IPBI-TN R. Arnold (with help from T. Fieguth)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast and Precise Beam Energy Measurement at the International Linear Collider Michele Viti.
Advertisements

E. Mocchiutti, INFN Trieste - CALOR th June 2006, Chicago E. Mocchiutti 1, M. Albi 1, M. Boezio 1, V. Bonvicini 1, J. Lund 2, J. Lundquist 1, M.
A Capture Section Design for the CLIC Positron Source A. VIVOLI* Thanks to: L. RINOLFI (CERN) R. CHEHAB (IPNL & LAL / IN2P3-CNRS) O. DADOUN, P. LEPERCQ,
MTest Facility Low Energy Beam Erik Ramberg AEM 15 October, 2007.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Pion capture and transport system for PRISM M. Yoshida Osaka Univ. 2005/8/28 NuFACT06 at UCI.
M. Woods (SLAC) BI Tests for the Linear Collider Turning the LOI into a Proposal SLAC ALCPG Meeting Jan. 9, 2004 M. Woods, SLAC LC-LEP Beam Tests at SLAC.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Slide 1 Diamonds in Flash Steve Schnetzer Rd42 Collaboration Meeting May 14.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
TEST BEAMS Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Ted Fieguth DoE/SLAC Program Review April & May 1, 1997.
K. Moffeit 6 Jan 2005 WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at the International Linear Collider SLAC January 6-8, 2005 Polarimetry at the ILC Design issues.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
P.N. Burrows GDE/MDI Vancouver 19/7/06 (T-488) Philip Burrows John Adams Institute Oxford University EM Background Tests of Feedback BPM.
EM background tests of IP feedback hardware Christine Clarke Oxford University 24 th September 2007 Oxford (P. Burrows, C. Perry, G. Christian, T. Hartin,
M. Woods (SLAC) Beam Diagnostics for test facilities of i)  ii) polarized e+ source January 9 –11, 2002.
August 2005Snowmass Workshop IP Instrumentation Wolfgang Lohmann, DESY Measurement of: Luminosity (precise and fast) Energy Polarisation.
SHMS Optics and Background Studies Tanja Horn Hall C Summer Meeting 5 August 2008.
(T-488) FONT: C Clarke, C Swinson, P Burrows, T Hartin, G Christian, H Dabiri Khah SLAC: Mike Woods, Ray Arnold, Steve Smith et al.
Jan MDI WS SLAC Electron Detection in the Very Forward Region V. Drugakov, W. Lohmann Motivation Talk given by Philip Detection of Electrons and.
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-Induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
The End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC Carsten Hast For the everlasting never giving up SLAC Test Beam Gang R. Erickson, T. Fieguth, C. Hast, J. Jaros,
Overview of the GlueX Tagger and Photon Beamline..
Latifa Elouadrhiri Jefferson Lab Hall B 12 GeV Upgrade Drift Chamber Review Jefferson Lab March 6- 8, 2007 CLAS12 Drift Chambers Simulation and Event Reconstruction.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Philip Burrows Snowmass 2005: SiD Concept Plenary, 15/8/05 SiD and MDI issues Philip Burrows Queen Mary, University of London Thanks to: Toshiaki Tauchi,
Initial Results from the SLAC ESTB T-506 Irradiation Study International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders University of Tokyo, November 2013 Bruce.
HARP measurements of pion yield for neutrino experiments Issei Kato (Kyoto University) for the HARP collaboration Contents: 1.HARP experiment Physics motivations.
Dec 2004 Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White, S Molloy.
Dec 2004 Simulation of Low Energy backgrounds in the TESLA IR Impact on feedback BPMs FONT collaboration  QMUL: P Burrows, G Christian, C Clarke, G White,
Ken Moffeit SLAC LCWA09 1 Polarization Considerations for CLIC Ken Moffeit, SLAC 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas 29 September to 3 October.
Forward Tagger Simulations Implementation in GEMC Moller Shield Tracking Studies R. De Vita INFN –Genova Forward Tagger Meeting, CLAS12 Workshop, June.
Performance Study of Pair-monitor 2009/06/30 Yutaro Sato Tohoku Univ.
The T506 Experiment: Electromagnetically-induced Radiation Damage to Solid-State Sensors Test Facilities Users Workshop SLAC, September Bruce Schumm.
Proposal for the End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC John Jaros ALCPG09 Albuquerque September 30, 2009.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
R. Arnold SLAC 24 June 2002 Real Photon Collaboration Conceptual Design Review Beam Monitoring Instruments.
FCC-ee Interaction Region design
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
(T-488) FONT: C Clarke, C Swinson, P Burrows, T Hartin, G Christian, H Dabiri Khah SLAC: Mike Woods, Ray Arnold, Steve Smith et al.
J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S
Forward Tagger Simulations
IP Beam Instrumentation R&D and Testbeams for the ILC
MICE The International Muon Ionisation Cooling Experiment
Conditions at a potential location of a beam dump experiment at LCLS-II Clive Field, SLAC: 4/29/16.
The Optimized Sensor Segmentation for the Very Forward Calorimeter
Testbeam plans for LEP instrumentation
γ γ-> hadron Background Events at CLIC
Pure  exposure for e/ separation
Beam Optics Set-Up at SLAC End Station A
Beam Background and the SVT Protection Collimator
K. Kawagoe (Kobe-U) 30-Mar-2010 LCWS10 in Beijing
Status Report on E-166 Undulator-Based Production of Polarized Positrons K.T. McDonald Princeton University EPAC Meeting SLAC, November 15, 2003.
A summary of world-wide test beam facilities
Hongbo Zhu (IHEP, Beijing) On behalf of the CEPC Study Group
End Station Test Beam (ESTB) at SLAC
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
Beam RF Effects Update Mike Woods, SLAC
Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump
(T-488) FONT: C Clarke, C Swinson, P Burrows, T Hartin, G Christian, H Dabiri Khah SLAC: Mike Woods, Ray Arnold, Steve Smith et al.
X-Ray Transport, Optics, and Diagnostics WBS Alan J
GLD IR optimization and background study
The Measurement of Forward Particle Production in LHC
T-489: Induced Activity and Residual Dose Rates
Diagnostics overview Beam profile monitors Cherenkov radiators Summary
小型X線源の性能確認実験計画 高輝度・RF電子銃研究会 広島大学 高エネルギー加速器研究機構 浦川順治
CLIC luminosity monitoring/re-tuning using beamstrahlung ?
Presentation transcript:

Spray Electron Beam for Tests of LC Forward Calorimeter Detectors in SLAC End Station A IPBI-TN-2004-5 R. Arnold (with help from T. Fieguth) MDI at ILC Workshop, SLAC, Jan 6-8, 2004

e+ e- Pairs from e+ e- Collisions From T. Maruyama, LC Workshop, SLAC Jan 2004. e+ e- Pairs from e+ e- Collisions With Current NLC IP Beam Parameters: # e+ or e- = 49,000/bunch <E> = 4.1 GeV E_total = 199,000 GeV <E> = 4.1 GeV 0.01 0.1 1 10 100 Energy (GeV)

Proposed Test Beam Method and Parameters Generate electron spray from Be target in BSY. Select momentum bin with A-line including 0.5 deg bend B2. Energy in ESA variable ~2 to ~20 GeV Intensity variable 1 to 106 per pulse Short pulse single bunches

SLAC Beam Switchyard A line entrance at 0.5 deg B2 Be target

Particle fluxes into A-line with 0.5 deg B2 bend off With B2 on, pion flux stays same, electrons increase X106

Typical electron flux forward with 0.5 deg B2 bend off Bend into A-line with B2 and use slits to select bite

Electrons in ESA per e on Be target From GEANT3 model of spray from Be, D10 aperture, simplified A-line

Possible Operating Ranges Typical beam incident on Be: 10 hz, 1010 e/pulse Short pulse single bunches Energy: 10 to 28 GeV, 1.6 to 5 kW Electrons in ESA 1 to 106 e/pulse Energy: 2 to 20 GeV, selected with A-line Energy spread max +/-1.6 % Spatial density, spread over ~11 cm2 Pion contamination less than 1 per 106 e

END STATION A Beam 60 meters Concrete Bunker; shielding blocks (9’x9’) Spray Beam Detector Test Stand Beam Alcove with 2 rf cavity BPMs, 4 toroids, 1 wire array Concrete slabs for mounting beamline components 60 meters

Spray Beam in ESA GeV / cm2 Y (cm) Can span interesting range of Spray beam size In End Station A Can span interesting range of energy density in ESA beam test Pair energy distribution at BEAMCAL detector; From K. Busser presentation at LCWS 2004 c = 20 mrad X (cm)

T-476 Proposal Spokesperson: Chris Kenney, Molecular Biology Consortium Collaborators: Molecular Biology Consortium, U. of Hawaii, Tohoku U., Brunel U., CERN - use “spray” beam of ~ 4-GeV electrons to mimic pair background - test speed (at nano-second level) of both 3-d and planar Si characterize detector response to “pair background”; can vary spray beam energy and absorber thickness in front of detector plane - use Monte Carlo to superimpose 250 GeV electron to determine electron id efficiency

Available Needed Primary beam Be target A-line deliver system Space in ESA for detector test station Needed Beam monitors - in-line gas Cherenkov - profile monitor (fiber fingers) - downstream calorimeter More proposals for forward detector tests