Structure of Escherichia coli Ribose-5-Phosphate Isomerase

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Javed A. Khan, Ben M. Dunn, Liang Tong  Structure 
Advertisements

Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
R.Ian Menz, John E. Walker, Andrew G.W. Leslie  Cell 
Crystal Structure of the Tandem Phosphatase Domains of RPTP LAR
Volume 9, Issue 11, Pages (November 2001)
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Volume 10, Issue 8, Pages (August 2002)
Structure of the Rab7:REP-1 Complex
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Volume 3, Issue 12, Pages (December 1995)
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages (October 2002)
by Alexey Dementiev, Abel Silva, Calvin Yee, Zhe Li, Michael T
Volume 5, Issue 1, Pages (January 1997)
Volume 8, Issue 12, Pages (December 2000)
Crystal structure of human mitochondrial NAD(P)+-dependent malic enzyme: a new class of oxidative decarboxylases  Yingwu Xu, Girija Bhargava, Hao Wu,
Tom Huxford, De-Bin Huang, Shiva Malek, Gourisankar Ghosh  Cell 
Structure of RGS4 Bound to AlF4−-Activated Giα1: Stabilization of the Transition State for GTP Hydrolysis  John J.G. Tesmer, David M. Berman, Alfred G.
Volume 10, Issue 12, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Xiao Tao, Zhiru Yang, Liang Tong  Structure 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages (July 1998)
A biosynthetic thiolase in complex with a reaction intermediate: the crystal structure provides new insights into the catalytic mechanism  Yorgo Modis,
Crystal Structures of Ral-GppNHp and Ral-GDP Reveal Two Binding Sites that Are Also Present in Ras and Rap  Nathan I. Nicely, Justin Kosak, Vesna de Serrano,
Crystal Structures of a Novel Ferric Reductase from the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Its Complex with NADP+  Hsiu-Ju Chiu, Eric.
Volume 15, Issue 10, Pages (October 2008)
Volume 6, Issue 11, Pages (November 1998)
Volume 133, Issue 1, Pages (April 2008)
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages (June 2004)
The 1.9 Å Structure of α-N-Acetylgalactosaminidase
Structural Analysis of Ligand Stimulation of the Histidine Kinase NarX
Moosa Mohammadi, Joseph Schlessinger, Stevan R Hubbard  Cell 
Andrew H. Huber, W.James Nelson, William I. Weis  Cell 
Volume 9, Issue 8, Pages (August 2001)
Daniel Peisach, Patricia Gee, Claudia Kent, Zhaohui Xu  Structure 
Qian Steven Xu, Rebecca B. Kucera, Richard J. Roberts, Hwai-Chen Guo 
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages (May 2006)
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages (April 2002)
Crystal Structure of the Borna Disease Virus Nucleoprotein
Crystal Structure of the DegS Stress Sensor
Volume 6, Issue 6, Pages (December 2000)
Volume 111, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages (November 2000)
Activation Mechanism of the MAP Kinase ERK2 by Dual Phosphorylation
Meigang Gu, Kanagalaghatta R. Rajashankar, Christopher D. Lima 
The structure of the C-terminal domain of methionine synthase: presenting S- adenosylmethionine for reductive methylation of B12  Melinda M Dixon, Sha.
Crystal Structure of Saccharopine Reductase from Magnaporthe grisea, an Enzyme of the α-Aminoadipate Pathway of Lysine Biosynthesis  Eva Johansson, James.
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages (March 2008)
Crystal Structure of 4-Amino-5-Hydroxymethyl-2- Methylpyrimidine Phosphate Kinase from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.3 Å Resolution  Gong Cheng, Eric M.
Volume 34, Issue 3, Pages (May 2009)
Neali Armstrong, Eric Gouaux  Neuron 
Structure of the Staphylococcus aureus AgrA LytTR Domain Bound to DNA Reveals a Beta Fold with an Unusual Mode of Binding  David J. Sidote, Christopher.
Hideki Kusunoki, Ruby I MacDonald, Alfonso Mondragón  Structure 
Jue Wang, Jia-Wei Wu, Zhi-Xin Wang  Structure 
The 2.0 å structure of a cross-linked complex between snowdrop lectin and a branched mannopentaose: evidence for two unique binding modes  Christine Schubert.
Volume 6, Issue 8, Pages (August 1998)
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages (November 2004)
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages (March 2001)
Kristopher Josephson, Naomi J. Logsdon, Mark R. Walter  Immunity 
Structure of the Histone Acetyltransferase Hat1
Volume 7, Issue 12, Pages (January 1999)
The Structure of Sortase B, a Cysteine Transpeptidase that Tethers Surface Protein to the Staphylococcus aureus Cell Wall  Yinong Zong, Sarkis K Mazmanian,
Volume 126, Issue 4, Pages (August 2006)
Structure of E. coli 5′-methylthioadenosine/S-adenosylhomocysteine Nucleosidase Reveals Similarity to the Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylases  Jeffrey E.
The Structure of T. aquaticus DNA Polymerase III Is Distinct from Eukaryotic Replicative DNA Polymerases  Scott Bailey, Richard A. Wing, Thomas A. Steitz 
The 1.4 Å Crystal Structure of Kumamolysin
Structure of GABARAP in Two Conformations
Volume 13, Issue 6, Pages (March 2004)
Luhua Lai, Hisao Yokota, Li-Wei Hung, Rosalind Kim, Sung-Hou Kim 
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages (February 2000)
Presentation transcript:

Structure of Escherichia coli Ribose-5-Phosphate Isomerase Rong-guang Zhang, C.Evalena Andersson, Alexei Savchenko, Tatiana Skarina, Elena Evdokimova, Steven Beasley, Cheryl H Arrowsmith, Aled M Edwards, Andrzej Joachimiak, Sherry L Mowbray  Structure  Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages 31-42 (January 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4

Figure 1 RpiA Reaction The expected catalytic acids and bases are placed with respect to the substrates, products, and intermediates. Carbon atoms of the sugars are numbered. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 2 Enzymatic Characterization Data from a typical series of kinetic experiments are shown, together with the curve calculated from the Michaelis-Menten equation using the overall average kcat of 2100 s−1 and Km of 3.1 mM (enzyme concentration 2.2 nM). An insert presents the same data in a Hanes/Woolf plot; the line calculated with the average kinetic constants is also shown. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 3 Representative Section of Electron Density in the Original MAD Map Contoured at 1 σ. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 4 Dimer of RpiA (A) The two subunits of RpiA are shown, each color coded, going through the rainbow from blue at the N terminus to red at the C terminus. (B) Topology diagram of a subunit, colored in the same way. First and last residues of secondary structural elements are indicated, along with the naming convention. Three active site residues (Asp81, Asp84, and Lys94) identified by earlier studies [2] are shown as magenta stars, while a fourth catalytic residue (Glu103) is shown as a red star. Five other residues (Lys7, Ser30, Thr31, Asp118, and Lys121), which contribute to a phosphate binding site, are indicated with orange stars. The loop that acts as a hinge within the subunit is red. (C) Comparison of the two subunits of the apo structure, illustrating the conformational differences observed. Residues 68–205 were superimposed, with the N-terminal domain of the A molecule in rainbow coloring and the B molecule in gray. The axis that describes the rotation of the N-terminal portion of the structure with respect to the rest is shown as a black line, and the putative hinge is marked in red. The groove in the enzyme surface that is affected by conformational differences is indicated. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 5 Sequence Conservation in the RpiA Family Eight representative sequences are aligned, and shaded according to the degree of conservation: E. coli (gi|1789270), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (gi|9946176), Methanococcus jannaschii (gi|2826437), Pyrococcus horikoshii (gi|21730744), Caenorhabditis elegans (gi|17551757), Mus musculus (gi|836673), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (gi|1262139), and Spinacia oleracea (gi|18654316). Residues previously implicated in catalysis by mutagenesis studies [2] are indicated by “c,” and an additional catalytic residue suggested by the present analysis by “a.” Residues of the phosphate binding site are marked by a capital “P” if they are directly involved in binding, and by a small “p” if their role is indirect. Residues in the dimer interface are also marked “d.” The segments of glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase that match within a 3.8 Å cutoff in the structural alignment are shown, together with the starting residue number of each segment; three key conserved residues of the phosphate binding site of the deaminase are shaded black. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 6 Complex with Inhibitor (A) Stereo diagram of the Cα backbone of the B subunit of E. coli RpiA, numbered every twentieth residue. The molecule is color coded according to sequence conservation in the RpiA family, based on the alignment in Figure 5: red is most conserved, and green is least conserved. The side chains of the residues of the active site are shown, together with the arabinose-5-phosphate inhibitor (cyan). Neighboring portions of the A subunit of the same dimer are gray. (B) Fo − Fc map of the active site of the B subunit, in the last refinement cycle before inclusion of arabinose-5-phosphate in the phases; the position of the inhibitor in the last refinement cycle is shown for comparison. The C1 and C2 atoms of the inhibitor are marked with asterisks. Residues in the catalytic site are labeled gray. Residues of the phosphate binding site are lilac and labeled with black italics. (C) Interactions between the inhibitor and the B subunit; those for the A molecule are the same. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 7 Comparison with Glucosamine-6-Phosphate Deaminase (A) Close-up of the RpiA active site. The protein structure is shown as a ribbon using the rainbow coloring introduced in Figure 4. The inhibitor is gray, with a plum-colored phosphate atom; carbon atoms are numbered. Catalytic residues suggested by site-directed mutations or by location within the structure have gold carbon atoms in a ball-and-stick representation, and are labeled with plain gray text. Carbon atoms of residues of the phosphate binding site (labeled in black italics) are lilac. (B) Close-up of the active site of glucosamine-6-phosphate deaminase. The view of the enzyme is similar to that used for RpiA in (A). The bound ligand in this case (carbons are numbered) is fructose-6-phosphate, the substrate for the back reaction. The main catalytic residues, Asp72 and His143, are labeled in plain gray text, and residues of the phosphate binding site that have a similar function in RpiA are shown with black italics. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)

Figure 8 Proposed Mechanism for RpiA Catalysis The two main stages of the catalytic reaction, ring opening and isomerization, are shown together with the groups of the enzyme believed to be important, as described in the text. Structure 2003 11, 31-42DOI: (10.1016/S0969-2126(02)00933-4)