Outcomes After Sleeve Lung Resections Versus Pneumonectomy in the United States Zaid M. Abdelsattar, MD, MS, K. Robert Shen, MD, Sai Yendamuri, MD, Stephen Cassivi, MD, Francis C. Nichols, MD, Dennis A. Wigle, MD, PhD, Mark S. Allen, MD, Shanda H. Blackmon, MD, MPH The Annals of Thoracic Surgery Volume 104, Issue 5, Pages 1656-1664 (November 2017) DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.086 Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
Fig 1 (A) Overall survival stratified by the type of operation in the unmatched overall cohort. (B) Overall survival in the propensity score–matched cohort. Note that the observed difference in survival (p < 0.001) in the matched cohort is mainly realized in the first year after the operation, after which the rate of decay becomes negligible (conditional p = 0.057 at 18 months). (C) Overall survival in the propensity score matched cohort stratified by carcinoid vs non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) histology. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2017 104, 1656-1664DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.086) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions
Fig 2 Risk-adjusted perioperative outcomes stratified by hospital sleeve-to-pneumonectomy (S:P) ratio quintile. Note that the outcomes are equivalent across quintiles of S:P ratios. Univariate comparisons are made between the highest and lowest quintiles. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery 2017 104, 1656-1664DOI: (10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.05.086) Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Terms and Conditions