(p for noninferiority = 0.01)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FRISC II: Fragmin and fast Revascularization during InStability in Coronary artery disease - LONG-TERM HEPARIN - Purpose To assess efficacy of long-term.
Advertisements

Georges Ghanem MD, FESC, FACC Associate Professor, Chief of Cardiology UMC-RH/LAU-SOM Beirut, Lebanon.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
Efficacy and safety of apixaban compared with warfarin at different levels of INR control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Study Guide Guide for Patients Undergoing Anticoagulant Therapy.
Randomized, double-blind, multicenter, controlled trial.
Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism N Engl J Med Apr ;348(15) : PREVENT (Warfarin) Trial.
RE-MEDY Cumulative Risk Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism or Related Death in the Active-Control Study Months since Randomization Estimated Cumulative Risk.
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
Do we Cross that Bridge? Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Krista Doiron, BSc, BSs (Pharm) Bryanne MacNeil, BSc,
ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club 1. Announcements Thank you attending the ACCP Cardiology PRN Journal Club – Thank you if you attended before or have.
Nathan P. Clark, Pharm D, FCCP, BCPS Clinical Pharmacy Supervisor Clinical Pharmacy Anticoagulation and Anemia Service Kaiser Permanente Colorado Aurora,
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Date of download: 7/10/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Choice of Antithrombotic Therapy for Stroke Prevention.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
Comparison of Dabigatran and Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Valvular Heart DiseaseClinical Perspective by Michael D. Ezekowitz, Rangadham.
The Efficacy of Dabigatran versus Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Systematic Review Karim Bouferrache Pacific University.
(p for noninferiority = 0.01)
Stroke, Bleeding, and Mortality Risks in Elderly Medicare Beneficiaries Treated with Dabigatran or Rivaroxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation.
From: Adjusted-Dose Warfarin versus Aspirin for Preventing Stroke in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8): doi: /
IRIS Trial design: Patients without diabetes with a history of stroke or TIA within 6 months, with objective evidence of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR value.
PRAGUE-18 Trial design: Patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI were randomized to prasugrel (n = 634) versus ticagrelor (n = 596). Results (p = 0.94)
NORSTENT Trial design: Patients with obstructive coronary artery disease were randomized to a drug-eluting stent (DES) (n = 4,504) versus a bare-metal.
CORAL Trial design: Patients with renal artery stenosis and hypertension or chronic kidney disease were randomized to renal artery stenting (n = 467) vs.
APEX Trial design: Patients hospitalized with an acute medical illness were randomized to oral betrixaban for days (n = 3,759) versus subcutaneous.
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
DAPT Trial design: Patients undergoing DES/BMS PCI, no ischemic/bleeding complications, and with documented compliance at 1 year, were randomized to receive.
RE-CIRCUIT Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation were randomized to uninterrupted dabigatran 150 mg twice daily.
(p < for group 1 or 2 vs. group 3)
IMPI Trial design: Participants with TB pericarditis and risk for HIV were randomized to prednisolone (n = 706) vs. placebo (n = 694) and to M. indicus.
BENEFIT Trial design: Patients with positive serologic tests for T. Cruzi and cardiomyopathy were randomized to benznidazole 300 mg daily for days.
DANISH Trial design: Patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy were randomized to ICD implantation (n = 556) versus usual care (n = 560). Results (p = 0.28)
EUCLID Trial design: Patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) were randomized to ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily (n = 6,930) vs. clopidogrel 75 mg.
GLAGOV Trial design: Patients with CAD and elevated LDL cholesterol on statin therapy were randomized to subcutaneous evolocumab (n = 484) vs. subcutaneous.
ATLANTIC Trial design: Participants with STEMI being transported for primary PCI were randomized in the ambulance to ticagrelor 180 mg (n = 909) vs. placebo.
LEVO-CTS Trial design: Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with the use of cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to infusion of levosimendan 0.2 µg/kg/min.
(p for noninferiority = )
EMPA-REG OUTCOME Trial design: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) at high risk for CV events were randomized to receive in a 1:1:1 fashion either.
EVITA Trial design: Smokers admitted with an acute coronary syndrome were randomized to varenicline 1 mg twice daily (n = 151) vs. placebo (n = 151). Study.
PARTNER 2A Trial design: Intermediate-risk patients with aortic stenosis (STS PROM score 4-8%) were randomized to undergo either TAVR or SAVR, stratified.
Compare-Acute Trial design: STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI were randomized to fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularization (n.
PARADIGM-HF Trial design: Participants with NYHA class II-IV and LVEF ≤40% were randomized to LCZ mg twice daily (n = 4,187) vs. enalapril 10 mg.
PRECISION Trial design: Patients with arthritis and increased cardiovascular risk were randomized to celecoxib 100 mg twice daily (n = 8,072) vs. ibuprofen.
ANTARCTIC Trial design: Patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing stenting were randomized to tailored antiplatelet therapy (n = 435) versus conventional.
SIGNIFY Trial design: Participants with stable coronary artery disease without clinical heart failure and resting heart rate >70 bpm were randomized to.
Modified Rankin score 0-2
ATMOSPHERE Trial design: Patients with symptomatic heart failure were randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to either aliskiren 300 mg once daily, enalapril 5.
SUSTAIN-6 Trial design: Patients with DM2 at high risk for CV events were randomized in a 1:1:1:1 fashion to either semaglutide 0.5 mg, semaglutide 1 mg,
NIPPON Trial design: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention were randomized to short-term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) (6 months; n.
After Eighty Study Trial design: Elderly patients with non–ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) were randomized to invasive therapy (n = 229)
AFACT Trial design: Patients with long-standing atrial fibrillation were randomized to ganglion plexus ablation (n = 117) vs. control (n = 123) on top.
FOURIER Trial design: Patients with established cardiovascular disease on statin therapy were randomized to evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneous every 2 weeks.
(p = 0.32 for noninferiority)
AMACING Trial design: Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing intravascular iodinated contrast administration were randomized to prophylactic hydration.
(p < for noninferiority)
BRAVO-3 Trial design: Patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to bivalirudin or UFH. They were followed for 30 days. Results.
(p for noninferiority < 0.001)
(p = for noninferiority)
CHAMPION Trial design: Patients with recent hospitalization for heart failure were implanted with a pulmonary artery pressure monitor and randomized so.
Incidence of (A) recurrent VTE and (B) major bleeding in select randomised clinical trials of LMWH for the treatment and secondary prevention of VTE in.
Canadian Cardiovascular Society Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines 2010: Prevention of Stroke and Systemic Thromboembolism in Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter 
FRISC Trial Placebo control, double blind Lancet 347:561,1996
SOLID-TIMI 52 Trial design: Participants within 30 days of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) were randomized to darapladib 160 mg daily (n = 6,504) versus.
MOMENTUM 3 Trial design: Patients with advanced heart failure were randomized to a centrifugal-flow pump (n = 152) vs. an axial-flow pump (n = 142). Results.
MATRIX: Radial vs. Femoral
CIRCUS Trial design: Patients with anterior STEMI were randomized to IV cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg (n = 475) vs. placebo (n = 495) immediately before coronary.
Gianluigi Savarese et al. JCHF 2016;4:
The CHA(2)DS2-(VASc) stroke risk and HAS-BLED bleeding risk index are calculated by totalling the scores for each risk factor present.68–71 The lower graph.
Presentation transcript:

(p for noninferiority = 0.01) BRIDGE Trial design: Patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy undergoing an invasive procedure were then randomized to placebo injection (n = 950) vs. low molecular weight heparin; dalteparin 100 IU/kg subcutaneous twice daily (n = 934). Results (p for noninferiority = 0.01) Stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism: 0.4% of the no-bridge group vs. 0.3% of the bridging group (p = 0.01 for noninferiority) Major bleeding: 1.3% vs. 3.2% (p = 0.005), respectively, for no-bridge versus bridge groups % 0.4 0.3 Conclusions Among patients with atrial fibrillation on warfarin therapy, bridge therapy with low molecular weight heparin did not prevent perioperative arterial thromboembolic events However, this strategy did increase major bleeding Low molecular weight heparin bridge Placebo Douketis JD, et al. N Engl J Med 2015;373:823-33