Designing, Implementing, and Benefiting from a Collections Attribution Channel: the view from iDigBio and the ADBC Alex Thompson, Deborah L. Paul, Gil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Library behind the scene How does it work ? The Library behind the scenes 1 JINR / CERN Grid and advanced information systems 2012 Anne Gentil-Beccot.
Advertisements

Data citation from the perspective of a scholarly publisher Lyubomir Penev TDWG Data Citation Workshop, New Orleans, Oct 2011 ViBRANT.
IDENTIFIERS & THE DATA CITATION INDEX DISCOVERY, ACCESS, AND CITATION OF PUBLISHED RESEARCH DATA NIGEL ROBINSON 17 OCTOBER 2013.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Scholarship VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the.
Software Engineer Report What should contains the report?!
Institutional Perspective on Credit Systems for Research Data MacKenzie Smith Research Director, MIT Libraries.
Identifying research resources should be easy Anita Bandrowski, representing the RII team.
THE DATA CITATION INDEX AN INNOVATIVE SOLUTION TO EASE THE DISCOVERY, USE AND ATTRIBUTION OF RESEARCH DATA MEGAN FORCE 22 FEBRUARY 2014.
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY INFORMATION FACILITY Dr Vishwas Chavan Senior Programme Officer for DIGIT Data Citation Mechanism and.
Identifying research resources should be easy Anita Bandrowski, UCSD.
ICT PSP Infoday Brussels Call 2011 – Theme 2 Digital Content ICT-PSP Call Theme 2: Digital Content Federico Milani, Marc Röder Infso E6/eContent.
Preserving Digital Collections for Future Scholarship Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University
University of Florida Florida State University
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
Mr. Gopi Nair Defense Technical Information Center Briefing at Board on Research Data and Information (BRDI) Meeting September 24, 2009 Approved for Public.
Software Sustainability Institute Software Attribution can we improve the reusability and sustainability of scientific software?
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
Symposium on Global Scientific Data Infrastructures Panel Two: Stakeholder Communities in the DWF Ann Wolpert, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Board.
Introduction to the Semantic Web and Linked Data
IDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation’s Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF ).
Scratchpads and the new Biodiversity Data Journal Biodiversity Data Publishing made… easier Dimitris Koureas Natural History Museum London.
Open access and subscription journals: implications for low- and middle-income countries Moderated by Subhasree Raghavan Presented by Emma Veitch and Paul.
Dataset citation Clickable link to Dataset in the archive Sarah Callaghan (NCAS-BADC) and the NERC Data Citation and Publication team
VIVO: DISCOVERY, MANAGEMENT AND CONNECTING RESEARCHERS Heather Seibert-Racine : Research and Scholarly Communications 12 th Annual Joyner Library Paraprofessional.
Data Sources & Using VIVO Data Visualizing Science VIVO provides network analysis and visualization tools to maximize the benefits afforded by the data.
Data Grids, Digital Libraries and Persistent Archives: An Integrated Approach to Publishing, Sharing and Archiving Data. Written By: R. Moore, A. Rajasekar,
Spotlight on the digital: improving discoverability of digital collections Paola Marchionni, Head of digital resources for teaching, learning and research,
Committed to making the world’s scientific and medical literature
OARE Module 5A: Scopus (Elsevier)
Our Digital Showcase Scholars’ Mine Annual Report from July 2015 – June 2016 Providing global access to the digital, scholarly and cultural resources.
Using Video-Annotated Peer Review to Support the Diffusion of
How to Use Google Scholar An Educator’s Guide
The OpenAIRE Catalogue of Services
Fresno State Digital Repository
Creative Commons and OER in 30 minutes
OpenAIRE in 8 Minutes Tony Ross-Hellauer State and University Library,
VIVO: Faculty Research Information System and Discovery
Institutional Repository and Friends
Active Data Management in Space 20m DG
Identifying researchers University of Sussex Library, 14 March 2016
ORS, Faculty of Tropical Medicine Mahidol University
Toward FAIR Semantic Resources
Assistant VP for Research Cyberinfrastructure
Introduction to Implementing an Institutional Repository
Access  Discovery  Compliance  Identification  Preservation
RDA/TDWG Metadata Standards for Attribution of Physical and Digital Collections Stewardship Anne E Thessen, Matt Woodburn, Dimitris Koureas 21 Sept, 2017/Montreal,
Find support in.
Data Management: The Data Repatriation Re-integration Step or …
Christy Shorey Southern Miss
DPubS: An Open Source Electronic Publishing System
for Engineering & Physical Sciences Postgraduate Researchers
SSarah The Value of Scholarly Communications Programming: Perspectives from Three Settings Sarah Beaubien • Scholarly Communications.
Opening Access: Increasing Scholarly Impact with
Interlinking standards, repositories and policies
Measuring Your Research Impact
Bird of Feather Session
The Impact of Metrics on Scholarly Libraries
Dataverse for citing and sharing research data
Lars Björnshauge, Lund University Libraries
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant #XXXXXX. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations.
Data + Research Elements What Publishers Can Do (and Are Doing) to Facilitate Data Integration and Attribution David Parsons – Lawrence, KS, 13th February.
Citation databases and social networks for researchers: measuring research impact and disseminating results - exercise Elisavet Koutzamani
FAIR Across – Implementation of FAIR into research practice
Digital Library and Plan for Institutional Repository
AUC’s Role In Facilitating Access To Knowledge In The Arab World
Presentation transcript:

Designing, Implementing, and Benefiting from a Collections Attribution Channel: the view from iDigBio and the ADBC Alex Thompson, Deborah L. Paul, Gil Nelson 13-14 Feb 2018, @idbdeb, @idiggilnelson BCoN Data Integration Needs Assessment Meeting, Biodiversity Institute at KU, Lawrence, KS

Attribution in Biodiversity Data - Definitions What is attribution? “the action of ascribing a work or remark to a particular author, artist, or person.” – Google Search dictionary widget What is the goal of attribution? The spread of scientific credit for a work, in whole and in part, to all the members of the broader scientific community that contributed to the work by action, idea, or support.

Attribution in Biodiversity Data – Current State Literature DOIs, ISBNs, In Text, Bibliographies. Methods, Materials Examined Author Strings Data records institutionCode/ID collectionCode/ID recordedBy / identifiedBy Aggregator Downloads CITATION.txt files Record IDs, Recordset/Dataset IDs Usage Metrics “Data accessed from iDigBio / GBIF”

Attribution in Biodiversity Data – Missing Pieces Funders? Non-Research Collections Staff Adding meaning to author strings We have the who. What, where, why? Enforcing attribution standards during publishing Enforcing data repository usage Maybe IPT should have an endpoint for collecting metrics?

Research Identification Initiative (RRI) The RII initiative was launched as a result of two planning meetings building off of the recommendations of the LAMHDI workshop. The first was held in 2012 at the Society for Neuroscience meeting with over 40 participants comprising editors, publishers and funders (sponsored by INCF; http://incf.org). This meeting outlined the problem of incomplete identification of research resources within papers, and the need for a computational solution for identifying and tracking them in the literature. Recognizing that any solution needed to work for both humans and machines, three broad requirements were identified: the standard should be machine-processable, that is, designed for search algorithms, in addition to human understanding the information should be available outside the pay wall, so that search algorithms and humans have free access to the information across the biomedical literature; and the standard should be uniform across publishers, to make uptake and usage easier for both human and machines. Enter the RRID: a Research Resource Identifier (RRID) for Tracking: antibodies, model organisms, tools and software (these 3 chosen for pilot study) prior to this, humans (OHSU Library) tracked and documented these by hand. in Bandrowski A, Brush M, Grethe JS, et al. The Resource Identification Initiative: A cultural shift in publishing. F1000Research. 2015;4:134. doi:10.12688/f1000research.6555.2. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4648211/ Journal practices in contacting authors. Different journals chose to contact authors at different stages of the publishing cycle and assist in the addition of RRIDs via different mechanisms. The participation rate was by far the lowest with only instructions to authors; these journals are not included in this table (for example BMC) and had <1% participation rates. When authors were asked by a blanket mailing containing instructions, participation rates ranged between 1 and 15%. Participation was very high if the editorial staff asked authors directly or suggested identifiers for their manuscript. Note that in some cases only an approximation could be made by the participating journals. Here are some example RRIDs: · Antibody: RRID:AB_2178887 · Model organism: RRID:MGI:3840442 · Cell line: RRID:CVCL_1H60 · Tools: RRID:SCR_007358 The RRID Portal lists existing RRIDs and instructions for creating a new one if an RRID matching the resource does not already exist.

VIVO x RDA x TDWG What is VIVO? VIVO is member-supported, open source software and an ontology for representing scholarship. VIVO supports recording, editing, searching, browsing, and visualizing scholarly activity. VIVO encourages showcasing the scholarly record, research discovery, expert finding, network analysis, and assessment of research impact. VIVO is easily extended to support additional domains of scholarly activity. (http://vivoweb.org/info/about-vivo) RDA / TDWG Metadata Standards for attribution of physical and digital collections stewardship (Chairs: Anne Thessen, Matt Woodburn, Dimitris Koureas):https://www.rd-alliance.org/groups/metadata-standards-attribution- physical-and-digital-collections-stewardship.html 5 Meetings across 3 RDA plenaries and 2 TDWG Conferences. Produced an extensive use case library Mapped use case elements to existing VIVO terms and relations where available, identified missing elements where necessary

Conclusions? Existing metadata can go a long way, but we’re not using it to its maximum capabilities Identifiers are a mess, but there are existing standards that cover almost every use case Many solutions, not sure what the “Right Thing” is. Instead of waiting for clarity, do Something.

Acknowledgements and many thanks! iDigBio funding statement iDigBio is funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation's Advancing Digitization of Biodiversity Collections Program (Cooperative Agreement EF-154729). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.