Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages (June 1997)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rein et al., 2002 Current Biology The mushroom bodies (MBs) in the adult Drosophila brain.
Advertisements

Volume 5, Issue 3, Pages (November 2013)
Temporal Control of Glial Cell Migration in the Drosophila Eye Requires gilgamesh, hedgehog, and Eye Specification Genes  Thomas Hummel, Suzanne Attix,
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages (November 2001)
Peizhang Xu, Stephanie Y. Vernooy, Ming Guo, Bruce A. Hay 
Distinct Mechanisms of Apoptosis-Induced Compensatory Proliferation in Proliferating and Differentiating Tissues in the Drosophila Eye  Yun Fan, Andreas.
A Null Mutation in Inositol Polyphosphate 4-Phosphatase Type I Causes Selective Neuronal Loss in Weeble Mutant Mice  Arne Nystuen, Marie E. Legare, Leonard.
Nuclear signaling by Rac and Rho GTPases is required in the establishment of epithelial planar polarity in the Drosophila eye  Manolis Fanto, Ursula Weber,
Cell-Autonomous Requirement of the USP/EcR-B Ecdysone Receptor for Mushroom Body Neuronal Remodeling in Drosophila  Tzumin Lee, Simone Marticke, Carl.
Savitha Kalidas, Dean P. Smith  Neuron 
The Cadherin Flamingo Mediates Level-Dependent Interactions that Guide Photoreceptor Target Choice in Drosophila  Pei-Ling Chen, Thomas R. Clandinin 
Volume 48, Issue 2, Pages (October 2005)
Volume 17, Issue 8, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 16, Issue 12, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 93, Issue 6, Pages (June 1998)
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages (May 2005)
Drosophila JAB1/CSN5 Acts in Photoreceptor Cells to Induce Glial Cells
Volume 97, Issue 7, Pages (June 1999)
Act up Controls Actin Polymerization to Alter Cell Shape and Restrict Hedgehog Signaling in the Drosophila Eye Disc  Aude Benlali, Irena Draskovic, Dennis.
Volume 91, Issue 6, Pages (December 1997)
Flies without Centrioles
Kim F. Rewitz, Naoki Yamanaka, Michael B. O'Connor  Developmental Cell 
Douglas J Guarnieri, G.Steven Dodson, Michael A Simon  Molecular Cell 
Chuxia Deng, Anthony Wynshaw-Boris, Fen Zhou, Ann Kuo, Philip Leder 
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages (February 2018)
Sightless has homology to transmembrane acyltransferases and is required to generate active Hedgehog protein  Jeffrey D. Lee, Jessica E. Treisman  Current.
Mechanisms of Odor Receptor Gene Choice in Drosophila
Stephen A. Thacker, Peter C. Bonnette, Robert J. Duronio 
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Andrew R. Bassett, Charlotte Tibbit, Chris P. Ponting, Ji-Long Liu 
Volume 105, Issue 4, Pages (May 2001)
Ayelet Schlesinger, Amy Kiger, Norbert Perrimon, Ben-Zion Shilo 
BTB/POZ-Zinc Finger Protein Abrupt Suppresses Dendritic Branching in a Neuronal Subtype-Specific and Dosage-Dependent Manner  Wenjun Li, Fay Wang, Laurent.
The Drosophila Hindgut Lacks Constitutively Active Adult Stem Cells but Proliferates in Response to Tissue Damage  Donald T. Fox, Allan C. Spradling 
J.Suso Platero, Kami Ahmad, Steven Henikoff  Molecular Cell 
ELAV, a Drosophila neuron-specific protein, mediates the generation of an alternatively spliced neural protein isoform  Sandhya P. Koushika, Michael J.
The Snail Family Member Worniu Is Continuously Required in Neuroblasts to Prevent Elav-Induced Premature Differentiation  Sen-Lin Lai, Michael R. Miller,
Understanding Human Cancer in a Fly?
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages (February 2004)
Volume 1, Issue 3, Pages (September 2001)
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (April 2005)
Let-7-Complex MicroRNAs Regulate the Temporal Identity of Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons via chinmo  Yen-Chi Wu, Ching-Huan Chen, Adam Mercer, Nicholas S.
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages (May 2001)
Drosophila atonal Fully Rescues the Phenotype of Math1 Null Mice
The Hippo Pathway Regulates the bantam microRNA to Control Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis in Drosophila  Barry J. Thompson, Stephen M. Cohen  Cell 
Yashi Ahmed, Shigemi Hayashi, Arnold Levine, Eric Wieschaus  Cell 
Haploinsufficiency at the Nkx3.1 locus
Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra, H. Robert Horvitz  Current Biology 
Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages (June 1996)
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages (September 2004)
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages (May 2003)
Volume 20, Issue 7, Pages (April 2010)
Cosuppression of Nonhomologous Transgenes in Drosophila Involves Mutually Related Endogenous Sequences  Manika Pal-Bhadra, Utpal Bhadra, James A. Birchler 
Joseph M. Bateman, Helen McNeill  Cell 
Volume 22, Issue 3, Pages (March 1999)
Matthew C Gibson, Gerold Schubiger  Cell 
flr mutations result in defects in the adult eye and larval eye disc.
A Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, Dacapo, Is Necessary for Timely Exit from the Cell Cycle during Drosophila Embryogenesis  Joriene C de Nooij, Mary.
Justin Blau, Michael W Young  Cell 
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages (October 2004)
Volume 14, Issue 12, Pages (June 2004)
Gene Amplification as a Developmental Strategy
The Class I PITP Giotto Is Required for Drosophila Cytokinesis
Kevin Johnson, Ferdi Grawe, Nicola Grzeschik, Elisabeth Knust 
Marelle Acts Downstream of the Drosophila HOP/JAK Kinase and Encodes a Protein Similar to the Mammalian STATs  Xianyu Steven Hou, Michael B Melnick, Norbert.
Volume 44, Issue 5, Pages (December 2004)
E93 Directs Steroid-Triggered Programmed Cell Death in Drosophila
Presentation transcript:

Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 881-887 (June 1997) InsP3 Receptor Is Essential for Growth and Differentiation but Not for Vision in Drosophila  Jairaj K Acharya, Kees Jalink, Robert W Hardy, Volker Hartenstein, Charles S Zuker  Neuron  Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages 881-887 (June 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1

Figure 1 The InsP3R1 Flies Lack InsP3R Function Shown is a 60 kb genomic interval indicating the location of InsP3R, Nmdar, and j5B4 (P-element). InsP3R and Nmdar refer to the Inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor (Yoshikawa et al. 1992) and the N-methyl-D-aspartate R1 receptor (Ultsch et al. 1993), respectively. The genes were mapped by sequence analysis and PCR amplification. Our sequence analysis revealed that the first 670 of the 842-nucleotide untranslated leader of the published InsP3R cDNA sequence (Accession # D90403; Yoshikawa et al. 1992) codes for the Drosophila myosin light chain kinase, and likely reflects a cloning artifact in the original report. Instead, the Drosophila InsP3R has a 327 bp untranslated leader. The InsP3R1 allele deletes all of the region between the P-insertion and position +139 of InsP3R. This mutant was identified first by genomic Southern and subsequently confirmed by sequence analysis of the mutant chromosome. Cosmid-A, containing full-length InsP3R and upstream elements (including partial coding sequence of Nmdar) rescues the lethality associated with j5B4 and InsP3R1. Cosmids -B and -C, coding for the entire Nmdar, do not rescue the mutants. The 6 kb Bam H1 genomic fragment (P[w+; 6]), containing sequences between the InsP3R and the Nmdar, also fails to rescue the mutants. However, a 20 kb construct, containing only the InsP3R and 5 kb upstream sequences (P[w+; 20]), rescues the lethality of InsP3R1 mutants. Neuron 1997 18, 881-887DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1)

Figure 2 InsP3R1 Mutants Are Arrested at Second Instar The figure shows InsP3R1/InsP3R1 on the left and heterozygous InsP3R1/+ larvae on the right at (a) first, (b) second, (c) early-, (d) mid-, and (e) late third instar stages. Neuron 1997 18, 881-887DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1)

Figure 3 InsP3R1 Larvae Are Defective in Cell Division and Differentiation Growth defects in 4-day-old InsP3R1 homozygous larvae (A, B, D, and F), compared with wild-type controls of the same stage (C, E, and G). All panels were taken at the same magnification (×500). (A) shows a dorsal view of brain hemispheres (br) labeled with basic fuchsin. Eye imaginal discs (ed), each numbering less than 100 cells, are anteriorly attached to the brain. (B) and (C) show brain neuroblasts (nb) of larvae labeled with anti-BrdU antibody. BrdU, which is incorporated into nuclei of proliferating neuroblasts, had been fed to the larva during day 2 (B) and day 3 (C) post hatching. In the control, clones of 4–8 labeled ganglion mother cells accompany each neuroblast (arrows in C). In InsP3R1 homozygote, many neuroblasts are labeled, demonstrating that they at least replicate once during the BrdU pulse. However, there are little, if any, ganglion mother cells, resulting in the reduced brain size compared to the control (ol = optic lobe cells). (D) and (E) show part of salivary gland of InsP3R1 homozygote and heterozygous control, respectively. Control nuclei outmeasure, in volume, mutant nuclei by at least two orders of magnitude. Also note the variable nuclear size in mutants (arrows in D). (F) and (G) compare larval midgut epithelial cells (PMECs) in mutant and control midgut, respectively. Adult midgut progenitors (AMPs) appear in the embryo as individual cells interspersed at regular intervals among the PMECs. During larval stages, they undergo 2–3 mitotic divisions, resulting in small “islands” of 4–8 AMPs (G). In InsP3R1 homozygotes, AMPs apparently fail to proliferate and impose as single, small cells scattered in between the PMECs. Neuron 1997 18, 881-887DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1)

Figure 4 InsP3R Is Not Required for Phototransduction (A) InsP3R1 somatic clone in the eye. The InsP3R1/InsP3R1 mutant patch is white, the control P[w+]/P[w+] homozygous patch is red, and the heterozygous P[w+]/InsP3R1 background is orange. (B) The InsP3R1 mutant clones undergo degeneration. Shown is a 1 μm section through a mosaic similar to the one shown in (A). The mutant InsP3R1 photoreceptors are w and hence do not have the red pigment granules in the supporting cells. The InsP3R1 mutant ommatidia show retinal degeneration with disruptions in the ommatidial architecture. However, note the nearly intact rhabdomeric structure in the mutant ommatidia. The adjacent heterozygous and the homozygous wild-type tissue are morphologically intact. (C) The upper panel shows electrophysiological responses to pulses of light in control and InsP3R1 mutant photoreceptor cells. Shown are the intensity-response relationships of dark-adapted cells (mean ± SEM; n ⩾ 6) for green test stimuli of the indicated intensities. The InsP3R1 mutant photoreceptors display normal light responses. The middle (w1118) and lower (InsP3R1) panels demonstrate that adaptation to background light is similar in wild-type and mutant flies. For each cell, intensity-response relations to green test pulses were recorded in the presence of different intensities of 570 nm background illumination at ND 3 (circles), ND 2 (triangles), ND 1 (inverted triangles), and ND 0 (diamonds). Insets show responses to 530 nm, 400 ms light pulses at ND 0, demonstrating that the kinetics of activation and deactivation are similar between the wild type and mutant cells. Neuron 1997 18, 881-887DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1)

Figure 4 InsP3R Is Not Required for Phototransduction (A) InsP3R1 somatic clone in the eye. The InsP3R1/InsP3R1 mutant patch is white, the control P[w+]/P[w+] homozygous patch is red, and the heterozygous P[w+]/InsP3R1 background is orange. (B) The InsP3R1 mutant clones undergo degeneration. Shown is a 1 μm section through a mosaic similar to the one shown in (A). The mutant InsP3R1 photoreceptors are w and hence do not have the red pigment granules in the supporting cells. The InsP3R1 mutant ommatidia show retinal degeneration with disruptions in the ommatidial architecture. However, note the nearly intact rhabdomeric structure in the mutant ommatidia. The adjacent heterozygous and the homozygous wild-type tissue are morphologically intact. (C) The upper panel shows electrophysiological responses to pulses of light in control and InsP3R1 mutant photoreceptor cells. Shown are the intensity-response relationships of dark-adapted cells (mean ± SEM; n ⩾ 6) for green test stimuli of the indicated intensities. The InsP3R1 mutant photoreceptors display normal light responses. The middle (w1118) and lower (InsP3R1) panels demonstrate that adaptation to background light is similar in wild-type and mutant flies. For each cell, intensity-response relations to green test pulses were recorded in the presence of different intensities of 570 nm background illumination at ND 3 (circles), ND 2 (triangles), ND 1 (inverted triangles), and ND 0 (diamonds). Insets show responses to 530 nm, 400 ms light pulses at ND 0, demonstrating that the kinetics of activation and deactivation are similar between the wild type and mutant cells. Neuron 1997 18, 881-887DOI: (10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80328-1)