Table 3. Direct Effects for the Dyadic Model

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1
Advertisements

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships
Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education
Table 3. Quran memorization students survey responses about App
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1
osteoporosis among the studied working women (n= 365)
Research, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 4, doi: /ajnr-5-4-6
SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
student achievement scores
Table 11. Chi-Square Analysis Based on Grade Shift for Study Group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 4. Percentage of post-harvest waste reported by the farmers
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Age-sex literacy rates by various surveys.
Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions
Total CO2 Emissions (Electricity + Fossil Fuel)
Age-sex employments by various surveys.
Test Mean Std. Dev. Mathematics English Language
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Rating of Water Quality
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 8. Income and expenditure of CFUGs in Nepal
Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio
Table 1. Rice yield in MT (Source-USDA, Foreign Agricultural Service)
Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)
Table 1. Diagnostic methods for systemic fungal infection (n=70)
Table 2. Modal parameters estimated by Pulse Reflex®
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 5. Pvalues of ttests for direction a
Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.
Table 1. LLC Academics Outcome Report ( )
Simulation Frequency(Hz)
Number of questionnaires sent out
Table 6. Pvalues of ttests for direction b
Table 1. Descriptive Statistics
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 6. The effect of porosity on pore velocity
Behavioral strategies
Table 4. Summary of Multi ways ANOVA results
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
chemistry that are involved in peer group
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 3. (d) Summary of two way ANOVA for overall adjustment
Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant
Table 4. Value creation (Y2)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Table 7. The Result of T Test After Treatment
Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Educational Attainment
Average Execution Time in seconds
Sum of Square df Mean Square F Sig Health Between Groups
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P
© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.
Presentation transcript:

Table 3. Direct Effects for the Dyadic Model Actor effects Partner effects W M W -M M -W Warmth-trustworthiness Sim-Com 0.30 0.26 - Com-Dis 0.43 0.16 0.12 Dis-Cop 0.50 0.29 Cop-Sat 0.23 0.19 0.17 Sim-Sat 0.14 0.33 0.06 Vitality-attractiveness 0.37 0.04 0.31 0.20 0.05 0.34 0.21 Intimacy-loyality 0.83 0.76 0.13 0.88 0.71 0.24 0.08 0.78 0.67 0.25 0.93 1.00 0.40 0.10 0.01 Passion 0.41 0.58 0.15 0.42 0.46 0.18 0.53 0.44 0.56 0.55 0.32 Note: W – Women, M – Men, Sim – Similarity, Com – Communication, Dis – Discrepancy, Cop – Coping, Sat – Satisfaction. Iulia-Diana Muraru et al. From Perceived Similarity of Ideals to Relationship Satisfaction: A Path Analysis Using Dyadic Data. American Journal of Applied Psychology, 2017, Vol. 5, No. 1, 12-17. doi:10.12691/ajap-5-1-3 © The Author(s) 2015. Published by Science and Education Publishing.