The Lepton colliders Data Base

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
July 24, 2008Super-B Mini-MAC MeetingPage 1 Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division SLAC.
Advertisements

1 Super-B Factory Scenarios John Seeman Assistant Director PPA Directorate SLAC SLUO Meeting September 11, 2006.
June 2-4, 2004 DOE HEP Program Review 1 M. Sullivan for the PEP-II Team DOE High Energy Physics Program Review June 2-4, 2004 PEP-II Status and Plans.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator Department SLUO.
SLAC Accelerator Department The PEP-II Accelerator Status and General Plans John T. Seeman Assistant Director of the Technical Division Head of the Accelerator.
Beam-beam simulations M.E. Biagini, K. Ohmi, E. Paoloni, P. Raimondi, D. Shatilov, M. Zobov INFN Frascati, KEK, INFN Pisa, SLAC, BINP April 26th, 2006.
ALPHA Storage Ring Indiana University Xiaoying Pang.
Working Group 3 Summary M. Sullivan / Y. Funakoshi.
Future Very High Luminosity Options for PEP-II John T. Seeman For the PEP-II Team e+e- Factories Workshop October 13-16, 2003.
Report on the Damping Ring Meeting at CERN, Nov , 2005 J. Gao IHEP, Beijing, China Nov. 24, 2005, ILC-Asia Meeting.
Scaling of High-Energy e+e- Ring Colliders K. Yokoya Accelerator Seminar, KEK 2012/3/15 Accelerator Seminar Yokoya 1.
Update of 3.2 km ILC DR design (DMC3) Dou Wang, Jie Gao, Gang Xu, Yiwei Wang (IHEP) IWLC2010 Monday 18 October - Friday 22 October 2010 Geneva, Switzerland.
Electron cloud in the wigglers of ILC Damping Rings L. Wang SLAC ILC Damping Rings R&D Workshop - ILCDR06 September 26-28, 2006 Cornell University.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
Luminosity of the Super-Tau-Charm Factory with Crab Waist D. Shatilov BINP, Novosibirsk TAU’08 Workshop, Satellite Meeting “On the Need for a Super-Tau-Charm.
Damping Ring Parameters and Interface to Sources S. Guiducci BTR, LNF 7 July 2011.
1 BINP Tau-Charm Project 3 February 2010, KEK, Tsukuba E.Levichev For the BINP C-Tau team.
February 5, 2005D. Rubin - Cornell1 CESR-c Status -Operations/Luminosity -Machine studies -Simulation and modeling -4.1GeV.
Beam Physics Issue in BEPCII Commisionning Xu Gang Accelerator physics group.
Prospect for an high energy factory at LNF P. Raimondi LNF Apr-10,2008.
Introduction of Accelerators for Circular Colliders 高亮度 TAU-CHARM 工厂 & 先进光源, 2014/09.
BINP tau charm plans and other projects in Turkey/China A. Bogomyagkov BINP SB RAS, Novosibirsk.
TDR and R&D Plans J. Seeman and M. Biagini For Super-B Staff.
Effect of high synchrotron tune on Beam- Beam interaction: simulation and experiment A.Temnykh for CESR operating group Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
WP9-SuperB in TIARA M. Biagini, INFN-LNF.
Dynamic Aperture Studies with Acceleraticum
Crab Waist at DAFNE: Numerical Simulations versus Experimental Results
J. Alexander + Cornell accelerator group Cornell University
Linac possibilities for a Super-B
DAFNE experience with compensating wires
Energy calibration issues for FCC-ee I. Koop, BINP, Novosibirsk
The SuperB Accelerator Lattice M. E
Report on ILC and SuperB work at LNF
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING
Why Study Electron Clouds? Methods and Tools to Study Electron Clouds
Future Collider Projects at CERN
Michael Sullivan and John Seeman SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
Design Study on High Luminosity Colliders EUROCRAB submitted to EU-FP7
The PEP-II Interaction e+e- Factories Workshop
Laboratoire de L’Accélérateur Linéaire
Top-Up Injection for PEP-II and Applications to a Higgs Factory
Status of the VEPP-2000 Collider Project at Novosibirsk
Super-B Overview John Seeman Accelerator Systems Division
Lecture 32 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture HT13 Beam-Beam I ACCELERATOR PHYSICS HT E. J. N. Wilson.
SuperB Accelerator Overview and Status
A Head-Tail Simulation Code for Electron Cloud
Luminosity Considerations for eRHIC
SuperB CDR Machine P. Raimondi for the SuperB Team Paris, May 9, 2007.
Accelerator R&D Results from the B-factory
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
CLIC damping rings working plan towards the CDR
Mini-Workshop on BEPCII Background Study
Study on Emittance Reduction with a Robinson Wiggler in HEPS
AC Power for a Super-B Factory
Beam-Beam Effects in High-Energy Colliders:
Super-B Accelerator Overview
SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov. 13th 2007
Commissioning Issues of BEPCII
Super-B Factory in a “4400m” Tunnel
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Some Issues on Beam-Beam Interaction & DA at CEPC
J. Seeman Perugia Super-B Meeting June 2009
Injection design of CEPC
DANE Compton ring for ultra high flux photons in the 100 KeV-10 MeV energy range D. Alesini (LNF, INFN Frascati)
Power Consideration of CEPC
Beam-beam simulations
JLEIC Accelerator R&D Meeting
3.2 km FODO lattice for 10 Hz operation (DMC4)
Presentation transcript:

The Lepton colliders Data Base M.E. Biagini, LNF-INFN Planning the construction of a collider means, once the energy range is chosen, to fix a goal value for the peak luminosity, and consequently choose a design strategy to reach that goal. In designing a storage ring the operational experience of similar machines is a valuable hint for what nature has allowed in that field. In this respect, a catalogue of characteristics and performances can be a very useful tool when designing new colliders or comparing operating machines performances.

Will very soon available on-line at: Published on: Will very soon available on-line at: http://www.lnf.infn.it/icfa/

Colliders in the DB (up to now) DAFNE (1.02), ADONE (0.6 to 3.1), Frascati National Laboratories, Italy VEPP-2000 (2.), Budker Institute, Novosibirsk, Russia BEPC (2. to 5.), BEPC-II (2. to 4.2), Institute of High Energy Physics, Beijing, China CESR (10.6), CESR-c (3. to 11.), Cornell University, Ithaca, US PEP-II (10.58), Stanford Linear Accelerator Centre, Menlo Park, US KEK-B (10.58), KEK, Tsukuba, Japan LEP-I (88. to 95.), LEP-II (161. to 209.), CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.

DB Structure Sheet 1: General and luminosity parameters. geometric and dynamical parameters. The luminosity data are the most important but also the most critical. A key point is that there should be consistency between peak luminosity, currents and tune shifts. This means that sometimes is not the maximum ever reached tune shift that has to be listed, but the one relative to the peak luminosity quoted. The same for the currents, since the maximum luminosity is often reached at currents lower than the maximum storable. Crossing angle, Piwinski angle, beam sizes in collisions and injection parameters are here. Sheet 2: Lattice parameters: magnetic layout, including fields and gradients, vacuum parameters, impedance and e-cloud instability observation. Sheet 3: Optics parameters: b, h, beam sizes, tunes, and the most important parameters, including bunch length, lifetimes and damping times. Sheet 4: RF related parameters: RF hardware and dynamics.

General Parameters

General Parameters (cont’d)

Lattice Parameters

Lattice Parameters (cont’d)

Optics Parameters

Optics Parameters (cont’d)

RF Parameters

RF Parameters (cont’d)

Future... The more efficient way to proceed is probably that for each collider, or each Laboratory, there is a person in charge of keeping the “dynamical” data updated. We also would like to encourage those designing new accelerators, or upgrading existing ones, to communicate the new data so that they can be included.

Many thanks to... D. Rice for CESR and CERC-c; Huang Nan, Jiuqing Wang for BEPC and BEPC-II; Y. Cai, M.H. Donald, M. Placidi, J.T. Seeman, M.K. Sullivan for PEP-II; Y. Funakoshi for KEK-B; A.A. Valishev for VEPP-2000; H. Burkhardt for LEP-1 and LEP-2; M.A. Preger for Adone; C. Biscari, S. Guiducci, M. Zobov for DAFNE.