Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Governors Grants Office Presents: Smart Issues for Effective Grants Management Governors Grants Office Higher Education Conference May 22, 2012 Martin.
Advertisements

OMB Circular A133 Audits of States, Local Governments, and Non-Profit Organizations 1 Departmental Research Administrators Training Track.
OMB Circular A-133 Audits of States, Local Governments and Non-Profit Organizations CReATE May 2013 Cathi Bass, Grants Compliance Manager Sponsored Research.
OMB Uniform Guidance 2 CFR Part 200.  The final guidance was issued on December 26, 2013 and supersedes and streamlines requirements from OMB Circulars.
4/28/20151 Presented by: Anne Taylor, NECTAC David Steele, OSEP OSEP Part C Fiscal Management Verification: What Is It And How Do I Prepare For It?
New Uniform Guidance Combines the requirements of OMB Circulars A-21, A-87, A-110, A-122, A-89, A-102, A-133, and A-50 into a streamlined format. *NOTE:
Subrecipient Monitoring CCIA Spring Conference Sheena Tran, Rancho Santiago CCD Tania Walden, Los Rios CCD Tracy Young, Coast CCD May 2013.
Subawards and Subcontracts Sponsored Projects Training Program October 17 th, 2011 Renee Hunt, Julie Macy & Dawn Pelkey.
Subrecipient Monitoring Webcast Presenters Pat O'Rourke, Irene St. Croix, Bridget Ware Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services.
Subcontracts Subcontractor or Vendor How do you know?
1 Subgrants vs. Subcontracts TAA-CCCT Grants November 16, 2011.
JULY12, 2011 SESSION 7 OF AAPLS – BUDGETING FOR PROPOSALS WITH SUBCONTRACTS: ESTABLISHING RELATIONSHIPS APPLICANTS & ADMINISTRATORS PREAWARD LUNCHEON SERIES.
Subrecipient Monitoring OFFICE OF RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION 2010.
Reporting Requirements and Procedures. Trafficking in Persons Reporting Requirements FAR Combating Trafficking in Persons* –Contractors shall.
Subawards and Subrecipient Monitoring
Dionysios Karamalikis November 9,  Award Identification—At the time of the award, identifying to the sub-recipient the federal award information.
Internal Controls Protect resources against waste and fraud Ensure accuracy and reliability Secure compliance Evaluate the level of performance in all.
Subrecipient Monitoring Under the New Uniform Guidance Steven A. Spillan, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring Forum 2015.
U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Veterans Health Administration Supportive Services for Veteran Families (SSVF) Program SSVF Grantee Audit Plan Overview.
A SOUND INVESTMENT IN SUCCESSFUL VR OUTCOMES FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT.
Uniform Grant Guidance Laura Hirst Office of the Auditor General.
Omni Circular Key Area #7: New Responsibilities of the Pass- Through Agency By Michael Brustein, Esq. Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC Spring.
Presented by Raaj Kurapati and Charlene Hart. Introduction  The Single Audit Act Amendments of 1996 was enacted to streamline and improve the effectiveness.
Recipe for Success in Subcontracting Crystal Miller and Elizabeth Fowlkes.
Subawards and the Uniform Guidance Research Reps Meeting 17 March 2015.
Risk and Subaward Management under the Uniform Guidance U.S. Department of Education.
Subrecipient Monitoring NCURA Regional Conference April 25, 2007 Jeri Muñiz Director, Sponsored Projects University of California, Irvine Csilla M. Csaplár.
The ABC’s of WIRED Financial Management June 15, 2006 Grand Valley State University, Fiscal Agent.
Preston Alderman MSDE, Director of Audit.  As recipients of federal and state funds we are charged with ensuring that the funds are adequately accounted.
SUBAWARDS & SUBRECIPIENT MONITORING UNIFORM GUIDANCE AT K-STATE 2 CFR Part 200 – Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP P RESENTED B Y : M ARCY F RIEDLE C OLLABORATIONS : S UBRECIPIENT V. C ONTRACTOR.
Office of Sponsored Programs- OMB Uniform Guidance October 21, 2015.
“SPEAR” W ORKSHOP O CTOBER 19 & 30, 2015 ANGELLE GOMEZ S UBAWARD R ISK A SSESSMENT / MONITORING.
Uniform Administrative Requirements 2014 YouthBuild Webinar Series.
JEOPARDY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT EDITION Documentation Procurement Mystery Cost Principles Administrative Requirements Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500.
Agency Roundtable Discussion: Subrecipient Monitoring.
The New Super Circular Inaugural Tribal Accounting Conference November 16, 2015 Morgan Aronson National Single Audit Coordinator
A risk assessment is the process of identifying potential hazards an organization may face and analyzing methods of response if exposure occurs.
PERSONAL SERVICE CONTRACTS MEMORANDUMS OF AGREEMENT PROCESS Amy Monroe, Procurement Teri Mason, Budgets Thelma Hawkins, Grants Management Karen Wirth,
What’s your friend up to? Subrecipient Monitoring Issues Tom Egan, MIT OSP Jeannette Gordon, Division of Grants Compliance and Oversight OPERA, OER, NIH.
F&A Rates 101 Basics of F&A rates for Proposals, Grants, & Contracts Dr. Mindy S. Connolly, CPCM Sr. Sponsored Research Officer Office of Sponsored Projects.
Juanita Syljuberget Alabama Cooperative Extension System May 23, 2012.
Sub-recipient Monitoring and Contractor Determination
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Subrecipient Monitoring
SUBRECEPIENTS POST-AWARD PROCEDURES
UNIFORM GUIDANCE: RESULTS AND BEST PRACTICES
Subaward - 2 CFR A formal legal agreement between your institution and another legal entity An award provided by a pass-through entity (PTE) to.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Lessons Learned from Crisis Leadership
Overview of Consultants in Sponsored Projects (OSR)
NCJA’s National Forum Financial Management Training
Uniform Grant Guidance (UG) – Subrecipient Monitoring, Risk Assessment and Award Identification Requirements October 25, 2016, AGA Central Pennsylvania.
Office of Monitoring & Internal Controls
CDBG Procurement Date of Session, 2017 Washington, DC Brian Delvaux
Other Key Uniform Administrative Grant Requirements
Uniform Guidance Discussion
Managing Outgoing Subawards April 18, 2017
TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT FORUM
Subaward Life Cycle 10/24/17.
The Importance of Subrecipient Monitoring
Outgoing Subs Understanding Subawards and Subcontracts
Subrecipient vs. Contractor Determinations
Subrecipient Monitoring
Sponsored Programs at Penn
CoC Subrecipient Management
Office of Sponsored Research and Programs (OSRP)
Subrecipient Management and Oversight
Presentation transcript:

Understanding a Subrecipient Agreement Date of Session, 2017 Washington, DC Steve Traina Program Director Institute for Building Technology & Safety

What is a Subrecipient?

What is a Subrecipient? The best way to identify what a subrecipient is, would be to compare it to the well known contractor.

Contractor/Subrecipient A contractors purpose is to obtain goods or services. A subrecipients purpose is to carry out a portion of the Federal award. Contractor Subrecipient Original Procurement 90 Days 5 – 10 Days Fees $150 - $250/hour 30% - 40% less Responsibilities Limited/Contractual Vested, Direct Flow Down from Grantor

Contractor/Subrecipient Original Procurement 90 Days 5 – 10 Days Fees $150 - $250/hour 30% - 40% less Responsibilities Limited/Contractual Vested, Direct Flow Down from Grantor A contractors purpose is to obtain goods or services. A subrecipients purpose is to carry out a portion of the Federal award. Contractor characteristics: Provides goods or services within the normal operations Goods or services are viewed as just support to the operation of the Federal program. NOT accountable for the requirements of the agreement made by the Federal program Subrecipient characteristics: Performance is measured against objectives of the Federal program Responsible for programmatic decision-making Required to adhere to Federal program requirements

Contractor/Subrecipient Subrecipient characteristics: Performance is measured against objectives of the Federal program Responsible for programmatic decision-making Required to adhere to Federal program requirements Contractor characteristics: Provides goods or services within the normal operations Goods or services are viewed as just support to the operation of the Federal program. NOT accountable for the requirements of the agreement made by the Federal program This arrangement ensures absolute “alignment” between the subrecipient and community.

Subrecipient This arrangement ensures absolute “alignment” between the subrecipient and community.

Subrecipient

Original Procurement There are no competitive procurement requirements because selecting a subrecipient is NOT CONSIDERED A PROCUREMENT. Due to the fact that engaging SR is not considered a procurement activity, this arrangement can be solidified within days if needed. This alone could save up to 60 days from conventional procurement.

Original Procurement State or Local Governments should follow their applicable administrative statutes, regulations, and policies. Ensure potential Subrecipient is not debarred or suspended. Evaluate the Risk Posed by the Subrecipient. This is a critical step because the Subrecipient will be held accountable for compliance throughout the agreement. Although it is not specifically required to check SAM, there are regulations that disallow reimbursement for activities undertaken by an entity that is not cleared on SAM.

Evaluating Risk

(1) The subrecipients prior experience with the same or similar subawards Evaluating Risk (2) The results of previous audits (3) Whether the subrecipient has new personnel or new or substantially changed systems (4) The extend and results of Federal awarding agency monitoring

Evaluating Risk As good practice, PTEs should also consider the Federal Agency evaluation factors listed at 2 CFR 200.205

Evaluating Risk Pass Through Entity Subrecipient When evaluating a subrecipient, the FTE should use a risk-based approach and could consider the following. Pass Through Entity Subrecipient Financial stability Quality of management systems and ability to perform management standards History of the subrecipients performance including timeliness of compliance and conformance to terms Previous findings from audits Subrecipients ability to effectively implement statutory, regulatory, or other requirements imposed

Common Interests Federal program regulations and standards Purpose of award Reporting requirements Performance metrics Compliance Requirements Payment right Allowable or unallowable costs Payment schedule and terms Audit and reconciliation requirements

Common Interests As per HUD guidelines, subrecipients are not allowed to profit from program administration activities. Subrecipients can be reimbursed for allowable cost such as; Indirect cost from contractors or vendors, with no mark up Direct labor wages with Federal and State taxes, fees, and benefits if applicable

Closeout Compliance The Pass Through Entity (PTE) will always be responsible for the proper use and management of federal funds by the subrecipient.

Closeout Compliance At closeout, the PTE should Review and document that all proposed programmatic activities were carried out Review and document that cost were allowable and ensure that contract terms are completed