Data simulation using the routine spm_MDP_VB.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fig. 1. Reward-based, free-choice task and monkey's performance. (A) Time chart of events that occurred during the task. (B) Diagram of large-reward probabilities.
Advertisements

Zatorre et al. Nature Neuroscience, 2002 These animations illustrate the stimulus sequences used in Experiments 1 and 2. For each experiment, the animation.
Date of download: 9/18/2016 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Copyright © All rights reserved. From: What determines the relationship.
Soyoun Kim, Jaewon Hwang, Daeyeol Lee  Neuron 
Volume 53, Issue 1, Pages 9-16 (January 2007)
Robustness of Amplicon Deep Sequencing Underlines Its Utility in Clinical Applications  Vera Grossmann, Andreas Roller, Hans-Ulrich Klein, Sandra Weissmann,
Gijsbert Stoet, Lawrence H Snyder  Neuron 
Pei-Chen Peng, Md. Abul Hassan Samee, Saurabh Sinha 
Ranulfo Romo, Adrián Hernández, Antonio Zainos  Neuron 
Choosing Goals, Not Rules: Deciding among Rule-Based Action Plans
Coding of the Reach Vector in Parietal Area 5d
Keno Juechems, Jan Balaguer, Maria Ruz, Christopher Summerfield  Neuron 
Hierarchical Active Inference: A Theory of Motivated Control
Rachael E. Jack, Oliver G.B. Garrod, Philippe G. Schyns 
Nils Kolling, Marco Wittmann, Matthew F.S. Rushworth  Neuron 
Neural Correlates of Knowledge: Stable Representation of Stimulus Associations across Variations in Behavioral Performance  Adam Messinger, Larry R. Squire,
Volume 62, Issue 5, Pages (June 2009)
Hierarchical empirical Bayesian inference on group effects using the function spm_dcm_peb. Hierarchical empirical Bayesian inference on group effects using.
A schematic overview of the analysis stream underlying the treatment of computational psychiatry in this article. A schematic overview of the analysis.
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
A Role for the Superior Colliculus in Decision Criteria
Figure 2. EZO levels in infants and young children compared to adults at similar doses EZO levels in infants and young children compared to adults at similar.
Keegan E. Hines, John R. Bankston, Richard W. Aldrich 
Simulated group difference between control subjects and patients (with a group difference in precision of one-quarter) in the average reward received.
Annabelle C. Singer, Loren M. Frank  Neuron 
Attention Governs Action in the Primate Frontal Eye Field
Incidence and spatial extent of epileptiform events observed in widefield calcium imaging. Incidence and spatial extent of epileptiform events observed.
Action Selection and Action Value in Frontal-Striatal Circuits
Volume 81, Issue 5, Pages (March 2014)
A Switching Observer for Human Perceptual Estimation
Modulation of Caudate Activity by Action Contingency
Neural Mechanisms Underlying Human Consensus Decision-Making
Broca's Area and the Hierarchical Organization of Human Behavior
Volume 25, Issue 5, Pages (March 2015)
The Social Dominance Paradox
Value-Based Modulations in Human Visual Cortex
Hierarchical Active Inference: A Theory of Motivated Control
Masayuki Matsumoto, Masahiko Takada  Neuron 
Volume 27, Issue 3, Pages (September 2000)
The C-terminal membrane-proximal region of MARCH8 interacts with TfR.
Coregulation of genes within TADs
Complex History of Admixture between Modern Humans and Neandertals
Gijsbert Stoet, Lawrence H Snyder  Neuron 
Repolarization of membrane potential is associated with a decreased membrane conductance. Repolarization of membrane potential is associated with a decreased.
Spatial statistics of X-ray volumes reveal layering and spatially diverse distribution of cell bodies. Spatial statistics of X-ray volumes reveal layering.
The Hippocampus, Memory, and Place Cells
Characterization of non-DA firing.
Log10-transformed EEG power in the 0- to 30-Hz range measured in females (white) and males (gray) at each channel for NFB (left) and CAL (right), shown.
Repetition suppression: Interaction between trials without (prime) versus with (target) context (C) and repeated versus non-repeated context (i.e., repetition.
Learning rates and CR latency data for mice trained at trace 50–350 or trace 50–450. Learning rates and CR latency data for mice trained at trace 50–350.
Acquisition of trace 50–250 is dependent on a subregion of mPFC in mice. Acquisition of trace 50–250 is dependent on a subregion of mPFC in mice. A, CR.
Yongli Zhang, Junyi Jiao, Aleksander A. Rebane  Biophysical Journal 
Effect of consecutive wins or losses on choice: test for reinforcement learning. Effect of consecutive wins or losses on choice: test for reinforcement.
Feature computation and classification of grating pitch.
Summary data for target shift experiments and transient recall of old memories observed in the second target shift task. Summary data for target shift.
Behavioral task and performance.
An Introduction to Infinite HMMs for Single-Molecule Data Analysis
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (May 2002)
Cue-evoked dopamine release dynamics in the NAc shell and core.
Matthew R. Roesch, Adam R. Taylor, Geoffrey Schoenbaum  Neuron 
Power spectra of EMG during the pre- and post-feedback sessions.
X-tile analysis of survival data from the SEER registry reveals a continuous distribution based on tumor size and node number, and a U-shaped distribution.
Thy1S promoter drives sparse expression of hrGFP in marmoset cortex.
Simulation of the effort-related T-maze choice task by a reinforcement-learning model incorporating the decay of learned values. Simulation of the effort-related.
MSCaTs measured by GCaMP6f imaging reflect NMDAR activation at individual synapses following spontaneous single vesicle release. mSCaTs measured by GCaMP6f.
A–C, Schematic representations of experimental timeline (A) and MRI data processing (B, C). A–C, Schematic representations of experimental timeline (A)
Volume 27, Issue 6, Pages (March 2017)
Integrated analysis of gene expression and copy number alterations.
Keno Juechems, Jan Balaguer, Maria Ruz, Christopher Summerfield  Neuron 
Bruce Rannala, Jeff P. Reeve  The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Presentation transcript:

Data simulation using the routine spm_MDP_VB. Data simulation using the routine spm_MDP_VB. A, A simulated example trial, where the left top panel shows the hidden states, the right top panel shows the inferred actions, the middle panels show the inference on policies (i.e., the possible sequences of actions), the bottom left panel shows the preferences over outcome states (c-vector), and the bottom right panel shows the expected precision, which could be encoded by dopamine (Friston et al., n.d.). In this trial, the subject starts in the middle position where the reward is (most likely) on the right arm. She then makes a selection to sample the cue and, finally, moves to the right arm, as indicated by the cue (darker colors reflect higher posterior probabilities). B, Overview of a simulated experiment comprising 128 trials. The first panel shows the inferred policies (black regions) and initial states (shown as colored circles: red circles, reward is located at the right arm; blue circles, reward is located at the left arm) at every given trial. The second panel shows estimated reaction times (cyan dots), outcome states (colored circles), and the value of those outcomes (black bars). Note that the value of outcomes is expressed in terms of an agent’s (expected) utility, which is defined as the logarithm of an agent’s prior expectations. Thus, the utility of an outcome is at most 0 [= log(1)]. Reaction times reflect the choice conflict at any given trial and are simulated by using the time it takes Matlab to simulate inference and subsequent choice in any given trial (using the tic-toc function in Matlab). The third and fourth panels show simulated event-related potentials for hidden state estimation and expected precision, respectively. The specifics of these simulations are discussed in detail elsewhere (Friston et al., 2016). Finally, panels five and six illustrate learning and habit formation. Our simulations did not include any learning or habitual responses. Philipp Schwartenbeck, and Karl Friston eneuro 2016;3:ENEURO.0049-16.2016 ©2016 by Society for Neuroscience