Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages (April 2011)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Advertisements

Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages e5 (February 2009)
Volume 133, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 127, Issue 2, Pages (August 2004)
Volume 141, Issue 4, Pages e5 (October 2011)
Serotonin Has a Key Role in Pathogenesis of Experimental Colitis
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages e2 (February 2011)
Volume 138, Issue 3, Pages e2 (March 2010)
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages e3 (January 2011)
Volume 135, Issue 4, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 136, Issue 1, Pages (January 2009)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
Volume 135, Issue 2, Pages e3 (August 2008)
Volume 132, Issue 4, Pages (April 2007)
Volume 136, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Volume 138, Issue 4, Pages (April 2010)
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages e4 (June 2009)
Volume 131, Issue 4, Pages (October 2006)
Volume 133, Issue 6, Pages (December 2007)
Volume 143, Issue 5, Pages e4 (November 2012)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (July 2007)
Volume 141, Issue 2, Pages e4 (August 2011)
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages e2 (December 2009)
Volume 137, Issue 5, Pages e1 (November 2009)
Volume 140, Issue 2, Pages (February 2011)
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages e1 (January 2008)
Volume 145, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2013)
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
PepT1-Mediated Tripeptide KPV Uptake Reduces Intestinal Inflammation
Volume 141, Issue 4, Pages (October 2011)
Volume 140, Issue 7, Pages (June 2011)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
E. Cario, G. Gerken, D.K. Podolsky  Gastroenterology 
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages (January 2008)
Volume 127, Issue 1, Pages (July 2004)
Volume 139, Issue 6, Pages (December 2010)
A novel NF-κB inhibitor, dehydroxymethylepoxyquinomicin, ameliorates inflammatory colonic injury in mice  Tohru Funakoshi, Kenichiro Yamashita, Nobuki.
Volume 141, Issue 1, Pages e1 (July 2011)
Volume 132, Issue 5, Pages (May 2007)
Dongmei Ye, Shuhong Guo, Rana Al–Sadi, Thomas Y. Ma  Gastroenterology 
Volume 130, Issue 6, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 125, Issue 6, Pages (December 2003)
Volume 145, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013)
Volume 138, Issue 1, Pages (January 2010)
Volume 146, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
Volume 135, Issue 3, Pages e3 (September 2008)
This Month in Gastroenterology
Volume 134, Issue 7, Pages e3 (June 2008)
Volume 129, Issue 3, Pages (September 2005)
Therapeutic Action of Ghrelin in a Mouse Model of Colitis
The PepT1–NOD2 Signaling Pathway Aggravates Induced Colitis in Mice
Volume 119, Issue 4, Pages (October 2000)
Volume 146, Issue 7, Pages e4 (June 2014)
Volume 135, Issue 5, Pages e5 (November 2008)
A2B Adenosine Receptor Gene Deletion Attenuates Murine Colitis
Antigen-Presenting Cell Production of IL-10 Inhibits T-Helper 1 and 17 Cell Responses and Suppresses Colitis in Mice  Bo Liu, Susan L. Tonkonogy, R. Balfour.
Volume 137, Issue 4, Pages (October 2009)
Ling Zheng, Terrence E. Riehl, William F. Stenson  Gastroenterology 
Volume 132, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Leptin: A pivotal mediator of intestinal inflammation in mice
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages (October 2010)
Volume 141, Issue 3, Pages (September 2011)
Helminth Infection Enhances Disease in a Murine TH2 Model of Colitis
CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cells Induce Relapsing Colitis in Normal Mice
Volume 132, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
The impact of primary and persistent cytomegalovirus infection on the progression of acute colitis in a murine model  Jerry L. Brunson, Felix Becker,
Volume 63, Issue 4, Pages (April 2003)
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages (September 2003)
Volume 136, Issue 7, Pages (June 2009)
Volume 137, Issue 6, Pages e2 (December 2009)
Presentation transcript:

Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages 1272-1282 (April 2011) Modifying the Protease, Antiprotease Pattern by Elafin Overexpression Protects Mice From Colitis  Jean–Paul Motta, Laurent Magne, Delphyne Descamps, Corinne Rolland, Camila Squarzoni–Dale, Perrine Rousset, Laurence Martin, Nicolas Cenac, Viviane Balloy, Michel Huerre, Leopold F. Fröhlich, Dieter Jenne, Julien Wartelle, Azzaq Belaaouaj, Emmanuel Mas, Jean–Pierre Vinel, Laurent Alric, Michel Chignard, Nathalie Vergnolle, Jean–Michel Sallenave  Gastroenterology  Volume 140, Issue 4, Pages 1272-1282 (April 2011) DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050 Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Modulation of colonic protease activity by elafin after DSS- or TNBS-induced colitis. Male C57/Bl6 WT, MCMV-EL, and Endo-EL mice drank either water (n = 9, 6, and 5, respectively) or DSS (n = 11, 8, and 8, respectively), or received TNBS intracolonically (n = 7, 5, and 4, respectively), and were killed 7 days later. Activity of (A and B) elastase/PR-3 and (C and D) trypsin were assessed in colonic extracts. Significant differences compared with WT inflamed: *P < .05 and ***P < .001. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Modulation of colonic macroscopic damage (A and B) and MPO activity (C and D) in elafin transgenic mice after DSS- or TNBS-induced colitis. Male C57/Bl6 WT, MCMV-EL, and Endo-EL mice (after H2O, DSS, or TNBS treatment) were assessed for colonic damage and MPO activity at day 7. Significant differences compared with the WT inflamed group: *P < .05, **P < .01, and ***P < .001. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Modulation of tissue architecture and proinflammatory cytokines in elafin transgenic mice after DSS- or TNBS-induced colitis. (A–C) Histology of colons and (D) cytokine protein content from C57/Bl6 WT, MCMV-EL, and Endo-EL mice 7 days after H2O, DSS, or TNBS treatment. Scale bar, 20 μm. Significant differences compared with WT corresponding treatment: *P < .05. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Modulation of in vivo NF-κB activity in elafin transgenic mice after DSS-mediated colitis. (A) Study design, (B and C) luciferase bioluminescence measurements (B, pictures, C, quantification), and (D) macroscopic damage score in male C57/Bl6 WT, MCMV-EL, and Endo-EL mice that drank H2O or DSS and received 2.5 × 109 pfu Ad–NF-κB–luciferase intracolonically, 5 days after starting water or DSS treatments. Numbers represent mean ± standard deviation. *P < .05 compared with WT water. **P < .05 compared with WT DSS. ***P < .001 compared with WT Adeno–NF-κB + DSS–treated mice. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Inhibition of TNF-α–stimulated permeability by Ad-elafin in intestinal epithelial cells. Permeability (apical-to-basal transport of a dextran probe conjugated to fluorescein isothiocyanate [FITC]) was measured in Caco-2 cells grown as a monolayer and exposed to apical and basolateral cytokines (TNFα, 10 ng/mL), and Ad-null or Ad-elafin (all at multiplicity of infection of 5) for 48 hours. Data are expressed as a percentage of paracellular flux compared with vehicle-treated cells and are representative of 3 experiments of n = 12 for the TNF group and n = 6 for the TNF + Ad-EL group. *Significant difference compared with TNF group was noted at P < .05. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Colonic Ad-elafin expression in WT mice recapitulates the elafin protection observed in transgenic mice. Three days after the induction of colitis by DSS (water was given to controls, n = 5), male C57/Bl6 WT mice were injected intracolonically with either PBS (n = 8) or 2 × 108 pfu of either Ad-null (n = 6) or Ad-elafin (n = 7). (A) Elastase/PR-3, (B) trypsin activity, (C) colonic inflammation, (D) histology, and (E) cytokine content were assessed in tissues of those mice 7 days after the induction of colitis. (A and B) Significant difference compared with PBS: *P < .05 and **P < .01. ΨSignificant difference compared with the Ad-null group: P < .05. (C) Significant difference compared with PBS: ***P < .001. ΨΨΨSignificant difference compared with the Ad-null group: P < .001. (D) Scale bar, 20 μm. (E) Significant differences compared with DSS alone: *P < .05. ΨSignificant difference compared with the DSS + Ad-null–treated group: P < .05. Gastroenterology 2011 140, 1272-1282DOI: (10.1053/j.gastro.2010.12.050) Copyright © 2011 AGA Institute Terms and Conditions