Ana Caballero-Herrera, Lennart Nilsson  Biophysical Journal 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Volume 92, Issue 12, Pages (June 2007)
Advertisements

How Does a Simplified-Sequence Protein Fold?
Molecular Analysis of the Interaction between Staphylococcal Virulence Factor Sbi-IV and Complement C3d  Ronald D. Gorham, Wilson Rodriguez, Dimitrios.
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Young Min Rhee, Vijay S. Pande  Biophysical Journal 
Membrane-Induced Structural Rearrangement and Identification of a Novel Membrane Anchor in Talin F2F3  Mark J. Arcario, Emad Tajkhorshid  Biophysical.
BamA POTRA Domain Interacts with a Native Lipid Membrane Surface
Induced Fit and the Entropy of Structural Adaptation in the Complexation of CAP and λ- Repressor with Cognate DNA Sequences  Surjit B. Dixit, David Q.
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Jing Han, Kristyna Pluhackova, Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Rainer A. Böckmann 
Investigating How Peptide Length and a Pathogenic Mutation Modify the Structural Ensemble of Amyloid Beta Monomer  Yu-Shan Lin, Gregory R. Bowman, Kyle A.
Christopher Wostenberg, W.G. Noid, Scott A. Showalter 
Giovanni Settanni, Antonino Cattaneo, Paolo Carloni 
Structure of bacteriophage T4 fibritin: a segmented coiled coil and the role of the C- terminal domain  Yizhi Tao, Sergei V Strelkov, Vadim V Mesyanzhinov,
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Theoretical and Computational Investigation of Flagellin Translocation and Bacterial Flagellum Growth  David E. Tanner, Wen Ma, Zhongzhou Chen, Klaus.
Hydration and DNA Recognition by Homeodomains
Liqun Zhang, Susmita Borthakur, Matthias Buck  Biophysical Journal 
Coupling of Retinal, Protein, and Water Dynamics in Squid Rhodopsin
Brittny C. Davis, Jodian A. Brown, Ian F. Thorpe  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages (January 2006)
Volume 4, Issue 5, Pages (November 1999)
Analysis and Evaluation of Channel Models: Simulations of Alamethicin
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
Binding of the Bacteriophage P22 N-Peptide to the boxB RNA Motif Studied by Molecular Dynamics Simulations  Ranjit P. Bahadur, Srinivasaraghavan Kannan,
A Molecular Dynamics Study of Ca2+-Calmodulin: Evidence of Interdomain Coupling and Structural Collapse on the Nanosecond Timescale  Craig M. Shepherd,
Andrew E. Blanchard, Mark J. Arcario, Klaus Schulten, Emad Tajkhorshid 
Modeling the Alzheimer Aβ17-42 Fibril Architecture: Tight Intermolecular Sheet-Sheet Association and Intramolecular Hydrated Cavities  Jie Zheng, Hyunbum.
Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of the ATP/apo State of a Multidrug ATP-Binding Cassette Transporter Provide a Structural and Mechanistic Basis for the.
Adam W. Van Wynsberghe, Qiang Cui  Biophysical Journal 
Calculating the Free Energy of Association of Transmembrane Helices
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages (February 2006)
Volume 96, Issue 7, Pages (April 2009)
Jason O. Moore, Wayne A. Hendrickson  Structure 
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
Kazuya Hasegawa, Ichiro Yamashita, Keiichi Namba  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 103, Issue 8, Pages (October 2012)
Sequential Unfolding of Individual Helices of Bacterioopsin Observed in Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Extraction from the Purple Membrane  Michele.
Volume 95, Issue 9, Pages (November 2008)
Sundeep S. Deol, Peter J. Bond, Carmen Domene, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Dissecting DNA-Histone Interactions in the Nucleosome by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of DNA Unwrapping  Ramona Ettig, Nick Kepper, Rene Stehr, Gero.
Zara A. Sands, Alessandro Grottesi, Mark S.P. Sansom 
Histone Acetylation Regulates Chromatin Accessibility: Role of H4K16 in Inter- nucleosome Interaction  Ruihan Zhang, Jochen Erler, Jörg Langowski  Biophysical.
Site-Directed Spin-Labeling Study of the Light-Harvesting Complex CP29
Grischa R. Meyer, Justin Gullingsrud, Klaus Schulten, Boris Martinac 
Cholesterol Modulates the Dimer Interface of the β2-Adrenergic Receptor via Cholesterol Occupancy Sites  Xavier Prasanna, Amitabha Chattopadhyay, Durba.
Hydrogen Bonding in Helical Polypeptides from Molecular Dynamics Simulations and Amide Hydrogen Exchange Analysis: Alamethicin and Melittin in Methanol 
Volume 111, Issue 1, Pages (July 2016)
Structural Flexibility of CaV1. 2 and CaV2
Hisashi Ishida, Steven Hayward  Biophysical Journal 
Molecular Dynamics Simulation of Protein Folding by Essential Dynamics Sampling: Folding Landscape of Horse Heart Cytochrome c  Isabella Daidone, Andrea.
Dynamics of the BH3-Only Protein Binding Interface of Bcl-xL
Volume 83, Issue 3, Pages (September 2002)
Logan S. Ahlstrom, Osamu Miyashita  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 83, Issue 6, Pages (December 2002)
Hierarchical Cascades of Instability Govern the Mechanics of Coiled Coils: Helix Unfolding Precedes Coil Unzipping  Elham Hamed, Sinan Keten  Biophysical.
Volume 114, Issue 1, Pages (January 2018)
Robust Driving Forces for Transmembrane Helix Packing
Dominico Vigil, Stephen C. Gallagher, Jill Trewhella, Angel E. García 
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Coupling of S4 Helix Translocation and S6 Gating Analyzed by Molecular-Dynamics Simulations of Mutated Kv Channels  Manami Nishizawa, Kazuhisa Nishizawa 
Nevra Ozer, Celia A. Schiffer, Turkan Haliloglu  Biophysical Journal 
Volume 74, Issue 1, Pages (January 1998)
OmpT: Molecular Dynamics Simulations of an Outer Membrane Enzyme
Shayantani Mukherjee, Sean M. Law, Michael Feig  Biophysical Journal 
Paolo Mereghetti, Razif R. Gabdoulline, Rebecca C. Wade 
Volume 94, Issue 11, Pages (June 2008)
Volume 98, Issue 4, Pages (February 2010)
Ultraslow Water-Mediated Transmembrane Interactions Regulate the Activation of A2A Adenosine Receptor  Yoonji Lee, Songmi Kim, Sun Choi, Changbong Hyeon 
Volume 98, Issue 3, Pages (February 2010)
Presentation transcript:

Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the E1/E2 Transmembrane Domain of the Semliki Forest Virus  Ana Caballero-Herrera, Lennart Nilsson  Biophysical Journal  Volume 85, Issue 6, Pages 3646-3658 (December 2003) DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1 Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 1 Helix-helix packing criteria. Two parallel helices pack in a right-handed (R-H) fashion if the interhelical angle Ω is between 0° and 90° or between 180° and 270° and in a left-handed (L-H) fashion for Ω angles between 0° and −90° or between 90° and 180°. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 2 Cα RMSF matrices. (a) Wild-type E1 peptide, (b) 4L peptide, and (c) 11L peptide. The axes are labeled with the residue numbers. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 3 Probability contact matrices. Probability contact matrix between Cα atoms of E1 and E2 of the complexes: (a) E1WT/E2WT, (b) E1WT/E2AN, (c) E14L/E2WT, (d) E111L/E2WT, (e) E1WT/E23L, and (f) E14L/E23L. The x axis accounts for the residue number of the helix E1 and the y axis for those of helix E2; the color reflects the normalized occurrence of each contact. The probabilities vary between 0.1 (white) and 0.9 (black). Contacts with probability lower than 0.1 were not plotted. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Helix packing curves. Helix packing curves of Cα(E1)-Cα(E2) distances of the E1/E2 complexes: (a) and (a′) E 1WT/E2WT, (b) and (b′) E1WT/E2AN, (c) and (c′) E14L/E2WT, (d) and (d′) E111L/E2WT, (e) and (e′) E1WT/E23L, and (f) and (f′) E14L/E23L. The nonprimed cases account for the minimal distances from every E1Cα atom to another E2Cα atom and the primed case for the minimal distances from every E2Cα atom to another E1Cα atom. For each trajectory (state #) a symbol (solid circle, 2.1-ns simulations; open triangle, 20.1-ns simulations) is plotted only if the average Cα-Cα distance (averaged during the last 1.1ns or 18ns) was less than 6Å. The vertical variation in the individual curves reflects the actual measured average distances, which were in the range 3.8–6Å. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 4 Helix packing curves. Helix packing curves of Cα(E1)-Cα(E2) distances of the E1/E2 complexes: (a) and (a′) E 1WT/E2WT, (b) and (b′) E1WT/E2AN, (c) and (c′) E14L/E2WT, (d) and (d′) E111L/E2WT, (e) and (e′) E1WT/E23L, and (f) and (f′) E14L/E23L. The nonprimed cases account for the minimal distances from every E1Cα atom to another E2Cα atom and the primed case for the minimal distances from every E2Cα atom to another E1Cα atom. For each trajectory (state #) a symbol (solid circle, 2.1-ns simulations; open triangle, 20.1-ns simulations) is plotted only if the average Cα-Cα distance (averaged during the last 1.1ns or 18ns) was less than 6Å. The vertical variation in the individual curves reflects the actual measured average distances, which were in the range 3.8–6Å. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 5 α-Helical spiral wheels. Helical spiral representation of the ideal α-helices of the E1/E2 wild-type complex respect to their own helical axis. The Cα position of each residue is projected along the helical axis. The view is from the C-terminal toward the N-terminal. Red corresponds to the closest turn to the N-terminal and the dark blue to the last turn at the C-terminal. Every Cαi atom is bound to the closest Cα atom, that is to the Cαi+4. The positions a, d, e, and g of the typical coiled-coil heptad motif are also marked. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 6 Two-strand rope helical wheels. Helical wheel with respect to the superhelical coil axis: The E1 and E2 wild type are shown as perfect coiled-coils with periodicity 3.5 with respect to the supercoil axis. The first figure (a) represents case A of Table 3, whereas the second (b) accounts for case B. The residues on the squares inside the circle of the E1 helical wheel are the corresponding residues of the 4L peptide in the case that E14L/E2WT complex will adopt the same disposition as the wild-type complex. The underlined residues are those that are mutated in 4L respect to the E1 wild type. In a, the mutated leucines at position 4 and 11 that are glycine in the wild-type peptide will be at the helical interface at the a position of the abcdefg heptad, loosing the close packing that the glycines provided. In b, the mutations occupy g positions and the disruption of the interhelical packing will be smaller than in a. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions

Figure 7 Snapshots. Stereo view of some snapshots of complexes E1/E2 at 2.1ns. The three first figures correspond to different simulations of the E1WT/E2WT complex. The E1 residues at the interhelical interface correspond to (a) a typical A case of Table 3, (b) a B case, and (c) a C case. In a and b, the helices formed a two-stranded rope, whereas in c the helices loosed practically the left-handed fashion of the rope. Snapshots of E14L/E2WT and E111L/E2WT are shown in d and e, respectively. The substitutions to leucines hindered the close contacts at the N-terminals; the effect is stronger for the E111L peptide. The helices got more parallel to each other. Biophysical Journal 2003 85, 3646-3658DOI: (10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74782-1) Copyright © 2003 The Biophysical Society Terms and Conditions