Texas Success Initiative Assessment

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Advertisements

High School Graduation Requirements Florida students entering their first year of high school in the 2011–2012 school year and thereafter may choose from.
PONCHATOULA HIGH SCHOOL DEADLINES: FRIDAY, MAY 9 –AP REQUEST OR DUAL ENROLLMENT FORM WITH ACT/PLAN SCORES ATTACHED DUE MONEY FOR FALL ONLY CLASSES.
Governing Board & Advisory Committee on College Readiness Special Joint Session College- and Career-Ready Determination Policy and Policy-Level Performance.
Parent Meeting February STAAR State of Texas Assessment of Academic Readiness Emphasis on college and career readiness standards Began school.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Staar Trek The Next Generation STAAR Trek: The Next Generation Performance Standards.
END OF COURSE TESTING WHAT YOU CAN EXPECT Freshman Parent Information Session
College-Ready Determination Policy and Performance Level Descriptors July
Establishing MME and MEAP Cut Scores Consistent with College and Career Readiness A study conducted by the Michigan Department of Education (MDE) and ACT,
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability Model June 2011.
 Dual Credit - Credit is earned for both high school and college at the same time  Dual credit courses may count for both high school and college credit.
Mark Wade Lieu, ASCCC President Jane Patton, ASCCC Vice President Janet Fulks, ASCCC Curriculum Chair 1.
Academic Success First-time/Full-time Students Fall 2008, 2009 and 2010 Concurrently Enrolled in English and Select Courses.
Department of Research and Planning Leadership Meeting January 16, 2013 ASSESSMENT CORRELATIONS.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) will replace the Texas Assessment.
Employing Empirical Data in Judgmental Processes Wayne J. Camara National Conference on Student Assessment, San Diego, CA June 23, 2015.
An Analysis of Successful Online Behaviors Across Disciplines Catherine Finnegan, University System of Georgia Libby V. Morris, University of Georgia Kangjoo.
Standard Setting Results for the Oklahoma Alternate Assessment Program Dr. Michael Clark Research Scientist Psychometric & Research Services Pearson State.
Math SOL Test Changes School Board Work Session March 8, 2012.
ACT Aspire Data: What Does It Tell Us? October 27, 2015 Developed by the WISExplore Content Work Team WISExplore Content Work Team Members: Mary Ann Hudziak,
1 PRESENTED TO THE FALL 2011 MEETING OF THE MICHIGAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION MAY 17, 2011 Methods for Setting Cut Scores to Represent College.
School Year Assessment Updates State Assessment Updates Coordinator Training November
Validity Evidence for the Orleans-Hanna Algebra Prognosis Test Jack B. Monpas-Huber, Ph.D. Director of Assessment & Student Information.
Advanced Placement Dual Credit UT Austin-On Ramp Program Parent Information February 11, 2016.
ACC - DUAL CREDIT CLASSES February 3, 2016 Presented by: Trisha Uhler Dual Credit Coordinator.
First College-Level Course Guidelines Webinar Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board February 5, 2014.
N EW S TUDENT A SSESSMENT P ROGRAM Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Huntsville City Schools School Year School Instructional Targets October 3,
TSI (Texas Success Initiative) Pre-Assessment Activity The purpose of this pre-assessment activity is to prepare you for completion of the TSI Assessment,
Dual Credit Parent Night RIO VISTA HIGH SCHOOL.
Presented by: Kaylin Ballard Special Admissions Coordinator Spring Creek Campus, Plano Dual Credit Program.
Next Generation Learners Session 1: Introduction of Next Generation Learners.
AP Validity Study Findings. Institutions & Years  Abraham Baldwin Agricultural College  Clayton State University  Kennesaw State University  University.
Go to College! Get Ahead! DUAL CREDIT PARENT INFORMATIONAL SESSION.
April 28, 2016 College Readiness and Success
LSUE Advisor Training Monday March 27, :00PM C116.
Analysis of AP Exam Scores
Report of Achieving the Dream Data Team
DUAL CREDIT ( ) Contact: Brittney Chavez
TACRAO Summer Meeting July 18, 2017
Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010
Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
Joint Elementary and High School Counselors’ Articulation Meeting
Texas Success Initiative Report: CBM002
Dual Credit Parent Night RIO VISTA HIGH SCHOOL
TACRAO Summer Meeting July 20, 2017
The All-important Placement Cut Scores
STATE ASSESSMENT DATA Madam President, Board Members, Dr. Gacutan
PARCC Math Options Stephanie Boyd, PARCC Consultant
Texas Success Initiative (TSI)
High School /College Dual Enrollment (FORMERLy MOWR)
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
DUAL CREDIT ( ) Contact: Brittney Chavez
Timeline for STAAR EOC Standard Setting Process
The Never Ending Story: College Readiness
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
WAO Elementary School and the New Accountability System
Presented by Joseph P. Stern
BEKRMAR High School Dual Enrollment
Rockwall ISD Dual Credit Overview
What we know about ab 705 Cheryl Aschenbach, North Representative
Michael Pilant, Texas A&M University
Texas Education Agency Standards and Engagement Performance Reporting
Dual Credit RIO VISTA HIGH SCHOOL
DUAL CREDIT 101 Associate’s Degree Crosswalk Dual Credit vs AP Courses
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Texas Success Initiative Assessment Predictive Placement Validity Study Hello. My name is Luz Bay and I am a Pyschometrician at the College Board. This is a presentation of the results of the Predictive Placement Validity Study of the Texas Success Initiative Assessment or TSIA. Luz Bay, Ph.D. June 28, 2017

Purpose of the Study determine the relationship between TSIA test scores and success in introductory credit-bearing college courses compute the probability of success associated with the current college-readiness cut scores provide to the THECB information that could help confirm or improve its current course placement policies When a test is used to implement a policy such as college placement, it is imperative to determine whether the test is being used productively. This sentiment is consistent with the purposes of the validity study. 1.) Through the validity study, we want to be able to show that there is a positive relationship between students’ scores on the test and success in the course to which students are placed. That is, students with higher scores on the placement test have a higher likelihood of succeeding in the course. BTW, for this study success in the course means earning a grade of C or higher. 2.) Another purpose of the study is to compute the probability of course success associated with the college readiness cut score for each TSI assessment. Although there is no specific probability of success that is desired more than others, 0.67 is a widely recognized probability value associated with the term “can do”. Thus, anything between 0.65 and 0.70 is acceptable. 3. The computed probabilities and other information were provided to the THECB as useful information for confirming or improving upon current course placement policies, including the consideration for adjusting college readiness cut scores.

College-Readiness Cut Score A TSIA college-readiness cut score is the score that a student needs to get to be placed in a pertinent college credit-bearing course A student who scores at this level or higher is deemed to have the necessary content knowledge that makes him/her ready to receive instruction and succeed in the course by earning a grade of C or higher Ideally, a cut score is associated with 0.67 expected probability of success In the middle of course placement policies are the college-readiness cut scores. The cut score on a placement test is the lowest score that a student can get and still be placed on the pertinent credit-bearing course on account of that score. A student with that score or higher is deemed to have the necessary content knowledge, such that, when given instruction in the course, he/she will have a high likelihood of success. Ideally, the cut score is associated with a 0.67 probability of success. And by success, we mean earning a grade of C or higher.

Mathematics Test Cut Score is 350 Mathematics Courses MATH 1314/1414 – College Algebra MATH 1324 – Mathematics for Business & Social Sciences I MATH 1332 – Contemporary Mathematics I MATH 1342 – Elementary Statistical Methods The college-readiness cut score for the math test is 350. By getting a score of 350 or higher, students are placed in the math courses listed on the slide. It is worth noting that in this study, about 70% of the students were enrolled in College Algebra.

Reading Test Cut Score is 351 Reading-intensive Courses GOVT 2301 – American Government I GOVT 2302 – American Government II GOVT 2305 – Federal Government GOVT 2306 – Texas Government HIST 1301 – United States History I HIST 1302 – United States History II HUMA 1301 – Introduction to the Humanities I PHIL 1301 – Introduction to Philosophy PSYC 2301 – General Psychology SOCI 1301 – Introductory Sociology The college-readiness cut scores for reading is 351. Students who receive 351 or higher on the TSI Reading assessment are deemed ready to take reading-intensive introductory credit-bearing courses. These courses are listed on the slide.

Writing Tests Cut Scores Essay Score of 5 and Multiple Choice Score of 350, or Essay Score of 4 and Multiple Choice Score of 363 English Composition Courses ENGL 1301 – Composition I ENGL 1302 – Composition II For placement in English composition courses, student have to take two TSI assessments – a multiple-choice test and an essay. A student is deemed ready to take ENGL 1301 or ENGL 1301 if he/she receives an essay score of 5 and a MC score of 350. Alternatively, a student who receives an essay score of 4 and a MC score of 363 is also deemed reading to take English composition courses.

Percentage of Students Data Number of Records and Students for Each Semester First time first year students in TX public higher education institutions in fall 2013, spring 2014, summer 2014, and fall 2014 Semester Number of Records Percentage of Records Number of Students Percentage of Students Fall 2013 130 0.61 123 0.60 Spring 2014 3,767 17.77 3,694 17.94 Summer 2014 1,599 7.54 1,571 7.63 Fall 2014 15,701 74.07 15,199 73.83 Total 21,197 100.00 20,587 Number of Records for Each Test The data used for the predictive placement validity study are from first time first year students in TX public higher education institutions from the launch of TSIA in the fall of 2013 through the fall of 2014. It is considered best practice to conduct a predictive validity study one year after a placement policy is in place. A data was extracted to study each test. Predictive placement validity studies customarily require at least 50 student records. Note that the sample sizes used in this study are well above what is required.  Test Number of Records TSIA Mathematics 3,690 TSIA Reading 11,911 TSIA Writing 5,202 WritePlacer 4,310

Logistic Regression Sample Result Expected Probability of Successful Reading-Intensive Course Completion Predicted by TSIA-R Sample Result 0.68 Each data set extracted for the study includes scores on the placement test and final grades on the pertinent college course. A mathematical model referred to as logistic regression is fitted to the data and the result represented graphically on the slide, which has the results for the reading test. The horizontal axis of the graph has the scores on the reading test from 310 to 390, and on the vertical axis is the expected probability of success associated with each score. Recall that successful course completion means receiving a grade of C or higher, and that withdrawing from a course is considered unsuccessful completion. This convention is represented by the red-dashed curve. Other curves representing different conventions are provided for additional information. Now, using the red-dashed curve, we draw a line from 351 which is the college readiness cut score for Reading, and follow it through to determine the expected probability of success. In this case the value is 0.68. This means that a student who scores a 351 or higher on the reading test has a 0.68 expected probability of earning a grade of C or higher in an introductory reading-intensive course.

P(C- or Higher; W Included) Logistic Regression Results Expected Probabilities of Successful Course Completion at the Cut Scores Course Predictor/Cut Score P(C- or Higher; W Included) Mathematics TSIA-M=350 0.64 Reading-Intensive TSIA-R=351 0.68 English Composition WP=5 and TSIA-W=350 0.75 WP= 4 and TSIA-W=363 0.78 A similar procedure for mathematics determines that a student who scores a 350 or higher has a 0.64 expected probability of earning a C or higher in a introductory math class. For English composition, a 0.75 probability of earning a C or higher is expected for any student who receives a 5 or higher on the essay and a score of 350 or higher on the multiple choice writing test. Similarly, a 0.78 probability of earning a C or higher is expected for any student who receives a 4 or higher on the essay and a score of 363 on the multiple-choice writing test. These results based on the logistic regression analysis provide information whether placement cut scores warrant adjustments. However, there are other pieces of information that should be considered.

Percentages of Correct Placement, Under-Placement, and Over-Placement Other Results Test Score Below Cut Above Cut Success Under-placement Correct Decision Non-Success Over-placement Percentages of Correct Placement, Under-Placement, and Over-Placement Course Cut Scores Correct Placement Under Placement Over Placement Mathematics TSIA-M=350 62.55 14.88 22.57 Reading-Intensive TSIA-R=351 68.59 10.54 20.86 English Composition WP=5 and TSIA-W=350 74.87 7.36 17.77 WP= 4 and TSIA-W=363 59.91 24.39 15.70 Course One such consideration is the percentage of correct decision. A correct decision was made on a student if he/she receives a score above the cut score and earns a C or higher in the course. It is also a correct decision when a student who receives a score lower than the cut score and gets a grade lower than a C in the course. This is indicated by the green quadrants of the 2x2 contingency table. Students who score above the cut score and fail the course are referred to as “over-placed”, while students who scored below the cut score but are able to earn a final course grade of C or higher are referred to a “under-placed”. Note that “under-placed” student is someone who would have been placed in a developmental education course based on the placement test, even though he/she has the wherewithal to earn a grade of C or higher in the credit-bearing course. When considering a cut score adjustment, part of the goal is to maximize the percentage of correct placement and minimize the percentages of under-placement and over placement. Considering the expected probability of success associated with the cut score alone might some times be counter productive. For example, the math cut score of 350 is associated with a 0.64 expected probability of success. Raising the cut score so that the associated probability of success is closer to 0.70 will decrease correct placement by over 10% and increase under-placement by about 30%.

Final Remarks Scores on TSI assessments are positively related to student success in college credit-bearing courses in Texas. Cut scores on TSI assessments are associated with high expected probabilities of success in college credit-bearing courses in Texas. When cut scores are used to place students in credit-bearing courses, the rates of correct placement are high. If adjustment to the cut scores are being considered, it should be based on both Expected probability of successful course completion Percentages of correct placement, under-placement, and over-placement Results of the predictive placement validity study indicates that scores on TSI assessments are positively related to success in college credit-bearing courses for which they are being used for placement. The current cut scores are associated with high expected probabilities of success in those courses, and the rates of correct placement are also high. If adjustments to the cut scores are being considered, both the expected probabilities course completion associated with the cut scores as well as the percentages of correct decision, under-placement, and over-placement have to be considered with equal improtance.

Thank You. lbay@collegeboard.org