Supplemental Project Planning Process Under Order 890 Within PJM

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Intra Hour Tagging/Oasis During System Contingencies The transmission tagging process was initially developed to solve an after the fact accounting issue.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
1 Smart Grid Vision Electric Grid Modernization Steering Committee Grid Facing Technology Subcommittee January 14, 2013.
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholde r to insert your own image. Cybersecurity.
Reliability Challenges White Paper Victoria L. Ravenscroft Senior Policy Analyst W ESTERN E LECTRICITY C OORDINATING C OUNCIL.
Vendor Briefing May 26, 2006 AMI Overview & Communications TCM.
Transmission Congestion on the Delmarva Peninsula December 17, 2003 PA
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Coordination between TSOs and DSOs – a necessity for system planning and operation Dr. Ralph Pfeiffer Amprion GmbH 1.
1. 11/26/2012: NERC Board of Trustees adopted CIP v5 CIP thru CIP CIP and CIP Version 5 Filing FERC requested filing by 3/31/2013.
By Lauren Felton. The electric grid delivers electricity from points of generation to consumers, and the electricity delivery network functions via two.
Jeffery J. Gust IOWA INDUSTRIAL ENERGY GROUP FALL CONFERENCE Tuesday, October 14, 2014 MidAmerican Energy Company.
2001 South First Street Champaign, Illinois (217) Davis Power Consultants Strategic Location of Renewable Generation Based on Grid Reliability.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Update Christine Hasha CIP Compliance Lead Advisor, ERCOT TAC March 27, 2014.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N 1 Network Operating Committee (NOC) June 12 th, 2014.
Determine Facility Ratings, SOLs and Transfer Capabilities Paul Johnson Chair of the Determine Facility Ratings Standard Drafting Team An Overview of the.
Don Von Dollen Senior Program Manager, Data Integration & Communications Grid Interop December 4, 2012 A Utility Standards and Technology Adoption Framework.
Smart Grid Technologies Damon Dougherty – Industry Manager.
Applying the Distribution System in Grid Restoration/NERC CIP-014 Risk Assessment Srijib Mukherjee, Ph.D., P.E. UC Synergetic.
Protect critical information with a smart information-based-risk management strategy. Prepared by: Firas Mohamed Taher.
APPA RELIABILITY STANDARDS & COMPLIANCE SYMPOSIUM Case Study: City Utilities of Springfield, MO January 11, 2007.
Smart Grid - Developments and Implementations Prof. Gady Golan – HIT, Israel Dr. Yuval Beck – HIT, Israel , Electricity 2012, Eilat.
1 Critical Mission Support Through Energy Security Susan Van Scoyoc Concurrent Technologies Corporation 16 August 2012 Energy Huntsville Meeting Huntsville,
Seattle City Light – AMI Business Case Results
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
OSC Meeting April 27, Transmission Cost Allocation Overview.
Status Report for Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
Enhancing Reliability of the North American Transmission Grid Enhancing Reliability of the North American Transmission Grid Presented By Dejan J Sobajic.
Generation assets important to the reliable operation of the Bulk Electric System What does this mean?
Presentation Identifier (Title or Location), Month 00, 2008 Cost and Benefit Analysis Framework: Update EPRI Smart Grid Advisory Meeting October 14, 2009.
Project Cyber Security Order 706 Version 5 CIP Standards Potential to Adversely Impact ERCOT Black Start Capability.
Updated 1/28/2011.
Designing Energy Solutions without Borders National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Page 1 Pacific Northwest Smart Grid Demonstration Project  Largest Smart Grid Demonstration.
Lessons Learned from Existing RTOs John Moore January WCEA Meeting January 7 th, 2016.
Oncor Transmission Service Provider Kenneth A. Donohoo Director – System Planning, Distribution and Transmission Oncor Electric Delivery Co LLC
National Grid Local System Plan Needs Assessment/Potential Solutions PAC Meeting September 21, 2010.
Security and Resilience Pat Looney Brookhaven National Laboratory April 2016.
Kansas City Power & Light and KCP&L Greater Missouri Operations – Suggestions for Chapter 22 Revisions Missouri Public Service Commission Meeting Aug 31,
BGE Smart Grid Initiative Stakeholder Meeting September 17, 2009 Wayne Harbaugh, Vice President, Pricing and Regulatory Services.
Reliability Standard TPL Transmission System Planned Performance for Geomagnetic Disturbance Events September 28, 2016 TPL Standard Status.
Resiliency and Reliability
Sustainable Future – Trends and Reality
ERCOT – Southern Cross Transmission ROS/WMS Working Group Assignments
Business Continuity / Recovery
Planning Geomagnetic Disturbance Task Force (PGDTF) Update to the ROS
Regional Transmission Organizations
Risk Assessment and Probabilistic Transmission Planning Methods
Grid Integration of Intermittent Resources
ISO New England System R&D Needs
CCNET Managed Services
The Transition to a High DER Future
NERC Cyber Security Standards Pre-Ballot Review
Module 4 Smart Grid Implementation Issues
Characteristics of Regional Power Markets
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Advisory Group (CIP AG)
Appendix: 2017 RTEP Report Key Graphics and Information
An Urgent National Imperative
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
EVP, Chief Administrative Officer
Alison Silverstein Contributor to DOE 2017.
1/16/2019 Univ. of Chicago/Argonne Agents 2002, Oct. 12, 2002 Introduction to Electricity Regulation Randal C. Picker Leffmann Professor of Commercial.
Byron Woertz Manager, System Adequacy Planning
Special MRC – Fuel Security
Emergency Management and Utilities
Grid Modernization in New Hampshire
WECC 2019 Scenarios – Scoping
2018 RTEP Report Key Maps, Tables & Figures
Offshore Wind Transmission:
Presentation transcript:

Supplemental Project Planning Process Under Order 890 Within PJM Gary e. guy, assistant general counsel Exelon corporation - views expressed are solely those of Mr. guy - Energy Bar Association

Order 890 Finds a “Substantial Need for New Infrastructure” (P 3) FERC acts under Section 217 of the FPA to facilitate “the planning and expansion of transmission facilities to meet the reasonable needs of lse’s.” Order No. 890, p 425. Energy Bar Association 2

PJM Supplemental Projects Fall Within Order 890 Supplemental projects in pjm are defined as “expansion and enhancement projects” that are not among the categories that are subject to pjm board approval or mandated by states. PJM only has planning authority for certain categories of projects (Reliability, Congestion Mitigation, and Operational efficiency) that the to’s voluntarily ceded to pjm, and by law no rights can be involuntarily transferred from transmission owners to pjm. Atlantic city v. ferc, 295 F.3d 1 (d.c. cir. 2002). A project that might otherwise be a Supplemental Project is included as a PJM RTEP baseline project if it is listed under Transmission Owner-driven criteria on FERC Form No. 715. For example, each utility sets voltage limit criteria on bulk and lower voltage systems, and specialized criteria, such as that no single contingency shall cause a thermal overload, cause a state of instability, or exceed voltage reliability criteria. Energy Bar Association 3

A New Order 890 Planning Process is Getting Underway for Supplemental Projects In 2018, Ferc approveD a section 205 tariff filing by pjm Transmission owners to improve the order No. 890 planning process for supplemental projects subject to certain changes that Were submitted in a compliance filing that Was approved. Monangahela power co., 162 FERC ¶61,129 (2018); reh’g denied and compliance filing approved, 165 FERC ¶61,217 (2018). Energy Bar Association 4

New Attachment m-3 provides for the following steps for supplemental projects (First, assumptions): 20-day advance Posting of assumptions meeting information convening of assumptions meeting Stakeholder comments up to 10 days thereafter This meeting addresses planning criteria assumptions, prioritization for replacement, ranking of assets, and assessment methodologies. Energy Bar Association 5

New Attachment m-3 provides for the following steps for supplemental projects (Second, needs): 10-day advance posting of needs meeting with slides needs meeting for to and stakeholder needs presentations Comments up to 10 days thereafter Stakeholders learn the needs the PJM Transmission Owners have identified, and the Transmission Owners learn the needs of stakeholders. These needs include increased customer expectations on service reliability, degrading equipment performance and condition, improving the resilience and security of the grid to be able to protect against growing severe threats, and meeting the demands of economic growth. Energy Bar Association 6

New Attachment m-3 provides for the following steps for supplemental projects (third, solutions): 10-days advance posting of solutions meeting with slides solutions meeting for solutions presentations by transmission owners and stakeholders comments up to 10-days thereafter. Energy Bar Association 7

Attachment m-3 provides for the following steps (fourth, selection): Pjm no-harm analysis of potential solution posting of selected solution stakeholder comments up to 10-days prior to local plan submission submission of local plan to pjm for integration into rtep. Energy Bar Association 8

Five Supplemental Project Drivers # Driver Definition 1 Equipment Material Condition, Performance and Risk Degraded equipment performance, material condition, obsolescence, equipment failure, employee and public safety and environmental impact. 2 Operational Flexibility and Efficiency Optimizing system configuration, equipment duty cycles and restoration capability, minimize outages. Energy Bar Association 9

Five Supplemental Project Drivers (Cont’d) # Driver Definition 3 Infrastructure Resilience Improve system ability to anticipate, absorb, adapt to, and/or rapidly recover from a potentially disruptive event, including severe weather, geo-magnetic disturbances, physical and cyber security challenges, critical infrastructure reduction. 4 Customer Service Service to new and existing customers. Interconnect new customer load.  Address distribution load growth, customer outage exposure, equipment loading. 5 Other Meet objectives not included in other definitions. Energy Bar Association 10