PTA April 2019 (Shorthorn base)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Multi-Breed Genetic Evaluations Lessons from UK Dairy evaluations Marco Winters.

Advertisements

T H E W O R L D L E A D E R I N B O V I N E G E N E T I C S ABS Global The World Leader in Bovine Genetics HB Genetics 2012.

2002 Paul M. VanRaden and Ashley H. Sanders Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.

Level II Agricultural Business Operations. What is the objective... ?  To produce a more efficient dairy animal  Milk producers want healthy cows, acceptable.

A Canadian Dairy Perspective ~ Christina Crowley-Arklie.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.

THE ISRAELI BREEDING PROGRAM elite cows selected based on their genetic evaluations. About ½ of these cows are mated to local elite bulls, and.

But who will be the next GREAT one?. USA Bull Proofs * Bulls are ranked based upon their DAUGHTER’S (progeny) production and physical characteristics.

Belgium Blue By: Adam Zurfluh. Table Of Contents History Male Description Female Description Desirable Traits Performance Genetic Problem.

2003 Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Interbull as a Tool.

Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,

Norway (1) 2005 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Selection for Disease Resistance Gert Pedersen Aamand Nordic Cattle Genetic Evaluation.

2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

AFGC Convention 2004 (1) 2004 Possibilities for Improving Dairy Cattle Performance Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,

John B. Cole, Ph.D. Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD, USA The U.S. genetic.

2007 J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Overview.

Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,

POPREP Population Structure and Pedigree Analysis 12/5/20151.

Understanding Cattle Data Professor N. Nelson Blue Mountain Agriculture College.

Why is it important for Geno to establish research collaboration with the U.S? Sverre Bjørnstad Sverre Bjørnstad.

2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.

2006 Mid-Atlantic Dairy Grazing Conference, 2006 (1) Is There a Need for Different Genetics in Dairy Grazing Systems? H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L.

XX International Grassland Conference 2005 (1) 2005 Genetic Alternatives for Dairy Producers who Practise Grazing H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright, R. L. Powell.

Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.

Ashley H. Sanders and H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

2001 ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) Heterosis and Breed Differences for Yield and Somatic Cell Scores of US Dairy Cattle in the 1990’s. PAUL VANRADEN Animal.

2001 NAAB / S-284 Meeting, Baltimore, 2001 (1) Implications of Crossbreeding on Dairy Cattle Improvement Paul VanRaden and Ashley Sanders Animal Improvement.

2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.

CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Meori Rosen Past, Present, and Future Dairy Cattle Breeding in Israel.

Dairy Cattle Breeds. Ayrshire Scotland; known for vigor and health; average milk production Only 18,000 in the U.S.

Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle Dr. Fred Rayfield Livestock Specialist Georgia Agricultural Education To accompany lesson.

Bull Selection: Beef Kay Farmer Madison County High School edited by Billy Moss and Rachel Postin July 2001.

2006 8th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (1) Trait Selection When Culling U.S. Holsteins H.D. Norman, J.L. Hutchison, J.R. Wright,

Fundamentals of the Eurostar evaluations

The Changing Environment

Now managed by Philip and Gillian Durbin

Alderston Broiler ALEX JH1C

Guernsey population census 2016

Validation of €uro-Star Replacement Index.

ABER SAMSON (Guernsey)

Evaluation & Use of Expected Progeny Differences in Beef Cattle

Lifetime Performance of Dairy Cows in Northern Ireland

Changes in animal performance and profitability of Holstein dairy operations after introduction of crossbreeding with Montbéliarde, Normande, and Scandinavian.

Keith Vander Velde UW Extension

Cross-Breeding What is X-Breeding?.

EPTA April 2016 (Friesian base)

Drought and fodder crisis What cows should I cull?

THE ROYAL GUERNSEY AGRICULTURAL AND HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY

FIRODA RANDY 9 Lakemead Randolf x Holwerda Torello x Dovea Bass

EPTA December 2015 (Ayrshire base)

Correlations Among Measures of Dairy Cattle Fertility and Longevity

A National Sire Fertility Index

EPTA December 2015 (Friesian base)

Domestic vs. imported AI semen for Holstein graziers in the US

Carrickshock Naut Rebnautical x Marker x Sem 90% Friesian

Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.

Young Genomic Pedigree Index

EPTA December 2015 (Shorthorn base)

PTA April 2019 (Shorthorn base)

Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth

MILK YIELD AND COMPOSITION VARIATIONS OF LATVIAN BREED GOATS DEPENDING ON THE LENGTH OF THE KIDS SUCKLING PERIOD Kristīne Piliena, Daina Jonkus Latvia.

How to understand and use dairy goat performance data

Economics of Reproduction: the Quality of the Pregnancy

Presentation transcript:

PTA April 2019 (Shorthorn base) Skyhigh Oscar St Hallebo x Peterslund x Syd Darla PTA April 2019 (Shorthorn base) Production Traits PLI £421 Milk 348kg Fat 37.3kg +0.39% Ptn 21.3kg +0.16% 157dtrs/40hds (96%Rel) Management Traits Fert Index na Lifespan -0.2 SCC 0 DOB – 24/08/2009 HBN – 22000396 AI Code – SR2038 SIRE: St Hallebo DAM: 690 Orreja EX93 G DAM: Denmark 043172-1153 3 DAM: Denmark 043172-0742 5 lacts average 6543kg 4.79%F 3.92%P Lact Age Milk Days Fat % Ptn % 1 2/01 7716 305 5.22 4.10 2 3/01 9528 5.41 3.92 3 4/01 10056 5.52 3.66 4 5/01 10432 296 5.08 3.71 5 6/00 9142 5.42 3.58 6 7/05 7454 277 5.28 3.46 Skyhigh Oscar 690 Orreja, dam of Oscar Lacts. Milk Fat % Ptn % 4 average 8824kg 4.46 3.67 Sire Analysts Notes... Skyhigh Oscar has fantastic production figures, based on crossbred progeny milking in the UK. He has a PLI of £421 and combines high milk production with very good milk quality. Oscar has an excellent pedigree and his EX93 dam was the top protein percent cow in the Skyhigh herd and sold for 4,000gns in the 2013 Skyhigh dispersal sale.