Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts  Julie Broadus, Chris Q. Doe  Current.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Advertisements

Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Cell Division (Mitosis)
Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Defective phenotypes of ts alp4 and alp6 mutants and the cellular localization of Alp4 and Alp6 at the MTOC. (A) Wild‐type (left, HM123, Table II), alp4‐1891.
Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Carly I. Dix, Jordan W. Raff  Current Biology 
Biology B-Day 1/26/18 Bellringer
Animal Cell.
The PDZ Protein Canoe Regulates the Asymmetric Division of Drosophila Neuroblasts and Muscle Progenitors  Stephan Speicher, Anja Fischer, Juergen Knoblich,
STAU1/2 and YBX1 recruit poly-GR/PR into large cytoplasmic granules.
Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Volume 15, Issue 8, Pages (May 2016)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (February 2016)
Instructions for Cell Cycle Foldable
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages (February 2003)
Dynamics of interphase microtubules in Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Volume 20, Issue 14, Pages (July 2010)
Volume 25, Issue 24, Pages R1156-R1158 (December 2015)
Playing Ping Pong with Pins: Cortical and Microtubule-Induced Polarity
Volume 18, Issue 19, Pages (October 2008)
Role of bud6p and tea1p in the interaction between actin and microtubules for the establishment of cell polarity in fission yeast  Jonathan M. Glynn,
Partner of Numb Colocalizes with Numb during Mitosis and Directs Numb Asymmetric Localization in Drosophila Neural and Muscle Progenitors  Bingwei Lu,
Vasudha Srivastava, Douglas N. Robinson  Current Biology 
Flies without Centrioles
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages (January 2004)
Live Imaging of Endogenous RNA Reveals a Diffusion and Entrapment Mechanism for nanos mRNA Localization in Drosophila  Kevin M. Forrest, Elizabeth R.
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages (February 2008)
Overexpressing Centriole-Replication Proteins In Vivo Induces Centriole Overduplication and De Novo Formation  Nina Peel, Naomi R. Stevens, Renata Basto,
Drosophila E-Cadherin Regulates the Orientation of Asymmetric Cell Division in the Sensory Organ Lineage  Roland Le Borgne, Yohanns Bellaı̈che, François.
Christopher B. O'Connell, Anne K. Warner, Yu-li Wang  Current Biology 
Roland Le Borgne, François Schweisguth  Developmental Cell 
Drosophila Neuroblast Asymmetric Cell Division: Recent Advances and Implications for Stem Cell Biology  Fengwei Yu, Chay T. Kuo, Yuh Nung Jan  Neuron 
Regulation of Temporal Identity Transitions in Drosophila Neuroblasts
Apical/Basal Spindle Orientation Is Required for Neuroblast Homeostasis and Neuronal Differentiation in Drosophila  Clemens Cabernard, Chris Q. Doe  Developmental.
Naoyuki Fuse, Kanako Hisata, Alisa L. Katzen, Fumio Matsuzaki 
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
The Centriolar Protein Bld10/Cep135 Is Required to Establish Centrosome Asymmetry in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Priyanka Singh, Anjana Ramdas Nair, Clemens.
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages (March 2001)
Myosin 2-Induced Mitotic Rounding Enables Columnar Epithelial Cells to Interpret Cortical Spindle Positioning Cues  Soline Chanet, Rishabh Sharan, Zia.
APKC Controls Microtubule Organization to Balance Adherens Junction Symmetry and Planar Polarity during Development  Tony J.C. Harris, Mark Peifer  Developmental.
Volume 42, Issue 2, Pages e5 (July 2017)
The Snail Family Member Worniu Is Continuously Required in Neuroblasts to Prevent Elav-Induced Premature Differentiation  Sen-Lin Lai, Michael R. Miller,
Yumi Uetake, Greenfield Sluder  Current Biology 
Anne Pelissier, Jean-Paul Chauvin, Thomas Lecuit  Current Biology 
Maintenance of Miranda Localization in Drosophila Neuroblasts Involves Interaction with the Cognate mRNA  Anne Ramat, Matthew Hannaford, Jens Januschke 
Volume 13, Issue 20, Pages (October 2003)
TOR signaling regulates microtubule structure and function
S. Chodagam, A. Royou, W. Whitfield, R. Karess, J.W. Raff 
The Role of Oocyte Transcription, the 5′UTR, and Translation Repression and Derepression in Drosophila gurken mRNA and Protein Localization  Carol Saunders,
Modes of Protein Movement that Lead to the Asymmetric Localization of Partner of Numb during Drosophila Neuroblast Division  Bingwei Lu, Larry Ackerman,
Volume 3, Issue 5, Pages (November 2002)
Volume 107, Issue 2, Pages (October 2001)
Volume 14, Issue 17, Pages (September 2004)
Victoria Stevenson, Andrew Hudson, Lynn Cooley, William E Theurkauf 
Sarah E. Siegrist, Chris Q. Doe  Cell 
Volume 8, Issue 9, Pages (April 1998)
Volume 99, Issue 4, Pages (August 2010)
Anna Marie Sokac, Eric Wieschaus  Developmental Cell 
Inscuteable and Staufen Mediate Asymmetric Localization and Segregation of prosperoRNA during Drosophila Neuroblast Cell Divisions  Peng Li, Xiaohang.
Numb Antagonizes Notch Signaling to Specify Sibling Neuron Cell Fates
Cnn Dynamics Drive Centrosome Size Asymmetry to Ensure Daughter Centriole Retention in Drosophila Neuroblasts  Paul T. Conduit, Jordan W. Raff  Current.
Apical Complex Genes Control Mitotic Spindle Geometry and Relative Size of Daughter Cells in Drosophila Neuroblast and pI Asymmetric Divisions  Yu Cai,
TAC-1, a Regulator of Microtubule Length in the C. elegans Embryo
Julie C Canman, David B Hoffman, E.D Salmon  Current Biology 
Volume 34, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)
CDC-42 controls early cell polarity and spindle orientation in C
Stem Cell Self-Renewal: Centrosomes on the Move
Presentation transcript:

Extrinsic cues, intrinsic cues and microfilaments regulate asymmetric protein localization in Drosophila neuroblasts  Julie Broadus, Chris Q. Doe  Current Biology  Volume 7, Issue 11, Pages 827-835 (November 1997) DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8

Figure 1 Cell-cycle-dependent asymmetric localization of Insc and Pros in neuroblasts in vitro. Neuroblasts grown in vitro and triple-labeled for Insc (green, top row), Pros (red, middle row), and DNA (blue, bottom row, merged with Insc and Pros); the same neuroblast is pictured in each column. Note that apical is down, basal is up (see Materials and methods for details). (a) During late interphase, Insc is detected uniformly at the neuroblast cortex; Pros is undetectable. (b) During prophase, Insc forms an apical cortical crescent; Pros is weakly cortical and nuclear or undetectable. At metaphase (c), anaphase (d) and telophase (e), Insc and Pros are localized as cortical crescents on opposite sides of the neuroblast; there is a clear gap between the apical Insc crescent and the basal Pros crescent. (f) Following cytokinesis, Insc is segregated to the apical neuroblast and Pros is segregated to the basal GMC. GMCs can contain Insc in vitro (f) and in vivo[16], presumably because of de novo production of Insc in the GMC. Current Biology 1997 7, 827-835DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8)

Figure 2 Cell-cycle-dependent asymmetric localization of Stau and Pros in neuroblasts in vitro. (a,b) Neuroblasts cultured in vitro triple-labeled for Stau (green, first row), Pros (red, second row), and DNA (blue, third row); a merged image of all three is shown in the bottom row. (c,d) Neuroblasts cultured in vitro triple-labeled for Stau (green, first row), Pros (red, second row), and microfilaments (purple, third row); a merged image of all three is shown in the bottom row. The same neuroblast is pictured in each column. Apical is down, basal is up (see Materials and methods for details). During interphase (a), Stau is usually detected uniformly at the neuroblast cortex or occasionally as a weak cortical crescent; Pros is undetectable or at low levels in the nucleus and at the cortex. The smaller cell at the upper right in (a) is a GMC containing nuclear Pros and cytoplasmic Stau. At metaphase (b,c), Stau and Pros are precisely co-localized as basal cortical crescents that overlap with the uniform cortical distribution of microfilaments. When Pros and Stau are at the cortex, they are always tightly co-localized (within the level of resolution provided by confocal microscopy). At anaphase (d), Stau and Pros basal crescents are restricted to the budding GMC and overlap with the uniform cortical distribution of microfilaments. The less intense microfilament staining in the budding GMC is not reproducibly observed. Current Biology 1997 7, 827-835DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8)

Figure 3 The effect of colcemid, cytochalasin B and latrunculin B on microfilaments in vitro. In vitro primary cell cultures labeled for microfilaments using phalloidin-FITC. See Materials and methods for drug treatment conditions. WT, untreated cells showing uniform cortical microfilaments. COL, colcemid treatment has no effect on cortical microfilaments. CB, cytochalasin B treatment transforms microfilaments into punctate spots of F-actin. CB REC, cytochalasin B treatment followed by drug washout results in total recovery of cortical microfilaments. COL+CB, colcemid plus cytochalasin B treatment transforms microfilaments into punctate spots of F-actin. COL+CB REC, colcemid plus cytochalasin B treatment followed by washout of only cytochalasin B results in total recovery of cortical microfilaments. LB, latrunculin B treatment largely eliminates microfilaments. LB REC, latrunculin B treatment followed by drug washout results in partial recovery of cortical microfilaments (note gaps at the cortex of most cells). COL+LB, colcemid plus latrunculin B treatment essentially eliminates microfilaments. COL+LB REC, colcemid plus latrunculin B treatment followed by washout of only latrunculin B results in partial recovery of cortical microfilaments. Current Biology 1997 7, 827-835DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8)

Figure 4 The effect of cytoskeletal inhibitors on asymmetric protein localization in metaphase neuroblasts in vitro. The three columns on the left show cultured neuroblasts labeled for (left to right) Insc (green), Pros (red) and the merged image; the three columns on the right show cultured neuroblasts labeled for (left to right) Stau (green), Pros (red) and the merged image. All neuroblasts are at metaphase, as determined by DNA staining (not shown). Each half row shows the same neuroblast stained for two proteins and merged. Apical is down, basal is up. See Materials and methods for details of drug treatment conditions. WT, neuroblasts show asymmetric Insc, Pros and Stau localization. COL, colcemid treatment does not affect asymmetric Insc, Pros and Stau localization. CB, cytochalasin B treatment produces some Insc crescents (bottom row), some delocalized cortical Insc (top row) and cytoplasmic Pros and Stau. LB, latrunculin B treatment produces delocalized cortical Insc and cytoplasmic Pros and Stau. COL+CB, colcemid treatment followed by cytochalasin B addition produces mostly cytoplasmic Insc, Pros and Stau (top row), although a few Insc crescents can be observed; COL+CB REC, exactly as COL+CB treatment, but then cytochalasin B is washed out: recovery of asymmetric Insc, Pros and Stau crescents is observed. Percentages indicate the frequency that the localization pattern shown in each panel was observed in all neuroblasts of the experiment; see Table 1. Current Biology 1997 7, 827-835DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8)

Figure 5 Summary of Insc, Pros and Stau localization in neuroblasts in vitro. (a) Localization of Insc, Pros and Stau in metaphase neuroblasts in vitro following no drug treatment (wild type), or after disruption of the indicated cytoskeletal structures. (b) Cell-cycle-specific localization and regulation of Insc, Pros and Stau in vitro and in vivo. Large circle, neuroblast; small circle, GMC; partial rectangles, neuroectodermal cells. In both (a) and (b) apical is down, basal is up; Pros, red; Stau, brown; Insc, blue; DNA, green; centrosomes, pink [in (b)]. See text for details. Current Biology 1997 7, 827-835DOI: (10.1016/S0960-9822(06)00370-8)