EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Signature (unit, name, etc.) Passive sampling of phosphate with DGT.

Advertisements

Chemical speciation of PM and mass closure David Green, Gary Fuller & Anja Tremper King’s College London.

S Larssen: PM-PP-Stockholm-Oct-2003.ppt slide 1 PM in Europe - State and past trends Emissions and concentration levels Steinar Larssen Norwegian Institute.

Title Performance of the EMEP aerosol model: current results and further needs Presented by Svetlana Tsyro (EMEP/MSC-W) EMEP workshop on Particulate Matter.

1 Laxenburg, 16 Nov TFIAM-TFMM joint workshop(1) Similarities and Differences in Particle Characteristics across Europe Jean-Philippe Putaud EC –

Intensive measurements and modelling of size segregated chemical composition of aerosols in June 2006 and Jan 2007 Wenche Aas, Rami Alfarra, Elke Bieber,

Developments in EMEP monitoring strategy and recommendations from AirMonTech Kjetil Tørseth, NILU/EMEP-CCC.

/tfmm3 EMEP Chemical Coordinating Centre Measurements of particulate matter in EMEP Current implementation Kjetil Tørseth, Wenche Aas, Michael.

STATE OF PLAY - FORECASTS FOR EUROPEAN CONSTRUCTION

GROWTH DRIVERS AND INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES IN EUROPEAN CONSTRUCTION TO 2016 Michael Weingärtler Metal Expert Europe Steel.

Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive- Measuring-Campaigns at Melpitz site (German lowlands, Saxony) Summer 2006 and Winter 2007 – Planned possible.

EMEP INTENSIVE MEASUREMENT PERIODS IN CLOSE PARTNERSSHIP WITH EU PROJECTS Wenche Aas, Andres Alastuey, Francesco Canonaco, Fabrizia Cavalli, Franco Lucarelli,

Directive 95/50/EC TDG Checks Application of Annexes Erkki Laakso EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG ENERGY & TRANSPORT TDG Checks Riga June 2006.

Relevant activities in EMEP Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC (NILU) EMEP Monitoring programme Expansion to the EECCA region, HTAP QA/QC.

Uncertainties in atmospheric observations Wenche Aas EMEP/CCC.

Synergies between EMEP and EUSAAR Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)

Trend analysis of HMs and POPs on the basis of measurements and modelling data Victor Shatalov and Oleg Travnikov, MSC-E.

EMEP Monitoring Strategy Status and challenges, with main focus on the EECCA region Wenche Aas and Kjetil Tørseth EMEP/CCC (NILU)

P. Schlag 1,2, A. Vermeulen 3, M. J. Blom 3, A. Kiendler-Scharr 2,A. Khan 1, R. Holzinger 1 1 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research Utrecht (IMAU),

ARISTOTLE UNIVERSITY OF THESSALONIKI Dept. of Civil Engineering Division of Hydraulics & Environmental Engineering Laboratory of Environmental Engineering.

Agriculture, Human and Natural Resources Information Technology, Virginia Tech United States Department of Agriculture Peer Panel Meeting July 8-9, 2004.

CIS-Workshop on „WFD and Hydropower“ June 2007 Berlin, Germany - First Workshop under Phase II ( ) of the EU activity „Water Framework Directive.

EMEP WGSR, EMEP Progress on HMs, 2006  Review and evaluation of the MSCE-HM model (TFMM)  Atmospheric pollution in 2004 (emissions, monitoring.

TRADE CONTACT GROUP Brussels 9th June 2009 Agenda item 3a) State of play of IT systems: Import Control System (ICS); Export Control System (ECS); New.

Extended Bureaux EMEP & WGE, Geneva March 21th 2017

CLEER-Project Helmer Schweizer Past-President EUROMCONTACT

Readiness for e-submissions Veterinary medicines agencies

Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason

For 24 countries with more than 20 citations, this figure compares contributions to ESMO and the UK cancer CPGs. Solid line of identity indicates equal.

SBS Compliance report item 3 of the agenda

ETS Working Group meeting 24-25/9/2007 Agenda point 7 CVTS3 brief update /09/ 2007 ETS working group.

Steering Committee, Eurostat, Luxembourg, 4 February 2011

EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006 and Jan 2007

EMEP intensive measurements

Wenche Aas and Karl Espen Yttri (EMEP/CCC)

Rivers X-GIG phytobenthos intercalibration

ACTRIS Aerosol Chemical Speciation Monitor (ACSM) Network and new filter off-line techniques to measure PM chemical composition and determine organic aerosol.

European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)

10th TFMM meeting, June, 2009, France, Paris

Massimo Vieno, Eiko Nemitz CEH Edinburgh & Univ. Edinburgh

EMEP Monitoring Strategy

Marine Strategy Framework Directive: Status of reporting

Status of data from EMEP intensive period 2008/2009

Monitoring strategy, technical issues

Some Experiences and results from EMEP-Intensive-

C.N.R. Institute of Atmospheric Pollution

Status of the measurement data checking process

Rami Alfarra, Urs Baltensperger: Paul Scherrer Institute, CH.

Ari Laaksonen, Jukka Rukkainen: University of Kopio, FI.

Title Effect of horizontal resolution on PM calculations:

The Steam Jet Aerosol Collector SJAC

The Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution

Uncertainties in atmospheric observations

Uncertainties of heavy metal pollution assessment

TFMM Work plan for 2010 Build-up the appropriate framework for the implementation of the revised monitoring strategy Technical support to the Parties.

First Approach to the EMEP Assessment Report – Slovak Republic

H. Fagerli, TFMM Bordeux, april 2008

19th TFMM Meeting, Geneva May 3rd 2018

Future intensive field periods Recommendations

Lessons learnt from the EMEP intensive measurements

UK (CEH) and ACTRIS WP3: In-situ chemical, physical and optical properties of aerosols WP4: Trace gases networking: Volatile organic carbon and nitrogen.

EMEP-Intensive-Measuring-Campaigns Summer 06 and Winter 07

EMEP new monitoring strategy in France Nathalie Poisson - ADEME

Wenche Aas Status of EMEP measurements today Field intercomparison

LAMAS Working Group June 2015

Update on activities of Bulgaria within/related to EMEP

Comparison of model results with measurements

EMEP intensive measurement periods

Svetlana Tsyro, David Simpson, Leonor Tarrason

Quality assurance and data quality in relation to trend assessments in EMEP Kjetil Tørseth, Wenche Aas and Jan Schaug Documenting changes in atmospheric.

Presentation transcript:

EMEP intensive measurements, June 2006 Wenche Aas

Announced measurements before June 2006

Received data from NO001 (Birkenes) PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC) –daily IT001 (Montelibretti) PM10,PM2.5 mass chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC, mineral) -daily Number distributen and denuder measurements NL0011 (Cabauw) PM10,PM2.5 (inorganic –NH4,NO3,Na, Cl, SO4 + gases) -hourly CZ0003 (Kozetice) PM10, PM2.5 mass and heavy metals (Mn, Pb, Ni, Cd, Cu, As) –daily DK0041 (Lille Valby) PM10, PM2.5, PM1 mass (+ NOx and O3) -hourly and daily FI0017 (Virolahti) PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and inorganic ions -daily DE0041 (Melpitz) Berner impactor (5 sizes) mass and inorganic ions –daily PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass and chemical speciation (inorg, EC/OC) daily BC, number distr, and PM10,PM2.5,PM1 mass -hourly UK, CH (Eiko’s talk) + ES will deliver SE0012 (Aspvreten) PM data stolen from a NMR project…

Average mass concentrations

Italy, Montelibretti PM10 Crustal ++ PM2.5 SO4 +

Finland, Virolahti PM1 PM10 SO4,Ca NH4 + rest SO4, NH4 + rest Flagged with contamination (K for PM1, all ions for PM10)

Norway, Birkenes PM1 SO4; NH4; NO3 + rest PM10 SO4; NH4 + rest

Netherlands, Cabauw Hourly MARGA meas. at two sizes

Germany, Melpitz

25th of June

Germany, Melpitz

23rd of June

Melpitz, chemical speciation from Digitel sampler PM1 PM10 PM2.5

Other sites with mainly mass measurements High Mn High Cd High Cu High Ni

Summary - Outlook Large efforts have been done at many sites Very valuable dataset New intensive period in January start 8th of January and continue for 4 weeks. How and what to present in the PM assessment report?? Will it be time to finish all the chemical analysis? A thorough evaluation of the data will be difficult to accomplish in time for the PM assessment report It should also be published in a peer reviewed paper later Should each participant evaluate their own data or should it be centralized? Data ownership. How to include model intercomparison. Any time for that?