Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 45 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Reinforcement Area of the Post Conference Presenters: Alishia Ancar & Nicole Bolen.
Advertisements

Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
The Power of Formative Assessment to Advance Learning.
February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership in the Common Core February 10, 2012 Session 3: Effective Leadership for the Common Core NYSED Principal.
Office of School Improvement Differentiated Webinar Series A Framework for Formative Assessment November 15, 2011 Dr. Dorothea Shannon Dr. Greg Wheeler.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
Denver Public Schools Diving Into the Revised Framework Taking a Closer Look at I.3 Instructional Methods and Pacing.
Denver Public Schools Illuminating the revised framework Taking a Closer Look at I3 Exploring Instructional Methods and Pacing.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Overview of Standards for Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects The Common Core State Standards.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Elementary
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Curriculum that Brings the Common Core to Life Session 1 Secondary
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Articulating Your Practice C3 - Session #3
Welcome!! Please sit in teams of 4
Student Progress Form- Constructive Conversation Language Sample Analysis Tool (SPF-CCLS)  
Customer Service, Balanced Scorecards: The Road to Becoming a Service-Oriented Organization 1.
Implementing the Common Core Standards
Organizing Students for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Building Academic Language
Multi-Classroom Leadership
As You Enter Take a moment to network and exchange contact information from those in the room you do not have yet.
Providing Resources and Guidance for Cognitively Complex Tasks
Strategies That Support Differentiated Processing
Guest WIFI Password: Back to school!
How do grade levels currently plan at your school?
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 90 minutes. Each slide includes an appropriate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 1 hour, 30 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Mapping it Out! Practical Tools to Use Assessment Well
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 2 hours. Each slide includes an appropriate amount of time for the discussion/activity. If.
WCSD SLO Process Updates
Secondary District Professional Development
Spelling and beyond Literacy Toolkit HGIOS
M.A.T.C.H. Professional Series: Module 11
Lead Evaluator Training
Analyze Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Planning Instruction Component 3: Session 4
Facilitator notes This session is designed to last 1.5 hours. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity. Materials.
Texas Performance Standards Project
Student Progress Form- Constructive Conversation Language Sample Analysis Tool (SPF-CCLS)  
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Canine Assisted Learning Lesson 4
Analyzing Student Work Sample 2 Instructional Next Steps
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 3.5 hours. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Say: Welcome to today’s professional learning session on inter-rater reliability. Inter-rater reliability is essential to the teacher evaluation process.
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 75 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System (T-TESS)
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
K–8 Session 1: Exploring the Critical Areas
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
Creating a Vision for a Caring School Community
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 75 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
PBIS Play-by-Play: Interaction
Core Competencies for Primary School Teachers in Crisis Contexts
Our Leadership Journey
CWT workshop 2.
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Fahrig, R. SI Reorg Presentation: DCSI
Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 75 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity.
Shifting Instructional Practices Aligning Instruction with
Helping Students Generate and Test Hypotheses
Teacher Evaluator Student Growth Retraining Academy
Instructional Plan and Presentation Cindy Douglas Cur/516: Curriculum Theory and Instructional Design November 7, 2016 Professor Gary Weiss.
The resources for this candidate support has been created and provided by CERRA utilizing materials from the National Board of Professional Teaching Standards.
Presentation transcript:

Facilitator notes This session is designed for approximately 45 minutes. Each slide includes an approximate amount of time for the discussion/activity. Materials needed for each participant: Interactive handout Criterion 3c critical attributes handout Chart paper, highlighters Paper end-of-session survey Each slide notes materials needed for that discussion/activity There are talking points and directions included in the notes section of each slide. CAPITALIZED TEXT ARE NOTES FOR YOU TO CONSIDER, and regular case are script for you to say.

Communicating Clearly and Accurately DPAS-II Criterion 3c Time: <1 minute Good morning/afternoon and thank you for being here. Welcome to our session on the DPAS-II framework Criterion 3c: Communicating Clearly and Accurately

Agenda Welcome, Objectives and Agenda Unpacking DPAS-II for Teachers: Criterion 3c Self-reflection and Exit Ticket Time: <1 minute Please take a moment to read the agenda. GIVE PARTICIPANTS A MINUTE TO READ INDEPENDENTLY

Objective Teachers will develop a deeper understanding of Criterion 3c: Communicating Clearly and Accurately Teachers will build their understanding of the elements of Criterion 3c Time: 3 minutes Materials: Interactive Handout Our goal is to help you get to know the DPAS-II rubric and continuously improve your teaching. By improving your practice, you can continue to contribute to students enhancing their learning and growth. Plus, knowing the rubric will help you be successful on your observations as well, potentially leading to increases in your DPAS ratings. Our overall goal is to create a shared understanding of what constitutes evidence aligned to the DPAS-II framework. We aim to ensure that all of us have a shared understanding of what excellent teaching looks like and sounds like according to the DPAS-II rubric. Today we are going to focus on communication and how it appears in the DPAS-II framework.

Agenda Welcome, Objectives and Agenda Unpacking DPAS-II for Teachers: Criterion 3c Self-reflection and Exit Ticket Time: <1 minute Let’s dive in.

When a teacher is communicating clearly and accurately, what are students doing and saying? Time: 8  minutes Materials: chart paper (or white board); interactive handout FACILTATOR NOTE – THIS SLIDE AND ACTIVITY ARE MEANT TO SET THE STAGE FOR DEEPER DISCUSSION. THE IDEA HERE IS NOT FOR PARTICIPANTS TO DIG DEEPLY INTO THE RUBRIC, BUT INSTEAD TO BRAINSTORM WHAT THEY HEAR AND SEE IN CLASSROOMS. THIS ACTVITY REINFORCES THAT THE VALUE OF THE DPAS-II FRAMEWORK IS THAT IT PROVIDES A SHARED UNDERSTANDING AND COMMON LANGUAGE FOR HOW WE TALK ABOUT TEACHING AND LEARNING. Let’s start by discussing what great instruction looks, sounds, and feels like. We have done this in past sessions and will continue to do so in future sessions about the DPAS framework. Our core question today is: When a teacher is communicating clearly and accurately, what are students doing and saying? Turn and talk with a partner and share out your thinking. Please capture your ideas on the interactive handout. (5 minutes) WALK AROUND THE ROOM. NOTE POSITIVE EXAMPLES. ASK THOSE PEOPLE TO BE READY TO SHARE OUT WHEN YOU RETURN TO THE WHOLE GROUP. LOOK FOR ACTUAL EXAMPLES OF WHAT TEACHERS DO AND SAY, AND WHAT STUDENTS DO AND SAY. HIGLHIGHT THE EXAMPLES THAT THEY’VE GIVEN AND HOW THEY MATCH CRITERION 3c (LISTED BELOW). ENCOURAGE PARTICIPANTS TO GET VERY SPECIFIC – WHAT EXACTLY MIGHT STUDENTS BE DOING AND SAYING? STUDENTS ARE USING ACCURATELY LANGUAGE/VOCABULARY STUDENTS ARE USING PRECISE VOCABULARY STUDENTS KNOW WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO DO/ARE DOING WHAT THEY ARE SUPPOSED TO DO STUDENTS ARE AWARE OF THE PURPOSE OF LEARNING/OF THE OBJECTIVE STUDENTS KNOW HOW THE OBJECTIVE IS CONNECTED TO THE REAL-WORLD ALL STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO ENGAGE/LEARN STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO ACCESS THE CONTENT STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO THINK THROUGH THE CONTENT/COGNITIVELY PARTICPATE IN THE WORK STUDENTS ARE ABLE TO THINK/WORK ON THEIR OWN, WITHOUT THE TEACHER STUDENTS ARE LISTENING TO THE TEACHER FIRST, AND THEN APPLYING WHAT THE TEACHER HAS TOLD THEM I’d love to share out and hear collective thinking in the room. What did you write on your form? (4-5 minutes) LIST THE BEST EXAMPLES ON THE BOARD

DPAS-II for Teachers Component 1: Planning and Preparation Component 2: The Classroom Environment Component 3: Instruction Component 4: Professional Responsibilities Time: 1 minute Materials: N/A The DPAS-II framework provides a common language we all can use to describe great teaching and in the impact it has on student learning. The framework helps us to take what we see in a classroom (what teachers and students say and do) and align it to common expectations. As you know, in the DPAS-II framework, a teacher’s practice includes these four categories: Component1: Planning and Preparation Component 2: The Classroom Environment Component 3: Instruction Component 4: Professional Responsibilities The four components are divided into 18 criterion, each of which has a rubric that identifies core elements and the range of performance from “Ineffective” to “Highly Effective.” We’ve focused on various criteria in past sessions; today we are focused on criterion 3C: communicating clearly and accurately. Communication plays a central role in the classroom; only through communication does teaching and learning happen. Today we are going to dive deep into what the DPAS-II framework tells us about communication and better understand the specific indicators and elements of the criterion. The goal is to ensure that we have a shared understanding of 3c, and that you are able to apply this understanding to your lessons.

3c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately Independently read Criterion 3c rubric language, elements, and indicators Highlight statements that align to our brainstormed examples of what students are doing and saying; what in the rubric language, elements and indicators would support these student actions? Check in with a partner Time: 5 minutes Materials: Criterion 3c critical attributes doc, highlighters Now let’s return to the examples we listed on the poster board. Independently read Criterion 3c , the elements, and the indicators and highlight statements that align to our brainstormed examples (2 minutes) Turn and talk to a partner: what did you highlight? Why? (2 minutes) CIRCULATE DURING THE TURN AND TALK, LOOKING FOR EXAMPLES ALIGNED TO LIST ON SLIDE 6 NOTES

Criterion 3c The goal of Criterion 3c is not just that the teacher is accurate and clear in communication, but that students are able to cognitively engage in the lesson as a result of the teacher’s communication. Time: 1 minute Materials: interactive handout The critical thing to remember about Criterion 3c is this – it is not enough just for the teacher’s communication to be clear and accurate. Students must be able to engage cognitively in the lesson as a result of the teacher’s communication. The communication must lead to and support students’ learning.

3c. Communicating Clearly and Accurately Independently read the critical attributes at each level of the rubric Highlight statements that resonate in your own practice communicating with students, and record your Ah-has! On the interactive handout Time: 6 minutes Materials: Critical Attributes Handout, highlighters Independently read the critical attributes document for 3c and highlight statements that resonate in your own practice as you engage students in questioning and discussion (6 minutes) AFTER THEY ARE DONE WORKING Remember, the critical attributes document is a key resource for your review in understanding and internalizing the content of the DPAS-II rubric.

Do these meet the critical attributes of 3c? The teacher shares that 15 x 3 = 60. After the teacher provides instructions for an activity, students talk to one another asking “what are we supposed to do?” The teacher uses a Venn diagram to illustrate the distinctions between a republic and a democracy. When a student responds “the equals of 2+2 is 4” the teacher prompts the student to revise the response to “the sum of 2+2 is four” Time: 8 minutes Materials: Interactive handout Time: 5 minutes Materials: n/a Remember, we’ve established that 3c is about more than the teacher communicating with students, its about that communication supporting students to engage cognitively in the lesson. GO THROUGH EACH AND ASK FOR VOLUNTEERS TO DETERMINE YES OR NO, WITH RATIONALE. SLIDE HAS ANIMATION TO SHOW AN X OR CHECK, SO EACH TIME YOU CLICK, THE CHECK OR X WILL APPEAR ANSWERS: NO – THIS IS INEFFECTIVE BECAUSE THE QUESTIONS ARE NOT HIGH-LEVEL. INSTEAD THEY ARE RECITATION QUESTIONS THAT AREN’T ENGAGING STUDENTS. WE KNOW THAT SOMETIMES THESE QUESTIONS ARE NECESSARY, BUT THEY SHOULD BE USED AS REVIEW VS. THE TOTALITY OF DISCUSSION YES – THIS IS EFFECTIVE BECAUSE IT IS THE BEGINNING OF AUTHENTIC DISCUSSION BETWEEN STUDENTS; THE TEACHER IS FACILITATING THAT IDSCUSSION NO – BECAUSE THE SAME SMALL NUMBER OF STUDENTS RESPOND, THIS IS NOT THE WHOLE CLASS ENGAGING YES – THIS STRATEGY SUPPORTS STUDENTS TO MEANINGFULLY ENGAGE IN DISCUSSION BECAUSE THEY HAVE HAD A CHANCE TO CONSIDER THEIR RESPONSE FIRST NO – QUESTIONING AND DISCUSSION IS NOT JUST ABOUT STUDENTS PARTICIPATING; TEACHERS ALSO HAVE TO ENSURE THAT STUDENTS ARE HELD TO HIGH EXPECTATIONS AND THAT THEIR MISCONCEPTIONS ARE CORRECTED – AND THAT STUDENTS ARE PRECISE IN THEIR RESPONSES TO THE QUESTION. IT IS OK FOR STUDENTS TO RESPOND INCORRECTLY, WHAT’S IMPORTANT IS HOW THE TEACHER CORRECTS THE STUDENT.

Agenda Welcome, Objectives and Agenda Unpacking DPAS-II for Teachers: Criterion 3c Self-reflection and Exit Ticket Time: <1 minute Before we adjourn, let’s take a moment to reflect

Independent Reflection and Next Steps How do I ensure that my communication in my classroom is clear and accurate? How can I use oral and written communication to ensure that students are able to access important learning in my classroom? What support do I have available? What additional support will I need? Time: 5 minutes Materials: interactive handout We have gone through a lot today, and we want to make sure that all of this work serves the larger purpose: building our instructional knowledge and skills to develop professionally as individuals and a team. Recognizing that we may all be in different places in growing our practice, we are going to take pause and take the opportunity to step-back reflect on your individual practice for 5 minutes. You can record your thinking on the interactive handout. Please also write down your next steps given your reflections. YOU CAN ASK TEACHERS TO SHARE THEIR THINKING. YOU CAN BE SELECTIVE ABOUT WHO YOU CALL ON TO ENSURE THAT TEACHERS LIKELY TO HAVE STRONG EXAMPLES ARE THE TEACHERS WHO ARE SHARING

Time: 5 minutes Materials: end of session survey Please complete the exit ticket to share your experiences about this training. We will use this feedback to inform future sessions, so please be honest and thorough.

Questions Optional time for questions if people have any