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
The PEFA Program – roll-out, impact and future focus
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Evaluation Activities
GPC WG and GPC meeting 5th of June “Future of Joint Programming”
Monitoring & evaluation in
JPIAMR Joint Research Calls – Update and Future Calls
Draft Methodology for impact analysis of ESS.VIP Projects
Culture Statistics: what next?
Expert Evaluation Network
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit DG EMPL Ines Hartwig
SRIA Roadmap Jonathan Pearce
ESF monitoring and evaluation in Draft guidance
Working Group Governance
JPIAMR Core Call Group activities (item 10.2)
Laura Marin JPIAMR Head of Secretariat Swedish Research Council
ERANET cofund call 2020 Laura Plant
- Kick-off meeting - ERANET Cofund BlueBio WP4 (Leader: AEI)
Presentation transcript:

Monitoring Status Patriq Fagerstedt Management Board Meeting, 2-3 April 2019, Basel Monitoring Status Patriq Fagerstedt

STATUS ON JPIAMR PROJECT MONITORING Timeline for monitoring of JPIAMR supported Transnational Research Projects Mid-term monitoring 1.5 years after the project starts First ex-post report 2 months after the project ends Second ex-post follow-up 3 years after the project ends Call year and name Report status Projects funded Reports received 2014 - Innovaresistance Final term 7 3 2015 – Antimicrobial Resistance through the JPIAMR Mid-term 2 2016 – Transmission Dynamics 19 4 Comprehensive analyses by JPIAMR secretariat Report and analyses shared with JCS and CSG Mid-term monitoring Detailed analyses by JPIAMR secretariat on research outputs Summarised report shared with SAB, JCS and CSG SAB performs qualitative assessment and provides a commentary First ex-post monitoring Additional analyses by JPIAMR secretariat on research outputs Summarised report shared with SAB and CSG Second

INFORMATION ON UPCOMING EVALUATION OF JPIAMR (by EC and GPC also) Own framework for monitoring and self-evaluation. Sets of indicators (both qualitative and quantitative) identified. Self-evaluation of JPIAMR is due. Task force of JPIs The 10 JPIs also established a Task Force (TF) on Monitoring and Evaluation of the JPIs with an aim to define a framework of common dimensions and indicators relevant and applicable for all the JPIs. For harmonisation of the emerging monitoring and evaluation efforts among the JPIs. TF identified a small set of important dimensions of JPIs with their associated indicators that is robust and is supported by all JPIs as a basis for the assessment of the JPIs as a whole. EC and GPC One of the main objectives of GPC is to create a report by 2020 focusing on the impact of JP participation at national level. This would be based in particular on a qualitative assessment from national delegations. This report should also provide perspectives for the post-2020 period to the EC.

Future actions: Process for self-evaluation of JPIAMR will be initiated soon and the analyses will be presented in the next Management Board Meeting in autumn, 2019. The analysis will support the update of the JPIAMR Strategic Plan.