Charging For Active Network Management / Flexible Connections

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 2003 Structure of Electricity Distribution Charges Update and Proposals Martin Crouch Director, Distribution.
Advertisements

DCMF Treatment of pre 2005 generation – DNO position Nigel Turvey 29 April | Energy Networks Association.
CE Electric UK – Potential developments in long-term charging arrangements and IDNO charging methodologies 1 April 9, 2008 Potential developments in long-term.
Funding UKLink Process changes (User Pays). 2 Purpose of Presentation  Review of User Pays  Principles  Application to date  National Grid NTS observations.
RIIO-T1 impact on allowed revenues and network charges 6 September 2012.
A DNO Perspective by Stephen Parker for Structure of Charges Workshop 15 July 2003.
July 2003 Structure of Electricity Distribution Charges Welcome and Introduction Charles Gallacher Deputy Director, Scotland.
EDCM submission workshop Andrew Neves CMG Chair 12 May | Energy Networks Association - CMG.
The Treatment of “Spare / Sterilised” Capacity – follow up Draft for discussion purposes only.
1 st April 2010 energynetworks.org 1 Common Methodology Group Work PRESENTED BY Tony McEntee, ENW Workstream 4 Update Common Connection Charging Methodology.
A layman’s guide to the structure of LDZ gas charges 27 July 2009 Please note – in the interests of clarity and accessibility, simplifications have been.
Update from DCMF MIG Update from the Distribution Charging Methodologies Forum (DCMF) Methodologies Issue Group (MIG) 14 June | Energy Networks.
03 April 2009 energynetworks.org 1 Common Methodology Group Work Presentation from Workstream 4 Review of the Connection Charging Boundary in the CDCM.
Discussion of Market Participant Choice for Transmission Connections Stakeholder Session October 14, 2011.
1 EHV DG Charging Nigel Turvey. 2 Background Our current EHV charging methodology was not vetoed on 18 th February 2010 with the following treatment of.
ElectraLink Update on DCUSA Activities. Charging Methodology CP Summary StatusCDCMEDCMCCCMBilling WG: Pre Consultation10 (DCP 133, 159, 160, 161, 165,
DCUSA Update ElectraLink. Charging Methodology CP Summary StatusCDCMEDCMCCCMBilling WG: Pre Consultation8 (DCP 133, 158, 159, 160, 161, 163, 165, 168)
Water Connection Fee Analysis Elk Grove Water District Finance Committee January 30, 2013.
11 December 2008 energynetworks.org 1 Common Methodology Group Work PRESENTED BY GEORGE MORAN, CENTRAL NETWORKS, ON BEHALF OF WORKSTREAM 2 Presentation.
DNPC08 Review of Standard LDZ System Charges 6 September 2010.
The EDCM proposals A summary of Ofgem’s consultation Ynon Gablinger 2 June 2011.
Managing Exceeded Capacity. 10 September The Issue of Exceeded Capacity DNO Connection Charging Methodologies: customers who increase Maximum Capacity.
Structure of Charges Year-end review for DCMF 22 November 2007.
Customer Charge On behalf of all DNs 25 October 2010.
CDCM Annual Review Workshop Mo Sukumaran SSEPD (on behalf of DNOs) 17 May May | Energy Networks Association - CMG.
Update from DCUSA Michael Walls DCUSA Secretariat 06 October | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.
Agency Charging Statement Overview of Consultation 11 th February 2008.
EDCM update Andrew Neves CMG Chair 2 June | Energy Networks Association - DCMF.
DNPC08 Review of Standard LDZ System Charges Consultation Responses 25 October 2010.
UNC0376A - Increased Choice when applying for NTS Exit Capacity – User Pays initial thoughts Review Group August 2010 Transmission Workstream 01.
G5/4 Revision Project Progress Update Andrew Bower
DNPC05 Consultation Paper Balance of Revenue Recovery between LDZ System Charges and Customer Charges Steve Armstrong 27 th July 2009.
Accelerating Renewable Connections Stakeholder Workshop Scotsman Hotel, Edinburgh 26 th June 2014 Presented by Euan Norris Senior Project Manager, Future.
Examples of capital expenditure models. Overview 2 Capex models developed and used by a number of regulators internationally Most commonly used as part.
New Customer Contributions for the Water Sector: Workshop 4 August 2004.
7th DCMF on 19th June Connection Boundary Review Network charges comprise Connection Charges and ongoing Use of System (UoS) charges. The Connection.
Contestability in Connections Contestability Working Group Meeting NIE/SONI Joint Presentation 9 September
1 Watson Peat Using Intelligence to INSPIRE Future Networks 12 th May 2016.
Transitional offtake arrangements – Ofgem Initial Proposals on transitional incentives 6 October 2005.
Loss of Mains Protection on DG Rectification Programme
Background Current balance of LDZ System and Customer charges
A new platform for testing TSO-DSO coordination schemes
CUSC Panel – 19th July 2016 Binoy dharsi
CMG and Workstream Update
Transitional Exit Capacity Proposals -Update
CMP277 ‘Special License Condition 4J’ CMP278 ‘BSIS 2017 Housekeeping’
Exit Capacity Release Methodology Statement
Consideration of issues raised by UNC Modification Proposal 0244
Elaine Wyllie Executive Director of Joint Commissioning
Network Innovation Allowance Project: South East Smart Grid
User Pays Funding – Potential Licence Mechanism
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
Euan Norris SPEN Gavin Stewart SSEN
Transmission: the Critical Link
Gemini Re-platforming Project; External User Participation July 2012
Statement of Works (SoW)
Holistic view of Charging Modifications – In flight 11th June 2018
Power Potential: A New Market for Reactive Power
Modification Proposal 0192 – Draft Business Rules.
Workshop on preparations for ANConf/12 − ASBU methodology
Rahandusministeerium
Using Data For cost allocation
Mod 0452 (PARCA) – Further thoughts
Exit Capacity Substitution and Revision
Development of Entry Capacity Substitution
Key Value Indicators (KVIs)
Proposed Transitional Gas Exit Arrangements
Owning Your Community’s Renewable Energy Opportunities
Rural Dividend Program
Introduction We hope that this webinar will provide you with the information you need to understand the DCUSA by covering the following:   What is the.
Presentation transcript:

Charging For Active Network Management / Flexible Connections Webinar - 15 May 2019 The Webinar will begin Shortly

Webinar Aims To provide you with: - an update on our work - an explanation of our proposals - opportunity to ask questions/challenge - an overview of next steps ANM Webinar

Background Ofgem asked DNOs to jointly review the principles for connection charging for Active Network Management (ANM) schemes. The existing Common Connection Charging Methodology (CCCM) was developed against a backdrop of traditional engineering assets. The CCCM includes rules for the apportionment of asset reinforcement costs (where shared assets are swapped-out for larger ones) In contrast ANM/flexible connections avoid the need for reinforcement by sharing available headroom and utilising existing assets closer to their maximum operating parameters. ANM/flexible connections use advanced smart grid technology with their own costs. ANM Webinar

Developing Common Charging Principles “… compliance with the methodology results in charges which reflect, as far as is reasonably practicable (taking account of implementation costs), the costs incurred by the licensee in its Distribution Business” What are the costs? Capital costs of connection Enduring running costs How should costs be allocated? Recognition of wider benefits Different treatment of capital costs associated with different scheme types? Different treatment of enduring O&M costs to those applied to existing ‘standard’ connections? ANM Webinar

Recognising ‘flexible’ can be Minimum Scheme “The Minimum Scheme is the Scheme with the lowest overall capital cost (as estimated by us), solely to provide the Required Capacity.” Customers now have choices to request and accept less than 24/7 capacity continuity via a flexible connection Required Capacity can therefore both be defined both in MW and the extent to which customers are prepared to be flexible. Customer can still choose 24/7 continuity and in such circumstances the Minimum Scheme will not be a flexible connection and will include reinforcement. ANM Webinar

Defining types The following categorisation of ANM is proposed: Type 1 – Dedicated ANM: A flexible connection/ANM scheme managing constraint(s) where there are no customers downstream of the constraint(s) who could connect new or additional generation without being controlled by the ANM scheme Type 2 – Wide Area ANM: An ANM scheme managing constraint(s) where there are customers downstream of the constraint(s) who could connect new or additional generation without being controlled by the ANM scheme The key difference is that the Type 1 scheme only benefits specific participants (no wider benefits) whilst Type 2 enables other diverse users to operate un-curtailed (providing wider benefits) ANM Webinar

Single Customer without ANM ANM Webinar

Type 1: Dedicated Single Customer ANM ANM Webinar

Type 1: Dedicated Multiple Customer ANM ANM Webinar

Type 2: Wide Area ANM (Simple) ANM Webinar

Type 2: Wide Area ANM (Complex) ANM Webinar

ANM Charging – Proposed Cost Recovery Cost Components Type 1 Single Type 1 Multiple Type 2 Wide Area Capital Customer extension assets Charged individually End user control unit Local system management unit Shared between participants Recovered via DUoS Scheme management unit Central Management unit N/A Enduring O&M Communications, licensing, other ANM Webinar

Next Steps Take on board feedback from today Conclude drafting of proposed changes to Common Connection Charging Methodology Present proposals to ENA Open Networks Steering Group – June 2019 Submit DCUSA Change Proposal - June/July 2019 ANM Webinar