2nd ANNUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE WALA Ciudad Real – Castilla – La Mancha 17th – 19th May 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Canadian Occupational Health and Safety System
Advertisements

AIRWORTHINESS ASPECTS OF AIRCRAFT LEASING
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP
© Integra A/S SAFETY MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP Karachi - January 2006 PRESENTERS: PETER THORSEN STEFAN REIB.
Basel Protocol on Liability Civil Liability József Kelemen Ministry of Environment and Water.
Secretariat of the Basel Convention United Nations Environment Programme Regional Workshop Aimed at Promoting Ratification of the Basel Protocol on Liability.
Civil liability system in the Republic of Latvia.
The Basel Protocol, Warsaw, Availability of insurance and other financial guarantees: coverage of the liability.
Basel Convention Secretariat United Nations Environmental Programme ___________________________________ Key Elements of the Protocol Laura Thompson Legal.
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
ICAO/ASPA Regional Seminar Mexico City, Mexico April 2007.
Module N° 7 – Introduction to SMS
Accident and Incident Investigation
A Joint Code of Practice Objectives and Summary Presentation
THE ROLE OF INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS WITHIN AN ORGANIZATION By Aaron Hardiman, MBA, ARM.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
Checking & Corrective Action
What You’ll Learn How to define negligence (p. 88)
ICAO Aerodrome Safety Workshop Almaty, Kazakhstan – 18 to 22 November 2002 NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES.
Risk & Liability. Risks from wildlife & plants Mammals Mammals Snakes Snakes Insects Insects Fish Fish Plants Plants.
INTERNATIONAL AIR LAW CONFERENCE 85 ANNIVERSARY OF WARSAW CONVENTION 24 OCTOBER 2014.
Private Wrongs: Torts Negligence and Strict Liability Chapter 14.
AIR ACCIDENT PREVENTION Presented by Rex Hamza Aviation Safety Inspector-Guyana Civil Aviation Authority.
Should carriers be liable under the Warsaw/Montreal regimes when the “accident” was due to an event or occurrence unrelated to aviation operations? Presented.
8TH ANNUAL MCGILL CONFERENCE IN INTERNATIONAL AVIATION LIABILITY AND INSURANCE MONTREAL, 17– 18 APRIL 2015 CARRIER LIABILITY FOR CONTAGIOUS DISEASE AND.
Nabarro Nathanson Workshop on Software Quality and the Legal System Friday 13th February 2004 Safety Related Systems: The Legal Framework Dai Davis Solicitor.
WASHINGTON STATE EMERGENCY WORKER PROGRAM State of Washington
Presented to: HAI FIRC By: Hooper Harris, Manager, AFS-250 Date:February 2006 Federal Aviation Administration Operational Control Operations Specification.
Importance of Documentation Demonstratin g Due Diligence concept application defense.
Safety and Loss Control
Evgeny A. Gorbunov, General Director, Union of Aviation Industrialists
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
EHS Management System Elements
Follow the Fortunes Clauses in Reinsurance Law – Practical Problems in Ensuring their Effectiveness Ralph Fearnhead.
INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE MEDIATION CONFERENCE Istanbul, March 2011 INTERNATIONAL INSURANCE MEDIATION CONFERENCE Istanbul, March 2011 George.
Presented to: 2012 Pacific Aviation Director’s Workshop, Guam By: Juan S.A. Reyes, A.C.E., ACSI Date: March 13-15, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration.
Section 54’s 54.Inspector’s power to deal with dangerous conditions – (1) if an inspector has reason to believe that any occurrence, practice or condition.
Liability in Athletics. “Deep Pockets” The plaintiff’s lawyer will name everybody—the coach, the athletic trainer, the physician, the school or other.
Legal Considerations Sports Med 2.
Unit 1.3 The Law of Sports Injury. The Coach The coach is typically the first person at the scene of an injury. The coach’s decisions and actions are.
Health and Safety Policy
1 Compensable Damage in the Modernized Rome Convention Jae Woon Lee Korean Air Legal Affairs Dept Abu Dhabi Presentation to GCAA/McGill Conference.
Traffic Control & Tort Liability
Merchant Shipping (Code of Safe Working Practices) Regulations Statutory Instrument 1998 No
Chapter 3 The Law of Sports Injury. The Coach The coach is typically the first person at the scene of an injury. The coach’s decisions and actions are.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
Jacques Vanier ICAO EUR/NAT Regional Officer Almaty, 5 to 9 September 2005 SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS RISK VERSUS SAFETY.
Chapter 20 Negligence. The failure to exercise a reasonable amount of care in either doing or not doing something resulting in harm or injury.
WALA Conference, Ciudad Real, 18/19 May 2009 Damages to third parties on the surface Update of Rome Convention Heinz Dillmann Vice President Special Legal.
Chapter 09 Negligence and Strict Liability Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
The Role of the Courts.
Defences for Negligence. The best defence is Negligence did not exist, or the defendant didn’t owe the plaintiff a duty of care. The best defence is Negligence.
4Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Intentional Torts Section 4.1.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
1 Ethical Lawyering Fall, 2006 Class 6. 2 MR 1.1 A lawyer shall provide competent representation to a client. Competent representation requires the legal.
Information day on EUROCONTROL Guidance Material on the application of Common Requirements for Service Provision LIABILITY AND INSURANCE ISSUES Nathalie.
LECTURE 7 AVIATION SAFETY & SECURITY
Health & Safety Management “and a few other things for your consideration”
Every employer must ensure, as far as is reasonable practicable, the health, safety and welfare of all his employees More specifically, employers must.
Negligence Tort law establishes standards for the care that people must show to one another. Negligence is the conduct that falls below this standard.
Legal Liability Issues
10th Annual McGill Conference on International Aviation Liability & Insurance 22 – 23 June 2017 WHAT IS AN “ACCIDENT” UNDER THE WARSAW/MONTREAL CONVENTIONS;
NON-CONFORMITIES AND EXEMPTIONS AERONAUTICAL STUDIES
AVIATION SAFETY QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAMME
ALLPIRG/4 MEETING PARTICIPANTS (Montreal , 8 February 2001)
Air Carrier Continuing Analysis and Surveillance System (CASS)
Defences for Negligence
Introduction In the first lesson we demonstrated the following:-
Basel Protocol on Liability and Compensation CIVIL LIABILITY
Presentation transcript:

2nd ANNUAL ASSEMBLY OF THE WALA Ciudad Real – Castilla – La Mancha 17th – 19th May 2009

POSSIBLE EXONERATION OF AIRPORT FROM LIABILITY FOR BIRD STRIKE DAMAGE Split Airport – Croatia Split Airport Ante Matijaca Ciudad Real, 17 – 19 May 2009

L I A B I L I T Y Human aspectFinancial aspect - Aircraft owner/operator is first party who may suffer significant damage - Airport operator is first party to wich damage compensation claim will be put

I N T R O D U C T I O N (1) A I R P O R T S Big & Small International & Local Public & Private Civil & Military D U T I E S Take-off, landing, parking Passengers, baggage and cargo handling

I N T R O D U C T I O N (2) LIABILITY FOR DAMAGE – Obligatory - legal relation in which one side is liable to repair damage caused to other side, and the other side is entitled to demand such reparation KIND OF LIABILITY Contractual and non-contractual Subjective and objective Proper liability and liability for others

L E G A L C A S E S Country In favour of plaintiff In favour of defendant Unknown result Total ARGENTINA --11 CROATIA 3--3 FRANCE GERMANY 1/2 -1 ITALY 2-13 THE NETHERLANDS SPAIN UNITED KINGDOM U S A Total16 + 1/ /2 330

COUNTRY# CASESPLAINTIFFSDEFENDANTS ARGENTINA1 Airline Company Airport Ministry of Defence CROATIA3 Insurance Company Airline Company Airport (2) Insurance Company FRANCE2 Private Company Insurance Company (7) Airline Company Airport (2) State, Chamber of Commerce, General Manager ITALY3 Airline Company (2) Insurance Company Airport (2) Ministry of Transport, Port Authority, ATC, CAA, General Manager GERMANY1 Private CompanyPrivate Person THE NETHERLANDS 1 Airline Company Airport SPAIN3 Airline Company (3)Airport (3) UNITED KINGDOM2 Airline Company (2) Airport (2) CAA, County, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 14 Insurance Company (3) Airline Company (5) Private Person (3) Private Company (2) Bank, City, CAA, Environmental Organization (2), Lawyer Office Airport (2) Port Authority (2), Airline Company, County, State (8), City (5), CAA, Aircraft Manufacturer, Engine Manufacturer, General Manager, ATC, Ministry of Defence

D E F E N D A N T S

ANSWER A QUESTION - What are the main reason why an airport operator is the first who will be sued? TRY TO EXPLAIN - What are the possibilities of exoneration of airport from liability in case of bird strike?

EFFORTS OF AIRPORTS (1) - To carry out necessary inspection of runways, taxiways, and other manoeuvring areas; - To warn pilots about possible presnce of birds and other animals at or in the vicinity of airport; - To realise proper design, construction operation and maintenance of airport areas and buildings; - To implement proper manner of land use; - To implement proper grass policy;

EFFORTS OF AIRPORTS (2) - To implement proper manner of zoning in the vicinity of airports; - To use different kind of adequate scaring devices; - To obtain certificates for: operation of airport, airworthiness of aircrafts and construction of engines; - Activities on permanent improvement in awareness of bird hazard; - To ensure sufficient financial resources to take necessary measures and activities;

EFFORTS OF AIRPORTS (3) - To have various specialists and other educated personnel at its premanent disposal; - To realise timely and accurate communication among all air traffic participants (airport personnel, air traffic controlers and air carrier personnel) in case of bird hazard or bird strike; - To register all appropriate statistical dana, as well as all other necessary records.

Omissions & Consequences Canadian Airport Wildlife Management Bulletin No. 23

In case of : - material damage - injury of persons or - death of persons as a result of bird strike AIRPORT OPERATORS lack of proper procedures lack of adequate bird control failure to take other activities L E G A L P R O C E E D I N G S

LIABILITY IN CIVIL AVIATION 1. AIR TRAFFIC PARTICIPANT LIABILITY 2. THIRD PARTY LIABILITY - Airport operator - Aircraft operator - ATC agency - Chicago, Warsaw, Montreal Convention - National regulations - Rome Convention (1952) - Montreal Protocol (1978)

26th International Bird Strike Committee Conference Warsaw, May 2003 Q U E S T I O N ? If bird strike happens outside bounded and strictly determined airport area, who is than responsible for occured damage ?

m a r s h l a n d P A N T A N RNW 05 Airport boundary

EXCLUSION FROM LIABILITY AIRPORT LIABILITY CIVIL LAW ELEMENTS : 2. Successful defence; 3. Knowledge and experience of the judge in this matter; 1. Prevention at or in the vicinity of an airport; 4. Sufficient number of qualitative proofs.

QUALITATIVE PROOFS 1.To have all facts completely and correctly established 2.To prove that everything that had to be done was done, and eventual damage occured without the fault of a defendant

Airport operator shall not be liable for damage occasioned by bird strike if it proves that it had taken all available measures and activities that could reasonably be required to avoid that strike, or if it proves that it had been impossible to take such measures or activities, especially due to safety reasons. BIRD STRIKE =EVENT caused by EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES

The extraordinary circumstances justifying airport operator behaviour at the moment of bird strike must be extraordinary in the sense of necessity to maintain total safety of flight. Meteorological conditions unusual with birds behaviour and with operation of the concerned flight

EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES & BIRDS BEHAVIOUR MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES

WILFUL MISCONDUCT NEGLIGENCE as intentional performance of an act knowing that its performance will probably result in damage, or as intentional performance of an act in a manner that implies reckless disregard of its probable consequences = failure to take reasonable, ordinary care =

INSURANCE ASPECT The insurance covers aircraft operators, as well as airport operators. Bird strike risks are within frame of aircraft operator property insurance, and of airport liability insurance. Lloyds building London

Kinds of insurances: - Property insurance (airport operator; aircraft; goods and baggage – against loss or damage); - Persons insurance (airport operator, passengers and crew on board of aircraft – against accidents); - Aircraft operator liability insurance (passengers and third persons damages; goods); - Airport liability insurance.

PROPOSALS & SUGESTIONS - To acknowledge that bird hazards exist; - To assess legal implications of airport bird hazards; - To assign responsibility and delegate authority for developing, initiating and maintaining of effective bird management program; - To identify sources of technical assistance;

- To identify bird hazards; - To acquire knowledge about bird management program and to exercise it periodically; - To allocate resources, funds, and personnel; - To develop routine training programs;

- To initiate bird management program; -To develop qualitative control procedures; - To maintain daily records of bird management program; - To evaluate bird management program; - To establish positive bird strike reporting procedure.

C O N C L U S I O N - Liability for damages caused by bird strikes within airport responsibility area represents the risk that, obviously, brings into question the whole system of measures predicted for prevention of such events.

- From the aspect of presumed liability the person in charge is obliged to prove that, in definite circumstances, all required actions were undertaken in order to avoid definite event.

- Every singular case of wildlife strike represents the possibility for evaluation of undertaking of protection measures, and it brings all participants in air traffic into question whether an airport does everything predicted in safety instructions or similar acts in order to avoid wildlife strikes.

- Every act and action of an airport referred to application of safety measures must be entered in respective official records, in order to enable its eventual identification and demonstration. Contrariwise, even on the assumption that safety measures are respected, there exists a practical possibility that an airport will be charged for damage.

HrvatskiEnglish BIRD STRIKE COMMITTEE CROATIA

Ante Matijaca Thank you very much for your attention