Submitted by the Secretary

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY
Advertisements

The application of real-time distraction monitoring to driver safety systems Matthew R. Smith Gerald J. Witt Debi L. Bakowski January 25, 2007.
Smartbrake Reducing Accidents smartbrake.com.au Smartbrake Presentation.
Semi Autonomous SafetyFeatures of Automobiles Semi Autonomous Safety Features of Automobiles Alex Riolo.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Alrik L. Svenson US Department of Transportation National Highway Traffic Safety Administration IntelliDrive.
Hazard and Incident Warning « Majority of events occurring on the road represent a danger for road users » By transmitting road events and road status.
OICA/CLEPA Homework Part I HMI, Driver in/out of the Loop Submitted by the experts of OICA/CLEPA Tokyo, June 2015 Informal Document ACSF
Proposal of Automated Driving from Ad- hoc group on LKAS/RCP Submitted by the Chair of the Special Interest Group on Lane Keeping Assist Systems (LKAS)
Safety Plans December 10, 2014 Marguerite.
1 Different use cases for ACSF Prepared from the experts of OICA and CLEPA Informal Document ACSF
3rd ACSF meeting Munich, September 2-3 Industry proposals for ACSF status definition and HMI Informal Document: ACSF Submitted by the experts from.
Presentation for Document ACSF-03-03_rev1 Oliver Kloeckner September rd meeting of the IG ASCF Munich, Airport Informal Document.
Cars - the better drivers ?
© Siemens AG, 2002 s CP RS Agenda The Role of IT for Accident-free Driving Interaction with driver’s physical condition Interaction with the roadside environment.
Difference for "Automatically commanded steering function", "Corrective steering function" and " Autonomous Steering System " Informal Document: ACSF
Vehicle Safety - (R)Evolution of Driving Assist Systems Jochen Schäfer Heiner Hunold Submitted by the experts from Informal document GRRF th GRRF,
Identification of regulatory needs for ACSF Oliver Kloeckner 16-17th June nd meeting of the IG ASCF Tokyo – Jasic Office Informal Document.
Driver Reaction Time AEBS/LDWS Event Recognition Focus on event Event analysing 0,48s 0,93s 0,45s Base re- action time Starting muscular.
Protective Braking for ACSF Informal Document: ACSF
Minimum Risk Manoeuvres (MRM)
TMALL 0143 Presentation engelsk v 1.0 Dr. Matts-Åke Belin Swedish Transport Administration Vision Zero Academy
In-field evaluation of the effects of Continuous Driver Support on driver behaviour András Várhelyi Anna Persson Clemens Kaufmann.
5 th ACSF meeting French views Bonn January 2016 Informal Document - ACSF Submitted by the expert of France.
1 6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016 Requirements for “Sensor view” & Environment monitoring version 1.0 Transmitted by the Experts of OICA and CLEPA.
Sample Workbook for Crash Avoidance Technologies Focus Groups.
Transmitted by the Experts of TRL (EC)
Informal document GRRF-84-32
Informal Document: ACSF-06-16
Vehicle to Vehicle Communication
Discussion paper – Major Issues
7th ACSF meeting London, June 28-30, 2016
HISTORY FLATBED ACQUISITION
Presentation of ACSF C tests
Informal Working Group on ACSF
Submitted by the experts of Japan Informal Document: ACSF-06-25
Industry proposal Driver availability recognition system
Informal Document: ACSF Rev.1
Automatic Emergency Braking Systems (AEBS)
Timing to be activated the hazard lights
The Safety Technologies to Consider While Buying a New Car.
Informal Document: ACSF-16-09
Accelerating the Introduction of
Informal document GRRF-86-36
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
TRANSPORTATION TUESDAY
Industry Homework from AEB 02
ACSF-19, September 03-05, 2018, Paris
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
DATA STORAGE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DRIVING (DSSAD)
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
ACSF C tests Prepared by JAPAN 15 November, 2017
Signalling of information and warnings
Quintessences Proposal for Category C of Germany and Japan
AEB IWG 06 – Industry Input
Reason for performance difference between LVW and GVW
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Proposals from the Informal Working Group on AEBS
Comparison of Cat.C HMI solution and vehicle without Cat.C
DATA STORAGE SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DRIVING (DSSAD)
Informal Document: ACSF-10-08
Safety considerations on Emergency Manoeuver
Emergency Steering Function
ACSF B2 SAE Level 2 and/or Level 3
ACSF B2 and C2 Industry expectations from ACSF IG Tokyo meeting
Hands-off detection versus Start of Lane Change Manoeuvre
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Status of the Informal Working Group on ACSF
Deactivation of the ALKS system: Different cases
Automated Lane Keeping Systems
Presentation transcript:

Submitted by the Secretary ACSF-19-10 System behaviour Expected event & unexpected event (without imminent danger) Transition Risk reduction Phase: Transition demand “No driver” [≥ 10 s] Standstill [≤ 4 s] Event: Unexpected event (w/o imminent danger) Expected event First alert (haptic & acoustic) (e.g. brake jerks) Minimum risk manoeuvre Risk mitigation strategy (e.g. “warning escalation” with respect to monitoring driver’s activity) Speed reduction, no standstill Speed reduction until standstill (maintain lane keep. functionality = “partial deactivation”) Lane change, if system fitted System behaviour:

System behaviour Unexpected event (with imminent danger) Submitted by the Secretary ACSF-19-10 System behaviour Unexpected event (with imminent danger) Phase: Emergency Normal “No time for transition to driver” Standstill or danger passed ??? Event: Unexpected event (w/ imminent danger) Emergency Manoeuvre System behaviour: Full braking performance or evasive manoeuvre