Hp(10) irradiations for personal dosimetry traceability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 4 Radiation Dosimeters
Advertisements

WORKING WITH X-RAYS Dr D E Dugdale October 2012 KEELE UNIVERSITY.
RADIATION PROTECTION IN RADIOTHERAPY Part 10: Optimization of protection in External Beam Radiotherapy PRACTICAL EXERCISE IAEA Post Graduate Educational.
Estimation of TLD dose measurement uncertainties and thresholds at the Radiation Protection Service Du Toit Volschenk SABS.
Key Concepts in Evaluating Overall System Uncertainty Carroll S. Brickenkamp NVLAP Program Manager Panasonic Users Meeting June 2001.
Diamond Detectors for Medical Dosimetry Jan U. Würfel, PTW-Freiburg, CARAT Workshop, 13–15 December 2010.
NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012 Classroom Session 9: Radiation Interaction with Matter  Absorbed Dose (D), Kerma (K) Gray (Gy) =
Calibration of extremity dosimeters for Tc-99m, Cs-137 and X-ray David Rawlings Regional Medical Physics Department Newcastle-upon-Tyne.
Kilovoltage X-ray Dosimetry
IAEA Quantities and Measurements - 3 Radiation Protection Quantities Day 3 – Lecture 1 1.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Effective and Committed Effective Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
X-Ray Production & Emission
Alexander Brandl ERHS 630 Exposure and Dose Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences.
TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Instrumentation 1 – Gas detectors / Part 1 Anthony WAKER, University of Ontario Instutute of Technology Wed. 21/11/2012,
X-Ray Production & Emission
Photon and Energy Fluence
Ch .4 Clinical Radiation Generators
Dose Distribution and Scatter Analysis
Derek Liu E. Poon, M. Bazalova, B. Reniers, M. Evans
Linac Beam.
TWO FIELD BREAST PLAN VS. OPTIMIZED CONFORMAL BREAST PLAN: COMPARISON OF PLAN PARAMETERS Authors: Borko Basarić, Ozren Čudić, Milan Teodorović, Borislava.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency RADIATION PROTECTION IN DIAGNOSTIC AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY Part 19.03: Optimization of protection in Mammography.
Radiographic Dosimetry
Higher Physics – Unit 3 3.5Dosimetry and Safety. Activity of Radiation The activity of a radioactive source is the average number of nuclei decaying per.
OSL Albedo Neutron Dosimeter
Basic Survey: External dose estimation Radiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University The International.
Neutron Dose Per Fluence and Weighting Factors for Use at High Energy Accelerators (Submitted to Health Physics) J. Donald Cossairt, Ph.D., C.H.P. Kamran.
International Atomic Energy Agency ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO EXTERNAL RADIATION SOURCES AND INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES Dosimetric Quantities.
Đ. Milković, M. Ranogajec-Komor, S. Miljanić, Ž. Knežević and K
RAD 354 Chapt. 8 X-ray emission
Optimisation in digital radiography 9 October 2015 Radiation Dose Metrics Dr Tim Wood Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust
Determining Radiation Intensity
International Atomic Energy Agency Quality Management System ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO EXTERNAL RADIATION SOURCES AND INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES.
What are the dose quantities in CT ? IAEA/RCA Kampala Kampala.
RTT 425 Radiation Therapy Physics Radiation Quality, Chapter 4 From Stanton and Stinson: Applied physics for Radiation Oncology.
MAIN FEATURES FOR CALIBRATING DOSEMETERS ORAMED WP5 J.-M. Bordy Laboratoire National Henri Becquerel (CEA/LIST/LNHB), France ORAMED 2011 January 2011.
Basis of Mammography F. Milano Dept. Clinical Physiopathology University of Florence
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lecture 8 – Quality management system Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of.
Adapting A Clinical Medical Accelerator For Primary Standard Dosimetry
AAPM TG-51 Protocol (Med Phys 26: , 1999)
Qing Liang, PhD Medical Physicist Mercy Health System, Janesville, WI
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lecture 7 – Calibration and Testing of Radiation Protection Instruments Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation.
Chp 2 : Interaction of radiation with matter Radiation Contrast
Ch 36 Radiation Protection Design
CHAPTER 3 DOSE DETERMINATION FOR EXTERNAL BEAMS
Electron Beam Therapy.
Khan, The Physics of Radiation Therapy, Ch7
Ch 7. Quality of X-ray Beams
Resident Physics Lectures (year 1)
Dr: Mohamed Afifi By Lecturer Radiological Science
X-RAY PRODUCTION AND EXPOSURE FACTORS
Gas Detectors for Neutron Dosimetry and Monitoring
X-Radiation.
David Sutton or Colin Martin But Borrowed from Jerry Williams
A Brachytherapy Treatment Planning Software Based on Monte Carlo Simulations and Artificial Neural Network Algorithm Amir Moghadam.
Stacy Kopso, M.Ed., RT(R)(M)
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Ch 10. A System of Dosimetric Calculations
RADIATION TERMS AND UNITS
Chapter 8 (Part 1) Measurement of Absorbed Dose
Resident Physics Lectures (year 1)
CHAPTER 7 X-RAY PRODUCTION.
Resident Physics Lectures (Year 1)
Occupational Radiation Dose Management
Occupational Radiation Dose Management
Occupational Radiation Dose Management
Dosimetry Standards at NMIJ/AIST Ionizing Radiation Standards Group
Hot and cold spots are common problems associated with planning:
Intercomparison on Personal Dose Equivalent (Hp(10))
Presentation transcript:

Hp(10) irradiations for personal dosimetry traceability Duncan Butler Workshop on Building Asia-Pacific Individual Monitoring Service (IMS) Capabilities toward Regional Sustainable Network. At Pullman Bangkok King Power Hotel, Bangkok Thailand 18-20 March 2019

Quantity Hp(10) Personal dose equivalent, Hp(d) = Absorbed dose to soft tissue at depth of d mm at a specified point in the body Note: For weakly penetrating radiation d = 0.07 mm is of interest (“skin dose”) For strongly penetrating radiation, d = 10 mm is of interest

In calibration laboratory… Radiation source

Comment Regulations mostly refer to “Effective dose” This quantity includes: assumption: radiation incident from everywhere dose throughout the human body organ risk factors Very to hard to measure! Personal dose equivalent, such as Hp(10), is an operational quantity – it can be measured Used as a surrogate for effective dose

Irradiation to the 137Cs Beam Direct teletherapy Cs beam (no attenuators added) Distance 4 m Beam diameter 40 cm PMMA slab phantom 30 x 30 x 15 cm 2 mm PMMA added over the front of the monitors Nominal Hp(10) rate of 35 µSv/s Conversion from air kerma: 1.21 Sv/Gy at 0° 1.22 Sv/Gy at 20° ISO 4037 Part 3 Table 33 Nominal relative uncertainty (k=2): 6% Traceability: Farmer Chamber calibrated at Co-60 and X-rays against ARPANSA primary standards, and interpolated to Cs-137

Irradiation to the X-ray Beam Constant potential, tungsten target X-ray tube Beam quality 70 kVp, 15 mA Additional filtration: 4 mm Al, HVL = 3.19 mm Al (approx. 0.11 mm Cu) Effective energy ~34 keV for Cu Similar to PTB therapy beam, code TH 70 Distance 3 m Beam diameter 45 cm Water slab phantom 30 x 30 x 15 cm of water outer 32 x 32 x 16.3 cm including PMMA walls No PMMA added over the front of the monitors Conversion from air kerma: 1.47 Sv/Gy at 0° 1.44 Sv/Gy at 20° ISO 4037 Part 3 Table 27 Nominal relative uncertainty (k=2): 6% Traceability: Via large area transmission chamber calibrated directly against the primary standard of medium-energy X-ray air kerma

What does “traceability” mean? Traceability = Documented chain of measurements A primary standard of radiation dose The radiation measurement you make

ISO 4037 – irradiation of personal monitors to Hp(10) Issued in 1999 4 parts Updated in 2019 Tells laboratories how to irradiate monitors to Hp(10) etc

ISO 4037 (1998) – irradiation of personal monitors to Hp(10) Determine air kerma K (free in air) at reference distance (say 3 m) Put the monitor on the ICRU slab phantom Adjust reference point of dosimeter to be at reference distance Cover with PMMA (2 mm for 137Cs or 4 mm for 60Co) Use ISO 4037 conversion coefficient to obtain Hp(10) from K

In the IAEA-ARPANSA comparison… 29 dosimetry services 2 beam qualities 2 angles 5 monitors per beam and angle 29 x 2 x 2 x 5 = 580 monitors to irradiate! Have to irradiate in groups of 2 or 3 Exposure times ~ a few minutes each Laboratory time taken = 3 days

(Added uncertainty due to monitor proximity to each other) 0° 20° (Added uncertainty due to monitor proximity to each other)

Uncertainty budget for primary standard laboratory for single monitor irradiation

Irradiated reference monitors Uncertainty budget Calibrate reader Primary standard Irradiated reference monitors (What energy? What dose? How many?) Wearer (~3 months) Read monitor, Dmon Subtract background! Occupational dose to wearer, D

Primary or secondary standard Source of uncertainty Primary or secondary standard Dose given to reference monitors Uncertainty in calibration of reader Variation in reading out the reference monitors

Uncertainty in dose readout Linearity Source of uncertainty Reader calibration Energy response Uncertainty in dose readout Linearity Fading Statistical variation for one monitor

Uncertainty in occupational dose Source of uncertainty Uncertainty in occupational dose Dose readout Background Dmon - B Over 3 months, can have a large variation!

Statistical uncertainty 5 reference monitors All irradiated to same dose (1 mSv) by standards laboratory Readout gives 1.2 mSv, 1.4 mSv, 0.6 mSv, 1.1 mSv, 1.2 mSv Average = 1.1 mSv Standard deviation = 0.3 mSv Standard deviation of the mean = 0.3 / sqrt(5) = 0.13 mSv

Statistical uncertainty Standard deviation = 0.3 mSv Is the estimate of the uncertainty in one reading Standard deviation of the mean = 0.3 / sqrt(5) = 0.13 mSv Is the estimate of the uncertainty in the average of the 5 readings

THANK YOU CONTACT ARPANSA Email: info@arpansa.gov.au Website: www.arpansa.gov.au Telephone: +61 3 9433 2211 Freecall 1800 022 333 General Fax: +61 3 9432 1835