Machine Protection PLC Based System Verification and Validation Plan

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOFTWARE TESTING. Software Testing Principles Types of software tests Test planning Test Development Test Execution and Reporting Test tools and Methods.
Advertisements

CIP Cyber Security – Security Management Controls
Software Quality Assurance Plan
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
Illinois Institute of Technology
Testing - an Overview September 10, What is it, Why do it? Testing is a set of activities aimed at validating that an attribute or capability.
Introduction to Software Testing
Software Testing & Strategies
© 2006 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved.Cisco PublicITE I Chapter 6 1 Characterizing the Existing Network Designing and Supporting Computer Networks.
Extreme Programming Software Development Written by Sanjay Kumar.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Copyright 2005 Welcome to The Great Lakes TL 9000 SIG TL 9000 Requirements Release 3.0 to Release 4.0 Differences Bob Clancy Vice President, BIZPHYX,
VALIDATION METHODOLOGY
© Palaniappan R Kannan PMP.,CFSE 1 IEC Standard – What is it? IEC is a Standard for the functional safety of Electric / Electronic / Programmable.
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
Cybersecurity: Engineering a Secure Information Technology Organization, 1st Edition Chapter 7 Software Supporting Processes and Software Reuse.
Software Testing Life Cycle
Software Testing Testing principles. Testing Testing involves operation of a system or application under controlled conditions & evaluating the results.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
TS Workshop, Archamps, May 24 – May 26, 2005 The LHC Access System Status report – May 2005 P. Ninin & the Access project team TS/CSE.
Safety Critical Systems 5 Testing T Safety Critical Systems.
Topics Covered: Software testing Software testing Levels of testing Levels of testing  Unit testing Unit testing Unit testing  Integration testing Integration.
Software Testing Process By: M. Muzaffar Hameed.
Over View of CENELC Standards for Signalling Applications
Network design Topic 6 Testing and documentation.
Configuration Management Romuald Duperrier Head of Systems Engineering Division April 22, 2015.
Reliability Applied to KM3NET
Configuration Management- Basic Concepts. Agenda  Configuration Management process Overview  Process Stages  Planning & Setup  Control  Audit  Case.
LINAC4 COMMISSIONING 1 LESSONS LEARNT DURING MY VISIT AT LINAC4 COMMISSIONING Evangelia Vaena, 02/02/2016.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Collaborating for Quality Quality Assurance (QA) & Quality Control (QC) in the Accelerator Project (ACCSYS) Matthew Conlon ACCSYS QA/QC
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
DISH LMC Software An Idea for Qualification Plan Francesco Schillirò INAF- OACT LMC Harmonisation Workshop Madrid April 2016.
Syndicate Members: 1. GC Muhammad Uzair 2. GC Umer Naveed Malik.
Installation and Commisioning SE view point Romuald Duperrier ESS SE manager.
Collaborating for Quality through the Project Quality Plan Matthew Conlon ESS ACCSYS QA/QC Quality Learning & Planning.
Steve Griffith February 28th, 2017
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
Supportability Design Considerations
SOFTWARE TESTING Date: 29-Dec-2016 By: Ram Karthick.
PREPARED BY G.VIJAYA KUMAR ASST.PROFESSOR
Software and Systems Integration
TechStambha PMP Certification Training
Test stand preparation and EMR "live" data summaries
Capability reporting Francesco Schillirò INAF- OACT
BU IS GIG Chemical, Oil & Gas
Engineering Processes
Introduction to Software Testing
Verification and Validation Unit Testing
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Chapter 10 – Software Testing
System Construction and Implementation
Engineering Processes
PSS0 Design & Concept of Operations
Testing Coordination at ESS
Introduction and Safety Plan
PSS verification and validation
MPS commissioning at ESS
Configuration Management
PSS Verification and validation
Author Team Supervisor A. Toral M. Mansouri S.L. Birch Y.K. Sin
PSS0 Configuration Management,
Safety Readiness Review (SRR) Thomas Hansson, ESH
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
PSS verification and validation
Operation of Target Safety System (TSS)
Atefeh Sadeghzadeh Control engineer – Target safety and control
Mikael Olsson Control Engineer
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Stuart Birch On behalf of Protection Systems Group
Presentation transcript:

Machine Protection PLC Based System Verification and Validation Plan Paulina Skog On behalf of Protection Systems Group www.europeanspallationsource.se 28 June, 2019

Agenda Scope and purpose Roles and responsibilities 2019-06-28 Scope and purpose Roles and responsibilities Verification strategy Verification activity flow Validation Agenda Paulina Skog Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Scope and purpose The purpose MPS V&V activities is to verify global protection The purpose MPS V&V activities is not to verify local protection safety and health of persons, nor environment protection 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Applicable standards IEC 61508 The protection development method used, is inspired by the IEC 61508 standard’s overall safety lifecycle concept SS-EN 62381 Automation systems in the process industry – Factory acceptance test (FAT), site acceptance test (SAT), and site integration test (SIT) 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group ESS guidelines ESS guideline for validation Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and Site Acceptance Test (SAT) ESS Handbook for System Verification 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Roles and responsibilities 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Verification strategy – part 1 Hardware and software component tests and system integration tests, the tests planning, and documentation shall be carried out according to SS-EN 62381:2012 ESS guideline for validation Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and Site Acceptance Test (SAT) 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Verification strategy – part 2 The software shall have documented code reviews All documents shall be reviewed and approved by appropriate reviewers 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Reviews usually conducted specifically for the MPS specific systems: Preliminary design review (PDR) Critical design review (CDR) Test readiness review (TRR) 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Reviews conducted for the parent or overall system Installation readiness review (IRR) Test readiness review (TRR) System Acceptance Review (SAR) Operational Readiness Review (ORR) 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Verifies that the as-built system (Racks) meets the specified design. Performed by the vendor, but it will be accepted by ESS. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Site Acceptance Test (SAT) Verifies that a system works as specified in its operational environment. SAT includes installation and integration verification of a system. The SAT shall be performed by ESS on the site. Note that this only verifies the MPS equipment itself and not the whole system which it shall protect. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Software Pre-SIT Note that this activity can be divided into two parts Develop the software to make the racks testable in the SAT Develop the software for the “smart” rack specially developed to ease the testing of the system. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Software Pre-SiT The main verification objectives during pre-SIT are to reveal: software design defects avoid systematic failures ensure compliance with the software safety requirements. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Verification activity flow 6/28/2019 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Validation Operation of the facility, even with low power beam, shall only be possible if the minimum required MP-SoS protection functions are in place and validated. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Validation strategy The validation shall be performed step by step as well when the constituent systems or its prototypes are integrated into the MP-SoS. Those validation activities should start early, and can be performed in the laboratory and should cover as much functionality as possible. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Scope of SIT Normal operation for all proton beam destinations and proton beam modes. Worst case timing situations. Abnormal operation situations. Interfaces to higher level control and other systems. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Entry criteria’s met by the constituents systems It shall be ensured that all cabling is correct and that the connections comply to their specification. A procedure shall be developed to confirm that the actual MP-SoS configuration corresponds to the setup in the MP-SoS configuration data base 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Entry criteria’s met by the constituents systems All interfaces of all protection functions shall be validated inside the final MP-SoS setup for all signals A complete end to end test of the signal flow through sensors, logic and actuators including timing measurements shall be planned and carried out for each protection functions 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

SIT acceptance criteria All requirements shall be met by the MP-SoS. The correct system behavior shall be validated. Non-conformities The result has been documented and stored in CHESS. 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Protection Systems Group Validation Continuous validation Validation after MP-SOS Changes 2019-06-28 Paulina Skog, Protection Systems Group

Thank you Questions? www.europeanspallationsource.se 28 June, 2019