SR Self Assessment for CARD4L - Geoscience Australia

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ESTEC July 2000 Estimation of Aerosol Properties from CHRIS-PROBA Data Jeff Settle Environmental Systems Science Centre University of Reading.
Advertisements

Module 2.1 Monitoring activity data for forests using remote sensing REDD+ training materials by GOFC-GOLD, Wageningen University, World Bank FCPF 1 Module.
Determining the accuracy of MODIS Sea- Surface Temperatures – an Essential Climate Variable Peter J. Minnett & Robert H. Evans Meteorology and Physical.
Surface Reflectance over Land: Extending MODIS to VIIRS Eric Vermote NASA GSFC Code 619 MODIS/VIIRS Science Team Meeting, May.
Incoming Themes for 2017 Frank Kelly, USGS
Analysis Ready Data LSI-VC – Adam Lewis Co-chair
A Atmospheric Correction Update and ACIX Status
Fourth TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Future directions of CEOS WGCV: Incoming chair perspective
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Framework
Australian report for Atmosphere theme
Landsat Analysis Ready Data for LCMAP
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
Geoscience Australia:
Analysis Ready Data July 18, 2016 John Dwyer Leo Lymburner
Analysis Ready Data ..
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI)
Calibration Status for the GOME Instrument
Albrecht von Bargen, Chair CEOS WGCV DLR Agenda Item # 6 GSICS-EP 17
USGS Status Frank Kelly, USGS EROS CEOS Plenary 2017 Agenda Item #4.14
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Framework
LSI-VC Jenn Lacey, USGS, LSI-VC Co-Lead CEOS SIT-33
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability: Overview & Framework
Action Item Review for WGCV-44
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Towards achieving continental scale field validation and multi-sensor interoperability of satellite derived surface reflectance in Australia Medhavy Thankappan1,
Level 2 Surface Reflectance Product Validation Thoughts
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. . Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 43
Analysis ready data: definition document
WGCV Overview K. Thome WGISS#45 / WGCV#43
Agency Report Geoscience Australia
Potential European SR ARD
USGS Agency Update: CARD4L Production Roadmap
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability (MRI) Initiative
Site classifications, definitions, and updates to Landnet
Moderate Resolution Interoperability Recap
Atmospheric Correction Inter-comparison eXercise
WGCV-32 Action Item Review
Moderate Resolution Sensor Interoperability
Session 2: Analysis Ready Data
Action Item Status / CEOS Work Plan Status
CARD4L Product Alignment Assessment
Geoscience Australia Report
Joint Remote Sensing Research Program 2016 Research Updates
CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land (CARD4L) Framework Recap
Definition of a benchmark for the GIRO
Recent activities of OCR-VC
LSI-VC Work Plan Updates
LSI-VC-3 Session 23, 24 CARD4L Overview and Specifications Objectives
Session 2: CARD4L Product Family Specification (10:00-10:45)
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
TanSat/CAPI Calibration and validation
WGCV Work Plan Actions K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 44
ARD Uncertainties WGCV Plenary # 43 Sao Jose dos Campos, Brazil
Igor Appel Alexander Kokhanovsky
Uncertainties for Analysis Ready Data
Future Near-term Plans
Committee on Earth Observation Satellites
Day 2 Summary K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 42 May 16-19, 2017.
Discussion on product interoperability: from CARD4L to MRI
Agency Reports – USGS Jenn Lacey LSI-VC-5 Agenda Item #2 February 2018
GEOGLAM Experiences with Accessing and Utilizing Sentinel Data
Session 2: CARD4L Product Family Specification (09:40:00-10:20)
WG Calibration and Validation
Product self-assessment to CARD4L Normalised Radar Backscatter
Session 2: CEOS Analysis Ready Data for Land (10:50 – 11:00)
CEOS Work Plan LSI-VC Deliverables
WGCV CARD4L Peer Review Medhavy Thankappan WGCV-45 July 15-19, 2019.
WGCV Chair’s Report C. Ong CSIRO WGCV Plenary # 45
DEM related topics K. Thome NASA WGCV Plenary # 45 CSIRO, Perth
Presentation transcript:

SR Self Assessment for CARD4L - Geoscience Australia Medhavy Thankappan Contributors: Lan-Wei Wang, Simon Oliver, Josh Sixsmith, Imam Alam, Passang Dorji, Alex Vincent, Jeremy Hooke, Andreia Siqueira

SR self assessment against CARD4L Self assessment of surface reflectance products derived from Landsat and Sentinel-2 done at GA (October 2018) Report of compliance / non-compliance against threshold and target CARD4L specifications for Landsat and Sentinel-2 prepared Feedback provided to LSI-VC about experience with the process, description of the metadata parameters and need for examples in some cases, along with self assessment outcomes. Sought feedback about CARD4L specifications for SR from WGCV membership and received written feedback from N Fox on potential improvements (TBD at WGCV plenary in July)

Self assessment outcome for Landsat SR

THRESHOLD Specifications on “General Metadata” # Item Threshold Comments 1.1 Traceability Not required 1.2 Metadata machine readability YES 1.3 Data Collection Time 1.4 Geographical area Current metadata document contains a polygon detailing the valid metadata extents 1.5 Coordinate reference system 1.6 Map Projection 1.7 Geometric correction methods 1.8 Geometric accuracy of the data 1.9 Instrument 1.10 Spectral bands NOT compliant Requirement: The central wavelength for each band for which data is included is identified in the metadata, expressed in SI units Can spectral response details be added into CEOS Missions, Instruments and Measurements Database? 1.11 Sensor Calibration 1.12 Radiometric Accuracy 1.13 Algorithms 1.14 Ancillary data 1.15 Processing chain provenance 1.16 Data access Requirement: The metadata identifies the location from where the product can be retrieved, expressed as a DOI. Our metadata does not identify the location from where the product can be retrieved, DOI-linked or otherwise. 1.17 Overall Data quality 7 Not required 8/10 COMPLIANT 2/10 NOT COMPLIANT

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Per-pixel Metadata” # Item Threshold 2.1 Metadata machine readability YES 2.2 No data 2.3 Incomplete testing 2.4 Saturation 2.5 Cloud 2.6 Cloud Shadow 2.7 Land/Water mask Not required 2.8 Snow/ice mask 2.9 Terrain Shadow Mask 2.10 Terrain occlusion 2.11 Illumination and viewing geometry 2.12 Aerosol optical depth parameters 5 Not required 7/7 COMPLIANT

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Radiometric and Atmospheric corrections” 3 Not required # Item Threshold Comments 3.1 Measurement YES 3.2 Measurement uncertainty Not required 3.3 Measurement Normalization 3.4 Directional Atmospheric Scattering 3.5 Water vapour corrections 3.6 Ozone Correction 3/3 COMPLIANT

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Geometric corrections” # Item Threshold Comments 4.1 Geometric correction YES Sub-pixel accuracy is achieved through the use of available GQA record 1/1 COMPLIANT

Landsat SR: THRESHOLD specifications - summary “General Metadata”: 8/10 “Per-pixel metadata”: 7/7 “Radiometric and atmospheric corrections”: 3/3 “Geometric corrections”: 1/1

TARGET Specifications on “General Metadata” # Item Target/Desired Comments 1.1 Traceability NO 1.2 Metadata machine readability 1.3 Data Collection Time YES 1.4 Geographical area 1.5 Coordinate reference system 1.6 Map Projection 1.7 Geometric correction methods Metadata includes ancillary data set such as elevation model(s), but DOI is not used. 1.8 Geometric accuracy of the data 1.9 Instrument No CEOS MIM database reference at this time 1.10 Spectral bands Can spectral response details be added into CEOS MIM database 1.11 Sensor Calibration 1.12 Radiometric Accuracy 1.13 Algorithms 1.14 Ancillary data 1.15 Processing chain provenance 1.16 Data access 1.17 Overall Data quality

TARGET Specifications on: “Radiometric and Atmospheric corrections” “Per-pixel Metadata” # Item Target/Desired 2.1 Metadata machine readability NO 2.2 No data YES 2.3 Incomplete testing 2.4 Saturation 2.5 Cloud 2.6 Cloud Shadow 2.7 Land/Water mask 2.8 Snow/ice mask 2.9 Terrain Shadow Mask 2.10 Terrain occlusion 2.11 Illumination and viewing geometry 2.12 Aerosol optical depth parameters # Item Target/Desired Comments 3.1 Measurement NO 3.2 Measurement uncertainty 3.3 Measurement Normalization YES 3.4 Directional Atmospheric Scattering 3.5 Water vapour corrections 3.6 Ozone Correction “Geometric Correction” # Item Target/Desired 4.1 Geometric correction YES

Landsat SR: TARGET specifications - summary “General Metadata”: 9/17 “Per-pixel metadata”: 6/12 “Radiometric and atmospheric corrections”: 4/6 “Geometric corrections”: 1/1

Self assessment outcome for Seninel-2 SR

THRESHOLD Specifications on “General Metadata” # Item Threshold Comments 1.1 Traceability Not required 1.2 Metadata machine readability YES 1.3 Data Collection Time 1.4 Geographical area Current metadata document contains a polygon detailing the valid metadata extents 1.5 Coordinate reference system 1.6 Map Projection 1.7 Geometric correction methods 1.8 Geometric accuracy of the data 1.9 Instrument 1.10 Spectral bands NOT compliant Requirement: The central wavelength for each band for which data is included is identified in the metadata, expressed in SI units Can spectral response details be added into CEOS Missions, Instruments and Measurements Database? 1.11 Sensor Calibration 1.12 Radiometric Accuracy 1.13 Algorithms 1.14 Ancillary data 1.15 Processing chain provenance 1.16 Data access Requirement: The metadata identifies the location from where the product can be retrieved, expressed as a DOI. Our metadata does not identify the location from where the product can be retrieved, DOI-linked or otherwise. 1.17 Overall Data quality 7 Not required 8/10 COMPLIANT 2/10 NOT COMPLIANT

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Per-pixel Metadata” # Item Threshold 2.1 Metadata machine readability YES 2.2 No data 2.3 Incomplete testing 2.4 Saturation NO 2.5 Cloud 2.6 Cloud Shadow 2.7 Land/Water mask Not required 2.8 Snow/ice mask 2.9 Terrain Shadow Mask 2.10 Terrain occlusion 2.11 Illumination and viewing geometry 2.12 Aerosol optical depth parameters 5 Not required 6/7 COMPLIANT 1/7 NOT COMPLIANT

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Radiometric and Atmospheric corrections” 3 Not required 3/3 COMPLIANT # Item Threshold Comments 3.1 Measurement YES 3.2 Measurement uncertainty Not required 3.3 Measurement Normalization 3.4 Directional Atmospheric Scattering 3.5 Water vapour corrections 3.6 Ozone Correction

THRESHOLD Specifications on “Geometric corrections” # Item Threshold Comments 4.1 Geometric correction YES Sub-pixel accuracy is achieved through the use of available GQA record 1/1 COMPLIANT

Sentinel-2 SR: THRESHOLD specifications - summary “General Metadata”: 8/10 “Per-pixel metadata”: 6/7 “Radiometric and atmospheric corrections”: 3/3 “Geometric corrections”: 1/1

TARGET Specifications on “General Metadata” # Item Target/Desired Comments 1.1 Traceability NO 1.2 Metadata machine readability 1.3 Data Collection Time YES 1.4 Geographical area 1.5 Coordinate reference system 1.6 Map Projection 1.7 Geometric correction methods Metadata includes ancillary data set such as elevation model(s), but DOI is not used. 1.8 Geometric accuracy of the data 1.9 Instrument No CEOS MIM database reference at this time 1.10 Spectral bands Can spectral response details be added into CEOS MIM database 1.11 Sensor Calibration 1.12 Radiometric Accuracy 1.13 Algorithms 1.14 Ancillary data 1.15 Processing chain provenance 1.16 Data access 1.17 Overall Data quality

TARGET Specifications on: “Radiometric and Atmospheric corrections” “Per-pixel Metadata” # Item Target/Desired 2.1 Metadata machine readability NO 2.2 No data YES 2.3 Incomplete testing 2.4 Saturation 2.5 Cloud 2.6 Cloud Shadow 2.7 Land/Water mask 2.8 Snow/ice mask 2.9 Terrain Shadow Mask 2.10 Terrain occlusion 2.11 Illumination and viewing geometry 2.12 Aerosol optical depth parameters # Item Target/Desired Comments 3.1 Measurement NO 3.2 Measurement uncertainty 3.3 Measurement Normalization YES 3.4 Directional Atmospheric Scattering 3.5 Water vapour corrections 3.6 Ozone Correction “Geometric Correction” # Item Target/Desired 4.1 Geometric correction YES

Sentinel-2 SR: TARGET specifications - summary “General Metadata”: 9/17 “Per-pixel metadata”: 6/12 “Radiometric and atmospheric corrections”: 4/6 “Geometric corrections”: 1/1

Thank you