WHAT IS KRA ? Key Result Areas” or KRAs refer to general areas of outputs or outcomes for which the department’s role is responsible. Key Result Area in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Twelve Cs for Team Building
Advertisements

Management by Objective (M.B.O) Management by results Goal management.
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
Competencies Are King… Improving organizational and staff performance
Key Result Areas” or KRAs refer to general areas of outputs or outcomes for which the department’s role is responsible. Key Result Area in simple Terms.
Improving Individual Performance: Effective Performance Management for Small States Presented by Curt P. Wellington.
System Office Performance Management
System Office Performance Management
INTRODUCTION Performance management is a relatively new concept to the field of management.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES. OBJECTIVE SETTING S S specific M M measurable A A achievable R R result oriented T T time-related WORK HAVESUCCESS In an MBO,
Performance Management System (PMS). The major concern for the organization to assess the level of efficiency of the employees working in the organization.
Defining Leadership.
MR. CAPUTO UNIT #2 LESSON #2 LEADING, MANAGING, FOLLOWING.
Succession Planning Who will replace your leaders? Presented by Jacquelyn Thorp, MSHR/SPHR -CA.
Learning outcomes:  Define that nature of management and organizations  State management’s importance, history, environment.  Underline management’s.
Office of Human Resources1 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT 2008 AT HKS.
System Office Performance Management Human Resources Fall 2015.
MANAGEMENT BY OBJECTIVES. OBJECTIVE SETTING S S specific M M measurable A A achievable R R result oriented (realistic) T T time-related WORK HAVESUCCESS.
Impact of Performance Appraisal System on Productivity of Employees of ONGC Ltd Presented by: Nisha Sharma Roll No: 175 Deepa Khastogir Roll No: 178.
© 2013 by Nelson Education1 Job Analysis and Competency Models.
Human Resource Management. To facilitate the alignment of human capital with organizational goals Ensuring that performance management systems & staffing.
CAN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ALONE HELPS IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY? Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions Cherèl.
Organizacional structure Rawhia salah Assistant Prof. of Nursing 2015/2016 Nursing Management and leadership 485.
1 Chapter 9 Implementing Six Sigma. Top 8 Reasons for Six Sigma Project Failure 8. The training was not practical. 7. The project was too small for DMAIC.
………………………………………………………………………………
Today’s managers & leaders are challenged unlike any of the past generations in their roles.
STARS! GoalsTraining Strategic Talent Assessment and Reporting System
BUGANDO MEDICAL CENTRE PRESENTATION ON OPRAS OVERVIEW
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Management Functions
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: AN OVERVIEW
System Office Performance Management
Performance Management
TOPS TRAINING.
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Management Functions.
J. Sterling Morton High Schools
The Management Process
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Performance Management System
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
2016 Year-End Performance Management
WELCOME TO THE PRESENTATION
NHN member organizations
Strategic Management of Human Capital Recruitment Strategy
2.3 LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT
Kristan Williams Soave HR Dept
Managing performance What is it? Why? How?.
Office of Human Resources
Vision Facilitation Template
Human Resources Competency Framework
Assessment Committee The ISER What you need to know. 9/14/2018
PERFORMANCE AND POTENTIAL APPRAISAL
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Human Resource Management By Dr. Debashish Sengupta
My Performance Journey
Chapter 2 Performance Management Process
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
Leadership and Management
[Insert Organization Logo and Year] [insert title, e.g., Our Vision]
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Strategic Plan Implementation July 18, 2018
Defining Leadership.
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Management, Leadership, and Internal Organization
Standard BMA-IBT-4 Analyze and integrate leadership skills and management functions within the business environment.
Alignment Diagnosis involves understanding each of the parts in the model and then assessing how the elements of the strategic orientation align with each.
Performance Management Training
Loyola’s Performance Management Process For Employees
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Administrative Leadership
Presentation transcript:

WHAT IS KRA ? Key Result Areas” or KRAs refer to general areas of outputs or outcomes for which the department’s role is responsible. Key Result Area in simple Terms may be defined as Primary responsibilities of an Individual, the core area which each person is accountable for. Key Results Areas enables you to take ownership of your job and to accept responsibility for those areas in which achieving results are your responsibility.

Importance of KRAs. • Set goals and objectives • Prioritize their activities, and therefore improve their time/work management • Clarify roles of department or individual • Focus on results rather than activities • Align their roles to the organization’s business or strategic plan • Promote an environment of self-management.

*CORPORATE BUSINESS UNITS/ DEPARTMENTAL PLANS/STRATEGY. Determinants of KRA VISION STATEMENT MISSION STATEMENT CORPORATE OBJECTIVES *CORPORATE STRATEGY *CORPORATE BUSINESS UNITS/ DEPARTMENTAL PLANS/STRATEGY.

Specific Measurable Achiev able Relevant Time Bound SMART

Present scenario of appraisal system in POSOCO Traditional way of maintaining appraisal system E1 to E3 – Filled at the end of the calendar year. Part –I Self Appraisal by Appraisee - Main Responsibilities and task accomplished - Major Achievements - Task Assigned but not completed and reasons thereof Part –II Reporting officer - Brief comment by reporting officer after discussion with the apparisee. - Brief comment on apparaisee’s job knowledge, cost consciousness, initiative, communication skills and commendable work done in Hindi - Integrity assessment

E4 & E5 – Filled at the end of the calendar year. Part –I Self Appraisal by Appraisee - Main Responsibilities and task accomplished - Major Achievements - Task Assigned but not completed and reasons thereof Part –II Reporting officer - Brief comment by reporting officer after discussion with the apparisee. - Brief comment on apparaisee’s job knowledge, cost consciousness, initiative, communication skills and commendable work done in Hindi - Assessment of managerial traits such as organizing ability, team effectiveness, cost effectiveness, development of subordinates and judgment. - Integrity assessment

E6 /E7/E7A - Appraisal Period – Financial year Part –IA – Performance Planning & Review - Targets/ Key Result Areas for the year to be filled in by the appraisee after discussion with Reporting officer. Part –IB – Review Discussion – 1st Half - Targets /KRAs assigned and filled. - Brief record of discussion of the reporting officer with the appraisee. Part –IC – Review Discussion – 2nd Half - Brief record of discussion of the reporting officer with the appraisee Part –II – Executive Abilities - Assessment on 10 parameters such as Job Knowledge, Organizing Ability, Cost Effectiveness, Team Effectiveness, Initiative, Judgment, Development of Subordinates, Commendable work done in Hindi and Peer Relationship. - Integrity assessment

Management objective for different appraisal formats for different levels E1 to E3 – Operational level executives E4 & E5 – Managerial cadre – heading sections within Department. E6 to E7A – Middle Managerial cadre

Use of Performance management system - Clarity of expectations and responsibilities of the employee. - Review the performance of the employees over a given period of time. - Assess the gap between the actual and the desired performance. - Identify training and development needs of the future. Provide information to assist in the HR decisions like promotions, transfers etc. To reduce the grievances of the employees. - Helps to strengthen the relationship and communication between superior – subordinates and management – employees.

New Performance Management System in POSOCO Introducing New Performance Management System in POSOCO

The new PMS is applicable to first two job clusters All the Executive in the organization has been divided into THREE JOB CLUSTERS E1 to E5 - Cluster I E6/E7/E7A - Cluster II E8 & E9 - Cluster III These job clusters have been finalized by IE Group during Competency Mapping exercise The new PMS is applicable to first two job clusters No Change has been made in the E8 & E9 PMS The New Appraisal formats in the New PMS has been approved by the Board of Directors.

The New Appraisal formats have the following features:- Part –I PERFORMANCE, Part - A.pdf, Part - B.pdf - KRA has to be set with measurable targets - KRA has to be aligned with MOU targets. - KRA to be set after mutual discussion between Appraiser and appraisee. - KRA to be reviewed bi-annually - Performance Review sheet shall be filled at the end of Appraisal Period which shall include need for training and development. Part –II Competencies (E1toE5), (E6toE7A) - All the Executives shall be assessed of 9 competencies identified for various job cluster. - Appraiser shall rate the appraisee on a scale of 1 to 5 on competencies

Part –III VALUES (E1 to E5), (E6 to E7A) - The values for all the job cluster is same. - Appraiser shall rate the appraisee on a scale of 1 to 5 on values Part – IV POTENTIAL APPRAISAL (E1to E5), (E6to E7A) - All the Executives shall be assessed on 5 potential appraisal attributes - Potential Appraisal attributes shall differ as per the job cluster - Appraiser shall rate the appraisee on a scale of 1 to 5 on values potential appraisal attributes

Marking System in the Appraisal formats Appraisal Parameters E1 to E5 E6 to E7A Performance 75 65 Competencies 15 Values 05 10 Potential Total 100

COMPETENCIES CompetenciesE6-E7A.doc CompetenciesE1-5.doc. 1. Business Environment 1. Business Knowledge: 2. Profession Specific Knowledge: 3. Decision Making 4. Planning & Coordination 5. Systematic Thinking 5. Problem Solving 6. Learning Orientation 6. Collaboration & Networking 7. Result Orientation 7. Accountability 8. Leadership 8. Drive & Initiative 9. Team Player

POTENTIAL APPRAISAL E6/E7/E7A E1/E2/E2A/E3/E4/E5 1. Inspire People 1. Leadership Abilities 2. Team Building 2 Business Sense 3. Ability to build a Strategic Vision 3. Foresight 4. Business Sense 4. Innovation 5. Coaching 5. Trust and Respect

Expectation from the New PMS Target setting at all executive levels Cascading of MOU to the lower levels to achieve optimum performance To provide objective assessment. Clarity in the beginning itself as to what is expected. Performance feedback to all Help in the overall achievement of Organization Goal Bring about efficiency in administration of the Performance Management System by implementing e-PMS

Thank You