PSS verification and validation

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
04/27/2006 Dr. Claudia Nowak Slide 1 Systems with safety-related software according to IEC – costs out of control? Experience from a development.
Advertisements

SESAME Radiation Safety and PSS Phase I : Microtron + Booster Morteza Mansouri on behalf of Safety group TAC SESAME TAC 2013 : Morteza Mansouri.
Verification and Validation
Software Quality Assurance Plan
EQUIPMENT VALIDATION.
Introduction to Software Quality Assurance (SQA)
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
SESAME PSS Phase I : Microtron + Booster Morteza Mansouri SESAME PSS engineer on behalf of Safety group TAC Morteza Mansouri, SESAME TAC 2012, Nov.10th,2012.
Software Quality Assurance Activities
SENG521 (Fall SENG 521 Software Reliability & Testing Software Product & process Improvement using ISO (Part 3d) Department.
Product Development Chapter 6. Definitions needed: Verification: The process of evaluating compliance to regulations, standards, or specifications.
Chiller control system Specification meeting Lukasz Zwalinski – PH/DT.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy SCL Vacuum Control System Upgrade Derrick Williams
Thursday August 20, 2009 John Anderson Page 1 Accelerator Interlock System Issues Flow Down of Requirements from the Safety Order to Engineered Safety.
 Software Testing Software Testing  Characteristics of Testable Software Characteristics of Testable Software  A Testing Life Cycle A Testing Life.
HNDIT23082 Lecture 09:Software Testing. Validations and Verification Validation and verification ( V & V ) is the name given to the checking and analysis.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
Teleprotection Equipment Clarification Meeting Tejin Gosai PTM&C 24 th April 2015.
Personnel Safety Systems Stuart Birch Senior Engineer, Personnel Safety Systems November 6 th, 2014.
1 Interfaces, Engineering and Standards. 2 Interfaces LoKI Interface document description for deliverables Elements: PBS number, Deliverable description,
Reliability and Performance of the SNS Machine Protection System Doug Curry 2013.
Combining safety and conventional interfaces for interlock PLCs
SOFTWARE TESTING Date: 29-Dec-2016 By: Ram Karthick.
OH&S Plant Obligations make
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
How To Apply Quality Management
FRIB PLC Testing & Verification Process
THE PROCESS OF EMBEDDED SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT
Engineering - potential areas for action
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
Engineering Processes
Lecture 09:Software Testing
From AS :   Part 4— Commissioning, operation and asset management
Regulatory Oversight of HOF in Finland
Training Module Introduction to the TB9100/P25 CG/P25 TAG Customer Service Software (CSS) Describes Release 3.95 for Trunked TB9100 and P25 TAG Release.
Radiation protection organisation
Systems Construction and Implementation
Testing Plan and Status
Installation Binder / IRR – an example
System Construction and Implementation
Systems Construction and Implementation
PLCs integration into the ICS
TS2 PSS Architecture, Concepts of Operations and Interfaces
Personnel Safety system 0 for the Ion Source and LEBT (PSS0)
PSS0 Design & Concept of Operations
Introduction and Safety Plan
PSS verification and validation
Configuration Management
PSS Verification and validation
Safety Analysis and Safety Functions
Author Team Supervisor A. Toral M. Mansouri S.L. Birch Y.K. Sin
On behalf of protection systems
PSS0 Configuration Management,
ESS approach and support for Declaration of Conformity (CE-marking) Fredrik Håkansson ESS Accelerator Collaboration Board Meeting Trieste
Introduction, PDR Recommendations & TS2 PSS Safety Analysis
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Machine Protection PLC Based System Verification and Validation Plan
Software Development Plan and Software Requirements
TS2 PSS; update on concepts of operation and system's architecture
Hardware integration and interfaces
Critical Design Review Personnel Safety System: PSS0
TS2 PSS Software Requirements and Software Design
Status of the ESS High Power RF Systems
Atefeh Sadeghzadeh Control engineer – Target safety and control
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
Rack installation and local tests for the MEBT Chopper Rack
Stuart Birch On behalf of Protection Systems Group
Presentation transcript:

PSS verification and validation TS2 PSS Critical Design Review PSS verification and validation Paulina Skog On behalf of Protection Systems Group ESS/ICS/PS 2019-04-09

Tests

Tests Agenda Measures and techniques Location Roles and responsibilities Identified items to be verified Test documentation Correctness of data and adequacy Non-conformance and procedures for corrective actions on failure during test Tools

Hardware Factory Acceptance Test (HWFAT) The TS2 PSS HWFAT will take place at ESS site (Gallery Technical Area) in cooperation between vendor (Processkontroll AB (Actemium)) and PSS team. The HWFAT verifies that the as-built hardware system (cabinets) meets the specified design.

Measures and techniques for HWFAT Tests covering the (IEC 60204-1, Safety of machinery - Electrical equipment of machines - Part 1: General requirements): checking functions covering: The electric supply PLC test of digital inputs PLC test of digital outputs PLC test of analog inputs electrical equipment compliance with the TS2 PSS Electrical and Mechanical Drawings checking insulation resistance checking disruptive discharge checking for residual voltages checking if the conditions for protection against indirect contact by automatic disconnection are fulfilled

Tools for FAT and SAT Flexible measurement probes Windows station with TIA portal installed (v 14 SP1 or higher) FLUKE 1507 Insulation Tester FLUKE 705 Current Loop Calibrator 24mA

Roles and responsibilities for HWFAT   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer Hardware designer Alberto Toral Diez The hardware designer will support the verifier during testing Verifier Hardware verifier Morteza Mansouri / Peter Holgersson The hardware verifier will organize the test, conducts the test, ensure that the test report documentation is completed and signed correctly Role Company Name Function Vendor representative Processkontroll AB (Actemium) Organisation number: 556781-1400 Per Persson The vendor representative will support the test with the PSS representatives

Identification of items to be verified for HW FAT The requirements listed to be verified during the HWFAT in the Hardware Requirements Specifications for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System

Test documentation For the FAT the following documents will be produced: Factory Acceptance Test Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety Systems Factory Acceptance Test Report for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety Systems Note: These documents will be written after the CDR and will be reviewed during the TRR All of the tests will have a specification and a test report and all of them will be reviewed during the TRR

Correctness of data and adequacy PSS have review procedures to demonstrate the adequacy of the outputs and to verify the correctness of the data produced. Design and requirement documents are reviewed: internally by PSS during the CDR by non-PSS experts during the Functional Safety Assessment (FSA) by ZHAW. The test specifications and test reports will be reviewed during the TRR and the FSA.

Non-conformance and procedures for corrective actions on failure during test Open items will be identified and listed in a HWFAT punch list and will follow the recommendation in “ESS Guideline for Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) and Site Acceptance Test (SAT) (ESS-0094204), Rev. 2” Note the items that cannot be cleared on the spot, will be documented in a non conformity report! To be cleared on the spot, HWFAT to continue after rectification On-going rectification during HWFAT HWFAT to be repeated Modifications to be made after HWFAT Remaining work to be rectified

Hardware Site Acceptance Test (HWFAT) The Hardware SAT verifies that the hardware is installed as specified in electrical and mechanical design drawing document. Hardware SAT include the same tests as the Hardware FAT and some additional field device loop tests and bunker interface test. Location: The SAT will be performed at ESS in the Gallery Technical Area.

Roles and responsibilities for FAT   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer Installation coordinator Mattias Eriksson The system installation coordinator will support the verifier during testing Verifier Hardware verifier Joakim Söder / Morteza Mansouri The hardware verifier will organize the test, conducts the test, ensure that the test report documentation is completed and signed correctly

Identification of items to be verified The requirements listed to be verified during the HWSAT in the Hardware Requirements Specifications for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System The bunker interface will be tested during this test

Software Pre-FAT The Software Pre-FAT verifies the software functionality through simulations. Software code review to reveal potential software design defects and avoid systematic failures. Location: The Software Pre-FAT will be performed in the PSS Lab at ESS.

Measures and techniques for pre-FAT Simulation CDR with design walkthrough. Code review Code, configurable hardware and firmware inspections to ensure compliance with software planning document and Software Pre-FAT checklist, which includes structural tests

Tools for pre-FAT Windows station with Siemens TIA portal installed (v 14 SP1 or higher), including the safety advanced optional package, WinCC Comfort and PLC Sim, WinCC runtime. Test environment PLCs and HMIs. Versiondog installed on the Windows station

Roles and responsibilities for pre-FAT   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer Software developer Denis Paulic The designer will support the verifier during testing Verifier Software verifier Sam Crossland The software verifier will organize the test, ensure that the test specification is carried out, ensure that the documentation is completed and signed correctly Reviewer Martin Carroll / Johannes Gustafsson The reviewer will conduct a code review, for details see the Verification and Validation Plan for Personnel Safety Systems [3]

Identification of items to be verified The requirements listed to be verified during the Software Pre-FAT in the Software Requirements Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System (SWRS) . Fully verified: Software quality check requirements Important software variables to store alarm, error, fault and start-up conditions. How sensors and actuators shall be connected (or read) in the software and requirements on I/O modules to which they are connected.

Identification of items to be verified Partly verified using simulation: System interfaces Simulation of signals sent to and received from the defined interfaces for the following interfaces: RF system Radiation monitors Operator interfaces HMI simulation Simulating the variables used for interfacing with EPICS Procedures Simulation of formalised search procedure TS2 ODH detection system alarming PSS modes of operation (state machine simulation) Safety Instrumented Functions (SIF)

Site Integration Test (SIT) The SIT verifies that installed hardware and software work together properly, ensuring that their combination is serving the purpose of PSS safety functions and procedures. Note: To reduce the risk of damaging the Stakeholder Associated Equipment (SAE) due to repeated tests, the SAE are not connected to PSS during PSS SIT (Low-Level RF (LLRF) and the modulator) Location: The SIT will be performed on ESS in the Gallery Technical Area. SAE are the equipment in TS2 that TS2 PSS interlocks in order to mitigate risks associated with them (Low-Level RF (LLRF) and the modulator).

Measures and techniques for SIT Positive and negative integration tests covering the following: Interfaces RF system Radiation monitors EPICS Procedures Formalised search procedure ODH detection system

Roles and responsibilities for SIT   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer Software developer Denis Paulic The software developer will support the system integrator during testing Verifier System Integrator Morteza Mansouri The system integrator will organize the test, conduct the test, ensure that the test report documentation is completed and signed correctly Role Department and group Name Function Supporting function Control System Hardware & Integration Support Group Krisztian Löki Supporting function for EPICS tests

Identification of items to be verified Requirement documents The safety requirements and SIFs specified in the Safety Requirements Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System The requirements listed to be verified during the SIT in the Hardware Requirements Specifications for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System The requirements listed to be verified during the SIT in the Software Requirements Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System (SWRS) The following areas can be verified. TS2 PSS interface with EPICS TS2 PSS interface with (Radiological & Environmental Monitoring System) REMS Formalised search procedure TS2 PSS ODH detection system alarming The SIF’s will be partly verified, since the LLRF and the modulator will not be connected during the SIT. The requirements and the SIF ‘s that are not fully verified shall be verified during the FIT.

Final Integration Test (FIT) The FIT is a repetition of the positive tests during the SIT, whilst the LLRF and the modulator are operational and connected to PSS. Location: The SIT will be performed on ESS in the Gallery Technical Area.

Measures and techniques for FIT Positive integration tests covering the following: The SIFs Interfaces RF system Radiation monitors EPICS

Roles and responsibilities for FIT   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer Software developer Denis Paulic The software developer will support the system integrator during testing Verifier System Integrator Morteza Mansouri The system integrator will organize the test, conducts the test, ensure that the test report documentation is completed and signed correctly

Roles and responsibilities for FIT Department and group Name Function Head of Environment, Safety and Health ES&H Peter Jacobsson Provide PSS with an approval for conducting the FIT System owner (per section) Utilities and Test Stands Section Wolfgang Hees Sub system owner 1 (per system) Control System Hardware & Integration Support Group Krisztian Löki Support function for tests covering the EPICS interface Sub system owner 2 RF Sources Section Morten Rostrup Forup Jensen Support function for tests covering the RF system interface Sub system owner 3 Power Converters Section Carlos De Almeida Martins Support function for tests covering the modulator interface. Sub system owner 4 Radiation Protection Group Alasdair Day Support function for tests covering the REMS Supporting function Owen Buchan Support function for electrical power

Identification of items to be verified The safety requirements and SIFs specified in the Safety Requirements Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System The requirements listed to be verified during the FIT in the Hardware Requirements Specifications for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System The requirements listed to be verified during the FIT in the Software Requirements Specification for Test Stand 2 Personnel Safety System (SWRS) TS2 PSS interface with the modulator TS2 PSS interface with the RF system SIF’s

Validation and handover To prove that PSS meets the safety and operational requirements, a demonstration of TS2 PSS operation and SIFs shall be presented to all identified stakeholders. The demonstration shall be carried out on the real system at the ESS site and cover the positive tests from the FIT.

Roles and responsibilities for validation and handover   Role Name Function Manager Work package manager Stuart Birch The work package manager will ensure that the tests are carried out correctly Designer System integrator Morteza Mansouri The system integrator will organize the test, supports validator in conducting the validation, ensures that the test report documentation is completed and signed correctly

Roles and responsibilities for validation and handover Department and group Name Function Technical director or their delegates Machine Directorate Roland Garoby Will witness the validation and approve the handover to operation by signing the validation and handover report. Associate Director Environment, Safety, Health & Quality or their delegates ES&H Ralf Trant System owner and validator Utilities and Test Stands Section Wolfgang Hees Validate the system as an operator Sub system owner 1 (per system) Control System Hardware & Integration Support Group Krisztian Löki Support function for tests covering the EPICS interface Sub system owner 2 RF Sources Section Morten Rostrup Forup Jensen Support function for tests covering the RF system interface Sub system owner 3 Power Converters Section Carlos De Almeida Martins Support function for tests covering the modulator interface. Sub system owner 4 Radiation Protection Group Alasdair Day Support function for tests covering the REMS Supporting function Owen Buchan Support function for electrical power

Questions? Thank you for your attention!