UECA PD Fest Sydney Challenging Games that Challenge Your LEARNERs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
By Dorothy Kropf, M.A.. 1. CIP or Cognitive Information Processing 2. Schema Theory 3. Piaget’s Cognitive Theory 4. Situated Cognition.
Advertisements

COGNITIVE SCIENCE & PLTL HOPE J. HARTMAN, PH.D. PLTL INSTITUTE CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK JULY 11, 2012.
Dance Conference 2014 Nisla A. Elli. Education Theorist techniques Lev Vygotsky  In this presentation, I will be posing as the educational theorist Lev.
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else! I can get to the right answer but I don’t understand well enough to explain it yet. I understand.
Why do we teach ???. Why teach? To Enthuse Students Reasons.
Constructivism Constructivism — particularly in its "social" forms — suggests that the learner is much more actively involved in a joint enterprise with.
The Learning Cycle Lesson
Aligning Feedback to Learning Outcomes Dawn Joyce & Ewan Ingleby, Teesside University.
Theories of Learning and ICT October 2005 [Dimension 2.4]
Lev Vygotsky’s Social Development Theory
What would I tell the staff? Literacy PD with Ken Kilpin Thursday 22/08/2013.
Professional Education Scott Walter, M.L.S., Ph.D. Associate University Librarian for Services, and Associate Dean of Libraries University of Illinois.
Stages of Second Language Acquisition
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else! I can get to the right answer but I don’t understand well enough to explain it yet. I understand.
Teaching, learning and psychology. We’ll look at: The developmental milestones that children go through Recognition of difficulties and delay (learning.
Theories of learning and pedagogy 1 Introductions Overview of theoretical perspectives Theorists Pedagogical approaches Small group activity Wrap-up Session.
Unit 9: Developmental Psychology
Andragogy and Online Learning Assignment #3 for Glen Gatin EL5006-8
Theoretical Framework for the Teaching Proposal
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
TRANSFER OF LEARNING INTRODUCTION TYPES OF TRANSFER
L EV V YGOTSKY Socialization Language Variety of Learners Gribbin- Week 2.
Lev Vygotsky: Social Development Theory Kyle Wesselman Thomas Stavely Matt Gordon Erin Benson ISTC 501.
NVHS is part of a national Partnerships funded project to increase student voice in schools across the Central Coast. WHY? Purpose of Project To develop.
Sarah Peterson Amy von Barnes Making “I Can” Statements Easy Supporting Learners – Week 3.
Teaching approaches that promote different forms of student learning CHEC/TALHE 3 August 2011.
Learning, Cognition and Memory EDC 312 Dr. Diane Kern Session 3.
Cognitive Structuring: Task- based performance assisting LinKai Jiang Teachers College, Columbia University.
Culturally Responsive Classroom Human Growth and Development Human Growth and Development Theories and Practice Theories and Practice Marie Dove EDU 515.
Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) Don Martin EPSY 6304 Cognition and Development UT-Brownsville Professor Garcia By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
Educational Psychology, 7 th edition Jeanne E. Ormrod © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. 1-1 Understanding research.
The Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD)
Reading To Learn 2008 READING TO LEARN In your school.
Pedagogy versus Andragogy Debate. Presented by Lynette Favors April 7, 2008.
EDN:204– Learning Process 30th August, 2010 B.Ed II(S) Sci Topics: Cognitive views of Learning.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
ID AND LEARNING THEORY Chapter 13
Facilitating Life-Long Learning Shelby County Schools ELL – PDA Session 6.
I did receive a call from my advisor. I know I do not have great English writing skills. I will be submitting my next assignment to the writing center.
Using Cognitive Development Psychology in the Classroom.
Unit 5 Seminar Cognitive Development Developmental Theories (Piaget and Vygotsky)
LEARNING THEORIES Learning Theory: To be able to summarise three broad learning theories [*Task: Association Map] Learning: ‘a relatively permanent change.
The importance of effective vocabulary teaching – Literacy.
Teaching the Growing Child Assessment One Hayley Fitzgerald EDU70004.
 Development dependent on a child’s interactions with their environment  children pass through 4 distinct stages of development  the stages progress.
The Constructivist Theory of Learning
The Dialectical Relationship between Prior and Present Learning: Mapping Vygotsky’s Activity Theory to the Prior Learning Portfolio Process Jessica Kindred,
My E-Learning activity
ED 260-Educational Psychology
Supporting the Academic Success of All Students:
Trial exam information
Designing Professional Development for Elementary School Teachers
Managing Student Centers in the Classroom
Memory.
”Through others we become ourselves”
Managing Student Centers in the Classroom
The Developing Person Through the Life Span
Paula L Smith Introduction
Constructivist Theory of Learning Piaget & Vygotsky’s Views
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
Introduction Week 1 Kang, Nam-Joon.
UECA PD Fest Adelaide Challenging Games that Challenge Your Students
Liliam, Meagan and Pazit
Group Work Digital Project February 7, 2016
Memory.
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
Constructivism Constructivism — particularly in its "social" forms — suggests that the learner is much more actively involved in a joint enterprise with.
I’m so confident - I could explain this to someone else!
Sociocultural Theory by Lev Vygotsky
Presentation transcript:

UECA PD Fest Sydney Challenging Games that Challenge Your LEARNERs Gus Wong Curriculum Coordinator Gus.Wong@monashcollege.edu.au

1. How the Learning and Teaching Strategy (LTS) is normally Practised Gus

1. How the Learning and Teaching Strategy (LTS) is normally Practised but

1. How the Learning and Teaching Strategy (LTS) is normally Practised In addition,

Revision activity a week after lessons on transition signals: 1. How the Learning and Teaching Strategy (LTS) is normally Practised Revision activity a week after lessons on transition signals: but/In addition, One word at a time Students explain the target word anyway they want Students operate in groups Rotation takes place within individual groups

2. Relevant Adult Learning Theories Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) (Hubball, Clarke & Poole, 2010) 3A (Traffic Light) Model (Nulty, 2016; Nulty, 2017) WPW Model (Knowles, Holton, & Swanson, 2014) Experiential Learning Theory (Kolb, Boyatzis, & Mainemelis, 1999) Social Constructivism (Piaget, & Inhelder, 1958; Searle, 1996; Vygotsky, 1978) Theory of Zone of Proximal Development (McLeod, 2012; Vygotsky, 1978) Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Implications Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Acquire-Assimilate-Apply Whole-Part-Whole Model What is the purpose of particular LTSs? Where do we place particular LTSs in our learning and teaching process? Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Acquire-Assimilate-Apply Whole-Part-Whole Model What is the purpose of particular LTSs? Where do we place particular LTSs in our learning and teaching process? Are our learners learning through ‘actively doing things’, with meaningful/strategic (micro/macro) repetition? Are our LTSs providing opportunities for learners to build knowledge, with others (teachers/peers)? Are we constantly stretching our learners’ ZPD? Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Acquire-Assimilate-Apply Whole-Part-Whole Model What is the purpose of particular LTSs? Where do we place particular LTSs in our learning and teaching process? Are our learners learning through ‘actively doing things’, with meaningful/strategic (micro/macro) repetition? Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Acquire-Assimilate-Apply Whole-Part-Whole Model What is the purpose of particular LTSs? Where do we place particular LTSs in our learning and teaching process? Are our learners learning through ‘actively doing things’, with meaningful/strategic (micro/macro) repetition? Are our LTSs providing opportunities for learners to build knowledge, with others (teachers/peers)?

3. How the LTS is Practised NOW yet

3. How the LTS is Practised NOW I love you. Yet

3. How the LTS is Practised NOW I love you. Yet, I can’t marry you.

3. How the LTS is Practised NOW Revision activity a week after lessons on transition signals: yet/ I love you. – Yet/ I love you. Yet, I can’t marry you. One word at a time  Simple clause(s)/Transition signal/Multiple clauses (Compound/Complex sentences) Students explain the target word anyway they want  Make use of metalanguage learnt (groups/s/v/o/pre/post-modifiers) Students operate in groups Rotation takes place within individual groups  Rotate between groups also

4. Data Analysis Comments “I don’t know how you did it but I just remember all these words we learnt in class. Even now, a year later…” “When we’re playing games, some groups kinda cheated by counting or spelling words. You’ve asked us to use the metalanguage you’ve taught us in class. That made it a lot harder.” “Very often we don’t know how to explain a difficult word, especially difficult words from academic word lists. You’ve asked us to use metalanguage. That made it easier.” Comments “I don’t know how you did it but I just remember all these words we learnt in class. Even now, a year later…” “When we’re playing games, some groups kinda cheated by counting or spelling words. You’ve asked us to use the metalanguage you’ve taught us in class. That made it a lot harder.” “Very often we don’t know how to explain a difficult word, especially difficult words from academic word lists. You’ve asked us to use metalanguage. That made it easier.” “We do it [play the same game] at least for a week and with many different classmates. We explain things shorter and shorter but we still understand each other.” Comments “I don’t know how you did it but I just remember all these words we learnt in class. Even now, a year later…” “When we’re playing games, some groups kinda cheated by counting or spelling words. You’ve asked us to use the metalanguage you’ve taught us in class. That made it a lot harder.” Comments “I don’t know how you did it but I just remember all these words we learnt in class. Even now, a year later…” Links to LTSs The intervention has helped acquire and retain knowledge and skills. Links to LTSs The intervention has helped acquire and retain knowledge and skills. Make use of knowledge to explain knowledge. Explicit effort in expanding learning through expanding students’ ZPD. Links to LTSs The intervention has helped acquire and retain knowledge and skills. Make use of knowledge to explain knowledge. Explicit effort in expanding learning through expanding students’ ZPD. Meaningful repetition. Strategic refinement of knowledge and skills. Constructing knowledge via a higher volume of social interaction.

https://www.youtube.com/wat ch?v=zVugmR_MQII 00:45-3:15 5. Other Examples Backs to the Board Catch Phrase https://www.youtube.com/wat ch?v=zVugmR_MQII 00:45-3:15 Two challenging words from the target text An animal/A person in the room Charade Implications Are our learning and teaching strategies (LTSs) guided by relevant adult learning theories? Are we contributing to SoTL? Acquire-Assimilate-Apply Whole-Part-Whole Model What is the purpose of particular LTSs? Where do we place particular LTSs in our learning and teaching process? Are our learners learning through ‘actively doing things’, with meaningful/strategic (micro/macro) repetition? Are our LTSs providing opportunities for learners to build knowledge, with others (teachers/peers)? Are we constantly stretching our learners’ ZPD?

References Hubball, H., Clarke, A., & Poole, G. (2010). Ten-year reflections on mentoring SoTL research in a research-intensive university. International Journal for Academic Development, 15(2), 117-129. Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602-611. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2392366 Knowles, M. S., Holton III, E. F., & Swanson, R. A. (2015). The adult learner: The definitive classic in adult education and human resource development. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.acu.edu.au/login?url=https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/acu/detail.action?docID=1883 897 Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., & Mainemelis, C. (1999). Experiential Learning Theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Stemberg, & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning and cognitive styles (pp. 227-248). Retrieved from https://books.google.com.hk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=rBuQAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Perspectives +on+cognitive,+learning,+and+thinking+styles.&ots=RxSKIftfCv&sig=lmhZwObZ_nissvXJYZg4H- GSY5s&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Perspectives%20on%20cognitive%2C%20learning%2C%20and% 20thinking%20styles.&f=false McLeod, S. (2012). Zone of proximal development [Website]. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books. Searle, J. (1996). The construction of social reality. New York, NY: Simon & Shuster. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.