Bunker Project Operation aspects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 KRB-A (Grundremmingen, Germany). 2 Type:Boiling Water Reactor Power: 250 MW(e) Started in 1966, shut down in 1977 First commercial power reactor in.
Advertisements

ESS Bunker Project Zvonko Lazić September, 2014.
Instrument Space Requirements Rob Connatser Chief Instrument Project Engineer November 2014.
Sector 13 Canted Undulator Upgrade Hutch Modification Requirements ( )
Science Directorate Instrument Technologies division Neutron Chopper Group TAP Requirements of Instrument suite Iain Sutton Neutron Chopper Group.
SOL-GEL COATING FACILITY CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW October 19, 2005.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
Transport and handling at CERN for FAIR
1 Homes take DUSEL NSF Preliminary Baseline Review - April 13-15, 2010 Bob Altes Engineer- ISE Water Shield Engineering Figure Courtesy PDG and LBNL Homestake.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 08, 2004 Page 1 ACD Installation, Post LAT CDR Response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA Number 13: MGSE Detailed Dimension Study [for ACD Installation]
Transport of the CLIC Modules and Elements CLIC Workshop October 2007 Two Beam Hardware and Integration Working Group Keith Kershaw (CERN)
Response to TAC8 and Annual Review Recommendations John Haines Head of Target Division April 2, 2014.
ISOLDE Activities for LS2 Richard Catherall EN-STI ISOLDE Technical Coordinator.
K.Gadow CALICE technical review 1 Move to FNL ECAL/HCAL-Movable Table Setup test beam integration to Fermilab MT6-B3/B4.
Progress on Remote Handling Systems TAC 12 Magnus Göhran – WPM 15 th October 2015.
GLAST LAT Project Page 1 ACD Installation, Post LAT CDR Response to GLAST LAT CDR RFA Number 13: MGSE Detailed Dimension Study [for ACD Installation] –A)
RICH1 Gas Enclosure Installation. Experimental Area Meeting at CERN on 21st June 2006 Bill Cameron (Imperial College London) on behalf of the RICH1 team.
Neutron Chopper Technologies Work Package
Monolith design update – Emphasis on Neutron beam extraction design
PS/SPS Days Roberto Losito/Oliver Aberle 13th January 2004
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
ESS Bunker A concept for a common beamline interface. ISIS Engineering Group, February 2015 For illustration purposes a conceptual CAD model of the VOR.
ESS STRATEGY for supply of chopper systems to NSS project Science directorate Instrument technologies division Neutron chopper group leader --- DRAFT ----
LBNE Remote Handling Conceptual Design Issues for ORNL Collaboration Kick-off Meeting at ORNL 1/6/2010.
Update on the ESS monolith design Rikard Linander Monolith and Handling Group ESS Target Division TAC 10, Lund, Nov 5,
SuperB Integration SuperB Experimental hall. Related topics of Slac D&D activities.
Target Systems and Monolith Design Update Rikard Linander Group Leader Monolith and Handling April 2, 2014.
DTU A VISION OF SUPPORTING NEUTRON CHOPPER ESS PT 1 - BUNKER SYSTEMS Discussion Document.
The ESS Target Station Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
The ESS Target Station F. Mezei ESS target division NPPatLPS, 2013.
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
Neutron Detector Systems at ESS
ESS Freia Scope Setting ESS - Lund - 17/10/2016.
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Operations, Risks & Hazards
Location and Alignment devices
The Bunker Project Overview Zvonko Lazic
Remote Handling Workshop Introduction
Roof design Bunker Project CDR
The Common Shielding Project
Rad safety and activation
Bunker Internal Review Welcome & Charge
Instruments Shielding Project Installation
Electrical and fluid couplings
Senad Kudumovic Design engineer
Imaging & Engineering STAP Meeting 12th-13th of April 2018
Lifting & Handling features
The Mechanical Engineering & Technology (MET)
IKON 15 Talal Osman & Iain Sutton
Preliminary Hazard Analysis of Bunker
Neutron guide Shielding Concept
Large Scale Structures
Radiation Protection Handbook
Bunker -Target interfaces
Bunker Project Schedule/Budget
APTM and GRID interface requirement PBIP and PBW
Bunker Wall Design Wall ESS
Technical Updates Gábor László NSS Lead Instrument Engineer
NSS integrated installation plan workshop Introduction
Bunker Project Schedule/Budget
The Bunker Project Overview Zvonko Lazic
Bunker Project Integration/Interfaces
Test Beamline System Requirements and Charge to PDR Committee
CDS-EL IRR Closeout 28 March 2019 J.G. Weisend II, Chairman.
BEER cave design and shielding
Shielding requirements for the baseline bunker shielding (current CATIA version ) Günter Muhrer
Bunker Project Interfaces introduction
MRV system budget and scheduling Short overview installation
Overview of the TARGET Monolith Rough Vacuum
Presentation transcript:

Bunker Project Operation aspects Zvonko Lazic, Iain Sutton www.europeanspallationsource.se December 2017

Intro ESS Context Equipment Activities Maintenance environment Strategy for maintenance Logistics

Context ESS specific context High Power source issues Long source instruments Components@ R6 Shielding common volume Vertical access High Power source issues Neutron activation Neutron damage Project constraints Minimize initial investment Large open shielding volume reminisant of reactor beamlines ILL FRM2 As a spallation source shielding thicknesses are consequent and it tightly surrounded by instrument Contrany to rIt does not contain only neutron guides But Large quantities of mechanical components

Strictly controlled access Dose limits & Zones Legal Maximum acceptable annual dose 10mSv Entry Non rad worker 25microSv Entry rad worker <2.5mil Sv > 1 mSv/h Strictly controlled access Zone I Requirement; All systems shall be remote handling installation compatible Access will be controlled Removal of hot spots Installation of tempory shielding Time limited Increasingly over time Forward area particularly unpleasant Remote handling obligatory 0.1 -1 mSv/h Restricted access Zone II Requirement; All systems shall be vertical handling installation compatible. ‘Hot’ components shall be remote handling installation compatible

Blocks installation – cranes coverage areas Definition of transfer zones is shown in ESS-0047079.3 Experimental Hall crane coverage area Cranes crossover (load interchange) area Monolith crane coverage area Third level block and its CoG

Lifting Clearance between the bunker roof top and the underside of the crane hook flange is 2,750m (+0/-0,1), The largest block is 0,65m tall, This gives available clearance for outrigging (spreader bar), and hook system of 2,1m, The largest chopper is ~2m, Therefore, available clearance for outrigging and hook system of 0,75m, Special mountings will be required to ensure installation compatibility, Mitigating low transport clearance (hook height) is done by removing additional blocks to from the rooftop,

Lifting The bunker blocks (as well as instrument hardware) can be placed on top of the roof. Shown below are 10 blocks placed on the roof, and ready for the transfer.

Lifting Mitigating low transport clearance (hook height) is done by removing additional blocks from the rooftop.

Summing up Strategy headlines High reliability Long service intervals Standard interfaces All designed for vertical removal ‘Critical’ systems equipped for remote handling Common tooling Starts with having a plan Push for reliability Building in Maintainability , manage risk Priority on critical systems Operational Integration Tooling Schedules Spares Work with experienced parters It not going to be perfect use the precious early years to Learn don't reinvent the wheel SNS ISIS Ensure future compatibility upgrade path

Crane route Bunker crane Exchange zone Storage zone Hall crane

Roof removal – access @ R6-R9 Example - Freia Minimum access – 6 blocks

Roof removal – access @ R6-R9 Example - Freia Minimum access – 6 blocks Removing chopper – 9 blocks (minimum)

Roof removal – access @ R6-R9 Example - Freia Minimum access – 6 blocks Removing chopper – 9 blocks (minimum) Clearing for short sector full access – 24 blocks (minimum)

Roof removal – access @ R6-R9 Example - Freia Minimum access – 6 blocks. Removing chopper – 9 blocks (minimum) . Clearing for short sector full access – 24 blocks (minimum). Full short sector access with frame beam cleared – 27 blocks

Scheduled & Regular Activity Incidence over 10yr period Beam port systems inspection 40 Neutron chopper maintenance 100 Optics realignment 20 Instrument shutter maintenance 20 Other component maintenance 60 Removal neighboring & Hot 80 Total 320

“Another” facility chopper/pit .2.1m 1.4m

The Bunker – Operation Aspects Q/A End of presentation Q/A