Mini-Unit: Focus on Evidence This Mini-Unit supports students use of evidence by focusing how students use nonfiction sources.   The unit includes lessons.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Critical Thinking Course Introduction and Lesson 1
Advertisements

Standards ELACC8RI1: Students will be able to use close reading strategies to identify the main idea in selected articles. ELACCW9b1: Students will be.
OP-EDS ARGUMENT MINI-UNIT Sugar as a Social Issue Linda Denstaedt Oakland Writing Project (MI) i3 Career and College Ready Writing Leadership Team Linda.
Online Privacy Sabrina Back Co-Director, Mountain Writing Project, Hazard, KY (Adapted by Jean Wolph from Sabrina Back’s LDC module) 1.
Overview Days 1-2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Day 7 Building Schema;
Should [topic/inquiry question]? Adapted from a framework developed by National Writing Project i3 College Ready Writers Program (January 2015) A Mini-Unit.
Focus on Evidence Based on work by Sabrina Back Co-Director, Mountain Writing Project, Hazard, KY (Adapted by Jean Wolph from Sabrina Back’s LDC module)
School Start Time Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project Inspired by a presentation by Tom Fox, National Writing Project (June 16, 2014) A Mini-Unit on.
Opinion Mini-Unit NAME / SCHOOL Lessons adapted from materials developed by Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and the National Writing Project i3.
Opinion Writing in Grades K-3 Should _______________[insert research question]? Adapted by [name and organization, school or district] A mini-unit adapted.
The Best Pet Adapted from materials developed by Abby Carter Second Grade Teacher South Todd Elementary Todd Co., KY.
Opinion Writing in Grades 3-5: Cell Phones in Elementary School Adapted by Jean Wolph, Kentucky Writing Project, from a materials developed by Harold Woodall,
Opinion Writing in Grades 1-3: [Topic] Adapted by Angel Peavler and Jean Wolph from NWP i3 College Ready Writers Program materials KWP RSPDI.
Strategic Reading Step 2 SCAN. Review from yesterday Preview- practice with Hamlet Oedipal Complex.
Opening the Door to Argument: Short Sequences that Engage Students Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and i3 College Ready Writers Leadership Team.
Opinion Mini-Unit Cyndi Wiles & Kristi Britt / NTES Lessons adapted from materials developed by Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project and the National.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Reading for Effective Arguments LINDA DENSTAEDT CRWP LEADERSHIP TEAM OAKLAND WRITING PROJECT (MI)
Standards That Count: Reading, Discussion, Writing, and Presentation.
Should We Have Zoos? Inspired by Should There Be Zoos? By Tony Stead Developed by Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project Based on National Writing Project.
ETHOS, LOGOS, & PATHOS Expos Comp.
Common Core: Close Reading Informational Text Professional Development Session Presenters: Chelsea Armann Adrienne Van Gorden.
The Victorian Games & Apps Challenge Design Brief (PowerPoint)
Response to Bullying Opinion Mini-Unit Mary-Adele Allison, RSPDI
Non-Fiction Annotation: Strategies for Success!
School – Based Assessment – Framework
Evaluating and Summarizing Sources
Identifying Question Stems
What Should We Do About Homelessness?
Writing Paper Three Monday, November 2.
Persuasive and Argumentation Writing
Writing A First Look.
Should We Have Zoos? Opinion Mini-Unit
Writing 8th Grade Top 5 Big Ideas Your Child
What the text is MOSTLY about.
Paper 1 Exam Technique: How to structure your answers and use your time! Mr. Guiney’s Guide to success. As you only have 60 minutes, plus 5 minutes reading.
Informational Writing Unit Grade 7-Looking at Grade 6/year 1
Get thinking: What is the problem, issue or challenge you want to take on? 
Bottom Lines Teachers need to make their own reading lives transparent for kids. A classroom is a place where readers live and a reading community.
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Enabling Student Learning One Bite at a Time
Tuesday, 4/19 Lesson 1: Research on Driverless Cars
Research Presentation
Logo slide English/Arabic
Ap Language ESSAYS SYNTHESIS.
Critical Analysis CHAPTER 7.
11/28/16 Learning Target: Students will gather relevant information from multiple print sources, close reading to analyze what the text says about the.
[Type The Title Of The Persuasive Speech Here]
LT- I can analyze a text for evidence that is supportive and valuable to my claim. SC- I can collect and explain evidence from texts that support my belief.
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
11/22/16 Learning Target: Students will gather relevant information from multiple print sources, close reading to analyze what the text says about the.
Design Brief.
APPROPRIATE POINT OF CARE DIAGNOSTICS
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Core Course Knowledge Lesson 6
Determining Theme Reading Myths in Expert Groups
Critical Response: How to begin
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Mini-Unit: Focus on Evidence This Mini-Unit supports students use of evidence by focusing how students use nonfiction sources.   The unit includes lessons.
QW #5 12/7 Reflect on the cartoon below. What is the creator's purpose or message? How do you feel about it? Write a minimum of one complete paragraph.
Lesson 4 Synthesis Overview & Peer Evaluation
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Wednesday, April 20 QW – 5 minutes – ½ page Driverless Cars-
Write a complete paragraph or more:
Do Now # Which of your three argument essays are you going to work on revising and editing? Why did you chose that one? What specific changes,
Connecting Evidence to a Claim was developed by Jean Wolph.
Reading and effective note-making
[Type the title of The persuasive speech here]
Research Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Mini-Unit: Focus on Evidence This Mini-Unit supports students use of evidence by focusing how students use nonfiction sources.   The unit includes lessons on the Harris moves and commentary on quotations. The text set focuses on protests Sabrina Back Co-Director, Mountain Writing Project, Hazard, KY (Adapted by Jean Wolph from Sabrina Back’s LDC module)

TEACHER SLIDE This unit is designed to take about 6 days. It can be taught in middle or high school by adjusting the reading selections. Most of the PowerPoint can be used “as is” with students – simply delete the “Teacher Slides” Argumentation skills addressed: Close reading of text to identify compelling evidence and effectively using evidence in a draft. Students are also engaged in evaluating their own work with a protocol based on the Using Sources Tool, providing feedback to others (again using the Using Sources Tool), and making some additions to the draft based on this self-evaluation and peer/teacher feedback. The original unit by Sabrina Back has 22 days of instruction. By focusing only on the issue of tracking, the time for close reading of source material takes 2 days instead of the 7 that are required in the longer module. Drafting is also allotted less time in this mini-unit, with the idea that students might later continue to refine the product from this experience. Splitting these topics also allows for a second round using this same unit framework, but substituting the articles that relate more to governmental tracking. Or an entirely different text set could be used that will allow students to practice the skills in this unit—reading closely to find compelling evidence and then using that evidence to support a claim. Two approaches to reading text are used: Paired Reading and Save the Last Word for Me. Both have been adjusted to reflect a way of thinking about evidence that Joseph Harris (2006) writes about in Rewriting: How to Do Things with Texts. A teacher might select to use only one approach in this mini-unit, however, to help students comprehend and use readings in order to understand an issue and gather information for eventual use as evidence.

TEACHER SLIDE The presenter notes section for this PowerPoint contains valuable additional information and detailed directions. In order to view those notes, you will need to DOWNLOAD the entire PPT and save/open on your computer. Note that there are multiple activity suggestions for these elements: building background (slides 7 - 11) and drafting (slides 27 – 30). You will want to see what kinds of activities will best fit your students’ needs and select accordingly.

Mini-Unit Sequence Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5 Day 6 Building Schema; Understanding Writing Task, Rubric Research: Reading #1 Identifying Compelling Evidence Reading Collection #2 Making a Claim Supporting a Claim Drafting Feedback and Revising Tools/ Activities Partner Notes Save the Last Word—adapted Agree, Disagree, Undecided Purpose/ Audience statement Practice Time: Forwarding / Using Sources Effectively Self-Evaluation and Draft (in progress) Peer Review and Draft (“for now”)

LT- Students will reflect on their current thoughts about protest. SC- Students will read and annotate and watch and take notes to build background knowledge about protesting.

QW #1 - 12/6 Reflect on the cartoon below. What is the creators’ purpose or message? How do you feel about it? Write a minimum of one complete paragraph (5+ complete sentences).

Protesting These are the overarching questions we will be studying during this unit. By the end of this unit, we will address this in a persuasive piece of writing. What are your thoughts about Americans and the right to protest. Should all people have the right to protest? What are the reasons people protest? Do protests result in changes to society? Day 1

In this mini-unit, we’ll practice these moves that writers use when they use sources to develop their arguments: QW #2 12/6 Notes: Illustrating | Using specific examples from the text to support the claim Authorizing | Referring to an “expert” to support the claim Countering | “Pushing back” against the text in some way (e.g., disagree with it, challenge something it says, or interpret it differently) Selected slides in this mini-unit can be revisited as students work on daily argument writing and/or on other mini-units, to remind students what these moves look like in the context of developing an argument. Jean Wolph, Louisville Writing Project, for NWP CRWP funded by the Department of Education

Viewing Strategy: Video QW #3 12/6 As you watch the clip, jot notes in your wnb about: the point or claim the clip is making key evidence or details from the video (you may use this later so get it down correctly) https://www.washingtonpost.com/video/national/black-lives-matter-movement-explained/2016/06/21/8a00e59e-16e8-11e6-971a-dadf9ab18869_video.html This activity will help students start to see what the different perspectives are on the issue of online privacy.

PREPARING FOR THE TASK: BUILDING SCHEMA Think, Write, Pair, Share QW #4 12/6 List everything you know about protests. Consider the following: What is a protest? What protests have you heard of or seen? In what ways do you protest? Why do people protest? What are people hoping is the outcome of the protest?   Discuss your lists with your small groups. Also discuss the questions below: Day 1 - The unit begins with figuring out what we know about online privacy, what questions we have, and what the writing task will be.

Annotate the way you found the evidence You and a partner will read a text about protests. Text for today’s reading: Article #1“What Makes For a Successful Protest” As YOU READ Highlight evidence. Annotate the way you found the evidence Bracket Dates and #s [43 per cent] Box Signal Phrases    studies suggest, Research shows, According to... Circle Quotation Marks     “ This research indicates…” Squiggly Line Authority Names of experts, businesses, organizations Write CLAIM in the margin In the margin, number the most important evidence [1, 2, 3, 4].