Empirical Legal Research Support Services: A National Survey of Law Libraries Allison C. Reeve, Research Librarian, Littler Mendelson, P.C. Travis Weller, Research Development Specialist University of Kansas Institute for Policy & Social Research

Acknowledgements acknowledge the support of Joyce McCray Pearson, Christopher Steadham, and Ja’net Miles thank all of our survey respondents and law library faculty members who sent notes of encouragement

Project Goals Describe extent and nature of empirical legal research (ELR) services in academic law libraries Determine if support varies among ranking Inform peers of trends in ELR support

Defining Empirical Legal Research (ELR) The investigation of legal and justice-system related questions attempting to understand a topic through data-driven, statistically based, controlled experiments, interview responses, case studies, historical analyses or other quantitative or qualitative data collecting mechanisms

Defining Empirical Legal Research (ELR) The investigation of legal and justice-system related questions attempting to understand a topic through data-driven, statistically based, controlled experiments, interview responses, case studies, historical analyses or other quantitative or qualitative data collecting mechanisms

Previous Work on ELR Shows: ELR by law faculty on the rise Lack of studies on practice of legal research ELR support marketed on some websites A few ELR librarian positions do exist

The “Next Big Thing” More law professors have advanced experience in social science disciplines Law journals exist that focus on empirical legal research Empirical Legal Studies community and Law and Society, Law and Economics Experiences of hiring of ELR Librarian at Yale

Academic Libraries Empirical research is the norm Expanding data services Few librarians consider research data services a primary role

Methods Nationwide survey of academic law libraries Distributed January and February 2015 Questions on each phase of an ELR project; from inception to archiving

Responses 62 surveys available for analysis (30% of ABA accredited law schools) 54 identified institution

Limitations Interpretation of questions Unknown number of participants on directors’ listserv

Significant Results

Significant Results

Significant Results

Significant Results

Significant Results

Significant Results

Significant Results

Conclusions (1/2) Empirical legal research is increasing, according to librarians Only a few faculty members at each school conduct ELR Law libraries most commonly assist with identifying and using existing datasets Sizable minority provide more in-depth services including data storage, archiving assistance, analysis, and research design; especially at higher ranking institutions

Conclusions (2/2) Few libraries have solely dedicated staff to support ELR; high ranking schools are more likely to employ one One-third have staff proficient with quantitative analysis software, fewer have qualitative data proficiency Schools ranked 101-150 are more likely to have plans to expand ELR services

Opportunities Cross-campus collaboration Future study The trend of hiring ELR Librarians Survey of faculty and deans on research habits Non-academic libraries