EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Packet Scheduling and QoS

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CS 268: Packet Scheduling Ion Stoica March 18/20, 2003.
Advertisements

1 CNPA B Nasser S. Abouzakhar Queuing Disciplines Week 8 – Lecture 2 16 th November, 2009.
Abhay.K.Parekh and Robert G.Gallager Laboratory for Information and Decision Systems Massachusetts Institute of Technology IEEE INFOCOM 1992.
Courtesy: Nick McKeown, Stanford 1 Intro to Quality of Service Tahir Azim.
CS 268: Lecture 8 Router Support for Congestion Control Ion Stoica Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences.
CS 4700 / CS 5700 Network Fundamentals Lecture 12: Router-Aided Congestion Control (Drop it like it’s hot) Revised 3/18/13.
Differentiated Services. Service Differentiation in the Internet Different applications have varying bandwidth, delay, and reliability requirements How.
Worst-case Fair Weighted Fair Queueing (WF²Q) by Jon C.R. Bennett & Hui Zhang Presented by Vitali Greenberg.
CS 268: Lecture 15/16 (Packet Scheduling) Ion Stoica April 8/10, 2002.
Generalized Processing Sharing (GPS) Is work conserving Is a fluid model Service Guarantee –GPS discipline can provide an end-to-end bounded- delay service.
Katz, Stoica F04 EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Packet Scheduling and QoS Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and.
CS 268: Differentiated Services Ion Stoica February 25, 2003.
CS 268: Lecture 8 (Router Support for Congestion Control) Ion Stoica February 19, 2002.
CSE 401N Multimedia Networking-2 Lecture-19. Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort” Future: next generation Internet.
1 CS 194: Distributed Systems Resource Allocation Scott Shenker and Ion Stoica Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer.
CS144, Stanford University Error in Q3-7. CS144, Stanford University Using longest prefix matching, the IP address will match which entry? a /8.
Packet Scheduling From Ion Stoica. 2 Packet Scheduling  Decide when and what packet to send on output link -Usually implemented at output interface 1.
CIS679: Scheduling, Resource Configuration and Admission Control r Review of Last lecture r Scheduling r Resource configuration r Admission control.
Integrated Services (RFC 1633) r Architecture for providing QoS guarantees to individual application sessions r Call setup: a session requiring QoS guarantees.
CSE QoS in IP. CSE Improving QOS in IP Networks Thus far: “making the best of best effort”
Fair Queueing. 2 First-Come-First Served (FIFO) Packets are transmitted in the order of their arrival Advantage: –Very simple to implement Disadvantage:
March 29 Scheduling ?. What is Packet Scheduling? Decide when and what packet to send on output link 1 2 Scheduler flow 1 flow 2 flow n Buffer management.
CS640: Introduction to Computer Networks Aditya Akella Lecture 20 - Queuing and Basics of QoS.
EE 122: Lecture 15 (Quality of Service) Ion Stoica October 25, 2001.
1 Multimedia Networking: Beyond Best-Effort Internet.
T. S. Eugene Ngeugeneng at cs.rice.edu Rice University1 COMP/ELEC 429 Introduction to Computer Networks Lecture 18: Quality of Service Slides used with.
T. S. Eugene Ngeugeneng at cs.rice.edu Rice University1 COMP/ELEC 429/556 Introduction to Computer Networks Weighted Fair Queuing Some slides used with.
1 Fair Queuing Hamed Khanmirza Principles of Network University of Tehran.
Spring Computer Networks1 Congestion Control Sections 6.1 – 6.4 Outline Preliminaries Queuing Discipline Reacting to Congestion Avoiding Congestion.
Providing QoS in IP Networks
Univ. of TehranIntroduction to Computer Network1 An Introduction Computer Networks An Introduction to Computer Networks University of Tehran Dept. of EE.
04/02/08 1 Packet Scheduling IT610 Prof. A. Sahoo KReSIT.
Advanced Computer Networks
Packet Scheduling (and QoS)
QoS & Queuing Theory CS352.
Topics discussed in this section:
Congestion Control and Resource Allocation
Measuring Service in Multi-Class Networks
Stratified Round Robin: A Low Complexity Packet Scheduler with Bandwidth Fairness and Bounded Delay Sriram Ramabhadran Joseph Pasquale Presented by Sailesh.
EE 122: Router Support for Congestion Control: RED and Fair Queueing
TCP, XCP and Fair Queueing
Quality of Service in the Internet
Advanced Computer Networks
Queuing and Queue Management
Quality of Service For Traffic Aggregates
COMP/ELEC 429/556 Introduction to Computer Networks
Variations of Weighted Fair Queueing
Hierarchical Scheduling Algorithms
Fair Queueing.
Advance Computer Networking
EE 122: Quality of Service and Resource Allocation
Computer Science Division
Advance Computer Networking
EE 122: Lecture 7 Ion Stoica September 18, 2001.
Variations of Weighted Fair Queueing
EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Midterm II Review
COMP/ELEC 429 Introduction to Computer Networks
Advanced Computer Networks
Congestion Control Reasons:
CIS679: Two Planes and Int-Serv Model
Introduction to Packet Scheduling
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
Congestion Control and Resource Allocation
Hierarchical Scheduling Algorithms
Real-Time Protocol (RTP)
Fair Queueing.
A Simple QoS Packet Scheduler for Network Routers
Introduction to Packet Scheduling
کنترل جریان امیدرضا معروضی.
Presentation transcript:

EECS 122: Introduction to Computer Networks Packet Scheduling and QoS Computer Science Division Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720-1776

Packet Scheduling Decide when and what packet to send on output link Usually implemented at output interface of a router flow 1 Classifier flow 2 1 Scheduler 2 flow n Buffer management

Goals of Packet Scheduling Provide per flow/aggregate QoS guarantees in terms of delay and bandwidth Provide per flow/aggregate protection Flow/Aggregate identified by a subset of following fields in the packet header source/destination IP address (32 bits) source/destination port number (16 bits) protocol type (8 bits) type of service (8 bits) Examples: All packets from machine A to machine B All packets from Berkeley All packets between Berkeley and MIT All TCP packets from EECS-Berkeley

Outline QoS guarantees Link sharing Service curve (short)

Recap: Token Bucket and Arrival Curve Parameters r – average rate, i.e., rate at which tokens fill the bucket b – bucket depth R – maximum link capacity or peak rate (optional parameter) A bit is transmitted only when there is an available token Arrival curve – maximum number of bits transmitted within an interval of time of size t Arrival curve r bps bits slope r b*R/(R-r) b bits slope R <= R bps time regulator

How Is the Token Bucket Used? Can be enforced by End-hosts (e.g., cable modems) Routers (e.g., ingress routers in a Diffserv domain) Can be used to characterize the traffic sent by an end-host

Source Traffic Characterization Arrival curve – maximum amount of bits transmitted during an interval of time Δt Use token bucket to bound the arrival curve bps bits Arrival curve Δt time

Source Traffic Characterization: Example Arrival curve – maximum amount of bits transmitted during an interval of time Δt Use token bucket to bound the arrival curve (R=2,b=1,r=1) Arrival curve bits 4 bps 3 2 2 1 1 Δt 1 2 3 4 5 time 1 2 3 4 5

QoS Guarantees: Per-hop Reservation End-host: specify the arrival rate characterized by token-bucket with parameters (b,r,R) the maximum maximum admissible delay D Router: allocate bandwidth ra and buffer space Ba such that no packet is dropped no packet experiences a delay larger than D slope ra slope r bits Arrival curve b*R/(R-r) D Ba

Packet Scheduling Make sure that at any time the flow receives at least the allocated rate ra The canonical example of such scheduler: Weighted Fair Queueing (WFQ)

Recap: Fair Queueing Implements max-min fairness: each flow receives min(ri, f) , where ri – flow arrival rate f – link fair rate (see next slide) Weighted Fair Queueing (WFQ) – associate a weight with each flow

Fair Rate Computation: Example 1 If link congested, compute f such that f = 4: min(8, 4) = 4 min(6, 4) = 4 min(2, 4) = 2 8 10 4 6 4 2 2

Fair Rate Computation: Example 2 Associate a weight wi with each flow i If link congested, compute f such that f = 2: min(8, 2*3) = 6 min(6, 2*1) = 2 min(2, 2*1) = 2 (w1 = 3) 8 10 4 (w2 = 1) 6 4 2 (w3 = 1) 2 If Σk wk <= C, flow i is guaranteed to be allocated a rate >= wi Flow i is guaranteed to be allocated a rate >= wi*C/(Σk wk)

Fluid Flow System Flows can be served one bit at a time WFQ can be implemented using bit-by-bit weighted round robin During each round from each flow that has data to send, send a number of bits equal to the flow’s weight

Fluid Flow System: Example 1 Packet Size (bits) Packet inter-arrival time (ms) Rate (Kbps) Flow 1 1000 10 100 Flow 2 500 50 Flow 1 (w1 = 1) 100 Kbps Flow 2 (w2 = 1) Flow 1 (arrival traffic) 1 2 3 4 5 time Flow 2 (arrival traffic) 1 2 3 4 5 6 time Service in fluid flow system 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 time (ms)

Fluid Flow System: Example 2 link Red flow has packets backlogged between time 0 and 10 Backlogged flow  flow’s queue not empty Other flows have packets continuously backlogged All packets have the same size flows weights 5 1 1 1 1 1 2 4 6 8 10 15

Implementation In Packet System Packet (Real) system: packet transmission cannot be preempted. Why? Solution: serve packets in the order in which they would have finished being transmitted in the fluid flow system

Packet System: Example 1 Service in fluid flow system 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 time (ms) Select the first packet that finishes in the fluid flow system Packet system 1 2 1 3 2 3 4 4 5 5 6 time

Packet System: Example 2 Service in fluid flow system 2 4 6 8 10 Select the first packet that finishes in the fluid flow system Packet system 2 4 6 8 10

Implementation Challenge Need to compute the finish time of a packet in the fluid flow system… … but the finish time may change as new packets arrive! Need to update the finish times of all packets that are in service in the fluid flow system when a new packet arrives But this is very expensive; a high speed router may need to handle hundred of thousands of flows!

Example Four flows, each with weight 1 Flow 1 time Flow 2 time Flow 3 ε 1 2 3 Finish times computed at time 0 time time Finish times re-computed at time ε 1 2 3 4

Solution: Virtual Time Key Observation: while the finish times of packets may change when a new packet arrives, the order in which packets finish doesn’t! Only the order is important for scheduling Solution: instead of the packet finish time maintain the number of rounds needed to send the remaining bits of the packet (virtual finishing time) Virtual finishing time doesn’t change when the packet arrives System virtual time – index of the round in the bit-by-bit round robin scheme

System Virtual Time: V(t) Measure service, instead of time V(t) slope – normalized rate at which every backlogged flow receives service in the fluid flow system C – link capacity N(t) – total weight of backlogged flows in fluid flow system at time t V(t) time Service in fluid flow system 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 time

System Virtual Time (V(t)): Example 1 V(t) increases inversely proportionally to the sum of the weights of the backlogged flows Flow 1 (w1 = 1) time Flow 2 (w2 = 1) time 3 4 5 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 V(t) C/2 C

System Virtual Time: Example w1 = 4 w2 = 1 w3 = 1 w4 = 1 w5 = 1 V(t) C/4 C/8 C/4 4 8 12 16

Fair Queueing Implementation Define - virtual finishing time of packet k of flow i - arrival time of packet k of flow i - length of packet k of flow i wi – weight of flow i The finishing time of packet k+1 of flow i is / wi

Properties of WFQ Guarantee that any packet is transmitted within packet_lengt/link_capacity of its transmission time in the fluid flow system Can be used to provide guaranteed services Achieve max-min fair allocation Can be used to protect well-behaved flows against malicious flows

Outline QoS guarantees Link sharing Service curve (short)

Hierarchical Link Sharing Resource contention/sharing at different levels Resource management policies should be set at different levels, by different entities Resource owner Service providers Organizations Applications 155 Mbps Link 100 Mbps 55 Mbps Provider 1 Provider 2 50 Mbps 50 Mbps Berkeley Stanford. 20 Mbps 10 Mbps EECS Math Campus seminar video seminar audio WEB

Hierarchical WFQ (H-WFQ) Example 10 Red session has packets backlogged at time 5 Other sessions have packets continuously backlogged 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 First red packet arrives at 5 …and it is served at 7.5 Service in fluid flow system 10 20

Packet Approximation of H-WFQ Idea 1 Select packet finishing first in H-WFQ assuming there are no future arrivals Problem: Finish order in system dependent on future arrivals Virtual time implementation won’t work Idea 2 Use a hierarchy of WFQ to approximate H-WFQ Fluid Flow H-WFQ Packetized H-WFQ 10 10 WFQ WFQ 6 4 6 4 WFQ WFQ WFQ WFQ 1 3 1 3 2 2 WFQ WFQ WFQ WFQ WFQ WFQ

Green packet finish first Problems with Idea 1 10 The order of the 4th blue packet finish time and of the first green packet finish time changes as a result of a red packet arrival 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 Green packet finish first Make decision here Blue packet finish first

Problem with Idea 2 10 A packet on the second level can miss its deadline (finish time) 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 First level packet schedule Second level packet schedule First red packet arrives at 5 …but it is served at 11 !

Solution Hierarchical-WFQ with a better implementation of WFQ, called Worst-Case Weighted Fair Queueing (WF2Q) Main idea of WF2Q Consider for scheduling only eligible packets Eligible packet at time t: a packet that has started being serviced in the fluid flow system at time t

Example Fluid-Flow System WFQ (smallest finish time first) WF2Q (smallest eligible finish time first)

Hierarchical-WF2Q Example 10 In WF2Q, all packets meet their deadlines modulo time to transmit a packet (at the line speed) at each level 5 1 1 1 1 1 4 1 First level packet schedule Second level packet schedule First red packet arrives at 5 ..and it is served at 7

Outline QoS guarantees Link sharing Service curve (short)

Bandwidth-Delay Coupling Assume An arrival curve specified by token bucket (R, r, b) A reservation request (rmin, D), where rmin – minimum bandwidth, D – maximum delay WFQ can be inefficient: to satisfy delay D, the allocated rate ra may need to be much higher than r ! slope ra slope r bits Arrival curve b*R/(R-r) D

Example End-host: request a worst-case delay D=10ms for a flow characterized by token bucket (R=1Mbps, b=10Kb, r=100Kbps) Router: allocate rate ra, where Thus, the router needs to allocate to the flow more than 5 times its average rate r ! ra = b*R / (D*(R-r) + b) = 0.52Mbps

Solution: Service Curve Generalize the service allocated to a flow Assume a flow that is idle at time s and it is backlogged during the interval (s, t) Service curve: the minimum service received by the flow during the interval (s, t) bits Arrival Curve D B S (t) = service curve t WFQ implements a linear service curve

Linear Service Curves: Example bits bits Service curves FTP Video t t Arrival process bits bits Arrival traffic t t bits bits Service t t Video packets have to wait after ftp packets t

Non-Linear Service Curves: Example bits bits Service curves FTP Video t t Arrival process bits bits Arrival traffic t t bits bits Service t t Video packets transmitted as soon as they arrive t

What You Need to Know Basic concepts Mechanisms: Arrival & service curve Token-bucket specification System virtual time / finish virtual time WFQ properties Link sharing requirements and challenges Bandwidth-delay coupling problem Mechanisms: WFQ implementation in the fluid flow & packet system You don’t need to know Details of WF2Q How service curve works