30/06/2019 Trends in measured and modelled precipitation quality parameters in Croatia 1993-2012 Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measurement and assessment of change What it the status quo in environmental science? In time – A simple trend line – A p-value or a 95% confidence interval.
Advertisements

Norwegian Meteorological Institute met.no EMEP data on the web SR Tables National reports Michael Gauss.
Czech Hydrometeorological Institute Assessment of air pollution by cadmium CZECH REPUBLIC EMEP Heavy metal case study Milan Váňa, Pavel Machálek + MSC-E.
(1)Dpto. de Estadística e I.O. III. Escuela de Estadística. Univ.Complutense de Madrid, Spain (2) Ciencias Agronómicas y Veterinarias. Universidad Politécnica.
Trend analysis: considerations for water quality management Sylvia R. Esterby Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, University of British Columbia Okanagan.
Jill Grenon, Terry Svalberg, Ted Porwoll, Mark Story Bridger-Teton NF Analysis of Lake, Bulk, NADP, and IMPROVE N and S data.
Croatian Air Quality Monitoring Strategy 2002 − onward Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia Zagreb, Grič 3,
Maximum Covariance Analysis Canonical Correlation Analysis.
EUROPEAN UNION INITIATIVES AND REQUIREMENTS : AIR QUALITY ASSESSMENT AS A POLICY MECHANISM Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service of Croatia.
Space-time trends in temperature extremes in south central Sweden Peter Guttorp Norsk Regnesentral University of Washington.
Pilot modelling of transport and deposition of black carbon: case of shipping in the Russian Arctic Irina Morozova Head of Department for modelling transboundary.
Derwent R.G. et al., 1998, “Observation and interpretation of the seasonal cycles in the surface concentration of ozone and carbon monoxide at Mace Head,
Modeling the mass balance of the Wolverine Glacier, Alaska USA using the PTAA model David L Korn, NSIDC, University of Colorado, Boulder,
Much variation but little change Rafael Rosa and Gerald Stanhill Institute of Soil, Water and Environmental research, Agricultural Research Organization,
Climate Change Tendencies in Georgia under Global Warming Conditions Mariam Elizbarashvili 1 Marika Tatishvili 2 Ramaz Meskhia 2 Nato Kutaladze 3 1. Ivane.
MODELS3 – IMPROVE – PM/FRM: Comparison of Time-Averaged Concentrations R. B. Husar S. R. Falke 1 and B. S. Schichtel 2 Center for Air Pollution Impact.
The trend analysis demonstrated an overall increase in the values of air temperatures as well as an increase in the occurrence of extremely hot days, but.
Summary of observed changes in precipitation and temperature extremes (D9)
Evaluating trends in irrigation water requirement per unit are in north region of China, : should stations being classified according to land.
Network for the support of European Policies on Air Pollution The assessment of European control measures and the effects of non-linearities.
Spatial Pattern of PM2.5 over the US PM2.5 FRM Network Analysis for the First Year: July 1999-June 2000 Prepared for EPA OAQPS Richard Scheffe by Rudolf.
EVALUATION OF THE RADAR PRECIPITATION MEASUREMENT ACCURACY USING RAIN GAUGE DATA Aurel Apostu Mariana Bogdan Coralia Dreve Silvia Radulescu.
Climate Literacy 201 Activity: “What are we seeing?” For your DATA SET: 1. Analyze what the data indicates. 2. Develop policy decisions and local assistance.
WGE September 20111Brit Lisa Skjelkvåle Trends in precipitation chemistry, surface water chemistry and aquatic biota in acidified areas in Europe.
Evaluation of concentrations of air pollutants and depositions of HMs over the EECCA and SEE regions Ilia Ilyin, EMEP/MSC-E EMEP/MSC-E TFHM, May 14-16,
Declining atmospheric deposition impacts forest soil solution chemistry in Flanders, Belgium Arne Verstraeten 15 th Meeting of the ICP Forests Expert Panel.
© T Madas. 1 m = cm cm = mm 10 1 km = m m = cm cm = mm 40 3 km = m m = cm cm = mm km = m cm = m 4 80.
Regional Workshop on SoE water quantity reporting of ETC/ICM with West Balkan Countries Skopje January 2013.
Air Quality trend analyses under EMEP/TFMM and link to EEA work Augustin COLETTE (INERIS), Chair of the TFMM/CLRTAP TFMM National Experts, CCC, MSC-E,
Eastern US Transport Climatology During Average, High and Low Ozone Days Bret A. Schichtel and Rudolf B. Husar Center for Air Pollution Impact and Trend.
29 th TF meeting of the ICP-Vegetation, March, 2016, Dubna, Russia ANALYSIS OF LONG-TERM TRENDS OF ATMOSPHERIC HEAVY METAL POLLUTION IN THE EMEP COUNTRIES.
- 200 hPa geopotential heights in the GDAS analysis are lower than in CDAS over most of the planet except the North American continent, particularly from.
Trends in floods in small catchments – instantaneous vs. daily peaks
Pao-Shin Chu, Hanpei Zhang, Kristine Tofte
North Atlantic Oscillation and its Influence on Ozone in London
Orbit comparison for ERS-1 mission between GFZ and REAPER
Moving from Empirical Estimation of Humidity to Observation: A Spatial and Temporal Evaluation of MTCLIM Assumptions Using Regional Networks Ruben Behnke.
Effects of Climate Change on the Great Lakes
BUSINESS MATHEMATICS & STATISTICS.
Determining Trends in Values of Concern During a Specified Time Period
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
25+ Years of Acid Deposition Monitoring in Vermont
Air Quality Monitoring Networks
Chart 6.8: Percent of Total Regional Employment(1) by Hospitals, 2014
Trend assessment (A. V, 2.4.4) Identification of trends in pollutants
Statistical Inference
POPs and HMs Summary , EMEP TFMM.
Alexey Gusev, Victor Shatalov, Olga Rozovskaya, Nadejda Vulyh
Multi-model and Observed PM Trends
TFMM trend analysis: use of AirBase. Preliminary results
17th Task Force on Measurement and Modelling Meeting
Trends for major ions at Russian EMEP stations for period 2002 – 2012
The Heavy Metal Case study for the Netherlands
Trend analysis of sulphur and nitrogen species in air and precipitation in Sweden Martin Ferm
Particulate matter in Croatia
The Nordic-Baltic co-operation on the EMEP Assessment
EMEP case studies on HMs: State of the art
Trends in sulphur and nitrogen components
Wenche Aas, Hilde Fagerli, Svetlana Tsyro, Sverre Solberg
PM Trends PM10, PM2.5, PM10-PM2.5 (not possible in 90s)
Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report (TOAR)
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Trend analysis for HMs and POPs
Ilyin I., Travnikov O., Varygina M.
Model assessment of HM and POP pollution of the EECCA region
based on EMEP/MSC-W model and EMEP monitoring data
What is winter? A reckoning for seasonally snow-covered, social-ecological systems B33M-2848 Alexandra R. Contosta1, Nora J. Casson2, Sarah.
Long-term changes in drought indices in the Eastern Europe
Modelling of BaP concentrations over France.
Summary of discussion (1)
Presentation transcript:

30/06/2019 Trends in measured and modelled precipitation quality parameters in Croatia 1993-2012 Sonja Vidič Meteorological and Hydrological Service sonja.vidic@cirus.dhz.hr

Precipitation Quality Monitoring Network 30/06/2019 R2 R1 R3 R4 R5 Precipitation Quality Monitoring Network 1981-2015 Regions: Continental East (R1) Continental West (R2) Mountainous Central (R3) Maritime West (R4) Maritime Southeast (R5)

Mean annual precipitation 1961-1990

R2 R1 R3 R4 R5 EMEP GRID 50 km x 50 km

Sox (modelled) in precipitation mg/l

Sox (modelled) in precipitation

Mann-Kendall Test and Sen's Slope Estimates for the Trend of Annual Data Non-parametric Mann-Kendall test and magnitude of the trends with the nonparametric Sen’s method for estimating the slope A positive (negative) value indicates an upward (downward) trend. Trend statistics it is given for significance levels + if there is a trend at α = 0,1 (90 %) * if there is a trend at α = 0,05 (95 %) ** if there is a trend at α = 0,01 (99 %) *** if there is a trend at α = 0,001 (99.9 %)

Strong significant downward trend *** — SO4-S= in precipitation NO — *** — *** — + Strong significant downward trend in cW, cM and mW regions * — *** — ** — * —

SO4-S= in precipitation concentrations, mg S /l /yr deposition, kg S /ha /yr

Strong significant downward trend *** — NO3-N - in precipitation NO — *** — ** — Strong significant downward trend in all regions except cE *** — *** — *** — ** —

NO3-N - in precipitation concentrations, mg N /l /yr deposition, kg N / ha/yr

Strong significant downward trend *** *** NH4-N+ in precipitation * *** — * ** — *** * *** — Strong significant downward trend in all regions Except E * — ** ** — ***

NH4-N + in precipitation concentrations, mg N /l /yr deposition, kg N / ha/yr

No significant upward trend significant (*, +) downward trend ** pH in precipitation No significant upward trend at some stations significant (*, +) downward trend * *

Acidity, pH

M-K test significance for observations S ox N ox pH N rd M-K test significance for observations R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 M-K test significance for model results

M-K test for trend: dependance on the length of time series 1993-2012 2000-2012 2000-2012

Conclusions Trend in precipitation quality parameters is obtained in both, observations and model results Trend is negative (downward) at high level of significance (99.9 %) for oxidizes S, N and reduced N – for both, observed and modelled values Significance of the trend in observations depends on the length of the period (20 vs. 13 years analysed) Sen’s slope of observations compared to model values is larger Trend is not uniform over the whole territory of the country – continental Eastern part shows different behaviour (lack of trend) At Southeastern maritime region precipitation acidity shows significant downward trend.