Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Intermediate-level learner

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Figure 3. Comparison of class performance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Source Sum of Squares (SS) df Mean Square (MS) F p-value

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Teachers Response (N= 11)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

student achievement scores

Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group

Table 8. Unit Key Performance Indicators

Table 7. Clinical Practice

Table 3. Shared Governance

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

in the last evaluation of the software

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Contrast equality of group means

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Table 2. Test of Normality

Table 1. Population by University

Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )

Number of questionnaires sent out

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Behavioral strategies

Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

chemistry that are involved in peer group

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Sample items for measuring attitude towards e-learning

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Figure 2. MDS-T configuration for the thirteen (13) criteria (and their Place) in DPESS in Athens (NKUA) Chris P. Lamprou et al. Evaluating the effectiveness.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

MASTERS DEGREE HOLDERS

Table 1. Illiteracy distribution by Gender and Place (No. in million)

Table 1. Students` responses

Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Independent Samples Test Application of ICT by Gender

Table 6. Range Comparisons amongst Subgroups and grade levels

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Presentation transcript:

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%) SD I enjoy using technology for personal/recreational matters 34 58 7 1 I am confident using technology for personal/recreational matters 38 48 13 I have a positive attitude towards technology for recreational matters 40 56 4 I enjoy using technology for learning 41 55 3 I am confident using technology for learning 37 8 I have a positive attitude towards technology for learning 36 6 SA = Strongly Agree, A = Agree, D = Disagree, SD = Strongly Disagree. Jorge Reyna et al. Implementing Digital Media Presentations as Assessment Tools for Pharmacology Students. American Journal of Educational Research, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 14, 983-991. doi:10.12691/education-4-14-1 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.