Some ideas on verification targeted to the use of the forecasters Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva Some ideas on the presentation to the forecasters.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide 1ECMWF forecast User Meeting -- Reading, June 2006 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Advertisements

Slide 1ECMWF forecast products users meeting – Reading, June 2005 Verification of weather parameters Anna Ghelli, ECMWF.
Learning checklist for Weather Explain the difference between weather and climate. Explain the difference between weather and climate. Know and understand.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 9° General MeetingAthens September Working package/Task on “standardization” The “core” Continuous parameters: T2m,
What is a Synoptic Weather Map?
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of COSMO in.
1 COSMO GM, Athens/2007 | E. Zala; D. Leuenberger Update on Weather-Situation Dependent COSMO-7 Verification against Radar Data Results of 2006 Emanuele.
Science Test Study Guide Weather Science Ch. 5 (Green)
Predicting the Weather. Weather Forecasting Meteorologists are scientists who study the causes of weather and try to predict it. –They analyze data and.
Weather Observation What is the weather in different places?
COSMO General Meeting Zurich, 2005 Institute of Meteorology and Water Management Warsaw, Poland- 1 - Verification of the LM at IMGW Katarzyna Starosta,
Verification Precipitation verification (overestimation): a common view of the behaviour of the LM, aLMo and LAMI Francis Schubiger and Pirmin Kaufmann,
Short-Range Ensemble Prediction System at INM José A. García-Moya & Carlos Santos SMNT – INM COSMO Meeting Zurich, September 2005.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2007SRNWP 8-11 October 2007, Dubrovnik SRNWP – Revised Verification Proposal Clive Wilson Presented by Terry Davies at SRNWP Meeting.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Report on Workshop « Stratified verification by weather.
P. Ñurmi / WWRP QPF Verification - Prague 1 Operational QPF Verification of End Products and NWP Pertti Nurmi Finnish Meteorological Institute.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Task 1 of PP Interpretation 1.1Further applications of.
Ch 8: Lesson 4: How are Forecasts Made?. Collecting Data To describe a weather system, you need to describe all its parts; 1.temperature 2.moisture 3.clouds.
Rozinkina Inna, Kukanova Evgenia, Revokatova Anastasia, & Muravev Anatoly, Glebova Ekaterina.
OUTLINE Current state of Ensemble MOS
Latest results in verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta, Joanna Linkowska Institute of Meteorology and Water Management, Warsaw 9th COSMO General.
The latest results of verification over Poland Katarzyna Starosta Joanna Linkowska COSMO General Meeting, Cracow September 2008 Institute of Meteorology.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results of COSMO at MeteoSwiss in the year.
Chapter 9: Weather Forecasting Surface weather maps 500mb weather maps Satellite Images Radar Images.
Read. Answer the following in your notebook:  What type of pressure systems produce hurricanes, tornadoes, and winter weather storms?  What things do.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
COSMO WG4 activities Oct Sept Pierre Eckert MétéoSuisse WG4 coordinator Interpretation and applications.
Priority project Advanced interpretation COSMO General Meeting, 18. September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG 4 activities.
Table of Content 6.5 How Do Meteorologist Predict Weather? Predicting the Weather Ms. D 6 th Grade Weather Patterns.
Warm-Up What type of pressure systems are tornadoes and hurricanes associated with? Name the intensity ranking system for Tornados and hurricanes. Which.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz The challenge to verify operational weather warnings.
Warm-Up 1) What type of pressure systems are tornadoes and hurricanes associated with (high or low)? 2) Name the intensity ranking system for Tornados.
Overview of WG5 future activities Adriano Raspanti Zurich, September 2005.
General Meeting Moscow, 6-10 September 2010 High-Resolution verification for Temperature ( in northern Italy) Maria Stefania Tesini COSMO General Meeting.
Weather Forecasting temp when air is saturated with water vapor. (Used to determine how low temp may drop.)
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Automatic weather classification at MeteoSwiss Tanja.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Verification results at MeteoSwiss in the year 2010 Francis.
Station Models and Converting Station Pressure into Millibars.
VERIFICATION Highligths by WG5. 2 Outlook Some focus on Temperature with common plots and Conditional Verification Some Fuzzy verification Long trends.
10th COSMO General Meeting, Cracow, Poland Verification of COSMOGR Over Greece 10 th COSMO General Meeting Cracow, Poland.
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Weather type dependant fuzzy verification of precipitation.
WG4 Oct 2006 – Sep 2007 plans COSMO General Meeting, 21 September 2006 Pierre Eckert.
Verification Priority Project ‘Quantitative Precipitation Forecast’ Progress report Task 1.1 and 1.2 Silke Dierer and Francis Schubiger MeteoSwiss.
Département fédéral de l‘intérieur DFI Office fédéral de météorologie et de climatologie MétéoSuisse Postprocessing methods Pierre Eckert MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss WG4 activities Pierre Eckert MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
© Crown copyright Met Office EUMETNET- SRNWP verification programme -Met Office Responsible member Clive Wilson – Project manager 31st EWGLAM/16th SRNWP.
New results in COSMO about fuzzy verification activities and preliminary results with VERSUS Conditional Verification 31th EWGLAM &16th SRNWP meeting,
Eidgenössisches Departement des Innern EDI Bundesamt für Meteorologie und Klimatologie MeteoSchweiz Statistics of COSMO Forecast Departures in View of.
Model verification and it’s relevance for forecasters
Weather Station Model.
Operational Verification at HNMS
Current verification results for COSMO-EU and COSMO-DE at DWD
Multi-scale validation of high resolution precipitation products
aLMo from GME and IFS boundary conditions: A comparison
WEATHER STATION MODEL Wind Speed Cloud Cover Temperature Wind
WG5-Report from Switzerland: Verification of aLMo in the year 2005
Daniel Leuenberger1, Christian Keil2 and George Craig2
Weather Forecasts.
WG4: interpretation and applications A success story… to be continued… Pierre Eckert MeteoSwiss, Geneva.
Workshop Results WG5 COSMO General Meeting
COSMO General Meeting 2009 WG5 Parallel Session 7 September 2009
Verification Overview
Christoph Gebhardt, Zied Ben Bouallègue, Michael Buchhold
2nd Workshop on Short Range EPS 7th–8th April 2005, Bologna
Some Verification Highlights and Issues in Precipitation Verification
Pierre Eckert Daniel Cattani MétéoSuisse
Weather Dependent Verification and link with forecasters
Seasonal common scores plots
VERIFICATION OF THE LAMI AT CNMCA
Presentation transcript:

Some ideas on verification targeted to the use of the forecasters Pierre Eckert, MeteoSwiss, Geneva Some ideas on the presentation to the forecasters of the verification results Francis Schubiger, MeteoSwiss, Models

Forecasters psychology Less models, better verified Quality of model(s) often judged subjectively Verification by order of preference: The temperature std is… The temperature bias in Europe is… The temperature bias in Switzerland is.. The temperature bias of low stations in CH is… The temperature bias of the low stations in Valais is … The temperature bias of the low stations in Valais in SW situations in autumn is…

Stratified verification Verification has to be local (not too much)… …and stratified It can be stratified by type of phenomena (thunderstorms, drizzle,…) either observed or forecasted Or by type of synoptic situation (any classification) These results can be used in order to implement targeted postprocessing… …or be used by the forecasters in order to correct the models, not use them in certain cases, use different indicators from models,… The verification should be relevant to the present version of the model

Work already done Precipitation bias by weather class (Zala) 2008, SW 2008, flat

Work already done Fuzzy verification by weather class (Weusthoff) We think about how to communicate the results

More basic ideas Other parameters than (radar) rainfall should be verified Eckert /Schubiger made a proposition (April 2009) It should be tried out Stratified verification 4 seasons Synoptic classification (Zala, COST 733,…) Temperature (bias, STD) Dew point (bias, STD) Precipitation (Frequency bias, POD, FAR, ETS) Cloudiness, wind speed, wind gusts

Graphical presentation By class on map By station, histogram 2008, sw, summer

Presentation to forecasters Seasonal verification is summarised on the MeteoSwiss Intranet (as it was on the COSMO web for a couple of years) In November 2008 a workshop between forecasters and modellers has been organised in order to improve the two way link between both “worlds” Redaction of “COSMO guidelines for forecasters” Redaction of seasonal factsheets Listing of all forecasters feedback “good /bad cases”, with remarks and proposed actions from the modellers