Combining Different Measurements

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Seeing Dark Energy (or the cosmological constant which is the simplest form of DE) Professor Bob Nichol (ICG, Portsmouth)
Advertisements

Observing Dark Energy SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
21 November 2005Bruce BassettSA COSMO SCALPEL AND SALT SA COSMO Main aim is to provide a place where students and post-docs can meet and learn from each.
Weighing Neutrinos including the Largest Photometric Galaxy Survey: MegaZ DR7 Moriond 2010Shaun Thomas: UCL “A combined constraint on the Neutrinos” Arxiv:
“The Dark Side of the SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Chris Miller, David Wake, Brice Menard, Idit Zehavi, Ryan Scranton, Gordon Richards, Daniel Eisenstein,
Institute for Computational Cosmology Durham University Shaun Cole for Carlos S. Frenk Institute for Computational Cosmology, Durham Cosmological simulations.
Cosmological Constraints from Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations
The Physics of Large Scale Structure and New Results from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Beth Reid ICC Barcelona arXiv: arXiv: * Colloborators:
Current Observational Constraints on Dark Energy Chicago, December 2001 Wendy Freedman Carnegie Observatories, Pasadena CA.
CMB: Sound Waves in the Early Universe Before recombination: Universe is ionized. Photons provide enormous pressure and restoring force. Photon-baryon.
SDSS-II SN survey: Constraining Dark Energy with intermediate- redshift probes Hubert Lampeitl University Portsmouth, ICG In collaboration with: H.J. Seo,
Observational Cosmology - a laboratory for fundamental physics MPI-K, Heidelberg Marek Kowalski.
Galaxy and Mass Power Spectra Shaun Cole ICC, University of Durham Main Contributors: Ariel Sanchez (Cordoba) Steve Wilkins (Cambridge) Imperial College.
Christian Wagner - September Potsdam Nonlinear Power Spectrum Emulator Christian Wagner in collaboration with Katrin Heitmann, Salman Habib,
Observational Cosmology - a unique laboratory for fundamental physics Marek Kowalski Physikalisches Institut Universität Bonn.
Marek Kowalski Moriond Cosmology The “Union” Supernova Ia Compilation and new Cosmological Constraints Marek Kowalski Humboldt Universität.
Physics 133: Extragalactic Astronomy and Cosmology Lecture 9; February
Lecture 2: Observational constraints on dark energy Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Falsifying Paradigms for Cosmic Acceleration Michael Mortonson Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics University of Chicago January 22, 2009.
1 SDSS-II Supernova Survey Josh Frieman Leopoldina Dark Energy Conference October 8, 2008 See also: poster by Hubert Lampeitl, talk by Bob Nichol.
Constraints on the Dark Side of the Universe Alessandro Melchiorri.
COMING HOME Michael S. Turner Kavli Institute for Cosmological Physics The University of Chicago.
Dark Energy and Cosmic Sound Daniel Eisenstein (University of Arizona) Michael Blanton, David Hogg, Bob Nichol, Nikhil Padmanabhan, Will Percival, David.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
“Observing Dark Energy” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Special thanks to Masao Sako, David Weinberg, Andy Connolly, Albert Stebbins, Rob Crittenden, Daniel.
Polarization-assisted WMAP-NVSS Cross Correlation Collaborators: K-W Ng(IoP, AS) Ue-Li Pen (CITA) Guo Chin Liu (ASIAA)
Dark energy I : Observational constraints Shinji Tsujikawa (Tokyo University of Science)
Dark Energy & LSS SDSS & DES teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth) Marie Curie (EC)
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
Cosmological Particle Physics Tamara Davis University of Queensland With Signe Riemer-Sørensen, David Parkinson, Chris Blake, and the WiggleZ team.
How Standard are Cosmological Standard Candles? Mathew Smith and Collaborators (UCT, ICG, Munich, LCOGT and SDSS-II) SKA Bursary Conference 02/12/2010.
WFMOS KAOS concept identified via the Gemini Aspen Process and completed a Feasibility Study (Barden et al.) Proposed MOS on Subaru via an international.
Constraining the Lattice Fluid Dark Energy from SNe Ia, BAO and OHD 报告人: 段效贤 中国科学院国家天文台 2012 年两岸粒子物理与宇宙学研讨会.
David Weinberg, Ohio State University Dept. of Astronomy and CCAPP The Cosmological Content of Galaxy Redshift Surveys or Why are FoMs all over the map?
Observational constraints and cosmological parameters Antony Lewis Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
Michael Doran Institute for Theoretical Physics Universität Heidelberg Time Evolution of Dark Energy (if any …)
中国科技大学交叉中心 吴普训 宁波大学理学院 Distance duality relation and cosmic opacity Collaborators: Zhengxiang Li, Jun Chen, Hongwei Yu Li, Wu and Yu, APJL.
A. Ealet, S. Escoffier, D. Fouchez, F. Henry-Couannier, S. Kermiche, C. Tao, A. Tilquin September 2012.
Using Baryon Acoustic Oscillations to test Dark Energy Will Percival The University of Portsmouth (including work as part of 2dFGRS and SDSS collaborations)
Wiggles and Bangs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams. Understanding Dark Energy No compelling theory, must be observational driven We can make progress on questions:
“The Dark SDSS” Bob Nichol ICG, Portsmouth Special thanks to Masao Sako, David Weinberg, Andy Connolly, Albert Stebbins, Rob Crittenden, Daniel Eisenstein,
BAOs SDSS, DES, WFMOS teams (Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth)
Cosmic Inhomogeneities and Accelerating Expansion Ho Le Tuan Anh National University of Singapore PAQFT Nov 2008.
DETERMINATION OF THE HUBBLE CONSTANT FROM X-RAY AND SUNYAEV-ZELDOVICH EFFECT OBSERVATIONS OF HIGH-REDSHIFT GALAXY CLUSTERS MAX BONAMENTE – UNIVERSITY OF.
Cosmic shear and intrinsic alignments Rachel Mandelbaum April 2, 2007 Collaborators: Christopher Hirata (IAS), Mustapha Ishak (UT Dallas), Uros Seljak.
Will Percival The University of Portsmouth
The Feasibility of Constraining Dark Energy Using LAMOST Redshift Survey L.Sun.
Extending the cosmic ladder to z~7 and beyond: using SNIa to calibrate GRB standard candels Speaker: Speaker: Shuang-Nan Zhang Collaborators: Nan Liang,
Latest Results from LSS & BAO Observations Will Percival University of Portsmouth StSci Spring Symposium: A Decade of Dark Energy, May 7 th 2008.
Searching High-z Supernovae with HSC and WFMOS
ERE 2008September 15-19, Spanish Relativity Meeting 2008, Salamanca, September (2008) Avoiding the DARK ENERGY coincidence problem with a COSMIC.
Jochen Weller XLI Recontres de Moriond March, 18-25, 2006 Constraining Inverse Curvature Gravity with Supernovae O. Mena, J. Santiago and JW PRL, 96, ,
Observational evidence for Dark Energy
Uncorrelated bins, two-population Supernovae, and Modified Gravity Asantha Cooray STScI - Dark Energy, May 08 Dark energy: Devdeep Sarkar (UCI) Alex Amblard.
A New Route to the Hubble Constant (and Dark Energy) from HST Adam Riess (JHU, STScI) SHOES Collaboration.
Probing Dark Energy with Cosmological Observations Fan, Zuhui ( 范祖辉 ) Dept. of Astronomy Peking University.
Dark Energy: The Observational Challenge David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
The Nature of Dark Energy David Weinberg Ohio State University Based in part on Kujat, Linn, Scherrer, & Weinberg 2002, ApJ, 572, 1.
Constraining Dark Energy with Double Source Plane Strong Lenses Thomas Collett With: Matt Auger, Vasily Belokurov, Phil Marshall and Alex Hall ArXiv:
Thomas Collett Institute of Astronomy, Cambridge
The Dark Energy Survey Probe origin of Cosmic Acceleration:
Probing the Coupling between Dark Components of the Universe
Modern cosmology 1: The Hubble Constant
STRUCTURE FORMATION MATTEO VIEL INAF and INFN Trieste
Cosmology from Large Scale Structure Surveys
Shintaro Nakamura (Tokyo University of Science)
Detection of integrated Sachs-Wolfe effect by cross-correlation of the
Measurements of Cosmological Parameters
Kinematic Dipole Anisotropy from COBE
ν Are we close to measuring the neutrino hierarchy? Filipe B. Abdalla
Presentation transcript:

Combining Different Measurements Bob Nichol, ICG Portsmouth Tommaso Giannantonio, H-J Seo, Dan Carson, Hubert Lampeitl*, Josh Frieman, Bruce Bassett, Mat Smith, Will Percival (for SDSS Collaboration) * see poster

BAO with Redshift Measure ratio of volume averaged distance Flat CDM = 1.67 Systematics (damping, BAO fitting) also ~1Next set of measurements will need to worry about this 99.74% detection z~0.2 143k + 465k 79k z~0.35 Percival et al. (2006) Percival et al. 2007

Cosmological Constraints Flatness assumed, constant w With CMB Only D0.35 /D0.2 W w= P/ 3 1 Favors w<-1 at 1.4 2 m

Cosmological Constraints Flatness assumed m = 0.249 ± 0.018 w = -1.004 ± 0.089 With CMB Only D0.35 /D0.2 W W w= P/ 3 1 D0.35 /D0.2 = 1.66 ± 0.01 2 m m

Discrepancy? 2.4 difference between SN & BAO. The BAO want more acceleration at z<0.3 than predicted by z>0.3 SNe ~1 possible from details of BAO damping - more complex then we thought Assumption of flatness and constant w needs to be revisited

Revisit with SDSS SNe 500 Ia’s 102 from 05 LCDM line 2s contours Only look at measurements at z<0.4 500 Ia’s 102 from 05 LCDM line 2s contours q0 = -0.34 (2s) SDSS BAO points

Cosmological Constraints Only look at measurements at z<0.4 ISW (z<0.4) Peacock et al Flat wCDM W SNe BAO w= -1 (15% stat & sym) SDSS BAO points

Curvature ISW (z<0.4) Peacock et al Only look at measurements at z<0.4 ISW (z<0.4) Peacock et al

Distance Duality Returning to BAO and SN discrepancy?

Cosmic Chronometers 5500 LRGs Carson et al. (in prep) Age of galaxies constraints age of universe (Jimenez & Loeb 2002) 5500 LRGs Carson et al. (in prep) (Using Thomas et al. models, marginalised over alpha-enhancement and metallicity)

Cosmic Chronometers II Age of galaxies constraints age of universe (Jimenez & Loeb 2002) ALL FLAT raw t(z) HST TSR ISW WMAP

Differential Ages H(z) We find H(z=0.2) ~ 80 +/- 12 km/s Same value as Gaztanaga et al. but not yet competitive in error

Conclusions Tension remains between BAO and SN (over same redshift range). But ~2s at best Cosmic Chronometers provide constraints on age-redshift relation (thus h and Wm). Also provide constraints on H(z) but not yet competitive BOSS could do much better, especially if we can do better on the stellar modeling (Maraston et al.)