Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NCEP ATP III Cholesterol Guidelines and Updates
Advertisements

Flow chart showing number of citations retrieved by individual searches and number of trials included in review Strippoli GF, et al. BMJ 2008 Feb 25 [Epub.
Protecting the heart and the kidney: Implications from the SHARP trial Dr. Christina Reith University of Oxford United Kingdom.
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
Lipid Lowering Substudy Trial of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288: ALLHAT- LLT.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease Presented at Late Breaking Clinical Trials AHA 2002 PROSPER.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 2 ARBITER-2 Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Primary Prevention With Statins: ACC/AHA Risk-Based.
Date of download: 5/29/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Mortality and.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Optimal low-density lipoprotein is 50 to 70 mg/dl:
Date of download: 6/26/2016 From: Lipid-Lowering Therapy in Persons With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis Ann Intern Med.
Double-blind, randomized trial in 4,162 patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: A Proposal to Incorporate Trial Data Into a Hybrid.
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior cerebrovascular disease.
Search strategy and results Amir Kashani, et al. Circulation. 2006;114:
The ALERT Trial.
The SPRINT Research Group
US cost-effectiveness of simvastatin in 20,536 people at different levels of vascular disease risk: randomised placebo-controlled trial UK Medical Research.
Title slide.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Cholesterol Lowering and CV Risk: Meta-analyses
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) Trial Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled cardiovascular.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Pravastatin in Elderly Individuals at Risk of Vascular Disease
The IDEAL Study Reference
Copyright © 2002 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
The Anglo Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
HDL cholesterol and cardiovascular risk Epidemiological evidence
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Effects of High Density Lipoprotein Raising Therapies on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, with or without Renal Impairment:
on behalf of the ASCOT Investigators *Imperial College London, UK
An International Atherosclerosis Society Position Paper: Global recommendations for the management of dyslipidemia-Full report  Scott M. Grundy, Hidenori.
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
An assessment by the Statin Diabetes Safety Task Force: 2014 update
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
TNT Study: Baseline Characteristics of the Patients
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Lipid Clinic Challenge
Definition of Elderly. Advanced Age and CV Risk: To Start or Not to Start a Statin in Older Patients?
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Trichopoulou A, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2337
Baseline characteristics for patients with diabetes in ASCOT-LLA Part I P.S. SEVER et al Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1151–1157.
Baseline Demographic Characteristics of Adults With Diagnosed Heart Failure and Eligible to Receive Lipid-Lowering Therapy Alan S. Go, et al.
Participation in Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD) Trial Hisao Ogawa et al. JAMA 2008;300:
Opening a New Lipid “Apo-thecary”: Incorporating Apolipoproteins as Potential Risk Factors and Treatment Targets to Reduce Cardiovascular Risk  Terry.
Relative Risk of Onset of Cancer from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Meta-Analysis of Statin Trials, According to Year of Onset Risk ratios.
Delahoy PJ, et al. Clin Ther 2009;31:236-44
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
James H O'Keefe, Jr et al. JACC 2004;43:
The cumulative incidence curve demonstrated that patients with a sub-optimal LDL-C response to statin therapy were associated with a higher risk of CVD.
Presentation transcript:

Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376

Flow of article selection in trial Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376

Characteristics of included trials Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376 NA=not available; WOSCOPS=West of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study; AFCAPS/TexCAPS=Air Force/Texas Coronary Atherosclerosis Prevention Study; PROSPER=Prospective Study of Pravastatin in the Elderly at Risk; ALLHAT-LLT=Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial; ASCOT-LLA=Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial—Lipid Lowering Arm; HPS=Heart Protection Study (diabetic subgroup publication); CARDS=Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study; ASPEN=Atorvastatin Study for Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease Endpoints in Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus; MEGA=Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese; JUPITER=Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: an Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin. *Primary prevention subgroup data used. †Median; in ASCOT-LLA data were from extended observations trial.w10 ‡Data from baseline characteristics publication of PROSPER.33

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for all cause mortality, major coronary events, major cerebrovascular events, and incidence of cancer Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376 Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for all cause mortality, major coronary events, major cerebrovascular events, and incidence of cancer. (Mortality risk based on mean follow-up of 4.1 years, with data from nine trials, and 67476 patients free of cardiovascular disease (no data available from HPS diabetic armw5). Risk of coronary events based on mean follow-up of 4.9 years, with data from eight trials, and 50681 patients free of cardiovascular disease (no data available from ASPENw3 and JUPITERw1). Risk of cerebrovascular events based on mean follow-up of 4.1 years, with data from nine trials, and 67476 patients free of cardiovascular disease (no data available from HPS diabetic arm). Risk of cancer based on mean follow-up of 3.9 years, with data from six trials, and 52027 patients free of cardiovascular disease (no data available from HPS, ASCOT,w10 PROSPER,w6 and ASPEN). See footnote to table 1 for full titles of studies. *Measures of heterogeneity

Treatment effects of statin therapy Values are odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) NR=not reported. See footnote to table 1 for full titles of studies. *Data from Thavendiranathan et al.14 Fixed effect and random effect models in meta-analysis gave almost identical results, making important statistical heterogeneity unlikely. †No data in primary prevention group (n=3239).w6 ‡Significant heterogeneity; however, a positive trend of statin therapy is observed in all trials, only of different magnitude (no neutral or negative trials). Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376

Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for clinically defined subgroups of sex, age, and diabetes for end points of all cause mortality, major coronary events, major cerebrovascular events, and cancer Brugts JJ, et al. BMJ 2009;338:b2376 Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for clinically defined subgroups of sex, age, and diabetes for end points of all cause mortality, major coronary events, major cerebrovascular events, and cancer. Subgroup data are obtained from AFCAPS,w8 PROSPER,w6 ASPEN,w3 MEGA,w2 and JUPITERw1, and for mortality and coronary events from ALLHAT-LLT.w7 We had complete mortality data from all six trials for sex; for age, no data from PROSPER on age<65; for diabetes, no data from ASPEN and AFCAPS on participants without diabetes, and no data from AFCAPS and JUPITER on participants with diabetes. For cardiovascular events, studies included in subgroup analysis were same as for mortality, except no data from AFCAPS for age groups. For cerebrovascular disease, no data from AFCAPS and ALLHAT for all subgroups; also no data from PROSPER on age <65, from ASPEN for participants without diabetes, and from JUPITER for participants with diabetes. For cancer no subgroup data were obtained from ALLHAT; also no data for age <65 from PROSPER, for participants without diabetes from AFCAPS and ASPEN, and for participants with diabetes from JUPITER and AFCAPS.