Audrey Velasco-Hogan, Dimitri D

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observing Microorganisms Through a Microscope
Advertisements

Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 The Dark-Field Microscope Image is formed by light reflected.
Institut für Mineralogie Detection and Imaging by Electron Microscopy Investigations by using electron microscopy offer the possibility to detect and image.
Copyright © 2014 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
Reflection and Refraction Light interacts with matter Interaction begins at surface and depends on –Smoothness of surface –Nature of the material –Angle.
MICROSCOPES Light (visible) Fluorescent U-V Electron Monocular
Microscope.
Dr. Shahzadi Tayyaba Hashmi
Microscopy.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Learning Objectives Observing Microorganisms Through a Microscope Chapter 3.
Copyright © 2006 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Micro 20 Lab 2- Microscopy.
Copyright © The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display. 1 Chapter 2 – Measurement and Microscopy.
Honors Microbiology: Chapter 3 Microscopy and Staining
Electron Microscopes Used to count individual atoms What can electron microscopes tell us? Morphology – Size and shape Topography – Surface features (roughness,
Advanced Biology Visualizing Cells. The Human Eye  Resolution – The minimum distance two points can be apart and still be distinguished as two separate.
ResourcesChapter menu Bellringer What do you think light is? Is light made of matter? Can light travel through space? Explain your answers in your lab.
Chapter 4 Atmospheric Optics.
The Microscope and Forensic Identification. Magnification of Images A microscope is an optical instrument that uses a lens or a combination of lenses.
Chapter 1.2 Electron Microscopy.  Top photo is a light micrograph : a photograph taken with a light microscope (aka a photomicrograph)  Bottom photo.
Title: Magnification Lesson Objectives : 1. Can I explain the difference between magnification and resolution? Grade B 2. Can I differentiate between the.
Copyright © by Holt, Rinehart and Winston. All rights reserved. ResourcesChapter menu Section 1 Characteristics of Light Chapter 13 Objectives Identify.
PHY 102: Lecture Wave Fronts and Rays 9.2 Reflection of Light
1 Parts of the Microscope Ocular (eyepiece) Interpupillary adjustment Body Arm Coarse adjustment knob Fine focus adjustment knob Stage adjustment knobs.
Date of download: 6/3/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Image of rat tail tissue taken while illuminated with unpolarized 940-nm light collected.
Date of download: 6/25/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Depiction of the confocal Raman system used to excite the embedded probes and collect.
ENAMEL Dr. Saleem Shaikh.
Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. (a) Overview of a quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) image with.
Chapter 2: Viewing the Microbial World
Section 1 Characteristics of Light
Microscope.
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
Forensic Science International
Biological nanocomposite materials
Light Waves Interacting with Matter
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 3, Issue 2, Pages (August 2017)
Volume 26, Issue 10, Pages (May 2016)
Optical Non-Invasive Approaches to Diagnosis of Skin Diseases
Probing Membrane Order and Topography in Supported Lipid Bilayers by Combined Polarized Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence-Atomic Force Microscopy 
Joke A. Bouwstra, Anko de Graaff, Gert S. Gooris 
Optimal-Enhanced Solar Cell Ultra-thinning with Broadband Nanophotonic Light Capture  Manuel J. Mendes, Sirazul Haque, Olalla Sanchez-Sobrado, Andreia.
Light Waves Interacting with Matter
Surface-Sensitive Raman Spectroscopy of Collagen I Fibrils
Optimal-Enhanced Solar Cell Ultra-thinning with Broadband Nanophotonic Light Capture  Manuel J. Mendes, Sirazul Haque, Olalla Sanchez-Sobrado, Andreia.
Automated Delineation of Dermal–Epidermal Junction in Reflectance Confocal Microscopy Image Stacks of Human Skin  Sila Kurugol, Kivanc Kose, Brian Park,
Volume 108, Issue 3, Pages (February 2015)
Multiphoton Excitation Provides Optical Sections from Deeper within Scattering Specimens than Confocal Imaging  Victoria E. Centonze, John G. White  Biophysical.
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
A Map for Horizontal Disparity in Monkey V2
Scanning Near-Field Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Supraresolution Imaging in Brain Slices using Stimulated-Emission Depletion Two- Photon Laser Scanning Microscopy  Jun B. Ding, Kevin T. Takasaki, Bernardo.
James G. Heys, Krsna V. Rangarajan, Daniel A. Dombeck  Neuron 
Volume 100, Issue 4, Pages (February 2011)
Abir M. Kabbani, Christopher V. Kelly  Biophysical Journal 
140MIC: Microbiology Lecture-6 Microscopes.
Volume 3, Issue 4, Pages (October 2017)
Membrane Shape Modulates Transmembrane Protein Distribution
Volume 23, Issue 9, Pages (September 2015)
MICROSCOPES.
Dana N. Moses, Michael G. Pontin, J. Herbert Waite, Frank W. Zok 
William L. Pickens, Ronald R. Warner, Ying L. Boissy, Raymond E
Mechanics of Individual Keratin Bundles in Living Cells
A Pulsed Electric Field Enhances Cutaneous Delivery of Methylene Blue in Excised Full- Thickness Porcine Skin  Patricia G. Johnson, Stephen A. Gallo, Sek.
P.J. Caspers, G.W. Lucassen, G.J. Puppels  Biophysical Journal 
Erika J Mancini, Felix de Haas, Stephen D Fuller  Structure 
Polarized Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Microscopy
Imaging the Activity and Localization of Single Voltage-Gated Ca2+ Channels by Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy  Angelo Demuro, Ian Parker 
Triplet Sensitization by Lead Halide Perovskite Thin Films for Efficient Solid-State Photon Upconversion at Subsolar Fluxes  Sarah Wieghold, Alexander.
Jennifer L. Ross, Henry Shuman, Erika L.F. Holzbaur, Yale E. Goldman 
Presentation transcript:

On the Nature of the Transparent Teeth of the Deep-Sea Dragonfish, Aristostomias scintillans  Audrey Velasco-Hogan, Dimitri D. Deheyn, Marcus Koch, Birgit Nothdurft, Eduard Arzt, Marc A. Meyers  Matter  DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010 Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Light Microscopy of Dragonfish Teeth (A) Head of a freshly collected specimen showing the row of teeth erecting outward from the jaw. Arrow points to the barbel. Image taken of the head in filtered seawater and captured using a polarizing filter. (B) Close-up, showing optical evidence of concentric layers and hollowness of the tooth. Image taken in filtered seawater with an immersive lens. Arrow points to the striations seen on the concave side. (C) Tooth imaged in seawater with color line behind to demonstrate transparency. The arrow indicates an air bubble within the hollow cavity of the tooth due to dissection from the jaw. Image captured with a polarizing filter. (D) Tooth under fluorescence excited at a broadband excitation 440–490 nm and collected with a long-pass filter (>515 nm). This image shows little fluorescence. Image taken of a dry specimen in air. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Optical Properties in Transmittance and Reflectance (A) μ-CT scan of a longitudinal cross-section of a representative tooth. The color mapping indicates relative density signifying degree of mineralization. Hotter colors (red) are more dense while cooler colors (blue) are less dense. Dashed lines represent relative locations where analysis was performed. (B) Transmittance for three sections of one tooth (tip, middle, base) with respect to wavelength. (C) Reflectance for three sections (tip, middle, base) with respect to wavelength. See also Figure S1. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Characteristic Teeth Exhibiting Longitudinal Striations on Concave Side (A) Shorter tooth from lower jaw with broken/worn tip. Arrow indicates radius of curvature. (B) Surface wear near the tip of the tooth revealing the thin enamel-like surface and dentin layer, which has preferred orientation in the longitudinal direction. (C) Transverse section showing detail of hollow pulp cavity. (D) Enhanced transverse cross-section showing enamel-like outer layer (∼3 μm, marked 1) with smooth fracture surface and dentin (marked 2) with an irregular surface. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 TEM of the Nanostructured Enamel-like and Dentin Layers (A) TEM showing the dentin-enamel-like junction (DEJ). (B) TEM showing organized structuring of the enamel-like layer. (C) Diffraction pattern of the enamel-like layer showing discrete spot characteristics of nanocrystalline structure and an amorphous structure (indicative of the diffuse background). (D) TEM showing dentin consisting of a woven pattern of nanometer rods (∼5 nm diameter). (E) Diffraction pattern of dentin which shows greater amorphous characteristics than the enamel-like layer. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Comparative TEM to Distinguish between Location of Inorganic and Organic Constituents (A) Bright-field TEM showing arrangement of nanorods and (B) dark-field TEM highlighting individual nanorods composed of inorganic material surrounded by an organic matrix. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy of a Single Tooth Characteristic bands of hydroxyapatite and collagen. Amide I, II, and III bands characteristic of collagen occur at 1,632, 1,536, and 1,240 cm−1, respectively. Hydroxyapatite bands are: v4PO43−, v2CO32−, v3PO43−, v3CO32− at 554 and 600, 870, 1,024, and 1,410 cm−1, respectively. See also Table S1. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Light-Scattering Efficiency Coefficient for Randomly Oriented Nanorods versus Radius A graph is plotted for three different wavelengths of light (450, 550, and 650 nm). The height of the cylinder was kept constant at 20 nm as the radius varied from 1–20 nm and n = 1.66. Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions

Figure 8 Influence of Mineralization Gradient on Nanoindentation Location (A) μ-CT scan of the longitudinal cross-section of a representative tooth. The color mapping indicates relative density signifying degree of mineralization. Hotter colors (red) are more dense while cooler colors (blue) are less dense. There exists a gradient in mineralization that increases from the base toward the tip of the tooth. Roman numerals i–vii mark the relative cross-sections where nanoindentation was performed and align with the designated indentation locations in (B) and (C). (B) The hardness values (mean ± SD) from nanoindentation are dependent on location within the tooth due to the gradient in mineralization as indicated by the μ-CT scan. (C) The reduced modulus values (mean ± SD) from nanoindentation are affected by the degree of mineralization. (D) μ-CT scans of transverse cross-sections that indicate the surface in which nanoindentation was performed. The two representative slices demonstrate that the degree of mineralization increases toward the tip of the tooth and outward radially. The same color mapping was used in (A) and (D). Matter DOI: (10.1016/j.matt.2019.05.010) Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. Terms and Conditions