Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate-term results Eugene A. Grossi, MD, Angelo LaPietra,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Resection of ascending aortic aneurysm without use of an interposition aortic graft John S. Ikonomidis, MD, PhD, FRCS(C), Abe DeAnda, MD, D.Craig Miller,

Advertisements

Max B. Mitchell, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Minimally invasive technology for mitral valve surgery via left thoracotomy: experience with forty cases Paul C Saunders, MD, Eugene A Grossi, MD, Ram.

Endoscopic mitral valve repair: Feasible, reproducible, and durable

Minimally Invasive Versus Sternotomy Approach for Mitral Valve Surgery in Patients Greater Than 70 Years Old: A Propensity-Matched Comparison David M.

Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery is associated with equivalent cost and shorter hospital stay when compared with traditional sternotomy Pavan.

The days of future past Neel K. Ranganath, MD, Aubrey C. Galloway, MD

Mitral surgery on the precipice of transformation

Thoracoscopic management of postoperative esophageal leak

Amine Mazine, MD, MSc, Subodh Verma, MD, PhD, Bobby Yanagawa, MD, PhD

George Gogoladze, MD, Sophia L

Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive versus traditional sternotomy mitral valve surgery in elderly patients Alexander Iribarne, MD, MS, Rachel.

Victor van Berkel, MD, PhD

Computer-generated three-dimensional animation of the mitral valve

A new approach: Ischemic mitral regurgitation guidelines by and for surgeons Patrick M. McCarthy, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Functional mitral stenosis after mitral valve repair is a true anatomic problem that originates from the time of surgery Vincent Chan, MD, MPH, Thierry.

Angelo LaPietra, MD, Eugene A. Grossi, MD, Bradley B. Pua, BS, Rick A

Ischemic mitral valve reconstruction and replacement: Comparison of long-term survival and complications Eugene A. Grossi, MD, Judith D. Goldberg, ScD,

The lord of the rings Antonio Miceli, MD, PhD

Long-term results of mitral valve repair for myxomatous disease with and without chordal replacement with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene sutures Tirone.

The variability of the mitral valve anatomy and terminology

Juan N. Pulido, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Support Your Specialty

Quality of mitral valve surgery at the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Juan A. Crestanello, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in intermediate-risk patients

Innovation and science: The future of valve design

It's not “just a shunt” but sometimes it should be…

Do we need a bibliometrician to know which way the wind is blowing?

A first start for lung transplantation?

Intermediate-Term Outcome Of Mitral Reconstruction In Cardiomyopathy

Robert W. Emery, MD, Christopher C. Krogh, Kit V. Arom, MD, PhD, Ann M

Surgery for aortic and mitral valve disease in the United States: A trend of change in surgical practice between 1998 and 2005 Scott D. Barnett, PhD,

Commentary: Faster recovery after complex neonatal cardiac surgery

Jeevanantham Rajeswaran, PhD, Eugene H. Blackstone, MD

Derrick Y. Tam, MD, Stephen E. Fremes, MD, MSc

Fenton H. McCarthy, MD, MS, Nimesh D. Desai, MD, PhD

S. Martens, MD, M. Dietrich, MD, M. Doss, MD, G

Replicating the success of mitral valve repair in the aortic valve

A fate worse than death Jennifer S. Lawton, MD

Attachment disorder in thoracoabdominal surgery

Surgical Treatment of Aortic Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis: A 20-Year Single-Center Experience Sossio Perrotta, MD, Anders Jeppsson, MD, PhD, Victoria.

Manuel J. Antunes, MD, PhD, DSc

Video-assisted resection for lung cancer results in fewer complications Lunxu Liu, PhD, MD, FRCS The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Commentary: Ongoing advancements in the understanding of tricuspid valve dynamics and functional geometry Daniel J.P. Burns, MD, MPhil The Journal of.

Using bilateral internal thoracic arteries—just do it

Michael Mack, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Mitral homografts for total tricuspid valve replacement: Comparison of two techniques Ulrik Hvass, MD, Frank Baron, MD, Dominique Fourchy, MD, Yves Pansard,

Warfarin or aspirin after mitral valve repair: Why work harder?

Process is helpful, but the procurement problem persists

Jason J. Han, MD, Pavan Atluri, MD

Bryan M. Burt, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Discussion The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Tai Ji: The law of inflammatory response

Tissue valve, nitinol stent, or storage solution

The future of cardiac surgery training: A survival guide

Commentary: Have mitral valve simulators made it to reality?

Building a clinical program in a single institution

The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

“The more things change…”: The challenges ahead

Managing conflicts of interest

First in line for robotic surgery: Would you want to know?

More than vital: Who bears the burden?

Repetition is the mother of skill

Aortic root replacement versus aortic valve replacement: a case-match study Paul P Urbanski, MD, Matthias Wagner, MD, Michael Zacher, MD, Robert W Hacker,

Which biologic valve should we select for the 45- to 65-year-old age group requiring aortic valve replacement? F. Dagenais, MD, P. Cartier, MD, P. Voisine,

Journal changes and initiatives

Zone zero thoracic endovascular aortic repair is all about “location, location, location” Kevin L. Greason, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular.

Zipping up after a median sternotomy: Are we at the end of the wire?

Presentation transcript:

Minimally invasive versus sternotomy approaches for mitral reconstruction: Comparison of intermediate-term results Eugene A. Grossi, MD, Angelo LaPietra, MD, Greg H. Ribakove, MD, Julie Delianides, MA, Rick Esposito, MD, Alfred T. Culliford, MD, Christopher C. Derivaux, MD, Robert M. Applebaum, MD, Itzhak Kronzon, MD, Bryan M. Steinberg, MD, F.Gregory Baumann, PhD, Aubrey C. Galloway, MD, Stephen B. Colvin, MD The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Volume 121, Issue 4, Pages 708-713 (April 2001) DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.112626 Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 1 A, Cumulative survival from late cardiac death. B, Cumulative survival from all late death. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 121, 708-713DOI: (10.1067/mtc.2001.112626) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 2 Cumulative survival from mitral reoperation of any cause. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 121, 708-713DOI: (10.1067/mtc.2001.112626) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions

Fig. 3 Cumulative survival from all valve-related complications (anticoagulant, endocarditis, and thromoembolic) and mitral reoperations. SS, Standard sternotomy approach; MI, minimally invasive approach. The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 2001 121, 708-713DOI: (10.1067/mtc.2001.112626) Copyright © 2001 American Association for Thoracic Surgery Terms and Conditions