Investigational Antiretroviral Strategies and Drugs

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slide #1 HIV Entry Inhibitors Trip Gulick, MD, MPH Director, Cornell HIV Clinical Trials Unit Associate Professor of Medicine Weill Medical College of.
Advertisements

The Unique Resistance Profile of Tipranavir Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
Response Rates in Heavily Pretreated HIV+ Patients Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Cornell Clinical Trials Unit.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
CCR5 Monoclonal Antibody PRO 140 Inhibited HIV-1 Resistant to Maraviroc, a Small Molecule CCR5 Antagonist Andre J Marozsan Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
1 Review of Antiretroviral Therapy in Adults HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
1 Resistance and Tropism - Maraviroc Lisa K. Naeger, Ph.D. Division of Antiviral Products Food and Drug Administration April 24, 2007 FDA Antiviral Advisory.
1 Introduction to ARV Therapy HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Efficacy and Safety of Maraviroc in Treatment- Experienced (TE) Patients Infected with R5 HIV-1: 96-week Combined Analysis of the MOTIVATE 1 & 2 Studies.
PO 2726; IAS; Vicriviroc (formerly SCH ): Antiviral Activity of a Potent New CCR5 Receptor Antagonist D. Schuermann, C. Pechardscheck, R. Rouzier,
Enfuvirtide for Drug-Resistant HIV Infection in North and South America Simon R. Bababeygy.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Antiretroviral targets in the viral life cycle Viral Replication and Drug targets.
Phase 2 of new ARVs  Fostemsavir, prodrug of temsavir (attachment inhibitor) –AI Study  TAF (TFV prodrug) –Study –Study  Doravirine.
SAILING Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment- experienced INI-naïve patients DK/DLG/0041/14c September 2015.
Design of the RESIST Study Program Dr Kevin Curry Boehringer Ingelheim, Bracknell, UK.
21st Century Therapy: Advances in Antiretroviral Options PROGRAM DIRECTOR Anton L. Pozniak, MD, FRCP Consultant Physician Department of HIV and Genitourinary.
Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Gladys and Roland Harriman Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Gladys and Roland Harriman Professor of Medicine Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases Weill Medical College of Cornell University.
Novel Antiretroviral Studies and Strategies
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Optimizing Antiretorviral Therapy for Long-Term HIV Care
Monotherapy or Dual Therapy in Switch Studies: Which is the Best Regimen? Dr. Jose R
Joseph J. Eron, Jr, MD Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Investigational Antiretroviral Drugs
Weekly Oral MK-8591 Protects Male Rhesus Macaques against Repeated Low Dose Intrarectal Challenge with SHIV109CP3 Martin Markowitz MD Aaron Diamond AIDS.
EFV versus ATV + RTV, both with ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC ACTG 5202
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
What’s Next – and When: An Update on Injectable Prevention
Investigational Drugs for HIV
Switch to DTG + RPV Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
ART 101 Successful HIV treatment usually consists of at least three drugs from two different “classes” of ARV drugs There are now six classes of ARV drugs:
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
UK-CAB: Entry inhibitors and Immunology 3 June 2005
Protease.
Evaluation of tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and anti-retroviral activity of MK-8591 in treatment-naïve HIV-1-infected adult subjects MK-8591 (EFdA)
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Next Generation Capsid Inhibitor: GS–CA1
Outwitting Evolution: Fighting Drug-Resistant TB, Malaria, and HIV
Investigational Antiretroviral Drugs
Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy
Changes in HIV-1 Co-receptor Tropism for Patients Participating in the Maraviroc MOTIVATE 1 and 2 Clinical Trials E van der Ryst and M Westby Pfizer Global.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Joseph J. Eron MD Professor of Medicine University of North Carolina
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to INSTI + NNRTI Switch to DTG + RPV SWORD Study
Updates From CROI 2019: Treatment of HIV and Its Complications
Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy
New Drugs in Development Are We Ready for Long-Acting ART?
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Share your thoughts on this presentation with #IAS2019
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Investigational Approaches to Antiretroviral Therapy
Thinking of Now and Tomorrow: Emerging Treatment Paradigms
HIV Resistance in the Context of PrEP
Dual vs. Triple ART: What to start?
ANTIRETROVIRAL RESISTANCE IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Presentation transcript:

Investigational Antiretroviral Strategies and Drugs Roy M. Gulick, MD, MPH Rochelle Belfer Professor in Medicine Chief, Division of Infectious Diseases Weil Cornell Medicine New York, New York

Financial Relationships With Commercial Entities Dr Gulick has no relevant financial affiliations to disclose. (Updated 04/03/18)

Learning Objectives After attending this presentation, learners will be able to describe: The latest data on investigational antiretroviral drugs The latest information about long-acting antiretroviral drugs Antiretroviral agents with new mechanisms of action

Antiretroviral Drug Approval: 1987 - 2019 BIC IBA DOR ETR DTG TAF EVG RAL MVC ENF ATV FTC FPV RPV DRV TPV NFV DLV APV TDF LPV/r RTV IDV NVP EFV ABC 3TC SQV ddC d4T ddI AZT

Question #1 Which of the following investigational drugs is earliest in clinical development? Cabotegravir EFdA Fostemsavir GS-2607

Newer ART Agents (partial list) NRTI NNRTI PI EI II MI CI Phase 3 fostemsavir PRO 140 (leronlimab) UB-421 cabotegravir Phase 2 censavudine MK-8591 (EFdA) elsulfavirine TMC 310911 cenicriviroc PF-232798 GSK- 2838232 GS-6207 Phase 1/2 elvucitabine GSK- 364025 Pre- clinical GS-9131

NRTI Needs: more convenient active against drug-resistant viruses

MK-8591 (EFdA) 4’-ethynyl-2-fluoro-2’-deoxyadenosine; EFdA DNA chain terminator Inhibits RT by preventing translocation (NRTTI) Half-life = 50-60 hours in plasma Accumulates in LN, vagina, rectum (animals) Grobler CROI 2017 #435 Potent antiviral activity (PBMC EC50 = 0.2 nM) with broad coverage (HIV-1, HIV-2, MDR strains) Low-dose and parenteral formulations Matthews IAS 2017 #TUPDB0202LB

MK-8591: Activity Against NRTI-Resistant Strains Grobler CROI 2019 #481

MK-8591 (EFdA) Double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-panel trial HIV- participants MK-8591 (or placebo) daily 5 mg X 6 weeks, 0.75 mg X 4 weeks, 0.25 mg X 4 weeks Results: After 2-3 weeks of dosing, MK-8591-TP levels exceeded 1.0 pmol/million cells (similar to 10 mg weekly dosing) Tissue (vaginal, rectal) and PBMC levels adequate Conclusion: Low daily doses expected to suppress HIV Phase 2b study in rx-naïve of MK-8591 + 3TC + DOR Considering weekly dosing regimens Matthews CROI 2018 #26

MK-8591 -- Prevention MK-8591 3.9 mg/kg weekly was 100% protective in 8 macaques given multiple weekly intrarectal SHIV challenges Markowitz IAS 2017 #MOAX0203LB Follow-up study with lower doses MK-8591: 1.3, 0.43, 0.1 mg/kg weekly (8 macaques/group) Results 1.3 mg/kg: all 8 remained uninfected 0.43 mg/kg: all 8 remained uninfected 0.1 mg/kg: 2 of 8 became infected Conclusions: MK-8591 protective at low doses Equivalent to 250 µg/week or 10 µg/day in humans Markowitz CROI 2018 #89LB

Long-Acting Subdermal Implants: MK-8591 in Animal Studies Drug-eluting implants, both bioerodible and non-erodible polylactic acid polycaprolactone ethylene vinyl acetate rats non-human primates plasma PBMCs Barrett AAC 2018;62:e01058-18

INSTI Needs: more convenient active against INSTI-resistant virus

Cabotegravir (CAB) Integrase inhibitor similar to DTG; similar resistance Potent in HIV+ individuals (5, 10, 30, 60 mg oral) Spreen HIV Clin Trials 2013;14:192 Nanotechnology formulation; SC + IM injections T ½ 21-50 days! Supports monthly, bimonthly or quarterly dosing Safety: ISR (mostly mild) and nodules with SC dosing Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies completed Spreen JAIDS 2014;67:481

Phase 2b: LATTE-2: IM CAB + IM RPV Randomized, open-label, phase 2b, non-inferiority study Study population: ART-naïve (N=309) Study rx: PO CAB + ABC/3TC X 4 wks, then randomized 2:2:1 Results (HIV RNA <50 at 96 wks) IM CAB + IM RPV q8 wks – 94% IM CAB + IM RPV q4 wks – 87% PO CAB + ABC/3TC – 84% Injection site reactions were nearly universal 97%+ were mild or moderate; lasted a median of 3 days 2 pts (<1%) d/c due to ISR Conclusions: IM non-inferior (comparable) to PO; well-tolerated week 160 90% 83% Margolis Glasgow 2018 #P118 Eron IAS 2017 #MOAX0205LB; Margolis Lancet 2017;390:1499

CAB Phase 3: FLAIR Randomized, international, open-label, non-inferiority (∆6%) Study population: rx-naïve adults (N=629; 22% women) Study rx: ABC/3TC/DTG X 20 wks  CAB + RPV (oral X 4 weeks, then IM monthly) or continue oral DTG regimen Results (week 48): 3 VF on LA: 3 Russian (A1) NNRTI and INSTI subs. 3 VF on oral: no resistance ISR ~70% -- mild, transient Conclusion: CAB + RPV non-inferior Orkin CROI 2019 #140

CAB Phase 3: ATLAS Randomized, international, open-label, non-inferiority (∆6%) Study population: adults with VS on 2 NRTI + PI, NNRTI, or INSTI regimens (N=616; 33% women) Study rx: continue ART or change to CAB + RPV (oral X 4 weeks, then IM monthly) Results (week 48): 3 VF: 2 Russian (A/A1) NNRTI and INSTI subs. ISR ~70% -- mild, transient Conclusion: CAB + RPV non-inferior Swindells CROI 2019 #139

CAB – Prevention: HPTN 077 Phase 2a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Study pop: low-risk HIV- participants (N=199); median age 31, 66% women, 34% men Study meds: 3:1 to oral CAB X 4 wks then CAB IM 800 mg q12 weeks or 600 mg q8 wks (or placebo) Results: ISR more common with CAB (34%) vs. PBO (2%); 1.5% d/c’ed No other differences in safety/tolerability drug troughs lower with CAB 800 q12 wks Conclusion: CAB 4 wk oral  600 mg IM q8 wks optimal Landovitz PLoS Med 2018;15:e1002690

HPTN 077: CAB and Weight Gain Baseline  Week 41 Conclusion: In HIV-negative individuals, no significant changes in weight on CAB (vs. placebo) over 41 weeks Phase 3 PrEP studies (IM CAB vs. oral TDF/FTC) enrolling. Landovitz CROI 2019 #34

Question #2 Which of the following new HIV drug classes is farthest along in clinical development? Attachment inhibitor Capsid inhibitor CXCR4 antagonist Maturation inhibitor

Entry Inhibitors Needs: Novel mechanism of action More convenient dosing

HIV Entry Inhibitors CD4 Coreceptor Virus-Cell Binding Binding Fusion CCR5 Inhibitors maraviroc* fostemsavir enfuvirtide* gp41 ibalizumab* gp120 HIV Entry can be divided into 3 discrete steps: attachment of the viral glycoprotein 120 to the CD4 receptor, followed by subtle conformational changes in gp 120 which expose structural elements on the V3 loop that bind to co- receptor, either CCR5 or CXCR4. This induces a structural rearrangement in gp41 which inserts a hydrophobic fusion peptide region into the target cell membrane which brings the virus and cell membrane in close apposition to initiate fusion and ultimately entry of the virus into the target cell. HIV Entry Inhibitors can be thought of as 3 distict subclasses, each tageting one of the 3 previous steps. I wanted to highlight those small molecules that are furthest along in development. BMS has a series of attachment inhibitors which prevents gp120 from binding to CD4. 806 was presented last year but the follow-on 043 has improved in vitro activity and a longer half-life. Monotherapy data were presented at CROI. 800 mg and 1800 mg twice daily gave a mean VL reduction of 0.7 and 1 log at Day 8, respectively. The 3 CCR5 antagonists that are furthest along include UK-427, SCH-D and the GW-140. SCH-C had been in Phase 2 but was shelved due to QTc issues. SCH-D is now in Phase 2. Monotherapy data were presented at retrovirus as well, demonstrating a 1-1.5 log reduction at 14 days from doses which ranged from 10-50 mg twice daily and a Phase 2b study in TE patients is being conducted by ACTG. The GSK compound licensed from ONO is reportedly also in Phase 2 of development. GSK - compound was also presented at CROI. SD and MD data were presented and the drug was given BID. Food increased absorption. Dose limiting toxicity was GI intolerance and there was no QTc prolongation. Finally, enfuvirtide which is a twice daily injectable fusion inhibitor from Roche was approved last year. Its follow-on, T-1249 was discontinued due to issues of production and cost. V3 loop CD4 Cell Membrane CCR5/CXCR4 (R5/X4) * = FDA approved Adapted from Moore JP, PNAS 2003;100:10598-10602.

Fostemsavir (FTR): Oral HIV Attachment Inhibitor Prodrug of temsavir (TMR) Inhibits CD4 binding by binding to gp120 PK suggests daily dosing without boosting Phase 1 dose-escalation over 8 days 5 doses (4 with RTV) up to 1.5 log cps/ml ↓ ↓ baseline susceptibility in 12% of pts due to envelope polymorphisms Nettles JID 2012;206:1002

Fostemsavir (FTR): Oral HIV Attachment Inhibitor Phase 2b: modestly rx-experienced, screened for susceptibility (IC50 <100 nM) (N=251) Study rx: TDF + RAL + 4 FTR doses: 400 mg bid, 800 mg bid, 600 mg qd or 1200 mg qd (vs. ATV/r) Week 48: 61-82% VL <50; dose then ↑ to 1200 mg qd Week 96: 61% VL <50 (MITT) Thompson Antivir Ther 2017;22:215 No TDF or ATV resistance; 6 on FTR developed RAL resistance; 13 with available phenotypes showed ↓ susceptibility to temsavir and 7 had substitutions in gp120 Latilliade JAIDS 2018;77:299 Week 192: “comparable rates of virologic suppression” to ATV/r Thompson CROI 2019 #483

Fostemsavir (FTR): Oral Attachment Inhibitor BRIGHTE (Phase 3): heavily rx-experienced, NOT screened for susceptibility (N=272 with 1-2 remaining ART classes randomized to FTR 600 mg bid or placebo; 99 with no remaining ART classes non-randomized) day 8 (primary endpoint): mean HIV RNA ∆: -0.2 log (placebo) vs. -0.8 cps/ml (FTR) (p<0.0001) then, optimized background ART wk 48: VL <40: 54% (randomized) vs. 38% (non- randomized) Aberg/Ackerman Glasgow 2018 #344 Comparable results by gender Quercia CROI 2019 FDA “breakthrough status” July 2015 Planned filing for approval 2019

New Mechanisms of Action

HIV Maturation Inhibitors (MI)

HIV Maturation Inhibitors Bevirimat – phase 2 ~50% of treatment-experienced patients had no response due to polymorphisms in gp120 McCallister 2008 XVII HIV Drug Resistance Conference #8 GSK 3532795/BMS-955176 – phase 2b TDF/FTC + ‘795: 76-83% <40 cps/ml GI intolerance Morales-Ramirez PLoS One 2018;13:e0205368 GSK 2838232 – phase 2a ‘232 + cobicistat: up to ↓1.7 log cps/ml at 10 days DeJesus CROI 2019 #142 GSK 3640254 – phase 1 pending; phase 2 starting

HIV Capsid Inhibitors X Sager CROI 2019 #142

Capsid Inhibitor: GS-6207 Potent antiretroviral activity: EC50 140 pM in PBMC Active across all tested subtypes Resistant variants have low fitness ↓ clearance and solubility  very long ½ life: 30-43 days Phase 1 single SQ dose (vs. placebo) in HIV- (10/group) Doses: 30, 100, 300, 450 mg Prolonged exposure (>24 wks) 3 highest doses >prot-adjusted-EC95 at 12 wks Phase 1 in HIV+ underway Sager CROI 2019 #480

Acknowledgments Cornell HIV Clinical Trials Unit (CCTU) Division of Infectious Diseases Weill Cornell Medicine AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) HIV Prevention Trials Network (HPTN) Division of AIDS, NIAID, NIH The patient volunteers!

Question-and-Answer