Electroweak Symmetry Breaking without Higgs Bosons in ATLAS Ryuichi Takashima Kyoto University of Education For the ATLAS Collaboration

Outline Possible scenarios of EWSB Little Higgs Model Chiral Lagrangian model Performance studies on boson scattering Summary

Electroweak Symmetry Breaking (EWSB) Extended Gauge Symmetry Little Higgs, Higgsless, Left-Right Symmetric Model Higgs-Gauge Unification J.Lykken, Physics at LHC (Vienna) SUSY (m)SUGRA GMSB AMSB Mirage Split SUSY RPV … Extra-Dimension LED(ADD) Randall-Sundrum Universal ED(KK) … Precision EW data Dynamical Symmetry Breaking Strong EWSB, Chiral Lagrangian, Technicolor, Composite Higgs, Top-quark Condensation Exotics: Compositeness, Lepto-quarks, Monopole …

EWSB possible scenarios ElectroWeak Symmetry Breaking (EWSB): ElectroWeak Gauge symmetry requires gauge boson and matter particles to be massless. The mechanism to give them mass: Standard theory of EWSB by scalar Higgs field Renormalization scheme predicts coupling constants of Strong and EW force become same value near  =1016 GeV: Suggest GUTs of SU(3)C  SU(2)L  U(1)Y forces Higgs radiative correction mass2 has a quadratic term of cutoff parameter. Hierarchy problem in GUTs. If Higgs  hierarchy problem: fine tuning in rad corr to Higgs mass solution: new physics at TeV scale (SUSY, Little Higgs, etc…) If NO Higgs solution: dynamical symmetry breaking (Technicolor, Chiral Lagrangian etc…) Unitarity violation in longitudinal WW scattering at high E solution: Higgs boson or other new particle with mass < 1 TeV

Little Higgs Model Evaluate the sensitivity to the Little Higgs models with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC Little Higgs Models proposed as a solution to the Hierarchy problem Loop corrections to the Higgs Mass: L is an ultra-violet cut-off Models try to arrange new particles to cancel these effects Little Higgs models add a minimal set of particles (and a symmetry) to cancel these corrections up to L>10TeV Some discussion on T-parity of heavy top and bosons. Require pair production. To suppress the quadratic divergence the mass of MT and MW should not be too large

Little Higgs: heavy top search Production: via QCD (gg  T Tbar, qq  T Tbar) via W exchange (qb  q’ T) dominant for MT > 700 GeV Decays: T  t Z, T  t h, T  b W cleanest is T  t Z  b l  l+ l- but small statistics, main bkg is tbZ 5 signal up to ~1.0-1.4 TeV T  t h  b l n b bbar < 5s T  b W  b l  main bkg is t tbar 5 signal up to ~2.0-2.5 TeV SN-ATLAS-2004-038 M = 1 TeV 300 fb-1 bkg

Little Higgs: heavy bosons SN-ATLAS-2004-038 300 fb-1 AH, WH and ZH discovery in lepton modes up to M ~ 6 TeV (depending on param cot q) Discrimination against other models predicting dilepton resonances via observation of decay modes like WH  W h, ZH  Z h, and WH  t b (important at cot q ≈ 1) 5s discovery ATL-PHYS-PUB-2006-003 300 fb-1 M = 1 TeV cot  = 1 30 fb-1 WH  t b observation up to ~3 TeV

Symmetry Breaking by Chiral Lagrangian Model SM cross section for Wlong Wlong scattering diverges at high energy if there is no Higgs  new physics via diboson resonances? Chiral Lagrangian Model Describes the low energy effects of different strongly interacting models of the EWSB sector. The differences among underlying theories appear through the values of the effective chiral couplings. The analytical complete form can be found in Dobado et al., Phys.Rev.D62,055011, but terms of major importance are: Different choices for the magnitude and the sign of a4 and a5 would correspond to 　different choices for the underlying (unknown) theory.

Performance studies on boson scattering WLWL with no resonances (Continuum) by J.M. Butterworth, P. Sherwood, S. Stefanidis. WLWL with resonances by S.E. Allwood, J.M. Butterworth, B.E. Cox. WLZL with resonances by G. Azuelos, P-A. Delsart, J. Id´arraga, A. Myagkov. PYTHIA has been modified to include the EWChL and to produce the resonances for different parameters. Detector response was studied using Athena computing environment of both fast and full simulators.

WW Boson Scattering

WW Boson Scattering Event Selection high pT lepton high ETmiss Jet(s) with high pT and m ~ mW. Little hadronic activity in the central region (|η|<2.5) apart from the hadronic W. Tag jets at large η (|η|>2). high pT W Backgrounds: W+jets (W  l), σ~60,000 fb, and , σ~16,000 fb ttbar (cf signal σ<100 fb).

Resonant WW Boson Scattering preliminary

Resonant WZ Boson Scattering choose parameters of a4 and a5 such that new resonance M = 1.15 TeV qq  qqWZ  qq ln ll (s x BR= 1.3 fb) qq  qqWZ  qq jj ll (s x BR= 4.1 fb) qq  qqWZ  qq ln jj (s x BR= 14 fb) q1 q’1 q2 W Z Lq.Ar FCAL h<4.9

Resonant WZ Boson Scattering Selection for qqjjll: 2 forward jets + central 2jets and 2 leptons Require no additional central jet Bkg: gluon and g/Z exchange with W and Z radiation also t tbar & W+4 jets (need more stats) Experimental issues: Merging of jets from high-pT W or Z decay (need cone DR = 0.2) Impact of pileup on forward jet tagging? Promising sensitivity for jet modes at 100 fb-1 (need 300 fb-1 for WZ  ln ll)  study is ongoing SMbg ATL-COM-PHYS-2006-041 100 fb-1 W Z  jj ll

Summary Many scenarios for EWSB being studied. Heavy Top is reachable. WH  t b hadronic decay channel can be used to discriminate the Little Higgs model from other models. WZ boson scattering is studied extensively. Promising mode to test the dynamical symmetry breaking and various models including higgsless model. Atlas can explore the parameter space of Chiral Lagrangian model by WW scattering with 30 fb-1 data.

References G. Azuelos; P. A. Delsart ; J. Idarraga; A. Myagkov ,ATL-COM-PHYS-2006-041 S.Willocq,http://ichep06.jinr.ru/reports/150_11s5_15p10_willocq.ppt S.Stephanidis,http://indico.cern.ch/conferenceOtherViews.py? view=standard&confId=a057#2006-07-06 F. Ledroit,http://susy06.physics.uci.edu/talks/1/ledroit.pdf S. González de la Hoz; L. March; E. Ros,ATL-COM-PHYS-2005-001 G. Azuelos et al, SN-ATLAS-2004-038