Kaisu Harju Finnish Environment Institute Eurostat March 13th 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Urban Land Use Industry category Canadas Industries.
Advertisements

National circumstances and inventories of GHG emissions Mirja Kosonen UNFCCC WS, Dublin.
DIABOLO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Project duration:
FDES Meeting NYC 8-10 November 2010 The interface between core environmental statistics and other information systems: which interaction is important?
Urban Land-Cover Classification for Mesoscale Atmospheric Modeling Alexandre Leroux.
West of England Joint Waste Development Plan Document Allan Davies Planning Policy Officer North Somerset Council West of England Partnership Office North.
Land Use Classification Greg X. Gong Presentation at London Group Meeting Canberra Australia April 2009
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis Team: Kelly Blanton, Erica Tice, William Weldon, and Paul Starkel.
EFGS – 10 November 2015 – Vienna UN-GGIM: Europe Work Group A European Core Data François Chirié (France)
7-8-March 2011 Task Force "Organic farming statistics"-Luxembourg, 7-8 March Item 4 Harmonised questionnaire for data collection: State of the art.
Spatial analysis for neighborhood accessibility GIS Water Resources Anna Okola.
Oslo Group on Energy Statistics
Copernicus Urban Atlas: an update
Standardized baselines
L. Radulov, A. Nikolaev Black Sea Regional Energy Centre
New Information - New Technology - New Directions
DIABOLO has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No Project duration:
Provision of harmonized land cover information for lucas from the Finnish datasets Eurostat grant 2014 Provision of harmonized land cover/land use information:
© 2016 Global Market Insights, Inc. USA. All Rights Reserved Fuel Cell Market size worth $25.5bn by 2024 Geographic Information System.
Definitions and data under the SEEA framework
Developing accounts for natural capital – scene setting
Proximity to airports via the road network
Developing energy consumption data to meet users needs
Short and long term strategy on Land Cover/Land Use information
LUCAS Task Force Statistical tables.
Lucas in NL Harmonised Land Use/ Land Cover Statistics, Part A
LC/LU statistical tables from available data
Pilot studies on the provision of harmonized land use/land cover statistics: Synergies between LUCAS and the national systems Norway Erik Engelien Division.
The new metadata structure & Country Specific Notes
LUCAS Task Force 30 September 2015 Item 4 – Update on the Knowledge Innovation Project on Accounting for Natural Capital and ecosystem services (KIP INCA)
Hill Country Associates Pedernales River analysis
LUCAS 2009/2012 results Optimising comparability and Quality Reports Item 4.1 Working Group for Land Cover and Land Use Statistics Bech.
LUCAS SURVEYS 2009/2012: Optimising comparability
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
Integration of Territorial And Land Information
A Finnish Approach For  Sustainable Forest Management and Energy Security Prof. Hannu Ilvesniemi.
Spatial data needs in EU Regional Policy
WORKING GROUP "Land Cover/Use Statistics" 20 October 2009, Luxembourg
5.2 draft European Statistical Work Programme 2013
Pilot studies: land use and land cover statistics
Pilot studies: land use and land cover statistics
Rural development statistics
LUCAS Advisory Group Meeting LU/LC Classification & INSPIRE compliance
Provision of harmonised land cover / land use information:
LUCAS Task Force The way forward.
WORKING GROUP "Land Cover/Use Statistics" 20 October 2009,Luxembourg,
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAMME OF SNA 2008 (Dominica)
Spatial Methodology Introduction Outline of draft Chapter Highlights
INSPIRE Directive & LUCAS: coordination of activities
Budget: ,00 € (90% Commission contribution)
The EU policy context: Ecosystem Capital Accounting
Integration of Territorial And Land Information
Land Cover and Land Use Statistics
Other urban data collections
2005 Transition Facility Programme
Rail transport developments Agenda point 7.2
Country Experiences in Mitigation Assessment : Republic of Korea
Finnish experiences in deriving CORINE land cover information
Collection and dissemination of data geo-referenced to a 1km² grid Item 3.2 of the draft agenda DSS Meeting 1 and 2 March 2018.
Lucas in NL Harmonised Land Use/ Land Cover Statistics, Part A
Methods to overcome low coverage of Statistical business register
Task Force Reference Paper
Environmental Accounts and Indicators
Water statistics reporting in the EU in the recent years
Passenger Mobility Statistics 21 May 2015
LUCAS long term perspective
Environmental aspects
Geo-enabling the SDG indicators – experiences from the UN Global Geospatial Management and the GEOSTAT 3 project Agenda item 12 Ekkehard PETRI – Eurostat,
MAES and Accounting support to BD 2020 evaluation
Geospatial data for cities and FUAs: state of play and opportunities
Presentation transcript:

Kaisu Harju Finnish Environment Institute Eurostat March 13th 2018 Provision of Harmonised Land Use Information – LUCAS and National Systems EUROSTAT Grants 2015 Kaisu Harju Finnish Environment Institute Eurostat March 13th 2018

Grants 2015 Project: Provision of Harmonised Land Use Information – LUCAS and National Systems Goal: To study how to get LUCAS compatible statistical data using national data sources Focus on land use, continuation of the work started in Eurostat Grants 2014 (land cover) Project duration: 1.1.2016 – 30.6.2017 Consortium Finnish Environment Institute SYKE (coordination) and Natural Resources Institute Finland LUKE Kaisu harju, SYKE 6.7.2019

Tasks WP1: Inventory of existing national data sources on land use Comparability of national datasets and Lucas LU classification Specific LUCAS LU classification for grant 2015 –projects was used WP2: Methodology development and calculation of results A method for data integration and statistical data production was developed and tested using a pilot areas Statistical tables for year 2012 were produced for 3 selected NUTS3 areas WP3: Quality assessment and feasibility study The results were evaluated using Lucas 2012 field observations and selected NFI 2016 survey results The feasibility of future updates using proposed and tested approach was evaluated including access and use conditions of the national datasets

Inventory of national data sources and their comparability to LUCAS land use classification Good availability of the national registers, spatial datasets and in-situ surveys Most datasets have full national coverage and they also cover all LUCAS LU classes in main level Some data gaps: detailed levels of secondary and tertiary production classes and abandoned areas Buildings and other topographic map layers Road and Rail network Forests, Fields Protected areas, national parks and willdernes reserves Land cover data Lakes and rivers 4 Etc.

LUCAS Land Use Classification for Grants 2015 Primary production U110 Agriculture U120 Forestry U130 MiningAndQuarrying U140 AquacultureAndFishing U150 OtherPrimaryProduction U200 SecondaryProduction U210 RawIndustry U220 HeavyEndProductIndustry U230 LightEndProductIndustry U240 EnergyProduction U250 OtherIndustry U300 TertiaryProduction U310 CommercialServices U320 FinancialProfessionalAndInformationServices U330 CommunityServices U340 CulturalEntertainmentAndRecreationalServices U400 TransportNetworksLogisticsAndUtilities U410 TransportNetworks U420 LogisticalAndStorageServices U430 Utilities U500 ResidentialUse (includes other compatible use) U600 OtherUses U610 Transitional use U620 Abandoned areas U630 Natural areas not in other economic use U6xx Other U111 CommercialAgriculturalProduction U112 FarmingInfrastructure U113 AgriculturalProductionForOwnConsumption U241 Nuclear based energy production U242 Fossil fuel based energy production U243 Biomass based energy production U244 Renewable energy production U411 RoadTransport U412 RailwayTransport U413 AirTransport U414 WaterTransport U415 OtherTransportNetwork U431 ElectricityGasAndThermalPowerDistributionServices U432 WaterAndSewageInfrastructure U621 Abandoned industrial** U622 Abandoned commercial** U623 Abandoned residential** U624 Other abandoned  HILUCS definitions of LU classes were followed

Methodology development and calculation of results The methodology for producing LUCAS compatible land use data was based on combining different spatial data layers into one spatial land use data layer High resolution (5 m * 5m) spatial data about land use  each pixel representing only one land use class LUCAS LU statistic calculated based on this data

Results of the Pilot Areas Results were calculated for three NUTS3-areas representing various conditions in Finland FI1C1 Southest Finland: urban center, agricultural areas FI197 Pirkanmaa: forests, agricultural areas, large lakes and also urban center FI1D7 Lappi: sparsely populated, protected areas and wilderness reserves, large national parks, specific feature: reindeer husbandry

Spatial Data and Analysis in Producing Statistics Processing of high resolution spatial data is time consuming Spatial data enables easy calculation of areas for each land use class at different levels (regional/national/etc…) Spatial data enables further spatial analysis and joint use with other data sources Spatial data/map gives a visual interpretation the LU classification  how well it describes the real world Example: Both protected areas and inland water areas classified as ”natural areas not in other economic use”  Class for inland waters would be needed

Some Considerations about the classification Different land use functions are mixed, especially all tertiary sector classes It is challenging to define detailed tertiary sector land use information as areas. Different tertiary sector functions are mixed and they also overlap with both industrial and residential areas. In Finland the proportion of built-up area is small: especially challenging to produce reliable statistics about secondary and tertiary sectors at very detailed level Use of forest areas in Finland is versatile and defining one land use value is difficult: Forestry, recreation, berry picking, hunting etc. are overlapping uses of forests. Finland has very large inland water areas and the main use of water areas is difficult to define as they are used for fishing, recreation, water transport etc. at the same time. It would be useful to have a specific class for water areas in LU classification. The versatile use of forests and water areas is based on “everyman rights”, which refer to the right of everyone in Finland to enjoy outdoor pursuits regardless of who owns or occupies an area.

Conclusions and Some Feedback LUCAS land use classification had some problems from national point of view LUCAS and Copernicus programmes could support each other more E.g. LUCAS in situ data could not be used in validating Copernicus products, because data content was not sufficien for that purpose LUCAS grants was a good opportunity to study the usage of spatial data in producing statistics Open data policy enables the flexible usage of national datasets Using spatial data for producing statistics is a very interesting option.

Thank you! The name of the presenter, SYKE 6.7.2019