Magnus Gulbrandsen Consortium meeting, Valencia, October 2018

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Research Policy: from coordination and cooperation to integration and the ERA Dr. Maria Nedeva MIoIR, MBS. The University of Manchester EULAKS.
Advertisements

Zürich, January 28, 2009 ERCIM WG eMobility Meeting Torsten Braun University of Bern, Switzerland
Merete Ulstein Chair of EurAqua Research Director Norwegian institute for Water Research (NIVA) Regions for Economic Change Networking.
EAC HIGHER EDUCATION POLICY
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
CAIM Start up Workshop Knowledge Management Ankita Handoo, IFAD India.
Science, Technology and Culture Strategy document October 2006.
Designing & Implementing an RPC Communications Strategy Annabelle South 19 th May 2009.
PROPHET Postgraduate Research on Photonics as an Enabling Technology 0.
The Principles of Student Engagement Ellie Russell, Student Engagement Partnership Manager.
Evaluating Effectiveness To what effect? Joanne Sharpe, Office of Development Effectiveness, AusAID.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
“Thematic Priority 3” Draft Evaluation of IP + NoE.
Patient Information Forum (PiF) Overview.
BCO Impact Assessment Component 3 Scoping Study David Souter.
IDARI Workshop, Tartu, June 2005 NUI Galway Work Package 4 Administration Lorna Ryan The IDARI project is financed under the FP5 Quality of Life and Management.
Hugo Horta Center for the Advancement of Higher Education, Tohoku University Japan CIES-ISCTE, Portugal.
Preliminary Survey on forming an Africa-Lics network Erika Kraemer-Mbula & Watu Wamae All African Globelics Seminar on Innovation and Economic Development.
Research and Innovation Research and Innovation Fast Track to Innovation 1.
What is impact? What is the difference between impact and public engagement? Impact Officers, R&IS.
The Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council Funding (EPSRC)
Research Impact Sarah Hall Research Impact Strategy and Policy Manager.
Values education in Nordic preschools: Basis of education for tomorrow Kick Off Conference, Oslo, June 2013 Anna-Maija Puroila Adjunct professor,
Stakeholders’ Perspective on Integration Gabi Lombardo PhD Net4Society Advisory Board.
1 Researcher mobility Why and How?. 2 NTNU as an example Vision: To be internationally outstanding Objective: The entire organization upholds quality.
Renewing our focus on Impact Becky Murray Nairobi, 15 March 2016 Twitter: #impactafrica.
External interaction and the humanities Magnus Gulbrandsen Professor, TIK Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, University of Oslo Introduction.
The POHS-project: Productivity and occupational health and safety in the garment industry in Bangladesh Overview of the POHS design and goal of the analytical.
ERASMUS + Care to Work project (2014) Abused no More project (2015)
LIVING LAB OF GLOBAL CHANGE RESEARCH
Design of foresight-based evaluation in Tekes Activities
The Academic CV UCL Careers Researchers.
Workforce Repository & Planning Tool
Magnus Gulbrandsen, Professor
Investment Intentions Survey 2016
DTC Impact module ‘Impact’: what, where and why
Workforce & Practice Transformation
EERA e3s and Energy Consumers
Building the foundations for innovation
Sustainability at Aalto University
Literacy Initiatives For Empowerment ( LIFE )
St Andrew’s College: Teaching as inquiry 2017
Visions for Open Innovation:
The leading subject association for all teachers of geography
GÉANT Community Programme Communications Activities
Strategic Planning Update
University & Industry Collaborative IP Development
The Q Improvement Lab August 2017.
Knowledge Exchange Networks
InnovaWood Overview Strategy Members network
Building the future Workshop 3 24 November 2017
FLINDERS INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT Peer Support Grant Writing Workshop Why Apply for Funding? Developing your Research Ideas Gerry Redmond.
An initiative that makes a difference
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
Who Are We? Camphill Scotland is not another name for ‘Camphill IN Scotland’. Camphill Scotland has its own unique identity as a membership organisation.
How can we build long term and reciprocal research alliances?
Sharing and showcasing our educational output
Welcome to the European Cluster Collaboration Platform!
Opportunity Nottingham in partnership with NCVS
Grand challenges and a process perspective on research impact
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analysis of
Economic Development Forum, Florence March
Dissemination & Exploitation Activities Demetris C. Hadjisofocli
The Use and Impact of FTA
Dr. Giuseppe Lugano Senior Researcher in ITS
SwafS Ethics and Research Integrity
Call for Ideas Phase 2 Mischa Peters 15 October 2018
Third International Seville Conference on Future-Oriented Technology Analysis (FTA): Impacts and implications for policy and decision-making 16th- 17th.
Water Science-Policy Interface (CIS-SPI) Progress report
Understanding Impact Stephanie Seavers, Impact Manager.
Presentation transcript:

Magnus Gulbrandsen Consortium meeting, Valencia, 10-11 October 2018 OSIRIS so far Magnus Gulbrandsen Consortium meeting, Valencia, 10-11 October 2018

Our overall goal To understand how and under which condition impact takes place – in a way that generates new knowledge, contributes to excellent research and helps users and policymakers to improve their strategies and policies

Research questions How can we identify impact and the processes that lead to it? Under which conditions does research lead to economic and social effects over time? How does impact vary between research fields and societal sectors? How can we shape science policy and framework conditions so that it stimulates impact?

Main ideas Our overarching goals are to better understand the antecedents for and ways in which science makes an impact We see impact as a process rather than a specific outcome Our empirical work primarily looks at this process from the user side We study three stylised pathways: impacts in policymaking, healthcare and industry OSIRIS work critical of the mainstream way in which impact is operationalised and measured My experience so far: the field is more fragmented and less sophisticated that I thought

Status so far Nice and interesting work, scaling up from autumn 2018 Organisational-practical challenges in all partner organisations beyond our control Seven scientific articles, two special issues, 30+ presentations at conferences and workshops, 30+ presentations at courses and meetings with practitioners We are doing well in terms of deliverables – we should probably emphasise policy-oriented activities even more next year Lots of external interest in what we do and the approach that we take We should continue putting the OSIRIS mark on our work so that our unique approach is visible in as many activities as possible

Recent developments We are now defined as a “researcher project” rather than a “user- oriented” project – this is mainly formal and influences our reporting We have organised two successful younger researcher events (PhD course, EU-SPRI summer school) We have a much larger team in Oslo now and will start to have regular OSIRIS meetings (discussing literature, work in progress etc.) every second week – everyone is welcome here Blog/web pages updated with new look, blog is going fairly well and seems to be accepted as our “policy briefs”, bad routines for news items and presentations We have some ideas for 10% collaborative work for 2019 (survey and course proceeding), new suggestions are welcome

Important discussion points Strengthening and promoting the OSIRIS profile and unique approach Improving integration between partners Strengthening the user side of OSIRIS Making a clearer plan for publications and other outputs Improving routines and practical issues

Conceptual work The conceptual working paper has been scrapped in favour of 3-4 blog posts about its key ideas/topics Two conceptual academic papers are work in progress and have toured the conference circuit – they will be discussed tomorrow Workshop on survey work in Manchester early 2018 led to pilot survey to Norwegian public organisations We will need a similar workshop for the cases (for later discussion)