Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Suggested PA Model for HRb
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /282r1 Submission September 2000 S. Halford, K. Halford, and M. WebsterSlide 1 Evaluating the Performance of HRb Proposals in the Presence.
Contents Physical layer for IEEE b Channel allocation
Phase Tracking During VHT-LTF
Doc.: IEEE /396 Submission November 2000 S. Halford, P. Chiuchiolo, G. Dooley, and M. WebsterSlide 1 Implementation and Complexity Issues for.
Doc.: IEEE /206 Submission Slide 1 July 2000 Loraine, Micro Linear Corp. HRb performance requirements: PHY Overhead & Data Rate July 2000 Jerry.
Doc.: IEEE /436r0 Submission July 2001 S. Halford, et al IntersilSlide 1 CCK-OFDM Normative Text Summary Steve Halford Mark Webster Jim Zyren.
NTU Confidential Packet Format Report of OFDM-based Agile Baseband Transceiver for Future Spectrum Pooling Wireless Systems Advisor : Tzi-Dar Chiueh Student.
Doc.: IEEE /283 Submission Sept/00 M. Webster and K. HalfordSlide 1 Spectral Mask Considerations for HRb Mark Webster and Karen Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /383 Submission November1998November 1998 Jamshid Khun-Jush, ETSI-BRANSlide 1 BRAN#11 PHY Decisions & Issues to Resolved with
Doc.: IEEE /188 Submission July 2000 Jan Boer, Lucent TechnologiesSlide 1 OFDM in the 2.4 GHz Band Jan Boer, Lucent Technologies.
802.11b PHY Wireless LANs Page 1 of 23 IEEE b WLAN Physical Layer Svetozar Broussev 16-Feb-2005.
Doc.: IEEE /393 Submission November 2000 Paul Chiuchiolo and Mark Webster, IntersilSlide 1 Power Amp Effects for HRb OFDM Paul Chiuchiolo and.
Doc.: IEEE /072 Submission May 2000 Mark Webster and Karen Halford, Intersil Corporation Slide 1 Market Acceptability Throughput Issues for HRb.
Doc.: IEEE / Submission July 2013 Juho Pirskanen, Renesas Mobile CorporationSlide 1 Potential approach to improve WLAN BSS edge performance.
March 2002 Jie Liang, et al, Texas Instruments Slide 1 doc.: IEEE /0207r0 Submission Simplifying MAC FEC Implementation and Related Issues Jie.
Doc.: IEEE /392 Submission November 2000 K. Halford, S. Halford and M. Webster, IntersilSlide 1 OFDM System Performance Karen Halford, Steve Halford.
Doc.: IEEE /390 Submission November 2000 Mark Webster and Steve Halford, IntersilSlide 1 Reuse of b Preambles with HRb OFDM Mark Webster.
S , Postgraduate Course in Radio Communications
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Channelization for HRb OFDM
PHY Design Considerations for af
Length 1344 LDPC codes for 11ay
Optimal Receivers in Multipath: Single-Carrier and OFDM
Technical Feasibility of Spreading Codes for HRb
Adjacent Channel results for Four Channels
Options for PBCC 22 Proposal
HNS Proposal for n Physical Layer
Blank GI choices under Timing Errors
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Options for PBCC 22 Proposal
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
Blank GI choices under Timing Errors
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
Error Rate Results of OFDM from Bluetooth Interference
Evaluating Channel Estimation Sensitivity
doc.: IEEE /304 Mark Webster Steve Halford
Comparison of IEEE g Proposals: PBCC, OFDM & MBCK
Range & Rate of CCK-OFDM
OFDM High Rate Extension Zyren, Webster, Halford
Jim Zyren Mark Webster Steve Halford Intersil Corporation
Backwards compatibility
Submission Title: [Harmonizing-TG3a-PHY-Proposals-for-CSM]
FDMA WUR Generation Date: Authors: May 2018 Month Year
OFDM System Performance
WUR Dual SYNC Design Follow-up: SYNC bit Duration
July / 20 / 10 MHz Channelization for Robust, High-Performance, Cost-Effective n Operation Jan Boer, Agere Systems, Inc.
CCK-OFDM Closing Remarks
ETRI Proposal to IEEE TGn
CCK-OFDM Summary Steve Halford Mark Webster Jim Zyren Paul Chiuchiolo
May 203 doc.: IEEE r1 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Wireless Mesh Networks
Spectral Control Issues for TGg
GCM Communications Technology
Jung Yee, IceFyre Semiconductor
Considerations on NGV PHY design
D1.0 PHY Comments Discussion
Strawmodel ac Specification Framework
<month year> doc.: IEEE < e>
80-MHz Non-Contiguous Channel Spectrum
Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
802.11a - High Speed PHY in the 5 GHz band PHY overview
Comparisons of HARQ transmission schemes for 11be
Technical Feasibility of CCK Extensions for HRb
PHY Signaling for Adaptive Repetition of 11p PPDU
May 203 doc.: IEEE r2 May 2003 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG3a Comparison.
Presentation transcript:

Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb Month 1998 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 Technical Feasibility of OFDM for HRb Mark Webster, Steve Halford and Carl Andren Intersil Corporation July 2000 Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

Why Consider OFDM for 802.11 HRb? Month 1998 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 Why Consider OFDM for 802.11 HRb? OFDM was selected as the best high-rate waveform by both IEEE 802.11a and HIPERLAN BRAN OFDM was considered superior for providing multiple high-data-rates with reasonable complexity while providing good performance for both high-multipath and low-SNR conditions. FCC processing-gain capability for OFDM is equivalent to other modulations being considered for HRb. Reuse of 802.11a would speed HRb to market. Provides standards harmonization: 802.11a, HIPERLAN and, now (?), 802.11 HRb Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

Multiple HRb OFDM Options Exist July 2000 Multiple HRb OFDM Options Exist Options 1. Use the 802.11a symbol structure and 20 MHz timing unmodified. This requires a 802.11b/HRb clock change from 11 MHz to 20 MHz. 2. Use the 802.11a symbol structure, but use 22 MHz timing. This requires a 802.11b/HRb clock change from 11 MHz to 22 MHz. 3. Change the # of pilots from 52 to 48 and use 22 MHz timing. This reduces the spectral occupancy slightly. 4. Use 22 MHz sampling but change guard interval from 16 to 24 samples. This maintains the 802.11a’s data rates. 5. Etc. This presentation addresses only option 2, since it appears to be the simplist for HRb. Mark Webster, Intersil

Key Features Use 802.11a’s OFDM symbol structure unmodified. July 2000 Key Features Use 802.11a’s OFDM symbol structure unmodified. Stay consistent with 802.11b’s chip rate of 11 MHz. For HRb OFDM, increase 802.11a’s 20 MHz sample rate by 10% to 22 MHz, which is double the 802.11b chip rate. Provides data rates 10% higher than 802.11a’s: 6.6, 9.9, 13.2, 19.8, 26.4, 39.6, 52.8, 59.4 Mbps. Spectrum is 10% wider than 802.11a’s. Mark Webster, Intersil

Trade Matrix 802.11a and 802.11 HRb Comparison Matrix July 2000 802.11a and 802.11 HRb Comparison Matrix Modifications to 802.11a’s parameters are shown in red. Mark Webster, Intersil

20 MHz Sampling Fundamental Month 1998 802.11a OFDM Symbol doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 OFDM Symbol Using 20 MHz Sampling Fundamental 20 MHz x 4 usecs = 80 samples 4 usecs OFDM Symbol Guard Interval IFFT/FFT SPAN 16 Samples 64 Samples time IEEE 802.11a ~16.25 MHz 312.5 KHz Tone Spacing 52 Subcarriers . . . This slides describes the OFDM waveform for the first idea for generating OFDM as appended to an 802.11b preamble. Here the OFDM symbol structure is totally identical to the 802.11a standard, where the fundamental sample rate is 20 MHz. Notice that this scheme has 16 samples in the guard interval. The guard interval is discard in the receiver, since it is only a buffer between successive OFDM symbols. The buffering allows the receive to not use an equalizer. Equalizers are very complex, which motivates the use of OFDM. frequency Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

22 MHz Sampling Fundamental Month 1998 HRb OFDM Symbol doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 OFDM Symbol Using 22 MHz Sampling Fundamental 80 samples / 22 MHz = 3.63637 usec 3.63 usecs OFDM Symbol Guard Interval IFFT/FFT SPAN IEEE 802.11a but 22 MHz clock 16 Samples 64 Samples time ~17.875 MHz 343.75 KHz Tone Spacing 52 Subcarriers . . . This is a second idea which uses a fundamental sample rate of 22 MHz, which is different than 802.11a’s 20 MHz. The motive for this is the 802.11b signal uses a sampling fundamental to 11 MHz, or integer multiples thereof. In this OFDM case, both signals are related to 11 MHz sampling, which simplifies the baseband processor. To handle the change to 22 MHz OFDM, the simplest idea is to merely put 8 extra samples in the guard interval. These 8 extra samples can be merely discarded in the receiver, with the rest be identical to 802.11a encoding/processing. frequency Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

Comparing 802.11a and 802.11b’s Spectral Masks Month 1998 SPECTRAL MASKS doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 Comparing 802.11a and 802.11b’s Spectral Masks 802.11b is Slightly More Restrictive 802.11b Spectral Mask Spectral Masks Appear Compatible Out-of-band regulatory restrictions are extra 802.11a Spectral Mask -20 dBr -28 dBr -40 dBr The big question remains before making this proposal to use OFDM sound. Are the spectrums compatible. This impacts cell layout within a building, and we do not want to harm existing cell plans within buildings designed around the 802.11b spectrum. Adjacent channel interference is the key concern. Shown is the spectral mask for 802.11a and 802.11b. This shows they are nearly identical. No significant harm should result from the use of OFDM. -30 -20 -11 -9 fc 9 11 20 30 Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

Corresponding HRb OFDM Spectral Mask SPECTRAL MASKS July 2000 Corresponding HRb OFDM Spectral Mask -20 dBr -28 dBr -40 dBr -33 -22 -12.1 -9.9 fc 9.9 12.1 22 33 Mark Webster, Intersil

Comparing 802.11a and 802.11b’s Channel Spacings Month 1998 Channel Spacing doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 Comparing 802.11a and 802.11b’s Channel Spacings 802.11b is More Loose 802.11b Channel Spacing frequency 25 MHz 2.4 GHz Frequency Plans Remain Unmodified Channel Spacings Appear Compatible 802.11a Channel Spacing The 802.11a and 802.11b standards suggest usable channel spacings. 802.11b suggests 30 MHz, but in practice folks generally use 25 MHz in the USA. 802.11a suggests 20 MHz, which is tighter than the 25-30 MHz of existing 802.11b systems. Again, no harm should result from using OFDM as the high-rate waveform to extend 802.11b to higher data rates. frequency 20 MHz Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

IEEE-802.11b PACKET STRUCTURE Month 1998 IEEE-802.11b PACKET STRUCTURE doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 CURRENT 802.11b PREAMBLES 802.11b LONG PREAMBLE PREAMBLE 144 BITS @ 1 Mbps HEADER 48 BITS @ 1 Mbps PSDU SELECTABLE @ 1, 2, 5.5 OR 11 Mbps 192 usecs Data Payload 802.11b SHORT PREAMBLE PREAMBLE 72 BITS @ 1 Mbps HEADER 48 BITS @ 2 Mbps PSDU SELECTABLE @ 2, 5.5 OR 11 Mbps 96 usecs 1 and 2 Mbps uses 11 chip BARKER codes. 5.5 and 11 Mbps uses 8 chip CCK codes. Chipping is at 11 MHz. 802.11b already has a defined preamble/header structure for WLAN packets. We propose that the preamble/header be reused as is. We propose only modifying the payload portion of the packet with higher rate OFDM. This provides interoperability and coexistence with already deployed equipment. New highest-rate systems can communicate with existing older systems at 1, 2, 5.5 and 11 Mbps. However, new highest rate systems can communicate at the higher data rates without harm to older units, since the preamble is common. The data rate and packet length is listed in the header. All units can receive the header. Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

HRb OFDM PACKET STRUCTURE Month 1998 HRb OFDM PACKET STRUCTURE doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 PREAMBLES for 802.11 HRb: Reuse 802.11b preambles Service Field Bit Denotes Switch to OFDM 802.11 HRb LONG PREAMBLE K usecs PREAMBLE 144 BITS @ 1 Mbps HEADER 48 BITS @ 1 Mbps PSDU SELECTABLE OFDM Symbols @ 6.6, 9.6, 13.2, 19.8, 26.4, 39.3, 52.8 or 59.4 Mbps OFDM SYNC OFDM Signal 192 usecs 16 usecs 4 usecs Use 802.11a’s OFDM sync pattern Data Payload Data rate # bytes of data 802.11 HRb SHORT PREAMBLE PREAMBLE 72 BITS @ 1 Mbps HEADER 48 BITS @ 2 Mbps PSDU SELECTABLE OFDM Symbols @ 6.6, 9.6, 13.2, 19.8, 26.4, 39.3, 52.8 or 59.4 Mbps OFDM SYNC OFDM Signal To run the current rates of 1, 2, 5.5 and 11 Mbps, everything remains as in 802.11b. To operate at the new data rates, the header denotes the higher mode. After the header would follow the 802.11a sync pattern, which is only 16 usecs long. This sync pattern is used for initialization of the key OFDM subsections. The 802.11a waveform has a segment called SIGNAL to convey data rate and packet length. This is not necessary, since the 802.11b header conveys the same information at a robust 2 Mbps. The payload would be the same as the 802.11a DATA waveform segment. 96 usecs 16 usecs 4 usecs Service Field Bit Denotes Switch to OFDM Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

802.11b Preamble/Header OFDM Sync Detail July 2000 802.11b Preamble/Header OFDM Sync Detail Signal Detection AGC Diversity Coarse Freq Estimation Timing Synchronization Channel Estimation 16 usecs 4 usecs QUESTIONS 1. Are short and long OFDM syncs necessary? 2. Are they preferred? 802.11b PREAMBLE 802.11b HEADER OFDM SYNC OFDM Signal Short Sync Long Sync t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 t7 t8 t9 t10 G12 T1 T2 8 usec 8 usec Signal Detection AGC Diversity Coarse Freq Estimation Timing Synchronization Fine Freq Estimation Channel Estimation Mark Webster, Intersil

Packet Structure for Long Preamble with OFDM Header: Standard Mode July 2000 Packet Structure for Long Preamble with OFDM Header: Standard Mode DATA BURST ACK BURST Sync SFD Header Short Sync Long Sync Signal MPDU: X Bytes IFS Sync SFD Header Short Sync Long Sync Signal Ack # Bits: Rate: Time: 128 bits 1 MBPS 128 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 20 usec 8*X bits R MBPS 8*X/R usec 128 bits 1 MBPS 128 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 20 usec 3 symbols 6 MBPS 12 secs 10 usec Standard IEEE802.11b header Standard IEEE802.11a Header OFDM Data Symbols Standard IEEE802.11b header Standard IEEE802.11a Header OFDM Ack (Uses 3 OFDM symbols) Throughput = 8*X Mbps/ (128+16+48+20 + 8*X/R+10+128+16+48+ 20 +12) usec This mode uses both IEEE 802.11b Long Preamble and IEEE 802.11a Preamble to acquire all necessary OFDM parameters Mark Webster, Intersil

Packet Structure for Long Preamble without OFDM Header: Fast Mode July 2000 Packet Structure for Long Preamble without OFDM Header: Fast Mode DATA BURST ACK BURST Sync SFD Header MPDU: X Bytes IFS Sync SFD Header Ack # Bits: Rate: Time: 128 bits 1 MBPS 128 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 8*X bits R MBPS 8*X/R usec 128 bits 1 MBPS 128 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 3 Symbols 6 MBPS 12 secs 10 usec Standard IEEE802.11b header OFDM Ack (Uses 3 OFDM symbols) Standard IEEE802.11b header OFDM Data Symbols Throughput = 8*X Mbps/ (128+16+48+8*X/R+10+128+16+48+12) usec This mode uses IEEE 802.11b Long Preamble only to acquire all necessary OFDM parameters Mark Webster, Intersil

With-and-Without OFDM Sync Long-Preamble Throughput Comparison July 2000 With-and-Without OFDM Sync Long-Preamble Throughput Comparison Mark Webster, Intersil

Packet Structure for Short Preamble with OFDM Header: Standard Mode July 2000 Packet Structure for Short Preamble with OFDM Header: Standard Mode DATA BURST ACK BURST Sync SFD Header Short Sync Long Sync Signal MPDU: X Bytes IFS Sync SFD Header Short Sync Long Sync Signal Ack # Bits: Rate: Time: 56 bits 1 MBPS 56 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 20 usec 8*X bits R MBPS 8*X/R usec 56 bits 1 MBPS 56 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 20 usec 3 symbols 6 MBPS 12 secs 10 usec Standard IEEE802.11b header Standard IEEE802.11a Header OFDM Data Symbols Standard IEEE802.11b header Standard IEEE802.11a Header OFDM Ack (Uses 3 OFDM symbols) Throughput = 8*X Mbps/ (56 +16+48+20 + 8*X/R+10+56 +16+48+ 20 +12) usec This mode uses both IEEE 802.11b Short Preamble and IEEE 802.11a Preamble to acquire all necessary OFDM parameters Mark Webster, Intersil

Packet Structure for Short Preamble without OFDM Header: Fast Mode July 2000 Packet Structure for Short Preamble without OFDM Header: Fast Mode DATA BURST ACK BURST Sync SFD Header MPDU: X Bytes IFS Sync SFD Header Ack # Bits: Rate: Time: 56 bits 1 MBPS 56 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 8*X bits R MBPS 8*X/R usec 56 bits 1 MBPS 56 usec 16 bits 1 MBPS 16 usec 48 bits 1 MBPS 48 usec 3 symbols 6 MBPS 12 secs 10 usec Standard IEEE802.11b header OFDM Ack (Uses 3 OFDM symbols) Standard IEEE802.11b header OFDM Data Symbols Throughput = 8*X Mbps/ (56 +16+48+8*X/R+10+56+16+48+12) usec This mode uses IEEE 802.11b Short Preamble only to acquire all necessary OFDM parameters Mark Webster, Intersil

With-and-Without OFDM Sync Short-Preamble Throughput Comparison July 2000 With-and-Without OFDM Sync Short-Preamble Throughput Comparison Mark Webster, Intersil

HRb SHORT/LONG-PREAMBLE Month 1998 HEADER DETAIL FOR HRb doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 HRb SHORT/LONG-PREAMBLE HEADER DETAIL Signal Field only accommodates rates up to 25.5 Mbps ( 8 bits x 100 Kbps, so use a Service Field bit to denote data-rate extensions) HEADER 48 BITS Unchanged SIGNAL 8 BITS SERVICE 8 BITS LENGTH 16 BITS CRC 16 BITS Use a Service Field bit to denote OFDM mode. Use a Service Field bit to denote data-rate extensions. The Length Field is adequate, since measured in usecs. OFDM proposal uses PSDU length in an integer number of usecs. The header is identical in structure to 802.11b’s. 802.11b’s header already provides fields providing provision for extended data-rate performance. The field modifications are shown, and they are compatible with existing equipment. The packet length field is fine unmodified, since the proposed OFDM packet length is an integer number of usecs. Free bits in the service can be defined to denote OFDM, recognizable to all equipment conforming to a new standard. Existing equipment is not harmed, since they can still decode the packet length. The signal field only has 8 bits which cannot quantify a data rate above 25.5 Mbps. To achieve higher rates, the service field bit denoting OFDM can be used to denote the higher rates as quantified by the signal field. Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

HRb OPTIONAL MODE: OFDM ONLY Super-Short OFDM-only Preamble Option Month 1998 HRb OPTIONAL MODE: OFDM ONLY doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 PREAMBLES for 802.11 HRb: Super-Short OFDM-only Preamble Option Data Rate # bytes of data Data Payload OFDM SYNC SIGNAL SYMBOL PSDU SELECTABLE @ 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, 36, 48 or 54 Mbps 16 usecs 4 usecs Not interoperable/coexistent with 802.11b If one wants to run purely OFDM at 2.4 GHz in a WLAN network which ignores (not coexistent and interoperable) with 802.11b equipment, a very short preamble can be defined as in 802.11a. The preamble would not be recognizable by existing 802.11b equipment. With super-short preamble, the 802.11a SIGNAL segment is needed to denote packet length and data rate. Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

Packet Structure for OFDM Only Header: Super Fast Mode July 2000 Packet Structure for OFDM Only Header: Super Fast Mode DATA BURST ACK BURST Short Sync Long Sync Signal MPDU: X Bytes IFS Short Sync Long Sync Signal Ack # Bits: Rate: Time: 8 usec 8 usec 4 usec 8*X bits R MBPS 8*X/R usec 10 usec 8 usec 8 usec 4 usec 3 Symbols 6 MBPS 12 usec Standard IEEE802.11a header Standard IEEE802.11a header OFDM Ack (Uses 3 OFDM symbols) OFDM Data Symbols Throughput = 8*X Mbps / (8+8+4+8*X/R+10+8+8+4+12) This mode uses IEEE 802.11a Preamble to acquire all necessary OFDM parameters Mark Webster, Intersil

Throughput of Super-Short Preamble July 2000 Throughput of Super-Short Preamble Mark Webster, Intersil

Month 1998 doc.: IEEE 802.11-00/203r1 July 2000 Realistic Impairments and Considerations Not Included in This Throughput Analysis Packet Errors cause retransmission. Packet collisions Integer data length requirement Time for backoff to avoid collision MAC Enhancements Mark Webster, Intersil Mark Webster, Intersil

1000 byte packet-error-rate vs. EbNo SIMULATION RESULTS July 2000 PERFORMANCE IN AWGN 1000 byte packet-error-rate vs. EbNo Mark Webster, Intersil

1000 byte packet-error-rate vs. SNR SIMULATION RESULTS July 2000 PERFORMANCE IN AWGN 1000 byte packet-error-rate vs. SNR Mark Webster, Intersil

OFDM has Reasonable PA Backoffs PA BACK-OFF for OFDM July 2000 OFDM has Reasonable PA Backoffs Pa Backoff Example Rapp Model p = 2 16 QAM Subcarriers OBO 3.9 dB It is fairly easy to meet the spectral mask. Mark Webster, Intersil

OFDM’s Large Peak Deviations are Rare July 2000 OFDM’s Large Peak Deviations are Rare 16 QAM Subcarriers Theoretical Max Peak-to-Ave Pwr: 22 dB 22 MHz sample rate Mark Webster, Intersil