Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
Advertisements

Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
A Fence-like Coat for the Nuclear Pore Membrane
Conformational Changes of the Flavivirus E Glycoprotein
Crystallographic Structure of SurA, a Molecular Chaperone that Facilitates Folding of Outer Membrane Porins  Eduard Bitto, David B. McKay  Structure 
Fulvia Bono, Judith Ebert, Esben Lorentzen, Elena Conti  Cell 
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 124, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 25, Issue 11, Pages e2 (November 2017)
Atomic Model of CPV Reveals the Mechanism Used by This Single-Shelled Virus to Economically Carry Out Functions Conserved in Multishelled Reoviruses 
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Chaperone-Assisted Crystallography with DARPins
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 23, Issue 7, Pages (July 2015)
Volume 10, Issue 3, Pages (March 2002)
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
David R Buckler, Yuchen Zhou, Ann M Stock  Structure 
Nadine Keller, Jiří Mareš, Oliver Zerbe, Markus G. Grütter  Structure 
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages (January 2017)
Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I Homolog MIC-A, a γδ T Cell Ligand
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Ross Alexander Robinson, Xin Lu, Edith Yvonne Jones, Christian Siebold 
N Khazanovich, KS Bateman, M Chernaia, M Michalak, MNG James  Structure 
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Volume 17, Issue 3, Pages (March 2009)
Crystal Structure of the MazE/MazF Complex
The 2.2 Å Crystal Structure of Hsp33
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages (March 2007)
Crystal Structure of E. coli YhbY
Volume 124, Issue 5, Pages (March 2006)
Structure of the Cathelicidin Motif of Protegrin-3 Precursor
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
The Crystal Structure of the Costimulatory OX40-OX40L Complex
Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages (March 2012)
Edith Schlagenhauf, Robert Etges, Peter Metcalf  Structure 
Antonina Roll-Mecak, Chune Cao, Thomas E. Dever, Stephen K. Burley 
Volume 8, Issue 5, Pages (November 2001)
Crystal Structure of the N-Terminal Domain of the Secretin GspD from ETEC Determined with the Assistance of a Nanobody  Konstantin V. Korotkov, Els Pardon,
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages (July 2000)
The Unmasking of Telomerase
Volume 15, Issue 2, Pages (February 2007)
Crystal Structures of the BAR-PH and PTB Domains of Human APPL1
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
Solution Structure of a TBP–TAFII230 Complex
Volume 14, Issue 6, Pages (June 2006)
Volume 9, Issue 2, Pages (February 2001)
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Crystal Structure of the Flagellar σ/Anti-σ Complex σ28/FlgM Reveals an Intact σ Factor in an Inactive Conformation  Margareta K. Sorenson, Soumya S.
Human glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase: the crystal structure reveals a structural NADP+ molecule and provides insights into enzyme deficiency  Shannon.
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages (May 2005)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Structure of CD94 Reveals a Novel C-Type Lectin Fold
Structure of an IκBα/NF-κB Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Three protein kinase structures define a common motif
Crystal Structure of the Human Neuropilin-1 b1 Domain
Brett K. Kaiser, Matthew C. Clifton, Betty W. Shen, Barry L. Stoddard 
Sequence-Specific RNA Binding by a Nova KH Domain
Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages R19-R23 (February 1999)
Sabine Pokutta, William I. Weis  Molecular Cell 
Crystal Structure of β-Arrestin at 1.9 Å
Volume 7, Issue 6, Pages (June 2001)
Morgan Huse, Ye-Guang Chen, Joan Massagué, John Kuriyan  Cell 
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages (October 1998)
A Potential Protein-RNA Recognition Event along the RISC-Loading Pathway from the Structure of A. aeolicus Argonaute with Externally Bound siRNA  Yu-Ren.
Presentation transcript:

Crystal structures of Nova-1 and Nova-2 K-homology RNA-binding domains Hal A Lewis, Hua Chen, Carme Edo, Ronald J Buckanovich, Yolanda YL Yang, Kiran Musunuru, Ru Zhong, Robert B Darnell, Stephen K Burley  Structure  Volume 7, Issue 2, Pages 191-203 (February 1999) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2 Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Structure-based sequence alignment of KH domains. See materials and methods section for Genbank accession numbers. Residues with strong (greater than 70%) and moderate (greater than 40%) homology are highlighted in color. Purple and dark green signify strong hydrophobic (Cys/Ala/Val/Leu/Iso/Phe/Tyr/Trp) and glycine conservation respectively. The remaining color codes denote moderate conservation: violet (hydrophobic), light green (Gly), dark brown (Arg/Lys/Gly), dark blue (Arg/Lys), brown (Pro), yellow (Asp/Glu), peach (Ser/Thr), and orange (hydrophilic: Ser/Thr/Asn/Gln). Residues in large loops are abbreviated within the sequence by the number of residues. Proteins with multiple KH domains have the number of intervening residues between adjacent KH domains listed in parentheses at the end of the sequence. Threading Z scores for successful threading calculations (Z > 4.0) are also tabulated at the end of each row along with the KH model giving the best alignment (Nv1 = Nova-1 KH3, Nv2 = Nova-2 KH3, Vig = vigilin KH6, FMR = FMR-1 KH1). Residue numbering for the Nova KH3 constructs is presented alongside the Nova-1 and Nova-2 KH3 sequences (# denotes residues in the hydrophobic core and ∗ indicates potential RNA-binding residues). Secondary structural elements, strands (S) and helices (H), are indicated at the bottom of the alignment. Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Domain mapping of the Nova-1 protein. Cleavage sites in full-length Nova-1 were determined through proteolysis with mass spectrometry measurements. The location of the three maxi-KH motifs are illustrated as boxes, with shading indicating the position of each variable loop. Arrows indicate sites of protease cleavage, with the large arrows indicating rapid cleavage and the smaller arrows slow cleavage; an asterisk indicates reduced cleavage (> twofold difference) in the presence of RNA. Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Structure of a Nova KH domain. Ribbon stereodrawing of Nova-2 KH3 with conserved aliphatic residues comprising the hydrophobic core illustrated in ball-and-stick format. The invariant Gly–X–X–Gly segment is shown in yellow, and the variable loop in red. The N and C termini are indicated. (a) A view of the β-sheet face of the KH domain. (b) A 90° rotation from the view shown in (a). Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Comparison of Nova KH3 with vigilin KH6 and FMR-1 KH1 domain structures. (a) Side-by-side ribbon drawings using the color-coding scheme and view of Figure 3a . (b) Superposition of Nova-2 KH3 (blue) on vigilin KH6 (red), and on FMR-1 KH1 (yellow), using the view of Figure 3b . Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 Potential KH-domain RNA-binding surfaces. Two faces of the Nova KH3 domain are shown with putative RNA-interacting residues (see text) in green and blue as ball-and-stick models. Blue indicates those residues with moderate conservation (see Figure 1 ). The H2–H3 and S2–S3 loops are color-coded as in Figure 3 . (a) The β-sheet surface, showing 14 potential RNA-binding residues, two of which show moderate conservation among KH domains. This view is identical to Figure 3a . (b) The α-helical surface, showing 15 potential RNA-binding residues, six of which show moderate conservation. This view corresponds to a 90° rotation about the vertical of the view in (a). Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Nova KH domain 22 tetramer. Ribbon drawing showing the asymmetric unit comprising the monoclinic Nova-2 KH3 crystals with the twofold axes indicated by arrows. The tetragonal Nova-1 KH3 crystals demonstrate a similar crystallographic 22 tetramer. Each Nova-2 KH3 domain protomer is color-coded: cyan, A; green, B; blue, C; magenta, D. The H1–H2 and S2–S3 loops are color coded as in Figure 3 . Missing loop regions have been included as modeled connections. Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Alternative KH domain dimers from the 22 tetramer. Individual KH domains are color-coded as in Figure 6 with modeled linker residues in black, the invariant Gly–X–X–Gly segment in yellow, and the variable loop in red. Twofold axes are denoted by the arrow and disk. The a and b dimers bury 1200 and 950 Å 2, respectively. For reference, a typical lattice packing interaction buries < 600 Å 2 (reviewed in [57] ). (a) The α-helix a dimer. (b) The β-sheet b dimer. Structure 1999 7, 191-203DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(99)80025-2) Copyright © 1999 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions