NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Highly Efficient Operations Keck Scientific Strategic Planning 2009 Hilton Lewis T. Armandroff, S. Adkins, R. Goodrich J. Johnson, K. Kinoshita, R. Matsuda.
Advertisements

1 Keck LGS AO Planning Workshop: Overview, Requirements & Schedule December 5, 2004.
National Research Council Canada Conseil national de recherches Canada Observing Efficiency and Reliability of Gemini South MCAO Glen Herriot Herzberg.
Copyright 2000, Stephan Kelley1 Estimating User Interface Effort Using A Formal Method By Stephan Kelley 16 November 2000.
Science Group: Status, Plans, and Issues Claire Max Liz McGrath August 19, 2008.
NGAO System Design Review Response Peter Wizinowich, Rich Dekany, Don Gavel, Claire Max for NGAO Team SSC Meeting June 18, 2008.
LGS AO Operations Transition: Introduction to Meeting April 15, 2005.
System-wide issues Before we get to the telescope System integration and verification at the telescope Operations Maintenance and support.
The Need for Contiguous Fields NGAO Team Meeting, Waimea January 22, 2007 Claire Max.
1 NGAO Instrumentation Studies Overview By Sean Adkins November 14, 2006.
Observing Operations Concept Document Elizabeth McGrath NGAO PD Team Meeting #6 March 19, 2009.
Science Operations Update NGAO - Meeting 11 D. Le Mignant, E. McGrath & C. Max W. M. Keck Observatory 11/05/2007.
Planning “Science Operations” tasks for the PD phase NGAO PD Phase D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 08/19/2008.
Demonstration of Science Observing Modes AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 D. Le Mignant, A. Bouchez for the Keck AO team.
NGAO Management Update Peter Wizinowich NGAO Meeting #11 November 5, 2007.
Science Operations Replan NGAO - Meeting 6 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 04/25/2007.
Keck Next Generation AO Performance Budget Development Team Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 R. Dekany.
LGS-AO Performance Characterization Plan AOWG meeting Dec. 5, 2003 A. Bouchez, D. Le Mignant, M. van Dam for the Keck AO team.
NGAO System Design Phase Management Report - Replan NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Science Operations Plan NGAO - Meeting 10 D. Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory 09/17/2007.
Observing efficiency for NGAO 1.Definitions 2.Lessons learned a)Keck LGS AO “efficiency” b)Keck AO brute conclusion 3.Observing efficiency budget 4. Observing.
NGAO Status R. Dekany January 31, Next Generation AO at Keck Nearing completion of 18 months System Design phase –Science requirements and initial.
NGAO discussion: Science Operations NGAO Meeting #4 D. Le Mignant 22 Jan
NGAO Team Meeting Management Peter Wizinowich May 26, 2009.
NGAO operations thoughts D. Le Mignant, E. Johansson, C. Neyman.
NGAO System Design Phase System & Functional Requirements Documents NGAO Meeting #6 Peter Wizinowich April 25, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
Encouraging “System Level” Thinking Christopher Neyman, Erik Johansson, David Le Mignant W. M. Keck Observatory Viswa Velur California Institute of Technology.
System Architecture WBS 3.1 Mid-Year Replan Richard Dekany NGAO Team Meeting #6 April 25-26, 2007 UCSC.
NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets Telecon Meeting 12/7 D. Le Mignant and E. Johansson 7 Dec Attendees; R. Campbell,
California Association for Research in Astronomy W. M. Keck Observatory NGAO Next-Generation Adaptive Optics System NGAO Uptime Budget Keck NGAO Meeting.
Keck Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics System: 1 st & 2 nd Milestones AOWG Telecon Oct. 17, 2003 A. Bouchez, J. Chin, A. Contos, S. Hartman, E. Johansson,
WMKO Next Generation Adaptive Optics: Build to Cost Concept Review Peter Wizinowich et al. December 2, 2008 DRAFT.
Trade Study Report: NGAO versus Keck AO Upgrade NGAO Meeting #5 Peter Wizinowich March 7, 2007.
Design Team Report: AO Operational Tools (aka Acquisition and Diagnostics) Christopher Neyman W. M. Keck Observatory (for the Operational tools team) Keck.
Keck AO Operations D. Le Mignant for the Keck AO team.
CXC Implementing 2007 NRC Portals of the Universe Report Chandra X-ray Center Recommended Best Practices Roger Brissenden and Belinda Wilkes 25 April 2012.
LGS AO Readiness for 05B AOWG meeting February 4, 2004 Keck LGS AO team.
AST3-1 photometry from Dome A Bin Ma, Peng Wei, Yi Hu, Zhaohui Shang NAOC AST3
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
PS1 PORDIG Meeting, Nov ● Observatory, Telescope, and Instrument Software (OTIS) ● Remote Operations ● Survey Efficiency ● Scheduler and Simulated.
1 Experience from Studies of Software Maintenance and Evolution Parastoo Mohagheghi Post doc, NTNU-IDI SEVO Seminar, 16 March 2006.
System Performance Metrics and Current Performance Status George Angeli.
Why is the VLT very efficient? Fernando Comerón On behalf of Francesca Primas and Martino Romaniello.
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
Keck Next Generation AO Next Generation Adaptive Optics Meeting #2 Caltech November 14, 2006 P. Wizinowich for NGAO Executive Committee.
HSC Queue Mode Implementation Plan ~ Stage I, II, III ~ Tae-Soo Pyo Subaru Telescope /01/15.
SINFONI data reduction using the ESO pipeline. Instrument design and its impact on the data (I) integral field spectrometer using mirrors brickwall pattern.
T. Axelrod, NASA Asteroid Grand Challenge, Houston, Oct 1, 2013 Improving NEO Discovery Efficiency With Citizen Science Tim Axelrod LSST EPO Scientist.
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
CPI Event / Project Tollgate Template
Robo-AO: Demo Period Nicholas Law.
JWST Science Policy & Science Parallels
LSST Commissioning Overview and Data Plan Charles (Chuck) Claver Beth Willman LSST System Scientist LSST Deputy Director SAC Meeting.
Ph.D. in Computer Science
Chapter 18 Maintaining Information Systems
SOCS/Scheduler Development Plan Michael Reuter, Fransicso Delgado
Computing Architecture
Chapter 6 Database Design
Laser(s) for Keck Observatory’s Next Generation AO (NGAO) System
Chapter 9 – Software Evolution and Maintenance
Click to add title Planning for LSST Verification George Angeli LSST All Hands Meeting Tucson August 15, 2016.
Project Management Chapter 11.
Observatory Science Operations
LGS Project Meeting December 21, 2006 Agenda SWIFT update - A. Bouchez
Measurement and Prediction of Dynamic Density
Observatory Science Operations
Rankings from the perspective of European universities
NGAO Uptime Budget Keck NGAO Meeting #2 Tuesday, November 14, 2006
CPI Event / Project Tollgate Template
Presentation transcript:

NGAO topical discussion: Observing Efficiency and Uptime Budgets Telecon Meeting 12/7 D. Le Mignant and E. Johansson 7 Dec. 2006 Attendees; R. Campbell, J. Lyke, E. Gates, M. Perrin

Discussion Outline NG AO background information Our tasks Proposal NG AO SEMP and WBS… Our tasks Observing Efficiency Budget Observing Uptime Budget Current Observing Efficiency and Uptime: words from… Keck Lick? Palomar? Next Generation Definitions for Observing efficiency Observing Uptime WBS Workscope:

WBS 3.1.1.11 & 12 Observing Efficiency: The purpose of this performance budget is to determine what will be required to meet the Observing Efficiency requirement. Also, report on the lessons learned with current LGS AO systems (Keck, Gemini, ESO, etc). A list of all the items contributing to the loss of LGS AO-corrected integration time will be produced along with reasonable allocations of the observing efficiency budget amongst these items. Observing Uptime Budget: The purpose of this performance budget is to determine what will be required to meeting the observing uptime requirement. This budget is only intended to cover the NGAO facility and science instruments (and not the telescope or facility). A list of all the items contributing to downtime will be compiled along with a distribution of the uptime budget amongst these items.

101 nights of Keck II LGS AO ops since Nov. 04 till Jul. 06 Our plans for Keck II LGS in the next couple of years are rather modest.

Keck Overall Efficiency: 101 nights Bad weather impact: ~17% nights dome closed - winter weather ~21% nights impacted by marginal weather Laser faults Lost: 2 full and 5 1/2-nights 9 nights with ~ 1h lost AO faults Minor time lost yet present for 50% of nights Laser Traffic ~ 2% impact Overheads A BIG chunck!

Keck Overall Efficiency: overheads LGS AO checkout 30min/night Telescope slew and pointing Target ID and centering LGS AO readiness 5 - 10 min/target LGS AO optimization 2min per hour on target Telescope/AO handshakes 30+ sec per dither Scientific instrument setup and readout Observing strategy     Ref: 2006 SPIE papers and some Keck internal discussion for K1 LGS AO

Keck Observing Efficiency: Lessons learned Keck NGSAO observing efficiency for nights w/o weather or technical problems at best vary from 25% (snapshot surveys, Lp and Ms obs) to 60-80% for deep-exposure science programs. LGSAO shows roughly the same values, except that it is more impacted by weather and technical problems DLM’s conclusions: For a reliable system in good weather conditions, we are currently mostly limited by Serial (vs parallel) algorithms (DCS /inst/AO) during observations Under-designed telescope pointing and acquisition systems Under-designed AO nodding/dithering hardware and software Under-designed science instrument readout

Review of Keck II LGS AO uptime statistics Major contributors to system downtime: AO Faults Laser Faults Other Faults (instrument + telescope) Space Command (?) Spotters (?) Laser traffic control (?) Should all these categories be considered as downtime?

1. Definitions for Observing Efficiency (what are we talking about?) Currently: Science instrument open shutter time during dark time, including science data and calibrations (sky, telluric, photometric, PSF, astrometry, wavelength) / dark time Does not take into account any metric science-data quality -> very difficult to understand how “observing efficient” an instrument is. A future definition for NGAO? Science instrument open shutter(s) time during dark time delivering science-quality data Each data set is flagged with a science-quality idx Good understanding of the “observing efficiency” for each type of science

2. Definitions for Observing Uptime (what are we talking about?) Currently: AO system and science instrument up and ready to go Does not take into account any instrument performance metric (good calibrations, image quality, operation efficiency, etc) A future definition for NGAO? Science instrument uptime is when it is ready to collect data in support of the science program. Uptime is the opposite of downtime! Downtime includes any time (under adequate weather conditions) not spent on collecting data in support of the science operations.

Observing efficiency work plan Lessons learned Collect experience from other LGS AO systems (Palomar, Gemini, Lick, ESO) and a complex non-AO MOS instrument Summarize, analyze and understand main factors Provide spreadsheet to science and technical team to help build the efficiency budget Look into big terms per science per sub-system Circulate a first phase of requirements Anyone welcome to work on this Need observing experience with other AO/instrument Need experience with high-level software Need new ideas to break limitations of current observing paradigms All need to work fast and efficiently (100 hours total!!)

Observing efficiency budget Built for each science use case Include all observing steps: target acquisition, ID & centering; dithering; science readout and reductions; dithering; command parsing and decision making process; calibrations; etc Should assume a 100% core hardware/software reliability? Why separate Uptime and Obs. Efficiency? Should look into other lost-time statistics (weather, technical, laser traffic) Should look into benefits of: Observing planning GUI and simulation tools Calibration units and auxiliary systems/data during observing (seeing, photometry, air-glow monitoring?) Other possible impact on science-quality data (cirrus, centering stability) System monitoring and recovery to optimize system uptime? etc

Roadmap to an uptime budget Review Keck AO statistics Currently have LGS AO stats Looking for NGS AO stats If not currently summarized, derive from Metrics database Attempt to get uptime statistics from other institutions Remove outliers Failures with large downtimes that can be avoided in NGAO, e.g.: K2 Laser timing board failure with no spares K2 WFC crashes K2 Laser failures may not apply to NGAO laser(s) Use remaining statistics as a starting point for a budget Iterate and fine tune

Conclusions Not all current Keck failures/downtime will map directly to NGAO Primary downtime drivers will be laser and AO system reliability Need to break down AO and Laser faults into finer granularity to draw more and better conclusions