MULTIWELL RETROSPECTIVE TESTING

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Predicting Future Gas Lift Performance in a Mature Water Flooded Field
Advertisements

The influence of wettability and carbon dioxide injection on hydrocarbon recovery Saif Al Sayari Martin J. Blunt.
FORM 1027 – BOTTOM HOLE PRESSURE TEST. This presentation will assist you in the completion of the Form The bottom hole pressure test. Date of Last.
2012 Williston Basin Petroleum Conference
Training in Oil & Gas Production for BP Technical Interns Section 4 – Pipes, Fittings, and Safety Looking at pipes, valves and fitting that we use for.
Hydraulic Fracturing Design for Optimum Well Productivity
Presentation to Repsol by MYS on 9/13/06 Well Completion Design for Tight-Gas Formations M. Y. Soliman, PhD September 20, 2006 Mendoza, Argentina.
Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves —
Analysis of Layered Gas Reservoir Performance Using a Quasi-Analytical Solution for Rate and Pressure Behavior I Nengah Suabdi Department of Petroleum.
Evaluation of Reservoir Performance Using Decline Type Curves Improve Reservoir Description - Area Central Norte (ACN) Region, El Tordillo Field Argentina.
Chapter 1 RESERVOIR.
Presented by Sudiptya Banerjee
Gas Buildup Analysis GasBU uses standard buildup tests from individual wells and performs a buildup analysis using various methods. The program allows.
Microgel Technology for Water Shutoff Applications Alain Zaitoun, Poweltec Guido Poggesi, REP WorkShop EOR, IAPG, Neuquen, 3-5 November 2010.
CAPP GUIDELINE - H 2 S RELEASE RATE ASSESSMENT FOR A WELL Committee Members: Todd WilsonBEHR Energy Services Ltd. Irakli KaceliEnergy Resources Conservation.
SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program The SPE Distinguished Lecturer Program is funded principally through a grant from the SPE Foundation. The society gratefully.
Schlumberger Public Scope and Application of Pressure Transient Tests in CBM and Shale Gas reservoirs Baijayanta Ghosh Reservoir Domain Champion Testing.
Gas Lift Redesign in Dual Strings Completion
Pseudopressure Function
New Decline Curve Tool for GOM 3 /GOMsmart & “Forgotten Oil & Gas Study” 2012 GOM 3 User Conference at Anadarko John D. Grace, Ph.D. Earth Science Associates.
Modelling Unconventional Wells with Resolve and Reveal Juan Biörklund (Gauloise Energía) and Georg Ziegler (Wintershall Holding)
Gas Condensate Reservoirs: Sampling, Characterization and Optimization SPE Distinguished Lecture Series F. Brent Thomas.
Alex Procyk, ConocoPhillips, David Atwood, Schlumberger
 Completed slim-tube tests for MMP measurement.  Completed swelling tests.  Completed phase behavior model.  Completed preliminary geological model.
Integration of Production Analysis and Rate-Time Analysis via Parametric Correlations — Montney Shale Case Histories Yohanes ASKABE Department of Petroleum.
Dr.Mostafa Mahmoud Kinawy
Wytch Farm Field Development Project
Agenda Today –Thin Film Interference Friday –Diffraction (Ch. 36)
Produced Water Reinjection Performance Joint Industry Project TerraTek, Inc. Triangle Engineering Taurus Reservoir Solutions (DE&S) E-first Technologies.
Waterflood Management Case Study - Goal  Change waterflood strategy early in waterflood to maximize recovery: 12 months of waterflood performance Predicted.
Schlumberger / Client Confidential
Case Study : History Matching of Well by Predictive Material Balance Term Project : Advanced Reservoir Engineering Presented By, Namit J Jaiswal B.E (Chemical)
0 International Joint Study on CO2-EOR - Study on Applicability of CO2-EOR to Rang Dong Field, offshore Vietnam - Sunao Takagi, Komei Okatsu IEA Collaborative.
SPE What Factors Control Shale Gas Production Decline Trend: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation HanYi Wang, The University of Texas at Austin.
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
Oil and Gas Technology Program Oil and Gas Technology Program PTRT 2432 Artificial Lift Green Book Chapter 1 Planning an Artificial Lift Program.
Date of download: 11/12/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Characterization and Prediction of Gas Breakthrough With Cyclic Steam and Gas.
Chapter 1 PTRT 2432 – 01 Vern Wilson ARTIFICIAL LIFT.
Chapter 5 Well Testing (III)
Chapter 5 Pressure Transient Testing (I)
Gas Condensate PVT – What’s Really Important and Why?
Chapter 2: Directional & Horizontal Drilling
Decline Curve Analysis Using Type Curves —
Environmental Engineer
on Petroleum and Refinery
Gas Condensate Rate Equation
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Gas Condensate Rate Equation
StimGun™ and StimTube™ Tool Successes in West Texas
Continuous Flow (IPO) Valves
Gas Condensate Blockage
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
Gas Condensate Rate Equation ”Pseudopressure Integral”
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Gas Condensate Rate Equation ”Pseudopressure Integral”
Andy Martin, Alexis Marmol & Abdullah Khan IPS-15-8
Radial flow equation Outer boundary: CR Inner boundary:
Сase #1 Well Pump Review Almaty 2018.
Extra data for history matching during the MGFM project
Water Distribution Networks Under Intermittent Pumping: Development of a hydraulic model and Assessment of water losses Prepared by Mohammad Jihad Abdo.
Pseudopressure Function
PPT Design on 3D models Landysh Minligalieva Reservoir Engineer
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
Condensate blockage is the build-up of liquid around the wellbore, reducing the effective gas permeability and lowering well deliverability.  Condensate.
Operator Maersk Oil and Gas
Gas Condensate Rate Equation
Gas Condensate Blockage
SPEGC Northside Study Group “Unconventional Reservoir Horizontal, Multi-Stage Completion Design Optimization” Presented by Stephen Schubarth President.
Presentation transcript:

MULTIWELL RETROSPECTIVE TESTING MRT - NDR 2018

AGENDA Pressure Decline GOR growth 1 Pressure Decline 2 GOR growth 3 Unclear cross-well connectivity & Compartmentalization

OBJECTIVES #1 Reconstruct formation pressure history for OP1 #2 Predict formation pressure based on the current rate for OP1 #3 Reconstruct productivity index history for OP1 #4 Assess formation pressure impact on IPR for OP1 #5 Estimate skin-factor, transmissibility and drainage area of OP1 #6 Reconstruct the history of cross-well interference with OP1 #7 Estimate cross-well transmissibility from offset wells towards OP1

FOCUS AREA AND WELL LOCATIONS OP5 OP4 OP3 PDG OP1 There is a group of wells. There are 3 production wells No 13, 18 and 15. And 2 injection wells No 20 and 21. There is a very typical water flow pattern. OP2

PRODUCTION AND PRESSURE HISTORY OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5

#1 – RECONSTRUCT FORMATION PRESSURE HISTORY FOR OP1

#2 – PREDICT FORMATION PRESSURE BASED ON THE CURRENT RATE FOR OP1 Forecast OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5

#3 – RECONSTRUCT PRODUCTIVITY INDEX HISTORY FOR OP1

#4 – ASSESS FORMATION PRESSURE IMPACT ON IPR FOR OP1 Pr = 1,650 psi Pr = 1,600 psi Pr = 1,550 psi Pr = 1,500 psi Pr = 1,450 psi Pr = 1,400 psi Pr = 1,350 psi

#5 – ESTIMATE SKIN-FACTOR, TRANSMISSIBILITY AND DRAINAGE AREA OF OP1 well OP1 Parameter MDCV Value OH Value Net thickness, ft 100 Transmissibility, (mD*ft/сPs) 88,000 87,500 Total Skin -4.86 Mechanical Skin +1 Permeability, Koil (mD) 230 Permeability, Ka (mD) 756 753 Horizontal length, ft 520 540 PI, bpd/psi 25 Formation pressure @ 28.02.2018, (psi) 1453 Drainage area, ft2 59,510,516

#6 – RECONSTRUCT THE HISTORY OF CROSS-WELL INTERFERENCE OP-2 → OP-1 Parameter Abbreviation Unit MRT Value OH Value Transmissibility oil σ md·ft/сp 86,380

#7 – RECONSTRUCT THE HISTORY OF CROSS-WELL INTERFERENCE WITH OP1 Cumulative impact well OP3 (-75 psi) Cumulative impact well OP2 (-112 psi) Cumulative impact well OP1 (-143 psi)

#6 – RECONSTRUCT THE HISTORY OF CROSS-WELL INTERFERENCE WITH OP1 Ψ psi/mnth Current impact Ψ∑ psi Cumulative impact OP5 OP4 OP3 Ψ= 0 Ψ∑= 0 Ψ= -10 Ψ∑= -75 Ψ= 0 Ψ∑= 0 OP1 Ψ= -12 Ψ∑= -143 OP2 Ψ= -12 Ψ∑= -112

#7 – ESTIMATE CROSS-WELL TRANSMISSIBILITY FROM OFFSET WELLS TOWARDS OP1  md · ft / cp pressure tested well transmissibility a apparent сross-well transmissibility  =88,000 a =86,380 OP1 OP2 OP3 OP4 OP5 a =89,420 Apparent cross-well transmissibility 2,3  1 is similar to near wellbore transmissibility of which 1

Thank you for attention Rushana Farakhova Technical Manager Sofoil DMCC / Maxwel rushana.farakhova@sofoil.com